Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Gold Leaps Into Backwardation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Gold Leaps Into Backwardation

    Since late January, the February gold contract has been in backwardation. This means that one could make a profit by simultaneously selling a gold bar and buying a February contract. One would still have one’s gold plus a little extra. I coined the term “temporary backwardation”, to describe this curious and very recent phenomenon. In our “new normal”, most gold and silver contracts go into backwardation as they get close to expiry.

    When the Feb contract first jumped into backwardation, it was well within the “contract roll” period. The roll is when naked longs sell the expiring contract and buy a contract for a more distant month. This heavy selling of the expiring contract pushes down its price. Since cobasis is Spot minus Future (oversimplified slightly), the cobasis rises purely due to the mechanics of this selling.

    But today something more serious occurred. The April contract, which is not yet being “rolled”, fell into backwardation. See the chart.



    The market is offering a free profit to anyone who will sell a gold bar and buy an April contract. For whatever reason, no one is either able or willing to take the bait. This is proof that the market for physical gold metal is drying up. Speculators in the futures markets may believe that the gold price “should” fall because the central banks say they are not going to competitively devalue their irredeemable paper currencies. Owners of real metal are increasingly reluctant to part with it at the current price.
    We don’t recommend that anyone ever naked short the monetary metals. Instead, we always advise to use an arbitrage position such as long gold / short silver.
    Using the basis theory, we have been bearish on silver this year, against the consensus posting two videos (here and here).
    Using the basis theory on gold today, we would suggest that now is a great time and a great price to buy gold.
    And to those who may be shorting gold due to downward momentum, we would say this. Caveat venditor.


    http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed...-backwardation


    This a peculiar enough phenomenon by itself. However, when I read it, I was reminded of something even stranger. Antal Fekete, a deflationist (sic!) "new austrian schooler", has written about gold backwardation before, referring to it as a major turning point in the gold endgame story:


    the elimination of research on the monetary role of gold is striking back. These ‘competent’ and ‘honorable’ gentlemen at the helm are perfect ignoramuses when it
    comes to gold basis, that is, the difference between the nearest future and the spot price of
    gold. They have no notion of the continuous and inexorable erosion of the gold basis for the past 40 years from its top reading in 1972 all the way to zero now. Worse still is the fact that
    they don’t understand the significance of the irresistible march of the gold futures markets
    into the death valley of permanent backwardation.


    When the basis goes irreversibly negative and permanent backwardation sets in, gold
    is not available at any price. At that point the U.S. Treasury bonds cease to be redeemable in
    gold at any rate of exchange. This may not bother the Keynesian and Friedmanite botchers
    at the Fed and the Treasury unduly, but it will certainly upset all those who accept them as
    collateral for the currency, among others, all the producers of real goods and services. Their
    refusal to accept irredeemable promises in payment for real goods and real services will
    trigger an irresistible slide into barter as far as essential commodities are concerned. The
    world is insidiously slipping back into direct exchange for want of money acceptable in
    indirect exchange. However, you cannot feed the world’s present population on the basis of
    a barter economy. Poverty, pestilence, famine threatens society, not to mention the
    breakdown of law and order. All this, and more, because government leaders have
    suppressed not only monetary gold itself, but also any meaningful research on its role in the
    global economy.


    Permanent gold backwardation, if nothing else will, must finally bring about a
    sovereign debt crisis in America as it metastasizes across the Atlantic. It will herald the
    arrival of the moment of truth. It will reveal without the shadow of a doubt that the U.S.
    Treasury bond is irredeemable; that it promises to pay nothing but more of itself; that the
    Fed backing Federal Reserve notes with Treasury paper while the Treasury paper is payable
    in Federal Reserve notes is just a legalized check-kiting scheme. The dollar would have gone
    the way of the Assignat and the Reichsmark a long time ago but for the fact that it could still
    be exchanged for gold (however little). To most people this fact suggests that the dollar will
    always command some gold (albeit a variable amount). These people are ignorant of the
    vanishing of the gold basis that is about to turn negative for the first time in all history.
    http://www.professorfekete.com/artic...Revisited2.pdf

    One reason, perhaps the chief reason for |the German gold repatriation| is that the managers of the global fiat money system are preparing for the coming showdown, the final curtain
    on what some years ago I dubbed The Last Contango in Washington. In other
    words, policymakers are preparing for (or trying to fend off) permanent
    backwardation in the world’s gold futures markets that is threatening to rip apart
    the present shabby make-belief payments system of the world.

    Contango is the normal condition of the gold futures markets when the spot
    price of gold is at a discount relative to the price of futures contracts. It
    demonstrates that plenty of gold is available to satisfy present demand. People are
    confident that promises to deliver gold will be honored. The condition opposite to
    contango is called backwardation that obtains when the futures price loses its
    premium relative to the spot price and goes to a discount. In the gold market this
    condition is highly anomalous because, on the face of it, it allows traders to earn
    risk free profits. They sell spot gold at a premium, and buy it back at a discount for
    future delivery. However, risk free profits are ephemeral since the very action of
    traders will instantaneously eliminate them. What this suggests is that permanent
    backwardation in gold could never happen by the very nature of the case.
    Yet unknown to the general public a very great danger is looming, the like of
    which has not threatened the world since the collapse of the Western half of the
    Roman Empire more than fifteen hundred years ago. This danger, should it
    materialize, would mark the end of our civilization and the beginning of a new
    Dark Age. I am talking about a threat of the sudden and complete collapse of world
    trade. It would be heralded by permanent gold backwardation, something that
    allegedly could never happen. Hard on its heels would follow the collapse of the
    dollar payments system. Barter, of course, would take place between neighboring
    countries, but world trade as we know it would disappear altogether.
    http://www.professorfekete.com/artic...yGoldBasis.pdf

    Of course, false alarms can and do occur, and it is possible that gold goes into backwardation and then promptly comes out of it. It has happened before. But
    here we are looking at a 35-year trend, embracing the entire history of gold
    futures trading. The trend has been that, as a percentage of the prevailing rate of
    interest the basis has been falling from practically 100% to practically 0%.
    You and I know the reason for this: it has to do with the vanishing of all
    newly mined gold into private hoards at an accelerating pace; the insatiable
    appetite in the world to snap up all available gold by well-heeled governments
    and individuals who no longer believe in the tooth fairy residing in the Federal
    Reserve.
    You have to remember that the basis is widely used as a guide in the huge
    arbitrage operations between gold holdings and dollar balances and in the gold
    carry trade. To participate in this arbitrage you must have gold on deposit in
    Comex warehouses. But with the vanishing of the gold basis the profitability of
    this arbitrage as well as that of the gold carry trade has been drying up, which
    explains the dwindling of warehouse stocks.
    Another consequence of the vanishing of the gold basis is that it makes
    the risks involved in the gold/paper arbitrage rather lopsided, as far greater risks
    are assigned to short positions on gold and long positions on the dollar, than on
    long positions on gold and short positions on the dollar. The arbitrageurs are
    very much alive to this lack of symmetry, and are increasingly unwilling to put
    their gold in harm’s way. They are fully aware that we are approaching an
    historic milestone, one that has never been passed before: the milestone marking
    the last contango. As a consequence of this lopsidedness the gold futures
    markets can no longer coax gold out of hiding. In vain do futures markets
    promise risk-free profits for taking over the carry from the individual.
    Here is the deal they offer you: give us your cash gold in exchange for
    gold futures that we’ll let you have at a deep discount, so that you can pocket
    risk-free profits. The offer is increasingly declined. There was a time when a
    drop in the basis would pull in gold from the moon, figuratively speaking. No
    more. Arbitrageurs no longer believe that gold futures are fully exchangeable
    for cash gold.
    Gold backwardation is virtually inevitable and when it comes, it will be
    irreversible. Why? Because it signifies a crisis of the first magnitude: the general
    disappearance of gold from trade for reasons of lack of confidence. No one will
    give up gold, because one is no longer confident that he can get it back on the
    same terms. Vanishing confidence is like a runaway train. The only thing that
    might turn this runaway train around is a steep rise in US interest rates.
    However, this is not in the cards. It would ruin what is left of the US economy.
    http://www.professorfekete.com/artic...stContango.pdf

    we have to explain the relevance of this to the present credit crisis.
    It is no secret that the bonds, notes, bills, and other obligations of the United
    States government, or any other government for that matter, are irredeemable.
    That is, they are redeemable in nothing but more of the same. For example, the
    bonds of the U.S. Treasury are redeemable in Federal Reserve credit, which is
    itself irredeemable and is ‘backed by’ the self-same bonds of the U.S. Treasury.
    Why is it, then, that these Treasury obligations are in demand, where one might
    think that redeemability is a sine-qua-non of issuing them? What makes people
    participate in this shell-game? How can such a crude check-kiting scheme
    mesmerize the entire population of our globe? Come to think of it, the sight of
    this Ponzi scheme would shudder the Founding Fathers of our great Republic.
    This is not an easy question to answer. But going through all the
    alternative explanations one-by-one, we come to the conclusion that the debt of
    the U.S. government is still redeemable in a sense, however limited or restrictive
    it may be. The debt of the U.S. government has a liquid market in which it can
    be exchanged for Federal Reserve credit. In turn, Federal Reserve credit can still
    be exchanged in liquid markets for physical gold, the ultimate extinguisher of
    debt, albeit at a variable price. But if you break that final link, when gold is no
    longer for sale at any price quoted in U.S. dollars, then the rug will have been
    pulled from underneath this house of cards, and the international monetary
    system will collapse like the twin towers of the World Trade Center. And this is
    the situation that we are now confronted with.
    Look at it this way. There is a casino where the lucky gamblers can
    gamble risk-free. Their bets are ‘on the house’. This casino is the U.S. bond
    market. There is only one catch. The pile of the winning chips in front of each
    gambler may become irredeemable at the exit when the hairy godfather waves
    his magic wand. As the gold markets enter their phase of permanent backwardation, all
    rational basis for holding U.S. Treasury debt, or any debt for that matter, will
    disappear. There will be a mad rush to the exits, and holders of debt will trample
    one another to death in trying to cash in on their winnings.
    http://www.professorfekete.com/artic...stContango.pdf

    There's a few more articles on it here: http://www.professorfekete.com/articles.asp
    "It's not the end of the world, but you can see it from here." - Deus Ex HR

  • #2
    Re: Gold Leaps Into Backwardation

    previously discussed here:
    http://www.itulip.com/forums/showthr...591#post250591

    Comment


    • #3
      how much could you make?

      Originally posted by NCR85 View Post
      .. .

      This a peculiar enough phenomenon by itself. However, when I read it, I was reminded of something even stranger. Antal Fekete, a deflationist (sic!) "new austrian schooler",

      1) how much could you make on this, say using 10oz of gold?

      2) Is fekete a deflationist? I think he expects inflation in the long run.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: how much could you make?

        Originally posted by Polish_Silver View Post
        1) how much could you make on this, say using 10oz of gold?

        2) Is fekete a deflationist? I think he expects inflation in the long run.
        He writes this:

        THE FEDERAL RESERVE AS AN ENGINE OF DEFLATION (sic!)
        http://www.professorfekete.com/artic...fDeflation.pdf
        "It's not the end of the world, but you can see it from here." - Deus Ex HR

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: how much could you make?

          Prof Antal Fekete awarded Dr Keith Wiener his PhD last year. They're both speaking from the same point of view. The key idea is that when a commodity with a LOW stocks-to-flow ratio goes into backwardation, it usually means there is a temporary shortage for either seasonal causes, or due to natural/man-made reasons. When a commodity with a HIGH stocks-to-flow ratio (such as the monetary metals) goes into backwardation it implies that something is wrong with the futures market. If some physical sellers are simply not willing to sell at a discount to current futures prices, then the futures price is "too low". Usually means a rally is imminent. Place your bets ;-)

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: how much could you make?

            Originally posted by NCR85 View Post
            He writes this:

            THE FEDERAL RESERVE AS AN ENGINE OF DEFLATION (sic!)
            http://www.professorfekete.com/artic...fDeflation.pdf

            His thinking may be similiar to Duncan: low rates cause overinvestment, which leads to falling product prices---deflationary.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: how much could you make?

              Originally posted by Polish_Silver View Post
              His thinking may be similiar to Duncan: low rates cause overinvestment, which leads to falling product prices---deflationary.
              His argument is roughly that:
              - the Fed creates a structural falling trend in interest rates in the bond market, thus giving bond speculators a risk free stream of capital appreciation income*
              - the falling rate of interest makes debt burdens on the part of the debtor greater (the flipside of capital appreciation)
              - this ultimately causes debtors to get squeezed income wise, suppressing their consumption rate until it completely dries up (?)
              - this causes the Fed to need to lower interest rates further, until interest rates hit rock bottom

              What I don't really understand is why debt monetization doesn't counteract this process. When the Fed puts debts on its balance sheet and rips it up (or keeps it there forever), the debtor (government in this case) is not burdened by said debt anymore. Of course that doesn't make the whole thing right. It's still an artificial scheme of wealth redistribution that raises perverse incentives. But I don't think the outcome would be deflation...

              * I'm not really sure how he argues that the Fed's mandate leads to this process... My own guess has always been that it happens when the banking system starts acting like a cartel and expands the aggregate level of credit in the economy, loading it down with debt-service charges so that consumption is suppressed and interest rate suppression is required to keep the CPI "stable".
              "It's not the end of the world, but you can see it from here." - Deus Ex HR

              Comment


              • #8
                Fekete wrong?

                Originally posted by NCR85 View Post
                - the falling rate of interest makes debt burdens on the part of the debtor greater (the flipside of capital appreciation)
                .
                I question that part of his thinking. He talks about the "iron law of bonds" or something.

                But as rates lower, people refinance thier house at the lower rate. The principal remains constant, but the annual debt service gets smaller, not bigger.

                His paradigm is that as rates go down, the higher interest rate bond becomes more valuable, that is more expensive to purchase. But for most private sector debtors, the dynamics do not work like that. The principal is a fixed dollar amount. As rates lower, your debt service becomes smaller. Most mortgages can be prepayed without penalty.

                For a government trying to pay off it's debt, he might be right. The older, higher rate bonds, are now very expensive to purchase. The US treasury issued non-callable high rate bonds around 1980. I am betting they won't make that mistake again!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: how much could you make?

                  What I don't really understand is why debt monetization doesn't counteract this process. When the Fed puts debts on its balance sheet and rips it up (or keeps it there forever), the debtor (government in this case) is not burdened by said debt anymore. Of course that doesn't make the whole thing right. It's still an artificial scheme of wealth redistribution that raises perverse incentives. But I don't think the outcome would be deflation...
                  Those debts are still being paid by the Treasury and mortgage holders. What do you mean the debtor is not burdened anymore?

                  The only burden that is relieved is on the banks who were only going to get paid 80 cents on the dollar. They really need to rip up the debts to unburden people and the government. That has not been politically feasible.


                  http://business.time.com/2011/07/05/...isaster-twice/

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Fekete wrong?

                    Originally posted by Polish_Silver View Post
                    I question that part of his thinking. He talks about the "iron law of bonds" or something.

                    But as rates lower, people refinance thier house at the lower rate. The principal remains constant, but the annual debt service gets smaller, not bigger.

                    His paradigm is that as rates go down, the higher interest rate bond becomes more valuable, that is more expensive to purchase. But for most private sector debtors, the dynamics do not work like that. The principal is a fixed dollar amount. As rates lower, your debt service becomes smaller. Most mortgages can be prepayed without penalty.

                    For a government trying to pay off it's debt, he might be right. The older, higher rate bonds, are now very expensive to purchase. The US treasury issued non-callable high rate bonds around 1980. I am betting they won't make that mistake again!
                    I share your confusion on that front.

                    Something that might be said for it, though, is that the debtors generally borrow to make an investment of some kind. And the rate of return on these investments is also rendered lower by the lower interest rate. So the debt service position of the debtor is not improved, it's kept stable. And meanwhile the principle just sits there looking twice as big and twice as hard to pay off.

                    Nothing goes wrong for as long as the debts can be piled up continually, for as long as the creditor tolerates this. When the creditor is anyone other than the Fed, this is obviously not for very long. When it is the Fed on the other hand... I'm not sure if he's just wrong or I'm missing something.
                    "It's not the end of the world, but you can see it from here." - Deus Ex HR

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: how much could you make?

                      Those debts are still being paid by the Treasury and mortgage holders. What do you mean the debtor is not burdened anymore?


                      If I'm not mistaken, Fed profits, above operating costs, are returned to the treasury. So the interest paid on treasury paper on the Fed's balance sheet is cycled back to the treasury as if the paper was never there. Paper that stays on the balance sheet forever is effectively already neutralized.

                      As for debtors other than the government: if the government uses its improved solvency position to fund infrastructure spending (which, if the economy is in a state of deflation, it will be under political pressure to do), private sector debtors can pay off their debts from the income flow provided by this spending.
                      "It's not the end of the world, but you can see it from here." - Deus Ex HR

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: how much could you make?

                        Originally posted by aaron View Post
                        Those debts are still being paid by the Treasury and mortgage holders. What do you mean the debtor is not burdened anymore?

                        The fed returns it's profits to the treasury. It has to do this by law, since ~1945 or so. But it did so even earlier. Without this this, it would be one of the most profitable "corporations" on earth.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: how much could you make?

                          Originally posted by Polish_Silver View Post
                          The fed returns it's profits to the treasury. It has to do this by law, since ~1945 or so. But it did so even earlier. Without this this, it would be one of the most profitable "corporations" on earth.
                          The profits are about equal to the food stamps given out to the needy.

                          The principle must still be repaid. Currently, the FED is using principle payments to buy more bonds. So, in that sense, if they maintain the same balance sheet size by continuously buying new bonds, then yes, it is effectively a good deal for tax payers. Otherwise, it is just a very, very low interest loan that still needs to be paid back.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: how much could you make?

                            Originally posted by fengguo1 View Post
                            Prof Antal Fekete awarded Dr Keith Wiener his PhD last year. They're both speaking from the same point of view. The key idea is that when a commodity with a LOW stocks-to-flow ratio goes into backwardation, it usually means there is a temporary shortage for either seasonal causes, or due to natural/man-made reasons. When a commodity with a HIGH stocks-to-flow ratio (such as the monetary metals) goes into backwardation it implies that something is wrong with the futures market. If some physical sellers are simply not willing to sell at a discount to current futures prices, then the futures price is "too low". Usually means a rally is imminent. Place your bets ;-)
                            Excellent summary fengguo1- short and sweet. Even our esteemed host EJ has never taken the "high stock to flow ratio of Gold" into account when discussing Gold.
                            one slight disagreement with your lumping statement with "monetary metals", because silver/platinum have low stock to flow ratio.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: how much could you make?

                              my simple translation:

                              if there's a rush to physical, expect the backwardation to get more severe. a gold bar in hand will be worth a lot more than the promise of one in a few months. ultimately, backwardation- if it persists- means that people are increasingly distrustful of the paper market.

                              "...the february gold contract has been in backwardation. This means that one could make a profit by simultaneously selling a gold bar and buying a February contract. One would still have one’s gold plus a little extra."

                              yes, provided there is a gold bar to deliver in february. backwardation is a vote of no confidence in the futures market's ability actually to deliver when the time comes.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X