Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Culture Friday: Lincoln

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Culture Friday: Lincoln



    A President Engaged in a Great Civil War

    By A. O. SCOTT
    It is something of a paradox that American movies — a great democratic art form, if ever there was one — have not done a very good job of representing American democracy. Make-believe movie presidents are usually square-jawed action heroes, stoical Solons or ineffectual eggheads, blander and more generically appealing than their complicated real-life counterparts, who tend to be treated deferentially or ignored entirely unless they are named Richard Nixon.

    The legislative process — the linchpin of our system of checks and balances — is often treated with lofty contempt masquerading as populist indignation, an attitude typified by the aw-shucks antipolitics of “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.” Hollywood dreams of consensus, of happy endings and box office unity, but democratic government can present an interminable tale of gridlock, compromise and division. The squalor and vigor, the glory and corruption of the Republic in action have all too rarely made it onto the big screen.

    There are exceptions, of course, and one of them is Steven Spielberg’s splendid “Lincoln,” which is, strictly speaking, about a president trying to scare up votes to get a bill passed in Congress. It is of course about a lot more than that, but let’s stick to the basics for now. To say that this is among the finest films ever made about American politics may be to congratulate it for clearing a fairly low bar. Some of the movie’s virtues are, at first glance, modest ones, like those of its hero, who is pleased to present himself as a simple backwoods lawyer, even as his folksy mannerisms mask a formidable and cunning political mind.

    After a brutal, kinetic beginning — a scene of muddy, hand-to-hand combat that evokes the opening of “Saving Private Ryan”— “Lincoln” settles down into what looks like the familiar pageantry and speechifying of costume drama. A flock of first-rate character actors parades by in the heavy woolen plumage of the past. The smaller, plainer America of the mid-19th century is evoked by the brownish chiaroscuro of Janusz Kaminski’s cinematography, by the mud, brick and wood of Rick Carter’s production design and by enough important facial hair to make the young beard farmers of 21st-century Brooklyn weep tears of envy.

    The most famous and challenging beard of them all sits on the chin of Daniel Day-Lewis, who eases into a role of epic difficulty as if it were a coat he had been wearing for years. It is both a curiosity and a marvel of modern cinema that this son of an Anglo-Irish poet should have become our leading portrayer of archaic Americans. Hawkeye (in “Last of the Mohicans”), Bill the Butcher (“Gangs of New York”), Daniel Plainview (“There Will Be Blood”) — all are figures who live in the dim borderlands of memory and myth, but with his angular frame and craggy features, Mr. Day-Lewis turns them into flesh and blood.

    Above all, he gives them voice. His Lincoln speaks in a reedy drawl that provides a notable counterpoint to the bombastic bellowing of some of his allies and adversaries. (John Williams’s score echoes this contrast by punctuating passages of orchestral grandeur with homey scraps of fiddle, banjo and parlor piano.)

    The script, by Tony Kushner, is attentive to the idioms of the time without being too showy about it. Lincoln is eloquent in the manner of the self-taught provincial prodigy he was, his speech informed by voracious reading and also by the tall tales and dirty jokes he heard growing up in the frontier country of Kentucky and Illinois. He uses words like “shindee” and “flib-flub” and likes to regale (and exasperate) his cabinet with homespun parables, shaggy dog stories and bits of outhouse humor. His salty native wit is complemented by the clear and lofty lyricism that has come down to us in his great speeches.

    The main business of “Lincoln” is framed by two of those, the Gettysburg Address — quoted back to the president by awed Union soldiers on a January night in 1865 — and his Second Inaugural Address, which he delivered a little more than a month before the end of the Civil War and his own assassination. These are big, famous words and momentous events, and the task Mr. Spielberg and Mr. Kushner have set themselves is to make this well-known story fresh and surprising. Mr. Day-Lewis, for his part, must convey both the human particularity and the greatness of a man who is among the most familiar and the most enigmatic of American leaders. We carry him around in our pockets every day, and yet we still argue and wonder about who he was.

    In this telling, drawn from parts of Doris Kearns Goodwin’s 2005 best seller, “Team of Rivals,” Lincoln the man is, for all his playfulness, prone to melancholy and attracted to solitude. He has a tender rapport with his young son Tad (Gulliver McGrath), and a difficult relationship with the boy’s older brother, Robert (Joseph Gordon-Levitt), who is furious that his parents have forbidden him to fight for the Union cause.

    Lincoln’s wife, Mary — he calls her Molly, and she is played with just the right tinge of hysteria by Sally Field — is still grieving the loss of another son, Willie, from illness during the first year of the war, and her emotional instability is a constant worry to her husband. These private troubles combine with the strains of a wartime presidency to produce a portrait that is intimate but also decorous, drawn with extraordinary sensitivity and insight and focused, above all, on Lincoln’s character as a politician.

    This is, in other words, less a biopic than a political thriller, a civics lesson that is energetically staged and alive with moral energy. Lincoln, having just won re-election, faces a complex predicament. The war has turned in the Union’s favor, but the Capitol is in some turmoil. Lincoln must contend with a Democratic opposition that reviles him as a dictator (“Abraham Africanus,” they call him) and also with a deep, factional split within the Republican Party.

    The radicals, led by Thaddeus Stevens (Tommy Lee Jones), the sharp-tongued chairman of the Ways and Means Committee and an aging lion of the Abolitionist movement, demand a vote on a constitutional amendment ending slavery. The conservatives in the party, whose gray eminence is Preston Blair (Hal Holbrook), are lukewarm at best, preferring to push for peace talks with the Confederacy that evade a decisive solution to the problem of slavery.

    The legal and ideological questions surrounding what would become (spoiler alert for those who slept through high school history) the 13th Amendment to the Constitution are crisply and cogently illustrated. Once Lincoln has decided that ratification is both the right and necessary thing to do, he has to hold his party together and also pick up a handful of votes from lame-duck Democratic congressmen.

    William Seward (David Strathairn), his secretary of state and wartime consigliere, engages three shady characters — high-spirited hucksters (played by Tim Blake Nelson, John Hawkes and James Spader) who could have stumbled out of the pages of Mark Twain — to lure a few susceptible candidates with promises of patronage jobs once they leave the Congress. With others, Stevens’s arm-twisting proves more effective. The better angels of our nature sometimes need earthly inducements to emerge.

    And the genius of “Lincoln,” finally, lies in its vision of politics as a noble, sometimes clumsy dialectic of the exalted and the mundane. Our habit of argument, someone said recently, is a mark of our liberty, and Mr. Kushner, whose love of passionate, exhaustive disputation is unmatched in the modern theater, fills nearly every scene with wonderful, maddening talk. Mr. Spielberg’s best art often emerges in passages of wordlessness, when the images speak for themselves, and the way he composes his pictures and cuts between them endow the speeches and debates with emotional force, and remind us of what is at stake.

    The question facing Lincoln is stark: Should he abolish slavery, once and for all, even if it means prolonging the war? The full weight and scale of this dilemma are the central lesson “Lincoln” asks us to grasp. The film places slavery at the center of the story, emphatically countering the revisionist tendency to see some other, more abstract thing — states’ rights, Southern culture, industrial capitalism — as the real cause of the Civil War. Though most of the characters are white (two notable and vital exceptions are Stephen Henderson and Gloria Reuben, as the Lincolns’ household servants), this is finally a movie about how difficult and costly it has been for the United States to recognize the full and equal humanity of black people.

    There is no end to this story, which may be why Mr. Spielberg’s much-noted fondness for multiple denouements is in evidence here. There are at least five moments at which the narrative and the themes seem to have arrived at a place of rest. (The most moving for me is a quiet scene when the 13th Amendment is read aloud. I won’t give away by whom.) But the movie keeps going, building a symphony of tragedy and hope that celebrates Lincoln’s great triumph while acknowledging the terror, disappointment and other complications to come.

    Some of the ambition of “Lincoln” seems to be to answer the omissions and distortions of the cinematic past, represented by great films like D. W. Griffith’s “Birth of a Nation,” which glorified the violent disenfranchisement of African-Americans as a heroic second founding, and “Gone With the Wind,” with its romantic view of the old South. To paraphrase what Woodrow Wilson said of Griffith, Mr. Spielberg writes history with lightning.

    Go see this movie. Take your children, even though they may occasionally be confused or fidgety. Boredom and confusion are also part of democracy, after all. “Lincoln” is a rough and noble democratic masterpiece — an omen, perhaps, that movies for the people shall not perish from the earth.

    Lincoln” is rated PG-13 (Parents strongly cautioned). Violence and strong language.



    Lincoln
    Opens on Friday in New York and Los Angeles.
    Directed by Steven Spielberg; written by Tony Kushner, based in part on the book “Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln,” by Doris Kearns Goodwin; director of photography, Janusz Kaminski; edited by Michael Kahn; music by John Williams; production design by Rick Carter; costumes by Joanna Johnston; produced by Mr. Spielberg and Kathleen Kennedy; released by DreamWorks Pictures and 20th Century Fox. Running time: 2 hours 25 minutes.

    WITH: Daniel Day-Lewis (President Abraham Lincoln), Sally Field (Mary Todd Lincoln), David Strathairn (William Seward), Joseph Gordon-Levitt (Robert Lincoln), Gulliver McGrath (Tad Lincoln), James Spader (W. N. Bilbo), Hal Holbrook (Preston Blair), Tommy Lee Jones (Thaddeus Stevens), Tim Blake Nelson (Richard Schell), John Hawkes (Robert Latham), Stephen Henderson (William Slade) and Gloria Reuben (Elizabeth Keckley).

    http://movies.nytimes.com/2012/11/09...?ref=arts&_r=0

  • #2
    Re: Culture Friday: Lincoln

    I'm looking forward to seeing this movie.

    The worst things that happened to the South: (a) the birth of Jefferson Davis, and (b) the murder of Abraham Lincoln.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Culture Friday: Lincoln

      Originally posted by Raz View Post
      I'm looking forward to seeing this movie.

      The worst things that happened to the South: (a) the birth of Jefferson Davis, and (b) the murder of Abraham Lincoln.
      I'm keen to see it as well.....I'm a fan of DDL as an actor.

      Probably my biggest concerns would be historical accuracy...to me that's far more important than impressive acting skills in this case.

      I remember how Spielberg's film Shindler's List had a considerable impact on society for a period....I wonder if Lincoln may have some effect as well.....which is where my concern for historical accuracy comes from.

      Personally, I believe one important facet in the US finding it's way in a positive direction again includes a refocus on States Rights........I hope this film doesn't shape public perception away from that.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Culture Friday: Lincoln

        I am looking forward to this also. Curious if the real Lincoln, warts and all, will be portrayed or will the usual Lincoln of mythology make an appearance.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Culture Friday: Lincoln


          Daniel Day-Lewis as Abraham Lincoln in a scene from director Steven Spielberg's new film Lincoln. Photograph: Reuters


          Thick mud and blood mingle in the opening scenes of Steven Spielberg's latest film, Lincoln. In a brutal demonstration of what happens when politics fails, bodies pile up across a boggy battlefield. The rest of the film, also full of dark and muddy tones, looks steadily at how politicians might end or prolong such a grim civil war. And at the heart of the matter, trying to abolish slavery and adorned with a representation of one of the most famous beards of all time, stands Daniel Day-Lewis.

          In playing the revered 16th president of the United States, the 55-year old actor adds to the series of New World archetypes he has tackled on screen. He has moved from the fleet-footed, fictional scout Hawkeye in The Last of the Mohicans to the compromised religious settler John Proctor in The Crucible and on to the society figure of Edith Wharton's Newland Archer in The Age of Innocence. Later, he embodied the ferocity of the mobster Bill the Butcher in Gangs of New York and the obsessional frontiersman Daniel Plainview in There Will be Blood.

          Lincoln opens in Britain in January, but already the film has put Day-Lewis in contention for his third Oscar, with one critic, AO Scott of the New York Times, suggesting he "eases into a role of epic difficulty as if it were a coat he had been wearing for years".

          The plot begins a good while after we left Henry Fonda, the other notable Honest Abe, in John Ford's 1939 film The Young Mr Lincoln. Gone is the straightforward lawyer from a Kentucky cabin. Spielberg's mature Lincoln has just been re-elected, yet faces a Capitol in revolt. The Democratic opposition regards him as a dictator and his Republican party is riven with feuds.

          The British film critic David Thomson once said that Day-Lewis "knows how to grasp an audience without noticing them" and in Lincoln the actor again delivers what could be called a total performance. He adopts an odd, light, cracked voice that has divided audiences so far, although Spielberg claims he won the role by sending him a recording of the way he felt Lincoln ought to speak. Day-Lewis also surprises by bringing out the folksy manner and homespun humour that apparently belied the intellect of the great man. Rather like TV detective Colombo in a stovepipe hat, he is full of anecdotes and shaggy dog stories.

          One shaggy dog story not included in the screenplay is the old one about an actor who is so determined to play the part of Abraham Lincoln in an upcoming show that he grows a beard and walks about in costume for weeks. At the risk of spoiling the Spielberg film for newcomers to American history, the punchline inevitably involves the actor, who fails to get the part, not making it home from a night out at the theatre. It is a black joke that could well have been on the mind of Spielberg's cast as they watched Day-Lewis between scenes. He stayed in his Kentucky accent at all times and even, according to Sally Field, who plays his wife, texted her silly limericks in the character of Abe.

          Each role Day-Lewis has played since his first success as a gay, fascist, punk in My Beautiful Laundrette in 1985 has been trailed with news of his extraordinary attempts to immerse himself in character. In the Oscar-winning guise of Christy Brown in My Left Foot, in 1989, Day-Lewis lived in a wheelchair and learned to paint with his toes.

          As Hawkeye for Michael Mann in 1992, he studied survival techniques, skinning rabbits and hollowing out canoes. While making In the Name of the Father in 1993, he rehearsed his portrayal of the incarcerated Gerry Conlon by eating prison food and sleeping in a cell, yet in the same year he also donned Victorian garb to walk Manhattan's sidewalks in preparation for going back to the 1870s in The Age of Innocence. By the time Nicholas Hytner cast him in The Crucible the crew cannot have been surprised to hear he wanted to help them build Salem.

          If a reputation for seeking ludicrous authenticity follows Day-Lewis, it is probably because his performances are so strong they demand explanation. As Thomson has pointed out: "Day-Lewis is uncanny. Watch his Newland Archer or his Hawkeye and it is not easy to believe we are seeing the same person."

          When audiences learn that the actor sharpened knives between takes on Scorsese's set for Gangs of New York in 2002, it helps them understand why he dominated the screen. "Day-Lewis gives a gargantuan performance as the mad, charismatic Bill, a cross between Fagin and Bill Sikes, inevitably overshadowing DiCaprio and Diaz as the Oliver and Nancy figures," Philip French noted in this newspaper at the time.

          And the legends are not confined to the film set. Before he appeared in The Crucible, there were reports he had become a nomad, wandering Europe and learning how to cobble.

          He has been linked to a string of famous women, too, from Madonna and Sinead O'Connor to Winona Ryder and Julia Roberts, and is most infamously supposed to have dumped Isabelle Adjani, the French actress and mother of his first child, by fax. Then, while working on Arthur Miller's The Crucible, he became close not only to the late playwright, but to his daughter, Rebecca, and headlines swiftly ensued. Day-Lewis's live-in girlfriend, fitness trainer Deya Pichardo, told the press of her horror at the news he had married the 32-year-old painter and film-maker in a secret ceremony in Vermont.

          Day-Lewis was born the son of the Irish-born British poet laureate Cecil Day-Lewis and the actress Jill Balcon, herself the daughter of the renowned film producer Sir Michael Balcon. According to his elder sister, Tamasin, a chef and film-maker, home life was not warm. "We didn't come down for dinner," she recalled last week. "We had tea in the nursery with nanny and were thrown together into a solitary world, but for each other, which led us straight into the landscape of the imagination."

          Describing her parents as "emotionally distant", she added that at boarding school in Hampshire, they spent their time rebelling. "I egged Dan on and, he has told me since, was an evil influence. He insists I made him steal for me," she said. But her brother's former English teacher, the film producer David Thompson, does not remember a trouble-maker.

          "He was a little wild perhaps, but he was one of those we all wanted to teach. He was staggeringly talented in school plays even at 14. He had incredible charisma," he told the Observer. "Smoking was the issue, I remember. It was a sackable offence and we had a long talk about whether he should really confess, when such a small misdemeanour would get him expelled."

          After school, Day-Lewis considered taking up furniture-making, but returned to acting, to the relief of his mother. "She probably feared for me much more than she ever let on, because all I ever got from her, no matter what I was doing, was encouragement – so much so that I think I became quite a harsh judge of myself to try to restore some kind of balance," he has recalled.

          At 25, he appeared in the West End in Another Country, the same play that gave Kenneth Branagh, Colin Firth and Rupert Everett their big break. Seven years later, he met his match on stage in Hamlet at the National Theatre when he collapsed during a performance in the ghost scene. The play was thought to have recalled his sorrow for his lost father, who had died 10 years earlier.

          The actor has recently explained he did not see the ghost of his father on stage "that dreadful night", although he admits the content of the play was hard for him. "I probably saw my father's ghost every night, because of course if you're working in a play like Hamlet you explore everything through your own experience."

          Twenty years ago, Day-Lewis wrote a piece for this newspaper about his difficult feelings for his father. He recalled the moment family members had urged him to hold his dying father's hand.

          "Since that bizarre, alienated, emotionless first encounter with the great scythe, which left me reeling from my own indifference, my sense of loss has grown, soured, devoured, belched and finally purified into what is now the eternal certainty of grief, ignorance and the mystery of love," he wrote bleakly.

          His sister now argues that life, even with success and his own family, gets more difficult daily for her brother as "the stakes get higher".

          If so, in the weekend that Stephen Fry, the troubled star of that other infamous theatrical walkout, courageously returns to the London stage, it is impossible not to wonder whether an actor who is hailed by many as the best working in film may one day return to the scene of his Shakespearean crime.


          Born Daniel Michael Blake Day-Lewis, 29 April 1957.

          His father was the poet laureate Cecil Day-Lewis who died aged 68 in 1972. His mother, the actress Jill Balcon, was daughter of Sir Michael, the producer of classic Ealing films and early Hitchcocks. In 1996, he married Rebecca, the late playwright Arthur Miller's daughter, with whom he has two children, Cashel and Ronan. He also has a son, Gabriel, by the French actress Isabelle Adjani.

          Best of times His career has so far been recognised with two Academy Awards for best actor, first for playing Christy Brown in My Left Foot and then for Daniel Plainview in There Will Be Blood

          Worst of times Collapsing and walking out of a National Theatre performance of Hamlet during the ghost scene in 1989, his last performance on stage

          What he says "I like taking a long time over things and I believe that it's the time spent away from the work that allows me to do the work itself."

          What they say "Look at the work. That's it. You cant teach it, bottle it, explain it. So much of it is sheer hard graft. When people imagine that Dan's doubt as an artist must have vanished by now, they couldn't be more wrong." Tamasin Day-Lewis, elder sister, chef and film-maker.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Culture Friday: Lincoln

            Originally posted by lakedaemonian View Post
            Personally, I believe one important facet in the US finding it's way in a positive direction again includes a refocus on States Rights.
            I saw this film today. Don't hold out any hope that it will aim the public in any direction but away from States Rights. Toward the end of the film, there is a scene where the representatives of the Southern states want to rejoin the union for the sole purpose of re-enslaving black folk. As portrayed in the film, States Rights are kicked to the curb. I'm ok with the curb kick. I suppose others will find it offensive.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Culture Friday: Lincoln

              Originally posted by Raz View Post
              I'm looking forward to seeing this movie.

              The worst things that happened to the South: (a) the birth of Jefferson Davis, and (b) the murder of Abraham Lincoln.
              Slavery didn't make the top 2?

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Culture Friday: Lincoln

                Originally posted by santafe2 View Post
                Slavery didn't make the top 2?
                Although you remain on my "ignore" list I decided to take a peek since you clearly addressed your comment to me.

                I don't know about other sections of the US, but in the South Jefferson Davis is synonomous with slavery.
                That "institution" combined with the hubris and megalomania of men like Davis led to the utter ruin of the South.

                Lincoln would have tried to "bind up the nation's wounds", and had Lincoln lived out his second term men like Thaddeus Stevens would have had a far harder time
                forcing their view of "reconstruction" (pillage) upon the bones of the eleven states that seceded. Stevens, Sumner and men of similar mind only made things worse.

                While I think Lincoln unwittingly began the destruction of the 10th Amendment it's easy for me to say. I didn't face what he faced. And few other men have.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Culture Friday: Lincoln

                  I can't find the original list I had come across on Wiki, but this is a good substitute.

                  Lists of US Fed'l gov't legislation.....starting in 1861, the number really starts to grow, and moreso in the 1900s.

                  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ion,_1789-1901

                  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ion,_1901-2001

                  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...,_2001-present

                  ...states be dammed, move over for the Feds.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Culture Friday: Lincoln

                    War almost always strengthens the executive branch - super charged in a civil war.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Culture Friday: Lincoln

                      I find it disgusting we had to have a war to accomplish what most of the world managed peacefully.

                      I'm not sure that "I'll kill you before I let you go." constitutes a Union.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Culture Friday: Lincoln

                        Originally posted by LorenS View Post
                        I find it disgusting we had to have a war to accomplish what most of the world managed peacefully.

                        I'm not sure that "I'll kill you before I let you go." constitutes a Union.
                        Really?

                        I kinda see the exact opposite.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Culture Friday: Lincoln

                          In time, inevitably the War Between the States became the War to End Slavery. Few wars are fought for noble purposes. This became one of them, despite many of the principals' wishes, including Lincoln. We should be proud of that fact.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Culture Friday: Lincoln

                            Originally posted by don View Post
                            In time, inevitably the War Between the States became the War to End Slavery. Few wars are fought for noble purposes. This became one of them, despite many of the principals' wishes, including Lincoln. We should be proud of that fact.
                            +1
                            and we need a 'new lincoln' - to start a 'war' to end the enslavement of The US by the debt mongers.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Culture Friday: Lincoln

                              Lincoln hits the boards at Yuletide . . .




                              Lincolns in Wartime Hope for a Midnight Clear

                              By CHARLES ISHERWOOD
                              The divisions plaguing a strife-torn country are not the only ones depicted in “A Civil War Christmas,” a beautifully stitched tapestry of American lives in transition in the fraught winter of 1864. Although the holidays are traditionally a time for festive coming together, most of the characters depicted in Paula Vogel’s song-trimmed drama, which opened on Tuesday night at New York Theater Workshop, are in search of loved ones lost in the fog of war or separated from family by the cruel finality of death.

                              Written with an embracing expansiveness by Ms. Vogel (a Pulitzer Prize winner for “How I Learned to Drive”), and featuring handsomely sung hymns and carols of the period, this unusual holiday pageant represents an illuminating alternative to the often garish or sentimental holiday fare foisted on theater audiences. Instead of a stocking full of sugar-shock-inducing candy, the show offers some real sustenance, even as it gently accentuates the spirit of hope and good will that even professional Scrooges try to embrace as the year winds down.

                              It’s a particularly chilly Christmas Eve in Washington, and the chill does not derive only from the quickly descending temperature. President Abraham Lincoln (Bob Stillman) has recently won re-election, and preparations are under way for his second inauguration. But the country is still riven by war, and troops on both sides are hunkered down for a frigid night with little hope of lasting peace ahead.

                              The spare wooden set, by James Schuette, emphasizes the hardship faced by most of the characters, who include Robert E. Lee (Sean Allan Krill) and his dog-tired, increasingly disarrayed Confederate troops, and Ulysses S. Grant (Chris Henry) and his only marginally better supplied Union combatants. One strand of the plot follows attempts to secure a Christmas tree, a new fashion imported from Germany. But there are no trees to be found; they have all been cut down for fires to warm the troops.

                              Ms. Vogel has taken particular care to salvage from the margins of history the experience of African-Americans. The production’s ample cast of characters includes Decatur Bronson (K. Todd Freeman), a composite figure inspired by two black soldiers who were awarded the Medal of Honor for their service in the war.

                              Bronson has given up his charge of a regiment of black soldiers to work as a blacksmith at a Union Army supply depot. He is still tormented by the kidnapping of his wife by Confederate soldiers fleeing the Gettysburg field of battle. Bronson has determined that should he ever again find Confederate prisoners in his power, he will seek vengeance by taking their lives.

                              Elizabeth Keckley (Karen Kandel) was an actual figure: a slave who purchased her freedom, using her gifts as a seamstress, and went on to dress the cream of Washington society, including the first lady, Mary Todd Lincoln, played by the musical theater veteran Alice Ripley. (Their friendship also figures significantly in the current movie “Lincoln.”) Like the first lady, who still wears mourning for the death of one of her young sons, Elizabeth is haunted by loss: her beloved son abandoned his college studies to join the Union Army, and was killed.

                              Visited by his ghost — “A Civil War Christmas” is peopled by almost as many ghosts as “A Christmas Carol” — she finds herself touched to the point of anguish when she learns that a young African-American girl, Jessa (Sumaya Bouhbal), is wandering the streets of the city on this frigid night. Jessa lost touch with her mother, Hannah (Amber Iman), as they fled across the Potomac to find freedom in Washington.

                              With a deftness that is surprising, given the breadth of experience she has chosen to include in her panoramic view of American society, Ms. Vogel links these stories together cleanly and efficiently. There is a sense of poetry, too, in her suggestion that the lives of Americans on both sides of the Civil War were so deeply intertwined that, despite their differences and sometimes fierce enmity, the country and its people share a united destiny: unseen filaments tie together all the lives of the characters. Eventually the angry Confederate boy who dreams of joining up with a band of marauding raiders finds himself staring down Decatur Bronson’s gun barrel, praying for his life.

                              The president’s journey through the story is, like that of many of the characters, solitary. Finding he has left his wife’s Christmas gifts at their summer home, he decides to escape his minders — who have been apprised that assassins are lurking nearby — on Christmas Eve and venture forth on horseback to retrieve them.

                              Free from the burden of his fractious cabinet, and his emotionally unstable wife, he rides through the night with a sense of happy freedom on his shoulders. Mr. Stillman’s austere, dignified performance is enlivened by appealing touches of dry humor, while Ms. Ripley’s Mary is depicted as both a nervous shopaholic and a troubled but humane woman who visits wounded soldiers incognito.

                              Directed in brisk story-theater style by Tina Landau, with minimal props and simple costumes used to move the story quickly from one location to another, “A Civil War Christmas” is rich in precise historical detail, but it never feels like a series of talking dioramas in a history museum. Even the most quickly sketched characters exude the warmth of real human beings, thanks to vivid performances from the cast. (Children may particularly enjoy the brief romance between a horse and a mule, amusingly conducted to the strains of a seductive duet from “Don Giovanni.”)

                              And when the actors’ voices rise together in song — in well-chosen spirituals, along with war songs, hymns and carols like “Silent Night” and “O Christmas Tree” — there arises from the dark history being told an ineffable sense of wonder at the survival of faith and humanity even in hearts ravaged by loss.

                              “The hope of peace is sweeter than peace itself,” one character remarks, an observation that speaks to the show’s clear-eyed but compassionate view of history. A lasting peace may be forever just over the horizon, but there is solace in our ability to keep believing that it may one day come ambling along.





                              A Civil War Christmas
                              By Paula Vogel; directed by Tina Landau; musical supervision, arrangements and incidental music by Daryl Waters; musical direction by Andrew Resnick; sets by James Schuette; costumes by Toni-Leslie James; lighting by Scott Zielinski; sound by Jill B C Du Boff; dialect coach, Deborah Hecht; production stage manager, Lori Lundquist. Presented by New York Theater Workshop, James C. Nicola, artistic director; William Russo, managing director. At New York Theater Workshop, 79 East Fourth Street, East Village; (212) 279-4200, ticketcentral.com. Through Dec. 30. Running time: 2 hours 30 minutes.

                              WITH: Sumaya Bouhbal (Jessa/Little Joe/Others), K. Todd Freeman (Decatur Bronson/James Wormley/Others), Chris Henry (Chester Saunders/Ulysses S. Grant/John Surratt/Others), Rachel Spencer Hewitt (Raz/Mary Surratt/Others), Antwayn Hopper (Walker Lewis/Jim Wormley/Others), Amber Iman (Hannah/Rose/Mrs. Thomas/Others), Jonathan-David (Ely Parker/Silver/Frederick Wormley/Moses Levy/Others), Karen Kandel (Elizabeth Keckley/Willy Mack/Others), Sean Allan Krill (Robert E. Lee/William Tecumseh Sherman/John Wilkes Booth/Others), Alice Ripley (Mary Todd Lincoln/Lewis Payne/Others) and Bob Stillman (Abraham Lincoln/Raider/Others).

                              http://theater.nytimes.com/2012/12/0....html?ref=arts

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X