Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

modelling the future loss of construction jobs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • modelling the future loss of construction jobs

    Originally posted by sudden debt blog
    Tuesday, October 23, 2007

    Still At Work, But Not For Long


    One puzzle that even Fed presidents find difficult to solve has to do with construction jobs. Though new housing starts have plunged, so far there have been no massive layoffs in the sector - at least not as measured by the BLS (see chart below).


    Employment in residential building construction (seasonally adjusted) Chart: BLS

    The two explanations that I hear most often have to do with (a) illegal, undocumented aliens not being counted and (b) switching work to commercial construction. Both are correct to a certain extent, but: (a) I find it hard to imagine that the proportion of jobs held by aliens was very much higher in 2006 than, say, 1988-90 and (b) the BLS does not show a commensurate increase in the number of jobs for the non-residential construction sector - employment there is flat. Plus, the number of jobs in the housing construction sector doubled since the last major housing recession in 1992, in line with housing construction activity (see chart below). So, the puzzle remains...


    The answer to the puzzle is much simpler, I believe. Unlike other housing recessions, this time housing starts fell off a cliff from a record high level - everything happened very, very fast. This means that there was still a lot of work to be completed at the time. Now, a builder will not abandon a project in the middle of construction - he has already invested too much money. Knowing that things are turning negative on the demand side, what he will do, instead, is rush every worker available to the sites already in progress, in an effort to complete and sell as many houses as possible, as soon as possible. This is the logical reaction to a dropping market: houses that come late to the market will fetch lower prices. Look at the chart below (click to enlarge): starts have plunged, but units still under construction are high. This can only mean that builders are working hard to finish existing projects already in the pipeline. And that's why construction workers are still at work.


    But what the future has in store is another matter altogether. Given the collapse in starts, construction layoffs are going to occur suddenly, too, just as soon as work in progress is finished. And that's when we may see half a million jobs disappear within months.


    ADDENDUM: When will the job losses happen?

    First a chart - you definitely need to click on it to enlarge and study it. Too many squiggly lines.

    The top two lines are starts and completions; they track quite closely, meaning that builders are completing what they started and not really abandoning many projects.

    The next two lines present somewhat of a puzzle. The blue line is sales and the pink one units under construction. After tracking for decades, as one would expect, after 1996 sales overtook construction significantly. What happened? It must be that cancellations became a significant factor (figures for sales are reported when contracts are signed and do not adjust for subsequent cancellations).

    The green line at the bottom is the most interesting of all: new houses for sale. They are stuck near all time highs, meaning that inventory is a big problem.

    OK, let's put it all together, from the jobs viewpoint:

    a) New construction activity (starts) is collapsing. Future employment will decline.
    b) Sales are approaching the number of units under construction, after being significantly higher. Builders are building fewer buildings, but sales are dropping faster.
    c) The result is that inventory is not coming down. Builders will have to do fire sales and cut costs - i.e. cut jobs soon.

    When and how much? Given the last three months data on starts, units under construction will probably drop to the 575.000/yr. level by year-end (September was at 675.000). This level is the same as in 1998, when residential construction employment averaged 725.000 jobs (September was at 981.000). So I project a loss of ~ 250.000 construction jobs in the next three months. Furthermore, starts currently are at 1993 levels, when employment was at 580.000 jobs and it seems to me we will drop to that level within another three months, for a total of 400.000 jobs lost in six months.

    If starts keep going lower then construction jobs will drop even further.
    http://suddendebt.blogspot.com/

  • #2
    Re: modelling the future loss of construction jobs

    Originally posted by jk View Post
    These data are also part of our recession forecast model.

    Ed.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: modelling the future loss of construction jobs

      Originally posted by jk, sudden debt blog View Post
      The two explanations that I hear most often have to do with (a) illegal, undocumented aliens not being counted.... I find it hard to imagine that the proportion of jobs held by aliens was very much higher in 2006 than, say, 1988-90...
      My anecdotal observation is that the proportion is much, much higher now. Every time I have work done on my house or see residential construction crews in my area, it is invariably latino workers doing the actual work. The person writing estimates, answering the phone and collecting the check is American and that's about it. So there are likely a lot of undocumented, unemployed and underemployed workers who are not showing up on the BLS report.

      The industry is also made up of a lot of independent contractors who don't just line up at the unemployment office when work slows down. I have 2 brothers who are contractors and they are having to take lower paying, lower profile gigs, but they don't consider themselves unemployed. Instead of building houses they are doing repairs and remodeling. The 10 guys they used to subcontract all the concrete, framing, drywall, roofing, etc to are working fewer days a week, but they spend their down days looking for work outside Home Depot, not the Department of Labor.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: modelling the future loss of construction jobs

        Originally posted by jk View Post
        Good to see someone digging into this issue, I hadn't given it much thought.

        Given the collapse in starts, construction layoffs are going to occur suddenly, too, just as soon as work in progress is finished. And that's when we may see half a million jobs disappear within months.
        Yikes. Still new to all of this macro economics and financial markets voodoo, I have been at times surprised but always intrigued when various trends suddenly reverse. Time passes by, everything seems fine... then WHACK, someone hits you over the head with a baseball bat.

        I can see why EJ is sticking with his Q4 recession call. Many of us look at the data and news reports, and even developing downturns seem to be moving so slowly there's no way they could reach recession levels before the end of the year. But few sudden lurches downward could get us there in a hurry. (I know some would argue we've already been in recession for a while.)

        Now, a builder will not abandon a project in the middle of construction - he has already invested too much money. Knowing that things are turning negative on the demand side, what he will do, instead, is rush every worker available to the sites already in progress, in an effort to complete and sell as many houses as possible, as soon as possible.
        I don't make it out to the suburbs much so I don't know about the big housing developments, but I've watched a few infill houses going up in my established neighborhood over the past few months, and they are cranking on those things to get them done and on the market.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: modelling the future loss of construction jobs

          Originally posted by jk View Post
          Residential construction employment does not weigh heavily in our models because construction is such a small part of total employment.


          The employment numbers to watch are government, goods-producing, and retail trade, followed by services. As we've said before, the only reason the US economy isn't already in a major post-housing bubble recession is due to rising job growth in government jobs driven by election year dynamics, tourism related jobs driven by a weak dollar, and health care jobs driven by demographics. It also appears that a weak dollar is helping to boost export growth, but that information is circumstantial: I've had meetings with several CFOs and CEOs of companies in the Tech industry. All report flat sales in the US but strong growth in Europe and Asia.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: modelling the future loss of construction jobs

            Originally posted by EJ View Post
            Residential construction employment does not weigh heavily in our models because construction is such a small part of total employment.


            The employment numbers to watch are government, goods-producing, and retail trade, followed by services. As we've said before, the only reason the US economy isn't already in a major post-housing bubble recession is due to rising job growth in government jobs driven by election year dynamics, tourism related jobs driven by a weak dollar, and health care jobs driven by demographics. It also appears that a weak dollar is helping to boost export growth, but that information is circumstantial: I've had meetings with several CFOs and CEOs of companies in the Tech industry. All report flat sales in the US but strong growth in Europe and Asia.
            What's the difference between Manufacturing and Goods-Producing? This chart confuses me a little, what lines use the left-hand scale vs the right-hand scale? Hm, I suppose only Total Nonfarm Payrolls uses the left. Ok I answered one of my questions.

            The Goods-Producing numbers seem to oscillate in a steady horizontal band all the way back to the 1960's. We appear to already be towards the lower range of that band since the early 2000's. Is there reason to expect this number to drop significantly?

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: modelling the future loss of construction jobs

              Originally posted by EJ View Post
              Residential construction employment does not weigh heavily in our models because construction is such a small part of total employment.
              if he's right and we lose 400,000 construction jobs over a 6 month span, that's an extra 66,000 jobs down/mo, which might show up in the employment statistics. [i say "might" since there always remains the mysterious birth-death model component as well as numerous adjustments and revisions.] the sudden transient in construction employment might move the gov't reports enough for even the markets to notice.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: modelling the future loss of construction jobs

                Actually there is a way to document the the undocumented worker portion of both the overall economy and construction.

                This does operate under the assumption that there are 3 pillars of illegal work: domestic services, farm labor, and construction labor, and furthermore that the first 2 pillars are fairly stable.

                The way? Look at remittances to Mexico and Latin/South America:

                2002: $9.81B

                http://www.mexidata.info/id60.html

                2003: $13.3B

                http://www.dallasfed.org/research/busfront/bus0401.html

                2004: $16.6B

                http://idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdo...?docnum=561166

                2005: $20B

                http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/miami/16816.html

                2006: $23.1B

                http://www.dallasfed.org/research/swe/2007/swe0704b.cfm

                2007: No data out yet, but
                In Mexico, for example, remittances grew 25 per cent in the first quarter of 2006 but by only 5 per cent in the last three months of the year and by only 1 per cent in December
                http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f94e4d5c-d...b5df10621.html

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: modelling the future loss of construction jobs

                  Originally posted by c1ue View Post
                  Actually there is a way to document the the undocumented worker portion of both the overall economy and construction.

                  This does operate under the assumption that there are 3 pillars of illegal work: domestic services, farm labor, and construction labor, and furthermore that the first 2 pillars are fairly stable.

                  The way? Look at remittances to Mexico and Latin/South America:

                  2002: $9.81B

                  http://www.mexidata.info/id60.html

                  2003: $13.3B

                  http://www.dallasfed.org/research/busfront/bus0401.html

                  2004: $16.6B

                  http://idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdo...?docnum=561166

                  2005: $20B

                  http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/miami/16816.html

                  2006: $23.1B

                  http://www.dallasfed.org/research/swe/2007/swe0704b.cfm

                  2007: No data out yet, but

                  http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f94e4d5c-d...b5df10621.html
                  Remittances to Mexico from the US are seasonal. They peaked May last year.

                  This may be due to housing construction employment or may be due to increased immigration enforcement activity.

                  Ed.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: modelling the future loss of construction jobs

                    Fred,

                    I think you've made a slight 3 order of magnitude error in the graph label: I'm guessing it should be 2,300 million?

                    I know we offshore a lot of manufacturing and labor, but sending $2.3T is even above my extremely pessimistic views :rolleyes:

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X