Re: HOW ONE iTuliper IS INVESTED?
Jim, I may not be the one to explain this, but I don't like your method. By assuming an equal nominal return for every time period you're basically assuming a diminishing rate of return in the future.
For example... 100 to 102 is a 2% gain, but 200 to 202 is only a 1% gain. IMO you'd be better off to use the percentage return over the past period if you're going to project into the future. Which, as we've already said, is more or less pointless.
But honestly, you have to do what works for you. JK and GRG are both far more experienced and savvy than I am, but I couldn't do things the way they describe - just wouldn't work for me.
Originally posted by Jim Nickerson
View Post
For example... 100 to 102 is a 2% gain, but 200 to 202 is only a 1% gain. IMO you'd be better off to use the percentage return over the past period if you're going to project into the future. Which, as we've already said, is more or less pointless.
But honestly, you have to do what works for you. JK and GRG are both far more experienced and savvy than I am, but I couldn't do things the way they describe - just wouldn't work for me.
Comment