Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

David Stockman Interview

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • David Stockman Interview




    salient (itulip) points:

    David: I don't think we are at the beginning of the recovery. I think we are at the end of a disastrous debt supercycle that has gone on for the last thirty or forty years, really. It started when Nixon defaulted on our obligations under Bretton Woods and closed the gold window. Incrementally, year after year since then, we have been going in a direction of extremely unsound money, of massive borrowing in both the private and the public sector. We now have an economy that is saturated with debt: $54 trillion or $53 trillion – 3.5 times the GDP – way off the charts from where it was for a hundred years prior to the beginning of this. The idea that somehow all of that debt is irrelevant, as the Keynesians would tell us, is fundamentally wrong – and the reason why the economy can't get up off the mat.



    This market isn't real. The two percent on the ten-year, the ninety basis points on the five-year, thirty basis points on a one-year – those are medicated, pegged rates created by the Fed and which fast-money traders trade against as long as they are confident the Fed can keep the whole market rigged. Nobody in their right mind wants to own the ten-year bond at a two percent interest rate. But they're doing it because they can borrow overnight money for free, ten basis points, put it on repo, collect 190 basis points a spread, and laugh all the way to the bank. And they will keep laughing all the way to the bank on Wall Street until they lose confidence in the Fed's ability to keep the yield curve pegged where it is today. If the bond ever starts falling in price, they unwind the carry trade. They unwind the repo, because then you can't collect 190 basis points.


    Then you get a message, "Do not pass go." Sell your bonds, unwind your overnight debt, your repo positions. And the system then begins to contract – exactly what happened in September and October of 2008. Only, that time it was an unwind to the repo on mortgage-backed securities and CDOs and so forth. That was a minor trial run for the great unwind that is going to happen when the Treasury market is finally shattered with a lack of confidence because, on the margin, no one owns a Treasury bond: they just rent it on borrowed money. If the price starts falling, they'll get out of that trade as fast as they got out of toxic CDOs.



    The Fed has destroyed the money market. It has destroyed the capital markets. They have something that you can see on the screen called an "interest rate." That isn't a market price of money or a market price of five-year debt capital. That is an administered price that the Fed has set and that every trader watches by the minute to make sure that he's still in a positive spread. And you can't have capitalism if the capital markets are dead, if the capital markets are simply a branch office – branch casino – of the central bank. That's essentially what we have today.



    The Fed has taken its balance sheet to $3 trillion. That's enough for the next 50 years. They don't have to do a damn thing except maybe have a discount window that floats above the market, and if things get tight, let the interest rate go up. People who have been speculating will be carried out on a stretcher.



    As Badgett said (Walter Badgett, the great 19th-century British financial thinker): provide liquidity at a penalty rate to sound collateral.


    Now, that's what J.P. Morgan did in 1907, in the great crisis of 1907, from his library. He didn't have a printing press. He didn't bail out everybody. He didn't do what Bernanke did and say: "Stop the presses, freeze everybody, and prop up Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs and all the rest of the speculators." The interest rate, the call-money interest rate, which was the open-market interest rate at the time, some days went to 30, 40, 70% – and they were carrying out the speculators left and right, liquidating margin debt, taking out the real estate speculators. Eight or ten railroads went bankrupt within a couple of months. The copper magnates got carried out on their shields.


    This is the only way a capital market can work, but it needs an honest interest rate. And we have no interest rate, so therefore we solve nothing and we have the kind of impaired, incapacitated markets that we have today.




    Greenspan panicked in December 2000. The interest rate was 6.5%; we had an economy that was threatened by competitors around the world. We needed high interest rates, not low. He panicked after the dot-com crash, and as you remember in two years they took the interest rate all the way down to 1%, and they catalyzed an explosion of mortgage borrowing, which was crazy.

    When they cut the final rate down to 1% in May, June 2003, in that quarter – the second quarter of 2003 – the run rate of mortgage borrowing was $5 trillion at an annual rate. That was nuts! There had never been even a trillion-dollar annual rate of mortgage borrowing previously. In that quarter the run rate was $5 trillion, 40% of GDP. Why? Because the Fed took the rate down to 1%. Floating-rate product got invented everywhere. Anybody that had a pulse was being given mortgage loans by the brokers. The mortgage brokers didn't have any capital or funding. They went to Wall Street. They got warehouse lines, and the whole thing got out of control. Millions of households were lured into taking on debt that was insane, and now we have a generation of debt slaves.


    There are 25 million households in America who couldn't move if they wanted to, because their mortgages are under water. They cannot generate a down payment and the 5% or 6% broker fee that you need to move. So we've got 25 million households immobilized, paralyzed, and worried every day about when they are going to lose property, because of what the Fed did. It's a terrible indictment.




    Alex: That's a pretty stark picture. So as an individual investor, what are we to do? How do we protect ourselves in this type of situation? Should I be owning bonds and staying out of stocks? Should I be owning stocks?


    David: No, I would stay out of any security markets. These are unsafe markets at any speed. It's all tied together. As I was saying when the great margin call comes and they start selling the Treasury bond, they'll take everything else with it. Real estate is priced off Treasuries. Mortgaged-backed securities are priced off Treasuries. Corporates are priced off Treasuries. Junk bonds are priced off Treasuries. Everything. The stock market will go into a panic. We don't know when the timing will come – we've never been in a world where there is $15 trillion worth of central-bank balance sheets, like we have today. The only thing I think you can conclude is preservation is the only thing you are about as an investor. Forget about yield. Forget about return. Just keep yourself liquid and preserve your capital, because you can't predict the day when, as I say, the great margin call in the sky comes down.


    Alex: So if it's not about coming out ahead, it's about coming out not behind everybody else. It's just losing a little less. What's the most effective way to do that? Do you want to hold cash? Alternative options?


    David: Yes. I don't even think there's nothing wrong with owning Treasury bills. I mean, if you want to get, for a one-year Treasury, what is the thing now? Twenty basis points or something.



    Alex: The dollar will be okay, because we still need a medium of exchange and the dollar is the least-bad currency in the world. How does gold fit into the picture? Do you think that gold is a good asset?


    David: Yes, I think that gold is a good asset. It's the only currency that anybody is going to believe in after a while.


    Alex: Okay, so maybe hold that as an insurance policy. Do you own gold yourself?


    David: Yes, as an insurance policy.


    Alex: Where else do you invest in today?


    David: I'm preserving capital. I'm in cash. I don't think the risk of the system is worth it.


    Alex: So you are practicing what you preach, 100%?


    David: Yes.

  • #2
    Re: David Stockman Interview

    [QUOTE=don;234602]

    All very much in line with iTulip philosophy since 1998. Our response was to buy Treasury bonds in 1999 gold in 2001 to play the Fed's Treasury casino and the attendant decline in the dollar, and sit out the stock market and housing casinos entirely.

    However, the interviewer repeats a phrase that is so often repeated that it has come to be accepted as fact. It is 100% wrong and Stockman does not correct him.

    Alex: The dollar will be okay, because we still need a medium of exchange and the dollar is the least-bad currency in the world.
    The worst performing currency is the one that has declined the most against gold since the IMS began to unravel in 2001. That worst performing currency is the US dollar.

    The rate of increase in the number of units of currency needed to buy an ounce of gold -- the only non-fiat currency held as reserves by global central banks -- is the right way to measure the relative strength of currencies.


    In order of best to worst:
    1. Swiss franc
    2. Canadian dollar
    3. Euro
    4. Japanese yen
    5. Chinese renmimbi
    6. Pound sterling
    7. Indian rupee
    8. USD

    Readers may quibble and note that the rupee has been beating the USD since mid-2011 in the international currency race to the bottom, but that is a recent event and I expect the relationship will soon revert. In any case the rupee is not a major currency. I only threw it in with the others to demonstrate that the USD cannot even compete with the currency of one of the most corrupt and poorly managed economies on earth.

    The USD has depreciated against gold more than any other currency over the past decade.

    The USD is not the least-bad currency. It is the worst bad currency. It is leading the pack.

    This fact helps to explain why Americans tend to be more excited about gold as an investment than are Japanese, Swiss, or Europeans. Americans have seen a far more significant rise in gold prices in dollars than citizens of all other major economies.

    Looking at this chart we have to ask, "What happened in 2005?"

    That is a good question and one we tackle in the next Janszen Scenario update. Hint: If you think Peak Cheap Oil then you're on the right track.
    Last edited by EJ; July 26, 2012, 04:30 PM. Reason: Grammar

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: David Stockman Interview

      Originally posted by EJ View Post

      ...
      In order of best to worst:
      1. Swiss franc
      2. Canadian dollar
      3. Euro
      4. Japanese yen
      5. Chinese renmimbi
      6. Pound sterling
      7. Indian rupee
      8. USD

      Readers may quibble and note that the rupee has been beating the USD since mid-2011 in the international currency race to the bottom, but that is a recent event and I expect the relationship will soon revert. In any case the rupee is not a major currency. I only threw it in with the others to demonstrate that the USD cannot even compete with the currency of one of the most corrupt and poorly managed economies on earth. ...

      Side Note:
      a. India continues to import most of the hydrocarbons.
      b. Monsoon rainfall is not good at all. [We are heavy agriculture based economy no matter "growth" stories].
      c. Incompetent governance.

      Overall, I think INR will be worst currency of all for sometime to come i.e. till Q1-ish of 2014.

      P.S.: BOLD in EJ's statement is all mine.
      Last edited by srivatsan; July 26, 2012, 02:10 PM. Reason: Changed the "it" to INR for clarity.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: David Stockman Interview

        plus Stockman is looking in his rear view mirror. Where was David back then . . . .

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: David Stockman Interview

          well at least SOMEBODY (from the .gov) with the 'intellectual authority' to say it, is SAYING IT:

          Originally posted by stockman/paraphrased

          after greenspan cut rates to 1%... runrate of 5 tril in mortgages by 2003q2 = 5x max level ever
          floating rate products exploded everywhere... created a generation of debtslaves... 25mil households..

          (and what did we get from congress..???... well... besides 'bush lied'...)

          1960 had 30bil on fed bal sheet, had taken 45years to build up.. then rapid exp of 70's-80's..
          had taken til 2008 (lehman) to get to 900bil.. overshot exp of gdp by 3x... in next 7weeks incr by 900bil in 7weeks... greater in 7weeks than since 1913... another 900bil in the next 6 weeks

          fed run by people who are clueless and should be run out of town... fed has taken itself hostage.. by the wealth effect...afraid of wall st having a hissy fit... afraid to stop it... created a doomsday machine... they now dont know how to unwind it...

          stay out of all markets.. unsafe at any speed...

          gold is a good asset is only currency anybody is going to believe in... an insurance policy

          continuing...

          bernanke, dudley, yellan... LUNATIC money printers... american people are victims of the fed... lured into... housing..debt...
          Last edited by lektrode; July 26, 2012, 03:26 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: David Stockman Interview

            The dollar may be the worst bad currency, but it's backed by something that is perhaps even better than gold, i.e., eleven carrier battle groups and over two thousand nukes. Just saying, if I was another country thinking about taking down the dollar, or taking undue advantage, that would give me pause. When a wild animal, or an aging overbought empire is backed into a corner very bad things can happen. I have a little gold (which is all I can afford), so I'm with you there, but I'm afraid radioactive gold has limited utility.

            Personally, I would want to pull the wild animal's fangs before backing it into a corner.
            "I love a dog, he does nothing for political reasons." --Will Rogers

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: David Stockman Interview

              EJ, could you please explain why do you expect the rupee situation to revert soon ?

              Originally posted by EJ View Post
              Readers may quibble and note that the rupee has been beating the USD since mid-2011 in the international currency race to the bottom, but that is a recent event and I expect the relationship will soon revert. In any case the rupee is not a major currency. I only threw it in with the others to demonstrate that the USD cannot even compete with the currency of one of the most corrupt and poorly managed economies on earth.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: David Stockman Interview

                Originally posted by photon555 View Post
                The dollar may be the worst bad currency, but it's backed by something that is perhaps even better than gold, i.e., eleven carrier battle groups and over two thousand nukes. Just saying, if I was another country thinking about taking down the dollar, or taking undue advantage, that would give me pause.
                The funny thing about fiat currencies is that they create their own destruction, often with an assist from greedy politicians. Self-destruction is practically built-in and guaranteed, and avarice is still one of the seven deadly sins.

                It doesn't matter how many battle groups, aircraft carriers, fighter planes, tanks or nukes you have. You can't use all that weaponry on a piece of paper which is essentially a token for an unpayable debt.

                I am always amazed (and a little disheartened) to see these "we'll just attack and nuke everybody who doesn't want to use our depreciating fiat and participate in our obfuscated kleptocracy" mentality.

                Nobody ever wants to talk about the irony concerning the fact that about half of US debts and deficits are due to building all that military equipment in the first place, or how to create peaceful solutions to deal with the real problems.

                I'm not trying to pick on you photon555, as I've seen similar statements thousands of times on the Internet. There are a lot of things about the future that I am unsure of ... but I am quite sure that history has shown us that the military will NOT be the saviour of the $USD or any other fiat currency.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: David Stockman Interview

                  Originally posted by Fiat Currency View Post
                  The funny thing about fiat currencies is that they create their own destruction, often with an assist from greedy politicians. Self-destruction is practically built-in and guaranteed, and avarice is still one of the seven deadly sins.

                  It doesn't matter how many battle groups, aircraft carriers, fighter planes, tanks or nukes you have. You can't use all that weaponry on a piece of paper which is essentially a token for an unpayable debt.

                  I am always amazed (and a little disheartened) to see these "we'll just attack and nuke everybody who doesn't want to use our depreciating fiat and participate in our obfuscated kleptocracy" mentality.

                  Nobody ever wants to talk about the irony concerning the fact that about half of US debts and deficits are due to building all that military equipment in the first place, or how to create peaceful solutions to deal with the real problems.

                  I'm not trying to pick on you photon555, as I've seen similar statements thousands of times on the Internet. There are a lot of things about the future that I am unsure of ... but I am quite sure that history has shown us that the military will NOT be the saviour of the $USD or any other fiat currency.
                  That certainly didn't save Russia -- the ruble took a plunge.

                  In ways, it makes things *worse*. It takes a *lot* of dollars to maintain all that high-tech capability.....

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: David Stockman Interview

                    i have trouble with anything coming from david stockman because of his role at omb during the reagan administration, when he knowingly propounded an unrealistic "rosy scenario" to sell bad budgets to congress. then he exited through the revolving door to cash in on wall street. not an admirable guy in my book.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: David Stockman Interview

                      ... then he exited through the revolving door to cash in on wall street. not an admirable guy in my book.
                      talk about yer 'low hurdles' to get under... is there ANYBODY inside the beltway today that IS admirable?
                      (a serious question, please give it some consideration)
                      i'm getting more skeptical by the day that any of em can measure up = why TERM LIMITS the Only Answer
                      since the longer they stay, the lower they go.....


                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: David Stockman Interview

                        Badget -> Bagehot

                        Under what scenarios could the Yield curve invert as he describes?
                        It's Economics vs Thermodynamics. Thermodynamics wins.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: David Stockman Interview

                          Originally posted by Fiat Currency View Post
                          The funny thing about fiat currencies is that they create their own destruction, often with an assist from greedy politicians. Self-destruction is practically built-in and guaranteed, and avarice is still one of the seven deadly sins.

                          It doesn't matter how many battle groups, aircraft carriers, fighter planes, tanks or nukes you have. You can't use all that weaponry on a piece of paper which is essentially a token for an unpayable debt ...
                          I think it does help ... in the short run. In the longer run, the US's security is a function of the health of its economy ... it's not the weaponry that supports the economy but the economy that supports the weaponry. As the economy rots, so too eventually will its military strength.
                          Finster
                          ...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: David Stockman Interview

                            Also, after watching this interview he mentioned that when the treasury market finally goes, the thing to own would be 30 day treasuries. Thinking back to the '08 early '09 period, EJ sold his 10 year notes and went to 30 days bills, which tells me that he is thinking a similar scenario has the potential to occur (or was happening right then.) Is there a permanent place for 30 day bills in a portfolio or would it make sense to just hold cash.

                            A side note to that, many brokerage houses automatically sweep your cash into money market funds, would that make any difference when this whole thing goes down? If so, should your excess cash be in a regular bank checking account?

                            Currently, I keep excess cash in extremely short duration corporate/muni bond funds.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: David Stockman Interview

                              Originally posted by Finster View Post
                              I think it does help ... in the short run. In the longer run, the US's security is a function of the health of its economy ... it's not the weaponry that supports the economy but the economy that supports the weaponry. As the economy rots, so too eventually will its military strength.
                              At this point in time the two are so intertwined - credit card military budgets with strong-arm reserve currency enforcement - that it's a question of the chicken and the egg . . . .

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X