Re: "Nothing to see here..."
I think I agree.
EJ said: "We have to consider the real possibility that she has been made to appear to be other than who she really is because she may in fact be able to "do something about it.""
On one hand, EJ makes a good point. On the other, how many chances does a person get to prove if they are phony?
The fact that this editorial was published in the WSJ doesn't raise suspicisions, all of a sudden the WSJ is on board with a total cleanup of the system?
She could have resigned from the campaign instead of coming out in favor of TARP. No one made her do that.
How is what Palin is doing now any different from any other politician that suddenly "saw the light" after they resigned from office?
I wonder what Hang 'em High Harry is working on now...he's been very quiet since publicly accusing State Street on some fraudulent activity a couple of years ago.
Originally posted by ltullos
View Post
EJ said: "We have to consider the real possibility that she has been made to appear to be other than who she really is because she may in fact be able to "do something about it.""
On one hand, EJ makes a good point. On the other, how many chances does a person get to prove if they are phony?
The fact that this editorial was published in the WSJ doesn't raise suspicisions, all of a sudden the WSJ is on board with a total cleanup of the system?
She could have resigned from the campaign instead of coming out in favor of TARP. No one made her do that.
How is what Palin is doing now any different from any other politician that suddenly "saw the light" after they resigned from office?
I wonder what Hang 'em High Harry is working on now...he's been very quiet since publicly accusing State Street on some fraudulent activity a couple of years ago.
Comment