Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prometheus Review

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Prometheus Review



    Something Wicked Their Way Comes, via the Galactic Void

    By A. O. SCOTT

    If you grew up in the 1970s, you may have a dim memory of “Chariots of the Gods,” an international best seller by Erich von Däniken full of dubious speculation about extraterrestrial influences on ancient earthling civilizations. The book, a kind of space age “Da Vinci Code,” inspired a goofy German documentary and, if memory serves, some earnest, anxious debates among sixth-grade protogeeks who shall remain nameless.

    Ridley Scott’s “Alien,” which arrived at the decade’s end, had a far more durable impact. If you saw it in a theater at an impressionable age you may still be seized by irrational, mortal fear every time you experience a touch of indigestion. A powerful, perfect blend of the space-travel and horror genres, “Alien” tapped into a deep, claustrophobic anxiety and an equally primal sense of adventure, the simultaneous thrill and terror of the unknown. The sinewy resilience of Sigourney Weaver’s Ripley and the designs of the Swiss graphic artist H. R. Giger — including various horrible manifestations of the alien itself — have been etched into the pop-cultural DNA ever since.

    In his new film, “Prometheus,” Mr. Scott, returning to science fiction after a 30-year post-“Blade Runner” absence, entwines the visceral, creatural dread of “Alien” with some of the quasi-mythic grandiosity of “Chariots.” Once again a vessel lumbers through the galactic void, and a diverse crew must contend with menacing weirdness outside the ship and growing paranoia within it. The Giger alien may still be out there. Something wicked lurks in subterranean tunnels, their walls etched in freaky runes. And hovering over all the scary stuff are some big, metaphysical questions about the origin and ultimate fate of humanity.

    A lot of the pleasure of “Prometheus” is in that hovering. Once the themes touch down and the arc of the story becomes clear, some disappointment sets in. But Mr. Scott’s sense of visual scale, which has often produced hectic, hectoring grandiosity (are you not entertained?), achieves, especially in the first hour, something like genuine grandeur. Twinned opening scenes — the first involving a giant, alabaster-skinned biped sacrificing himself to propagate life on Earth, and the second, thousands of years later, devoted to scientists’ finding traces of his presences — impart a palpable sense of awe. The music, by Marc Streitenfeld, soars and rumbles toward cosmic significance. And the shudders of sublimity only grow more intense as Mr. Scott elegantly lays out a series of overlapping conceits.

    You might also call them science-fiction clichés, but the amazing thing is that, at least for a while, they don’t feel that way. The visual scheme is sufficiently captivating, and most of the performances are subtle enough that whatever skepticism you may arrive with quickly turns into happy disorientation. The 3-D is unusually graceful — your gaze is absorbed rather than assaulted — and you are pulled into a world of lovely and disconcerting strangeness with plenty of time to puzzle over the behavior of its inhabitants.

    These include David, an android played with silken wit by Michael Fassbender. The sentient, sensitive, possibly treacherous robot is hardly a novelty in this kind of movie, and David is partly a collage of cinematic allusions. His name and his air of innocence recall the mechanical boy hero of Steven Spielberg’s “A. I.,” but David also has a clear kinship with HAL 9000 from “2001: A Space Odyssey” and the existentially wounded replicants in “Blade Runner.” His chosen role model, however, is Peter O’Toole in “Lawrence of Arabia,” whose mannerisms and worldview inform David’s idea of what it is to be human.

    The actual humans in his company are the usual motley bunch. The captain of the Prometheus is Idris Elba, who smokes cigarillos and owns an ancient squeezebox and a bewildering accent. His boss, representing obscure but undoubtedly sinister corporate interests, is Charlize Theron, who is doing everything she can (in this movie and in “Snow White & the Huntsman”) to make this an icy June at the movies.

    Like John Ford and Shakespeare, Mr. Scott likes to throw a few clownish, expendable rustics into his ensembles, though in this case the designated buffoons are bickering scientists played by Rafe Spall and Sean Harris. Tradition dictates that there also be, among all this compromised, agenda-driven humanity, a paragon of decency and idealism under duress. This would be Elizabeth Shaw — Dr. Who fans take note: Your bases have been covered too — a researcher played by Noomi Rapace. Along with her husband, Charlie Holloway (Logan Marshall-Green), Shaw regards the voyage of the Prometheus as a spiritual quest. The child of missionaries (glimpsed in flashback), she wears a cross and speaks sincerely and literally about going to meet her maker.

    Ms. Rapace, the girl with the dragon tattoo in the Swedish film adaptations of the Stieg Larsson trilogy, is a fine heroine, vulnerable and determined. Her physique and features suggest a Hello Kitty version of Ms. Weaver’s Ripley, though, as in the “Dragon Tattoo” movies, her pixieishness is accompanied by superhuman endurance. This is evident, above all, in a scene of self-inflicted surgery capable of reducing a packed, rowdy theater to stunned, appalled, almost reverent silence.




    But the virtuosity on display makes the weakness of the story — the screenplay is by Jon Spaihts and Damon Lindelof — all the more frustrating. I’ll avoid spoilers here, but “Prometheus” kind of spoils itself with twists and reversals that pull the movie away from its lofty, mind-blowing potential. Geeks and dreamers will hold onto scraps of splendor and wish for more. There are no revelations, only what are called, in the cynical jargon of commercial storytelling, “reveals,” bits of momentarily surprising information bereft of meaning or resonance. For example: A sequel is coming.

    “Prometheus” is rated R (Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian). Some gory sights and salty talk.

    Prometheus
    Opens on Friday nationwide.
    Produced and directed by Ridley Scott; written by Jon Spaihts and Damon Lindelof; director of photography, Dariusz Wolski; edited by Pietro Scalia; music by Marc Streitenfeld; production design by Arthur Max; costumes by Janty Yates; released by 20th Century Fox. Running time: 2 hours 3 minutes.
    WITH: Noomi Rapace (Elizabeth Shaw), Michael Fassbender (David), Guy Pearce (Weyland), Idris Elba (Janek), Logan Marshall-Green (Holloway), Charlize Theron (Vickers), Rafe Spall (Millburn) and Sean Harris (Fifield).

    http://movies.nytimes.com/2012/06/08...apace.html?hpw

  • #2
    Re: Prometheus Review

    This one is a must see for a film nerd like me.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Prometheus Review

      I saw the trailer for this when I saw The Avengers (go see it if you haven't!) and it looked FANTASTIC. I seldom go to the movies, but The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel was on my list and now Prometheus is, also.

      Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Prometheus Review

        Funny you'd post that, Don, just an hour after I read a deliciously snarky review of the same movie.
        For the record, I'm a big scifi fan and will certainly pay full ticket to see Prometheus

        Without further ado, I offer the counterpoint review


        Prometheus: an archaeological perspective (sort of).

        Posted by Henry Rothwell
        Opening scene:

        Chunky unconvincing CGI chap chases a departing ufo to the top of a hill. Drinks something the aliens left behind. Disintegrates into a nearby waterfall.
        Cut to the Isle of Skye:

        Archaeologist Noomi Rapace is excavating a crevice in a cave with a paintbrush. Shining a small torch into the crevice, she smiles, and tells her assistant to shout to Dr. Holloway, who is excavating a fair distance away down the hill. You can tell he’s an archaeologist, as opposed to another kind of doctor, because he is sieving soil. When his name is called, he instantly throws the sieve to the ground, and pounds up the hill to the cave. Because, as we all know, archaeology can be extraordinarily hard to catch.
        Go on. I dare you. . .
        Speed is of the essence. He is too slow however, as in the time it takes him to cover the distance, the crevice is now a large cavern, replete with cave art, which Noomi has already dated. It’s 35,000 years old. Possibly older. One bit shows a human figure pointing at some dots. It’s significant. They hold hands. Archaeologists are hot. Archaeology is cool.
        Cut to some more dots, but these are stars. There’s a spaceship. Inside the spaceship people are in suspended animation pods.

        A robot is checking the sleepers, a job which apparently requires him to wear a rather splendid sci-fi hat. ...
        Last edited by thriftyandboringinohio; June 11, 2012, 03:07 PM. Reason: removed full text, replaced with link, it copied in as an unreadable mess.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Prometheus Review

          I've read mixed reviews.....and have heard mixed comments from friends.....most are on either extreme.....really good or really bad.

          I look forward to seeing it as I'm a big sci fi fan and of Alien/Aliens...but might wait to watch from home.

          I have to admit not likely Blade Runner as a kid, but just watched the "final, last, we promise the very best director's platinum cut" and I appreciate it much more now than when I was a kid....they really got the atmosphere of the near future right and it stands the test of time pretty well 30 years on.

          Bladerunner and Alien got the whole "Future Old, Dirty and Beat Up" thing pretty much spot on.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Prometheus Review

            Originally posted by thriftyandboringinohio View Post
            a deliciously snarky review of the same movie...
            Yep. Pretty much. I enjoyed watching the movie because it was pretty -- and because I was out, after dark, sans small children for the first time in quite awhile -- but the script was... lacking. Fortunately, I'm not especially invested in the Alien series, and earlier sequels like Alien 3 sufficiently disrespected the prior material that I didn't feel like a 'betrayed' fanboy -- there was no great legacy to disrespect.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Prometheus Review

              The snarky review is more a commentary on the differences between science fiction novels, which tend to be pretty self-consistent logically, and science fiction movies, which emphasize being self-consistent visually, often at the hilarious expense of other considerations when one looks at them with a jaded eye.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Prometheus Review

                I saw Prometheus. Beautiful as all Ridley Scott movies. It is the first movie that I thought actually utilized and execute the 3D aspect well. Some of the scenes were breath taking. As for "the plot" it seemed to be pretty much right on par with Alien and Blade Runner for nuanced and complex vagueness that tempts the imagination without satisfying the gut. Once you accept the basic premise that answers about life are available to only those driven by ambition, faith, and quest the movie feels about right.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Prometheus Review

                  Originally posted by lakedaemonian View Post
                  Bladerunner and Alien got the whole "Future Old, Dirty and Beat Up" thing pretty much spot on.
                  As did Firefly and Serenity, IMHO.

                  I plan on seeing Prometheus, flawed though it may be. It just looks too darned shiny not to.

                  Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Prometheus Review

                    I plan to see it, as I have always been a sci-fi fan.

                    Forbidden Planet is still one of the best sci-fi films ever; I was fortunate to see the film when it first came out in 1956. If you haven't seen it, plan to do so.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Prometheus Review

                      The problem with every single Ridley Scott movie I've seen since Gladiator: 1/2 or 1/3 a good movie. The rest? Meh.

                      Absolutely that 1/2 or 1/3 is really good.

                      After that, not at all.

                      Robin Hood was a fine example. The beginning was promising: Robin Hood as a yeoman archer doing his duty for king and country. Working for a king but not subservient, honorable, self sufficient, etc etc. Russell Crowe and the other actors are actually dirty as you'd expect in a medieval battlefield situation.

                      By the end, there's women and children charging into battle against armored men-at-arms and winning.

                      Argh.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Prometheus Review

                        I agree about Forbidden Planet. Still visually stunning.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Prometheus Review

                          Originally posted by sunskyfan View Post
                          I agree about Forbidden Planet. Still visually stunning.


                          Agreed, Best Sci-Fi King Lear Shake ever made . . .

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Prometheus Review

                            I went to see it 2 days ago. It was so-so. I basically agree with the review.

                            It is worth seeing on blu-ray when it comes out in a few months (as a rental). It is not worth the "big bucks" to see in the theater. Scott should have spent less money on special effects and more on writing/actors.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Prometheus Review

                              Scott should have spent less money on special effects and more on writing/actors.
                              +1 Isn't that nearly always the case with major studio US films.




                              Last edited by don; June 15, 2012, 06:11 AM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X