Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Movie Review: Pink Stinks

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Movie Review: Pink Stinks



    Turning a Charity Symbol Into a Corporate Logo

    By JEANNETTE CATSOULIS

    In “Pink Ribbons, Inc.” the director Léa Pool takes aim at the breast cancer movement and the corporations that benefit from its ubiquitous rosy symbol of awareness and action. Yet for all the stellar intentions; revelatory evidence; and thoughtful, wall-to-wall interviewees, this frustratingly overstuffed documentary indulges more in spraying buckshot than stalking a target.

    This is a pity, because the film highlights legitimate concerns that others, notably the medical sociologist Gayle Sulik, have been digging into for years, including the questionable commingling of marketing and philanthropy and the prioritization of pharmaceutical solutions over prevention. Casting a pink veil of positivity over a dark and dreadful disease, we are told, encourages the myth of progress and distracts from treatment options that remain limited to what Dr. Susan Love calls “slash, burn and poison” and mortality rates that have barely altered in six decades.

    Depressing statistics, however, don’t sell products. Arguing forcefully that corporate sponsorship of this so-called pink culture is more likely to fatten bottom lines — or rehabilitate a damaged image — than result in a cure, Ms. Pool wonders who is being served by a fuchsia Niagara Falls or a blushing bucket of KFC. But though poking indignantly at the close ties between nonprofit giants like Susan G. Komen for the Cure and, for example, large chemical companies whose goals are unlikely to include investing in explorations of suspected links between cancer and pollution, the film fails to offer substantive financial analyses. Where, exactly, do all these millions in charitable donations go? There may well be too many players to track, but Komen’s detailed financial statements, freely available on its Web site, might be a good place to begin.

    Bristling with valuable information but with no clear path to a point, “Pink Ribbons” (based on the 2008 book by Samantha King) is a head-reeling, hot-button mess. Only in one segment does the fog fully clear, as we meet a dignified group of women weathering metastatic disease. Through these faces of pain, fear and anger, and with the lucid guidance of Barbara Ehrenreich (drawing on her brilliant 2001 essay “Welcome to Cancerland”), we understand how the movement’s Mardi Gras atmosphere and “tyranny of cheerfulness” — walk, run, smile, be a warrior! — serve marketers more than the terminally ill.

    Though leaving us with many more questions than answers, this well-intentioned blur of accusations, advertising clips and pink-washed events nevertheless deserves to be seen. At the very least, the movement’s apparent drive to make breast cancer, in the words of Ms. Ehrenreich, “pretty and feminine and normal” should raise our hackles. “It’s not,” she insists. “It’s horrible. It must be stopped.” And maybe festooning ourselves in little-girl pastels is not the best way to achieve that goal.

    Pink Ribbons, Inc.
    Opens on Friday in New York and Los Angeles.

    Directed by Léa Pool; written by Ms. Pool, Nancy Guerin and Patricia Kearns, inspired by the book “Pink Ribbons, Inc.: Breast Cancer and the Politics of Philanthropy” by Dr. Samantha King; produced by Ravida Din; released by First Run Features. In Manhattan at the IFC Center, 323 Avenue of the Americas at Third Street, Greenwich Village. Running time: 1 hour 38 minutes. This film is not rated.

    http://movies.nytimes.com/2012/06/01...tml?ref=movies

  • #2
    Re: Movie Review: Pink Stinks

    Just curious, anyone know the origin of the phrase "tyranny of cheerfulness"

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Movie Review: Pink Stinks

      A good candidate may be Barbara Ehrenreich, who wrote the best-seller "Nickled and Dimed", about America's working poor..

      She wrote a another book later about a serious illnes she had (cancer I believe), where she was constantly told to think positive thoughts, while she was feeling like hell during her treatment. She rebelled against the "tyranny of cheerfulness" and wrote a book about it called "Bright-Sided:
      How Positive Thinking Is Undermining America
      "

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Movie Review: Pink Stinks

        Approximately one woman in eight gets breast cancer. When it happens, we're expected to hide the damage, be cheerful, optimistic and grateful that we have the best medicine in the world! Yay! Before women even leave the hospital, volunteers teach us how to get a wig to hide our upcoming chemo baldness. How to decide if breast reconstruction is for us, or if we would rather wear falsies in our bra. It is expected of us that we be ashamed of our bodies, as if we have something to be ashamed about. It makes me furious.

        Personally, after watching two women I loved go through the slash/burn/poison treatment of breast cancer with fatal results, I opted-out when it was my turn.

        The companies that make chemicals that cause cancer also make the chemotherapy for when we get sick. Pretty slick, eh? They buy ads on TV promoting both lawn chemicals and Breast Cancer Awareness Month. They buy the Congress to protect their industries and keep a pharmaceutical monopoly on cancer treatment. More people depend on the cancer industry for their livelihood than actually get cancer. If there was a cure they'd be out of work!

        How many women do you see walking around half-breasted or flat-chested? How many flat-out bald women do you see? Hardly any. Yet it's one in eight. They hide themselves, like women in burkhas. Women in burkhas can't recognize and bond with other women out in public. It keeps them isolated and powerless. Prosthetic breasts and wigs do the same thing to breast cancer survivors. Keeps everybody from seeing just how many we are. Because then we might just get mad!

        If the rate of testicular cancer was one in eight, you can bet your life that congress would be demanding better treatment options! There would be congressional hearings calling on the cancer industry to account for their dismal progress. There would be demands that alternative treatments get studied and approved. There would be legislation to remove estrogen disruptor chemicals from our environment, corporate profits be damned! But it won't happen as long as breast cancer patients and survivors keep acting as willing enablers to the cancer system.

        If women would stop dutifully playing the role of brave, cheerful victims, stop hiding their ravaged bodies in shame, stop being so damned passive and compliant about this horrific disease, maybe then things would start to change.

        Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Movie Review: Pink Stinks

          I propose that this year for Breast Cancer Awareness Month, every woman who has a chemo wig and/or prosthetic breasts stop wearing them. That would generate real awareness!

          Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Movie Review: Pink Stinks

            Originally posted by shiny! View Post
            The companies that make chemicals that cause cancer also make the chemotherapy for when we get sick.
            If only it were that simple. It is probably a combination of many different chemicals and lifestyle rather than one specific chemical and company.

            Originally posted by shiny! View Post
            If the rate of testicular cancer was one in eight
            I think you probably mean prostate cancer

            Originally posted by shiny! View Post
            If the rate of (testicular) 'male' cancer was one in eight you can bet your life that congress would be demanding better treatment options!
            If only this were true. Womans health gets much more attention and funding than male health.

            Originally posted by shiny! View Post
            But it won't happen as long as breast cancer patients and survivors keep acting as willing enablers to the cancer system.
            Most people in the West can't even manage to control their own body weight to accepted healthy standards. Nearly 1 in 5 Americans smoke daily and they seem to be towards the bottom / lower end of the list for Western countries. I am sure you know the stats for obesity.

            Given these facts I don't see how you can blame cancer on lawn chemicals unless people are sprinkling them onto their big macs or smoking them?

            Clearly most people don't care about their health - well at least until they lose it. I guess this is some sort of human psychological phenomenon?

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Movie Review: Pink Stinks

              Originally posted by bungee View Post
              If only it were that simple. It is probably a combination of many different chemicals and lifestyle rather than one specific chemical and company.
              That's what I meant. That's why I used the plural rather than the singular for "companies" and "chemicals".

              I think you probably mean prostate cancer
              No, I meant testicular. Pardon my crudeness, but if one congressman in eight was getting his balls chopped off like women are getting their breasts chopped off, they'd be raising hell.


              Most people in the West can't even manage to control their own body weight to accepted healthy standards. Nearly 1 in 5 Americans smoke daily and they seem to be towards the bottom / lower end of the list for Western countries. I am sure you know the stats for obesity.

              Given these facts I don't see how you can blame cancer on lawn chemicals unless people are sprinkling them onto their big macs or smoking them?

              Clearly most people don't care about their health - well at least until they lose it. I guess this is some sort of human psychological phenomenon?
              I wasn't blaming cancer exclusively on lawn chemicals. That was merely an example of ONE company, Bayer. Pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, pre-emergents... not good at all for people and pets. They make chemo, too. It was a lame attempt to point out the hypocracy of our system that protects the interests of companies that poison us, then make a fortune off of our disease. Plastics, fragrance chemicals, combinations of thousands of chemicals you can't pronounce entering our bodies every day where they combine into new, unstudied chemical compounds. People buy it all up like they do cigarettes. The latest and most chemically complex deodorants, lotions, hair color, shampoo and conditioners, perfumes, air fresheners, laundry products, fabric treatments... eating, drinking and microwaving foods in plastics... it's a very toxic life we lead! And then we get cancer and they say they don't know what causes it.

              Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Movie Review: Pink Stinks

                Originally posted by shiny! View Post
                I propose that this year for Breast Cancer Awareness Month, every woman who has a chemo wig and/or prosthetic breasts stop wearing them. That would generate real awareness!
                That's a great idea.

                Comment

                Working...
                X