Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Britain's silent, scandalous epidemic

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Britain's silent, scandalous epidemic

    http://www.independent.co.uk/life-st...c-7622363.html

    Look back in hunger: Britain's silent, scandalous epidemic

    Evidence is mounting that thousands of children in the UK are not getting enough food to eat – and that, as financial hardship spreads, their numbers are increasing rapidly.
    Charlie Cooper

    Friday 06 April 2012

    hris is 10. He and his brother are so malnourished that their skins are pale and they have rings under their eyes. Their older brothers have such an unhealthy diet that they have lost their adult teeth. They live in the sixth-richest city in the world – London. The boys are just four among thousands of Britain's hungry children – victims of a "silent epidemic" of malnutrition in the capital and beyond.

    Kids Company, which supports 17,000 children in London, has reported a dramatic increase in the number of children coming to its walk-in centres not in search of shelter or safety, but food. The situation is mirrored around the country. In Barnsley, child-support charities are working with parents who struggle to keep cupboards stocked with such staples as milk, bread and pasta. In Bristol, a youth project has gone from offering a place for teenagers to go for advice and support, to a place they go for a basic meal.

    FareShare, a charity that redistributes surplus supermarket food, says soup kitchens, hostels and community groups are struggling to meet demand from parents and young people "desperate" for handouts. Since October, 42 per cent of the groups it works with have faced rising demand for food.

    Kids Company, founded in 1996 to provide practical, emotional and educational support to London's most vulnerable children, has seen young people reduced to shoplifting, stealing from bins and eating raw meat. Every week, 70 new children visit the charity looking for support and a meal, compared with 30 a week last year.

    Many hungry children are from immigrant families whose parents are not eligible to work or claim benefits. But working parents and those on state handouts are also struggling as the cost of living soars and the job market remains stagnant. "We are seeing effectively responsible parents who are just not managing to have food in the house," said Kids Company's founder, Camila Batmanghelidjh. "Children don't have a public voice so they can't tell us."

    The problem is perhaps most visible in schools. Kids Company cites five inner London schools where staff say between 70 and 80 per cent of pupils are affected by food insecurity – not always having food at home, nor knowing where the next meal is coming from.

    But it is not just in the capital. A poll conducted in February by Netmums, the largest web forum for parents, found that one in five mothers was regularly missing a meal so her children could eat.

    Meanwhile, evidence from Trussell Trust, which supports food banks that give meals to 120,000 people nationwide, also suggests that the problem is growing. Its executive chairman, Chris Mould, said there had been a "huge increase" in demand in recent months – and among the hungry were 36,000 children. Even though the service is expanding, the charity is discovering more and more people in food poverty, who increasingly rely on the charity sector. "What we have seen suggests there are thousands of people in this country going hungry – making hard choices between, fuel, warmth, transport and food," he said. "The pressure falls hardest on mothers and children."

    For those on the front line, the problem is clear. "It's all down to money," said Charlotte Williams, who runs Station House, a community group providing childcare services in Thurnscoe, near Barnsley. "We are in a perfect storm. Working parents are having their hours cut and many are losing their jobs. Even where incomes are steady, the cost of living – gas, water, clothes – has gone up to the point that people are having to squeeze their food budget to afford other basics. Next week it will get even worse when working tax credits are cut.

    "This week we gave out fresh fruit, and parents said this was great – that they hadn't had it for some time.

    "Barnsley is a proud place, parents don't want to admit they can't afford food, but when you see their reaction when we have something we can give away, you can tell immediately what the situation is at home. It's the first thing children ask about when they come in the door – do you have any food?"

    The School Food Trust, which advises the Government about children's nutrition, said that for "far too many children" a free school lunch was their only proper meal of the day. "Teachers often report children coming to school too hungry to learn, and fears about whether they will eat at all when they get home from school in the evening," a spokeswoman said.

    At the same time as demand at front-line food charities is rising, funding for them is running out. In a survey last year, FareShare found that one in three of its client charities had fallen prey to Government funding cuts; two-thirds were cutting food budgets to stay afloat.

    The problem of child food poverty is the worst it has been, even in the experience of seasoned youth workers such as Ms Batmanghelidjh.

    "A lot of agencies who could help are short of funding and they are having to gatekeep more or refer more," she said. "I have been at street level 21 years, and lack of food in the last year-and-a-half has become a much more widespread problem than we have seen before. I know of a collective of parents who are shoplifting just to feed their kids."

    This week, Kids Company is launching its "Plate Pledge" to help tackle food insecurity, hunger and malnutrition among children. To support the appeal, visit www.kidscoplatepledge.org

    Additional reporting by Aaron Lee, Olivia Lee and Raziye Akkoc

    Case studies: Starving children

    Kids Company has shared the stories of some of London's hungry. Names have been changed and because young children find it hard to articulate their experience, two young adults were asked to recall what it is like to be young, scared and starving.

    Chris, 10: "The only food the children were given was cheap, fried, processed food"

    Chris and his brother showed signs of extreme malnourishment with pale skin and dark rings under their eyes. His two elder brothers had lost their four adult front teeth and his two-year-old brother was losing his baby teeth prematurely.

    His alcoholic father left his mother two years ago. When case workers first visited Chris's home, the only food the children were given was cheap, fried, processed food. The children have very low confidence and were bullied at school.

    Chris's key worker now picks him up from school every day and eats a healthy supper with him in one of Kids Company's centres. Now, he loses his temper less.

    Amy, 20: "I was so hungry I would even chip bits of brick off the wall and eat those"

    "When I was little I was very thin and was very embarrassed about it. I had developed a tummy ache which attached itself to eating and stress, which I believe was something I inherited from my mother's stress around not having enough food.

    "I would wake up starving in the night but there would be no more food. When I went to people's houses their parents would make as much food as possible for me and more for me to take home.

    "At my best friend's house I would fill up on dog biscuits in between meals. I would wait at my garden fence and ask passers-by for sweets or food. I would even chip bits of brick off the wall and eat those. When I lived on my own and on the streets I would spend days walking around London, hoping to be able to find or steal some food. I would look in every bin and on every bit of the floor."

    Joe, 20: "I could hardly eat – my stomach was so shrunken, my ribs were sticking out"

    "I was nine when I was first arrested for stealing from a supermarket. I was trying to get baby formula for my sister. When I first came to Kids Company, I could hardly eat anything – my stomach was so shrunken, my ribs were sticking out.

    "It took about eight months for me to eat what I should be eating. But I got to have a full meal every day. Coming here made me so happy because I was a lot less stressed. I had stability for the first time. I was able to learn better. I was able to do a lot of things better because I wasn't tired all the time."

  • #2
    Re: Britain's silent, scandalous epidemic

    Can't feed the kids, but Can:-

    Own & drive a car!
    Got Cable
    Go out on Friday/Sat nite
    Smoke
    Drink
    Weed

    Mega

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Britain's silent, scandalous epidemic

      Originally posted by Mega View Post
      Can't feed the kids, but Can:-

      Own & drive a car!
      Got Cable
      Go out on Friday/Sat nite
      Smoke
      Drink
      Weed

      Mega

      Most of them are responsible parents. Large numbers of them have jobs. This is a real problem and nasty comments don't help.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Britain's silent, scandalous epidemic

        Yes, there is a real problem, but there also is a lack of responsibility from quite a few parents. No one refuses to help the truly needy, but there are far too many freeloaders today than in the past. We do have to help the children.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Britain's silent, scandalous epidemic

          They Have BMW's, Old ones.......thirsty, they should drive Nissan Micra's, they should live within their means....
          Many years ago a bloke was on local TV saying how nice it was that the city concil had built new houses & he was lucky to get one because he could afford to buy his own, however he could afford to:-

          Buy a NEW Ford XR4 (about £30,000 in todays money)
          Run said XR4 (2.8 litre V6)
          Two, yes TWO hoildays to Spain or Turkey a year
          Nights out at the local pub EVERY night
          Go the Match EVERY week.

          I gew up using my brothers "Hand-me-down" & 2nd hand stuff.....
          Mike

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Britain's silent, scandalous epidemic

            I guess it's a rather old problem of accurately/efficiently filtering the needy from the foolish...since they are often times mixed together....has anyone found a decent way to do so?

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Britain's silent, scandalous epidemic

              Children cannot pick their parents. Whether the parents are hard-working and very poor or shiftless and irresponsible, the kids have no control over the situation.

              Their basic needs should be met, certainly before a country decides to splurge on tax cuts for the very rich, subsidies for profitable corporations, or cost-plus military contracts.

              If the parents indirectly benefit from child subsidies, so be it.

              I'd rather see my taxes help poor kids than have them spent on projects and subsidies that benefit rich political donors.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Britain's silent, scandalous epidemic

                Lets not forget the effect of malnutrition on brain development at young age. A lot happens between 0 - 5 years with the brain that is permanently wired after this age. Neglect this and society will pick up the bill later down the road. Few understand this though.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Britain's silent, scandalous epidemic

                  I was in Madrid for March and on my first night I saw a group of well-dressed kids turning over rubbish bins to search them.
                  It's Economics vs Thermodynamics. Thermodynamics wins.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Britain's silent, scandalous epidemic

                    Originally posted by *T* View Post
                    I was in Madrid for March and on my first night I saw a group of well-dressed kids turning over rubbish bins to search them.

                    I've been living in the south of France for two years and the situation looks dramatically better than San Francisco. Very few people going through trash cans for food here. Very few homeless people. Nice is not a particularly safe city after hours, but quite a bit better than SF.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Britain's silent, scandalous epidemic

                      Originally posted by Shakespear View Post
                      Lets not forget the effect of malnutrition on brain development at young age. A lot happens between 0 - 5 years with the brain that is permanently wired after this age. Neglect this and society will pick up the bill later down the road. Few understand this though.
                      Our family's small efforts at philanthropy in our greater community is largely directed towards an organization called Plunket that supports development of all under 5s in NZ and the Salvation Army.

                      Plunket is a great, non profit org that really seems to achieve a lot for society for quite a small cost....something that would be great to see replicated elsewhere.

                      A conflict we have is a perception of parents that society would deem unproductive/unsuccessful seem to be having far more children than parents that society would deem productive/successful seem to be having.

                      We do believe welfare plays a role in contributing to that perceived distortion, but at the same time we don't wish to see kids suffer because they have bad or unlucky parents.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Britain's silent, scandalous epidemic

                        Originally posted by lakedaemonian View Post
                        ...
                        ...
                        A conflict we have is a perception of parents that society would deem unproductive/unsuccessful seem to be having far more children than parents that society would deem productive/successful seem to be having.

                        We do believe welfare plays a role in contributing to that perceived distortion, but at the same time we don't wish to see kids suffer because they have bad or unlucky parents.
                        +1
                        tho from what i see daily, its not mere 'perception' - the welfare class, some subset of it anyway, has learned that its far more profitable to krank out kids than work.

                        couple that fact with the (US) political class having calculated that its far more productive at re-election time to cater to them rather than design welfare programs that make it difficult to re-produce while collecting welfare, ie: a policy that states clearly/unequivically that one kid is an 'accident' but after the first one, there's no more additional incentive to have more, not while on welfare - and for that matter, should be on mandatory birth control - with no incentive to stay at home instead of doing something - ANYTHING - that forces, uh... leads them in the direction of becoming productive members of society - or at least becoming members of the working class.

                        i dont have any problem with people who, for no fault of their own, find themselves unable to support their families and need a helping hand for some period of time to get back on their feet.
                        but i do have a problem with those who game the system that allows them to krank out kids while they do nothing but watch tv all day - hey! - even stay-at-home-on-welfare moms can do _something_ to payback society - babysit other peoples kids for instance, while the parents go to work and pay taxes to fund their welfare benefits - stuff envelopes, answer call-forwared telephone lines, clean parks, pickup trash on the roadside, staff community centers

                        no able bodied person should be able to collect welfare benefits whilst sitting on their ass and/or kranking out more babies.

                        hows that one go?
                        when the number of people who collect outnumber the people who work/pay taxes, we're doomed - seems to be coming right at us....

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Britain's silent, scandalous epidemic

                          Originally posted by lektrode View Post
                          +1
                          tho from what i see daily, its not mere 'perception' - the welfare class, some subset of it anyway, has learned that its far more profitable to krank out kids than work.

                          couple that fact with the (US) political class having calculated that its far more productive at re-election time to cater to them rather than design welfare programs that make it difficult to re-produce while collecting welfare, ie: a policy that states clearly/unequivically that one kid is an 'accident' but after the first one, there's no more additional incentive to have more, not while on welfare - and for that matter, should be on mandatory birth control - with no incentive to stay at home instead of doing something - ANYTHING - that forces, uh... leads them in the direction of becoming productive members of society - or at least becoming members of the working class.

                          i dont have any problem with people who, for no fault of their own, find themselves unable to support their families and need a helping hand for some period of time to get back on their feet.
                          but i do have a problem with those who game the system that allows them to krank out kids while they do nothing but watch tv all day - hey! - even stay-at-home-on-welfare moms can do _something_ to payback society - babysit other peoples kids for instance, while the parents go to work and pay taxes to fund their welfare benefits - stuff envelopes, answer call-forwared telephone lines, clean parks, pickup trash on the roadside, staff community centers

                          no able bodied person should be able to collect welfare benefits whilst sitting on their ass and/or kranking out more babies.

                          hows that one go?
                          when the number of people who collect outnumber the people who work/pay taxes, we're doomed - seems to be coming right at us....
                          I guess that's the multi trillion dollar question:

                          How to morally/ethically/reasonably differentiate between actual welfare abusers and those who are genuinely in need of welfare when they temporarily hit hard times.

                          I guess if we could answer that question it wouldn't be such a genuine problem as well as a subject of such enormous and heated debate and divide.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Britain's silent, scandalous epidemic

                            I wonder also how much of its an analytical decision to krank out more kids because its profitable. I'm not saying it's not, I have no idea, rather I don't know if a lot of the people we are talking about think and plan that well. I suspect its just as much a matter of carelessness. How else do you explain people having 'too many' kids who are poor, but not on welfare?
                            If carelessness and poor decision making is the root cause, then the policies you suggestion would not be a disincentive, and would then impede the goal of 'helping the children'. As far as paying back society, I wonder if these are the best candidates for being competent day-care providers.

                            I certainly understand your sentiments, and I don't have better ideas, but I suspect the problem is not as easily solved as you suggest, even if there were the political will.

                            And looking ahead, if one believes that there are major structural problems with the economy (thinking of other itulip threads regarding automation, etc) the problem will only likely get bigger.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Britain's silent, scandalous epidemic

                              lakedaemonian - What I was alluding to with regard to that 0-5 remark is how extremely important this period is in a human beings development. I used to think that if enough time was spent one could make up for things not done at an earlier age. It can be done but the full potential of the brain will not be involved. Once the the "wiring" of the brain is established at that time it is close to impossible to undo it. The pruning/strengthening of synaptic connections is nearly final, though this process continues at a slower rate to really end around the age of 20 yrs. There after it goes slowly in revers.

                              If a child is to have a hope to be an Olympian it needs to start very very early in any given discipline. Exceptions do happen but on average this is the golden formula of success. Success in all areas is directly related to what was happening with the child in those critical years. I am convinced that parents armed with this knowledge could do so much more to help their children to at least have a better hope to do the best possible in the future. Not having this knowledge is a HUGE disadvantage.

                              Hence the effort should be to make sure the child is well fed and exposed to activities that allow it to develop its brain and potential talent to the max. The potential IS THERE but it needs to be accessed and developed.

                              One parent when I told him this told me that "I can't teach the child all the sports and all the subjects. We have no time or money to do this.". Well he was missing the point. The idea is not that ONE MUST EXPOSE the child to EVERYTHING. The idea is to expose it to as much as possible and hope that something in this range of experiences attracts it to keep going in that direction. Then the magic has a better hope of happening in the future.

                              Leaving the child in front of a TV is as good as feeding it poison. Leaving it to play with toys/blocks etc. it the way to go.

                              Another area that opened my eyes was the program "Super Nanny". Heck, it made me realize how much better parents can do and HOW LITTLE they know about children and how to raise them. For me it was a Great Awakening.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X