Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Greed & Fear on ‘desperate reflation’

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Greed & Fear on ‘desperate reflation’

    from ft's alphaville blog http://ftalphaville.ft.com/


    Greed & Fear on ‘desperate reflation’

    Sep 28 12:44
    by Gwen Robinson




    The ebullient stock-market action since the Fed easing makes it clear that, when the next bubble forms, it will be in Asia and emerging markets, says CLSA’s Christopher Wood in the latest issue of his client newsletter, Greed & Fear.

    The MSCI Emerging Markets Index is back at an all-time high, as is the MSCI All Country Asia ex-
    Japan Index. More importantly, perhaps, Asia and emerging markets have outperformed the S&P500 “spectacularly” since their mid-August lows, with the BRIC countries leading the way. Thus, the MSCI AC Asia ex-Japan Index and the Emerging Markets Index have rebounded by 26% and 23%, respectively, in US dollar terms since bottoming in mid-August, while the MSCI BRIC Index has risen by 33%. By contrast, the S&P500 has risen by only 8.4% over the same period.

    The main conclusions, then, are clear, says Wood. First, “it makes sense to remain structurally overweight Asia and global emerging markets - most particularly for genuine long-term investors such as pension funds. For a new round of Fed easing is akin to lighting a match to the Asian asset-reflation story”.

    Second, “if the US consumer does not slow in a material fashion, then world stock markets bottomed in August”.

    It is the second conclusion, however, that Wood still questions. The view is that more of a growth scare is coming as a result of housing- and credit-related problems, which will hit stocks when these problems emerge. “For Wall Street-correlated stocks want to see growth, which is why they have ceased to be positively correlated to bonds ever since the subprime problem first hit the public consciousness in February”.

    The “silver lining” of such a renewed growth scare is that it will precipitate more aggressive easing from the Fed and, quite likely, co-ordinated easing from other central banks worried not only about growth but also about dollar weakness, says Wood. Indeed, the dollar, he adds, “is becoming rather important”.

    "Billyboy Ben’s panicky 50bp cut last week, in obvious response to jawboning from the executive branch of government, will go down in history as one of the milestones on the way to the long-since-inevitable collapse of the US dollar paper standard - a trend that has been in place ever since Richard Nixon broke the link with gold back in 1971."

    If this is the big picture point, the short-term call is where the dollar will go from here. Wood is less convinced of the short-term call than of the fact that the dollar is heading for a “long-term collapse”. Right now is not the time to be dogmatic on the dollar from a technical standpoint, he adds. “For the US dollar index is now at 78.3, which is just above the level of 78.2 where the dollar last bottomed, in September 1992″.

    The stakes are, therefore, high. Either the dollar is going to break down completely (which in Wood’s view has bearish implications for global stock markets in terms of the questions it raises about the Fed’s ability to maintain autonomy in setting interest-rate policy), or the US currency is going to stage a counter-trend rally off this long-term support level.
    Such a rally could be driven by short covering, as well as by the forex market’s sense that other central banks are going to have to start cutting rates too in order to fend off US dollar weakness, he predicts.

    The best environment for Asian stocks in the short term is for the dollar to stay weak but not
    collapse through this perceived support level, which would likely trigger a new wave of chart-related
    selling, says Wood. But such continuing sideways action is unlikely, in Wood’s view. More likely is that the dollar either breaks down completely or bounces sharply off long-term support.

    In this respect, Greed & Fear advises investors “simply to wait and see what happens” in the current circumstances, where it is better to be guided by market action and not be dogmatic. In the meantime, Wood reminds us, the last time the dollar bottomed, back in 1992, the bottom was made because of co-ordinated central bank intervention.

    This raises the question of whether world central banks will again be willing to buy dollars to allow America to “continue to play its reckless game of chicken with the world economy”.

    Wood believes that reluctant, co-ordinated intervention to “save” the dollar will probably come if the dollar completely breaks down. But that stage has not yet been reached. In the meantime, the issue is whether central banks such as the ECB and Bank of England will start cutting rates.

    Greed & Fear’s guess is that weaker economic data and continuing credit problems will give these central banks an excuse to start cutting rates in coming months. For now, the money markets expect the BoE and the ECB both to be cutting by 25bp in 1Q08.

    What about the credit problems? Is the story over, as stock markets clearly want to believe?

    This story is far from over, in Wood’s view, although it is true that Libor rates have come down significantly during the past week. The acid test, he says, “will come only when the next credit problem emerges”. Unsurprisingly, he predicts that such problems are surely inevitable, if, as is likely, “the US housing market continues to deteriorate and if US consumption continues to slow”.

    In this respect, Wood notes an interesting interview on Bloomberg this week with an American small-cap investor who highlighted that domestic-orientated companies, such as restaurants and trucking firms, are seeing sales volumes decline as costs rise. Yet the Russell 2000 index is apparently trading on 39x earnings, he notes.

    This should serve to remind investors that “the key development for all world stock markets in the next few months will be what happens to the US economy, not what the Fed does”.

    In this respect, all the macro risk remains on the downside. The continuing strength of commodities , meanwhile, cannot be viewed solely as a confirmation of global economic strength, since commodity strength also reflects US dollar weakness - as does the resilience of the S&P500.

    As for the strength of oil, the bull story remains more about rising production costs and declining cheap reserves than about a lack of supply or booming demand. Such is the argument put by Hernan Ladeuix, CLSA’s head of oil and gas research, who expects that long-term oil prices will trend at US$60/bbl in real terms, but with intermittent spikes to US$80-100/bbl in the next three to five years. Clearly, one such spike is now under way, helped by US dollar weakness.

    But Wood still views oil and hard commodities in general as “tactically vulnerable to more of a US-led growth scare”. What is evident is that the growth in oil demand from the likes of China and India is not as strong as the more fervent bulls assume, he says.

    All that, and the related continuing growth-scare risk, is why Wood would “rather continue to own interest-rate sensitives in Asia ex-Japan geared to domestic demand rather than commodity cyclicals”.

    Indeed, he says, Greed & fear “will only aggressively add to commodity-related cyclicals in the
    Asia ex-Japan thematic portfolio if and when more of a slowdown in the global economy is better discounted”.

    So, if the view here is that more of a US-led slowdown is coming, that also raises the issue of how effective will be the likely co-ordinated central banking easing. “Whereas stock markets still have a touching, if not absurd, faith in central banks and their ‘bold actions’, Wood reminds investors that monetary easing is not going to be as effective reflating debt-driven growth in the west as many assume if banks’ balance sheets will be constrained, as is Greed & fear’s view, by an extended hangover from the structured-finance boom.

    This is why Fed easing will ultimately go on longer than the market currently expects, he concludes. “It is also why western financials remain a structural short”. But for Asia, the more aggressive the Fed easing, the greater will be the asset-reflation bubble that will be the ultimate consequence of desperate US efforts to reflate.

    On that last point, the past week has seen more definitive evidence that the US housing market
    continues to deteriorate, be it rising inventories of unsold houses or accelerating house-price
    declines. But for those investors who want to still short homebuilders, Wood’s advice is now to
    “short British homebuilders, not American ones”.
    Last edited by jk; September 29, 2007, 11:10 AM.

  • #2
    Re: Greed & Fear on ‘desperate reflation’

    Originally posted by jk View Post
    ...The main conclusions, then, are clear, says Wood. First, “it makes sense to remain structurally overweight Asia and global emerging markets - most particularly for genuine long-term investors such as pension funds. For a new round of Fed easing is akin to lighting a match to the Asian asset-reflation story”...
    This is more or less the same view held by GaveKal. However, emerging Asia markets have historically proven to be higher beta and correlated to US markets to a greater degree than some presently wish to admit. The economies of Asia may be "decoupling" from the USA, but that doesn't mean the equity markets will - at least for now. And that's probably part of the thinking behind John Rubino's China short.

    Originally posted by jk View Post
    ...Second, “if the US consumer does not slow in a material fashion, then world stock markets bottomed in August”.

    It is the second conclusion, however, that Wood still questions. The view is that more of a growth scare is coming as a result of housing- and credit-related problems, which will hit stocks when these problems emerge. “For Wall Street-correlated stocks want to see growth, which is why they have ceased to be positively correlated to bonds ever since the subprime problem first hit the public consciousness in February”...
    Although this column mentions shorting British homebuilders at the end (also see the post on Jim Nickerson's Bearish News thread), for the most part investors seem to be overlooking what is going on in Europe. Anecdotal evidence suggests growth is slowing much faster than the main stream media is recognising. Even if neither technically enters recession, a synchronised demand fall-off in Europe + USA would be very bad news for the merchantile economies of emerging Asia - and could be the 1-2 punch that puts their high-flying equity markets on the mat for a little while.

    Originally posted by jk View Post
    ..."Billyboy Ben’s panicky 50bp cut last week, in obvious response to jawboning from the executive branch of government, will go down in history as one of the milestones on the way to the long-since-inevitable collapse of the US dollar paper standard - a trend that has been in place ever since Richard Nixon broke the link with gold back in 1971."

    If this is the big picture point, the short-term call is where the dollar will go from here. Wood is less convinced of the short-term call than of the fact that the dollar is heading for a “long-term collapse”. Right now is not the time to be dogmatic on the dollar from a technical standpoint, he adds. “For the US dollar index is now at 78.3, which is just above the level of 78.2 where the dollar last bottomed, in September 1992″.

    The stakes are, therefore, high. Either the dollar is going to break down completely (which in Wood’s view has bearish implications for global stock markets in terms of the questions it raises about the Fed’s ability to maintain autonomy in setting interest-rate policy), or the US currency is going to stage a counter-trend rally off this long-term support level.
    Such a rally could be driven by short covering, as well as by the forex market’s sense that other central banks are going to have to start cutting rates too in order to fend off US dollar weakness, he predicts...
    So what is the most "hated" currency on earth? Before you answer, have a look at a chart of the Yen/Dollar cross for the past few years.

    Even Japanese housewives have been speculating against their own currency in a desperate effort to try to get a nominal positive carry on their family savings. With "everyone" on the same side of the boat, a contrarian may want to consider this (as Jack Crooks has suggested if you've been reading his great stuff).

    If other central banks start cutting rates the two central banks that can't really play that game are Japan and Switzerland, as their rates are barely above zero now. Might any continued long-term fall in the US$ be vented increasingly through these two currencies, instead of the currencies that have already risen a lot? In the case of the Yen there would appear limited downside as the Chinese are unlikely to accept a falling Yen when the yuan is appreciating against the greenback. Previous episodes imply PBoC-BoJ coordinated intervention whenever the Yen approaches 122 to the US$. That number is likely to get ratcheted down as the Yuan is adjusted upward against the US$.

    I've also been betting that the GCC currencies are going to get re-pegged against the US$, but that is a trade that may be difficult to place for those that don't live in the region. Inflation pressures here are unbelievable. Food prices are rising faster than in the USA because, other than dates, they really can't grow much here. Dairy products and fresh vegetables from Holland and Denmark, converted from Euros to the local currency are becoming obscene. There's a lot of political pressure on the Governments. They will either increase consumer subsidies, or re-peg. I am betting on the latter because it will also lower the cost of Bentley's and Benz's for the elite.

    Originally posted by jk View Post
    ...Wood believes that reluctant, co-ordinated intervention to “save” the dollar will probably come if the dollar completely breaks down. But that stage has not yet been reached. In the meantime, the issue is whether central banks such as the ECB and Bank of England will start cutting rates.

    Greed & Fear’s guess is that weaker economic data and continuing credit problems will give these central banks an excuse to start cutting rates in coming months. For now, the money markets expect the BoE and the ECB both to be cutting by 25bp in 1Q08...

    ...So, if the view here is that more of a US-led slowdown is coming, that also raises the issue of how effective will be the likely co-ordinated central banking easing. “Whereas stock markets still have a touching, if not absurd, faith in central banks and their ‘bold actions’, Wood reminds investors that monetary easing is not going to be as effective reflating debt-driven growth in the west as many assume if banks’ balance sheets will be constrained, as is Greed & fear’s view, by an extended hangover from the structured-finance boom.

    This is why Fed easing will ultimately go on longer than the market currently expects, he concludes. “It is also why western financials remain a structural short”. But for Asia, the more aggressive the Fed easing, the greater will be the asset-reflation bubble that will be the ultimate consequence of desperate US efforts to reflate.

    On that last point, the past week has seen more definitive evidence that the US housing market
    continues to deteriorate, be it rising inventories of unsold houses or accelerating house-price
    declines. But for those investors who want to still short homebuilders, Wood’s advice is now to
    short British homebuilders, not American ones”.
    Last edited by GRG55; September 30, 2007, 04:06 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Greed & Fear on ‘desperate reflation’

      Originally posted by greed&fear
      Second, “if the US consumer does not slow in a material fashion, then world stock markets bottomed in August”.

      It is the second conclusion, however, that Wood still questions.
      grg55,
      without a doubt, the phrases quoted above are key. i agree with all your comments, including those on currencies. currently i'm 25% in pm's and 8% fxy and 8% fxf. with about 10% in canadian income trusts, mostly energy-related, i'm over 50% out of the dollar. i'm still struggling with whether to hedge out the remainder of my dollar exposure. have you retained much dollar exposure?
      Last edited by jk; September 30, 2007, 06:12 AM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Greed & Fear on ‘desperate reflation’

        Originally posted by jk View Post
        grg55,
        without a doubt, the phrases quoted above are key. i agree with all your comments, including those on currencies. currently i'm 25% in pm's and 8% fxy and 8% fxf. with about 10% in canadian income trusts, mostly energy-related, i'm over 50% out of the dollar. i'm still struggling with whether to hedge out the remainder of my dollar exposure. have you retained much dollar exposure?
        jk: Agree with your choice of extracted phrases and would add only the following:

        "...So, if the view here is that more of a US-led slowdown is coming, that also raises the issue of how effective will be the likely co-ordinated central banking easing. “Whereas stock markets still have a touching, if not absurd, faith in central banks and their ‘bold actions’, Wood reminds investors that monetary easing is not going to be as effective reflating debt-driven growth in the west as many assume if banks’ balance sheets will be constrained..."

        On your question of US Dollar exposure, I think it's just about impossible to completely insulate oneself from the world's reserve currency - but I try to minimize my direct holdings. My employment/business income and day-to-day living expenses are essentially US$ because of the hard currency peg here. Like you, I have some Cdn trusts (and other energy/commodity companies) which means we are voluntarily holding businesses with essentially US$ denominated revenue streams.

        Having said that, the options for investors to diversify are now so plentiful and accessible that I haven't held more than an 8-12 month reserve (for expected US$ purchases, expenses, travel in the USA, etc) directly in US$ for the last 5 or 6 years. I am the world's worst trader or timer, so tend to put emphasis on macro-fundamentals and cyclically out-of-favour sectors with rotten sentiment. They also have to be sectors I think I can understand. Since I am not that smart, it means I sometimes completely miss out on big events; like the boom - and the bust - in tech (watched that entire circus from the sidelines without ever understanding any of it, until recently signing on with iTulip and reading EJ's lucid writings about those days).

        I wasn't nearly smart enough to buy gold at the trough (unlike EJ, Charles MacKay and you other fine folks on iTulip). I started in 2003 and, like you, it's now my largest single allocation. Since January I have gradually been switching Singapore $ to Yen, and Euros/Pounds to Swissie (should have waited a bit longer - told you I am lousy timer).

        The only other things that look interesting to me right now are perhaps select PM miners & bullion on a pullback, and I've been "stirring around in the ashes" of the Canadian natural gas industry (recently torched by multiple arsonists). There's not much else that looks cheap right now, hence the allocation to foreign currency, since I simply do not have the temperament or courage to hold anything approaching a 100% PM position. Energy and commodity positions are largely the residue of the "old economy" stocks I accumulated in '99/'00 during the height of the craziness when they were all consigned to the cardiac ward - so maybe I didn't completely miss out on the tech boom after all...

        I am dismissive of the currently fashionable view that tech is non-cyclical/defensive and that corporate IT Depts are captives to some sort of obligatory "upgrade cycle". I am equally sceptical of the view that somehow a US business, with foreign currency earnings, is suddenly and intrinsically a more valuable enterprise because the $ has fallen yet again. This type of thinking fits right alongside the "...touching, if not absurd, faith in central banks..."

        Finally, it would not surprise if the US$ bounces a bit to clear the current oversold condition, and that would give me a chance to convert recent local currency savings into perhaps more PMs if they fall in reaction to the US$ move.

        Hope this is of some help.
        Cheers, GR.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Greed & Fear on ‘desperate reflation’

          Originally posted by GRG55
          I am dismissive of the currently fashionable view that tech is non-cyclical/defensive and that corporate IT Depts are captives to some sort of obligatory "upgrade cycle". I am equally sceptical of the view that somehow a US business, with foreign currency earnings, is suddenly and intrinsically a more valuable enterprise because the $ has fallen yet again. This type of thinking fits right alongside the "...touching, if not absurd, faith in central banks..."
          I echo your sentiment, GR.

          Tech is absolutely a consumer driven sector now.

          In the past this was less obvious because tech could increase profits just by scaling down in technology (and thus dropping costs).

          The scale-down happened every 2-ish years, and could also be traded off for greater functionality.

          This dynamic is over; present scale-down cycle is now 5 to 7 years.

          There will be secular adjustments to this new cycle as well as effects from economic recession/consumer spending reductions.

          I would note that the recent dynamic of fabless vs. fab companies is likely to reverse at least somewhat - the economics of building your own fab when the technology is obsolete in 4 years is completely difference when life cycle increases to 10 years.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Greed & Fear on ‘desperate reflation’

            Originally posted by jk View Post
            grg55,
            without a doubt, the phrases quoted above are key. i agree with all your comments, including those on currencies. currently i'm 25% in pm's and 8% fxy and 8% fxf. with about 10% in canadian income trusts, mostly energy-related, i'm over 50% out of the dollar. i'm still struggling with whether to hedge out the remainder of my dollar exposure. have you retained much dollar exposure?
            jk: Addendum to previous reply. Shifting from US$ to European currencies was not due to any brilliant investment acumen on my part. When I moved to the Middle East at the beginning of this decade it seemed logical to move money into European currencies since I would be spending more time there than in North America. If I still lived in North America I would undoubtedly be holding more US$ than current.

            Congrats on the new sobriquet. Well deserved! :cool:

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Greed & Fear on ‘desperate reflation’

              Originally posted by c1ue View Post
              I echo your sentiment, GR.

              Tech is absolutely a consumer driven sector now.

              In the past this was less obvious because tech could increase profits just by scaling down in technology (and thus dropping costs).

              The scale-down happened every 2-ish years, and could also be traded off for greater functionality.

              This dynamic is over; present scale-down cycle is now 5 to 7 years.

              There will be secular adjustments to this new cycle as well as effects from economic recession/consumer spending reductions.

              I would note that the recent dynamic of fabless vs. fab companies is likely to reverse at least somewhat - the economics of building your own fab when the technology is obsolete in 4 years is completely difference when life cycle increases to 10 years.
              C1ue: Thanks for filling in some of the white space on tech. My view's based on a reaction to the persistent cheerleading from the analysts, etc., which always makes me suspicious, instead of any particular knowledge of the sector. Your comments are helpful and appreciated.

              Comment

              Working...
              X