Re: Real Role of Regulation in a Corporate State?
I got rid of my employees when the cost of compliance put me at a point where I could not compete with the cash only businesses, the unlicensed and uninsured types. They have all these rules, but no enforcement. So only the law abiding comply. The ones with no assets and nothing to lose can get away with murder. So are we really any safer in the end? I'd venture to guess that at least 75% of residential electrical work in Atlanta done after the home is built is being done by rank amateurs. Just appalling work. Many simply call themselves electricians. Amazingly no one ever checks. Only about twice in 21 years have I ever been asked to see my license! A few more have asked for proof of insurance. Things have really changed a lot in the last 20 years. It really is amazing to me. People don't seem to care anymore about the quality of work, or if the worker is qualified. Turn in unlicensed people? Or people without workers comp? The government could care less. So its understandable why a underground market has grown.
These regulations serve a purpose, and I am all for most of the codes, especially in regards to safety. But it seems that the powers that be don't consider the actual rationale for some of the regulations that important if they won't enforce them. Or is it really just about the money?
Originally posted by doom&gloom
View Post
These regulations serve a purpose, and I am all for most of the codes, especially in regards to safety. But it seems that the powers that be don't consider the actual rationale for some of the regulations that important if they won't enforce them. Or is it really just about the money?
Comment