Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Server Virtualization

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Server Virtualization

    Start-Up Nicira Plans to Disrupt Networking Giants



    SAN FRANCISCO — Google, Facebook, Microsoft and Amazon already turn millions of computers into single clouds of supermachines, managing the flow between personal computers of cat videos, e-mails and the president’s recent chat on Google Plus.


    Millions more of these computer servers figure out what to sell you while you browse the Web. These global systems work only because of something called virtualization, a kind of software that tricks one server into doing the tasks of several. The cost savings and flexibility revolutionized the data management business, since virtualized machines can run on cheap semiconductors.


    High-price networking gear still ties together most data centers, however. Companies pay for it because managing data traffic is tougher than mere computation. Now a small company called Nicira, along with a few other scrappy players, is pursuing what is called software-defined networking, which should cut costs and make equipment more efficient.


    A software-defined network, which originated in government spy agencies, is similar to server virtualization, and because of that is quite likely bad news for networking equipment makers like Cisco and Juniper Networks. If proprietary systems can be mixed together and cheap chips used in place of custom semiconductors, prices for the gear would most likely will drop.


    Nicira claims savings of up to $37 million in a facility with 40,000 servers, and 50 percent cost reductions in setting up the fastest networks. Customers from big phone companies, large Internet service providers and computer makers think they can exceed the kind of cost savings Google has achieved in its large data centers.


    “Extremely powerful computing is going to get cheaper and cheaper and cheaper,” said Lew Moorman, the president of Rackspace, a company with 161,000 customers using its cloud. It has been working with Nicira since 2009. “Facebook and Google run their applications at a massive scale; we’ll let tens of thousands of companies do whatever they want too, on the fly.”


    Other Nicira customers include AT&T, which is spending $1 billion a year on its cloud. AT&T wants its software engineers to be able to quickly build new personalized features for 100 million or more mobile phone customers. By interacting with several parts of the AT&T cloud, it might be possible for customers to send automatic texts to their friends, for instance when they are stuck in traffic.


    Japan’s NTT, the big phone company, has used it to automatically reconfigure a computer center’s thousands of machines, enabling it to take on the workload of a center in the middle of a tsunami. EBay can use it to better manage workloads or offer new sales applications across its network.


    Martin Casado, the company’s co-founder and chief technical officer, began thinking about network virtualization in 2002, when he was working as a contractor for a United States intelligence agency. (He cannot say which one.) “They needed secure, isolated networks that shared the same infrastructure,” he said. “Virtualization means you have fewer machines and fewer cables. That is fewer points of entry they have to control.”


    It is tough to do. Networks are supposed to operate in real time, and many computing jobs cannot shift around a data center without manually changing things like security and processing-task priorities. Mr. Casado, who calls network virtualization “the hardest problem I’ve looked at in my life,” returned to Stanford and in 2007 finished a Ph.D. thesis on security management in big networks. The government gave Nicira its first $1.5 million soon after.


    The product took four years of work by Mr. Casado and 20 other Ph.D.’s from Google, M.I.T., Cornell and VMWare, a pioneer in server virtualization. They worked quietly, but last spring the company attracted a burglar who, according to surveillance tapes, broke into the building and walked straight to the desk of Nicira’s principal engineer. The company, which thinks the burglar was most likely an agent of a foreign government, claims the man made off with a low-value testing server.


    A number of start-ups are betting big on network virtualization. Pica8 has a virtualized switch made with off-the-shelf chips that it claims can do the work of a $25,000 Cisco box for $3,000. VMWare, which already sells small-scale network virtualization, works with young switch vendors like Arista on building extremely large data centers.


    “Nicira is an element we can work with,” said Paul Maritz, VMWare’s chief executive. “There will be tens of thousands of big clouds defined by software, and they’ll be easy to set up.”


    Both Cisco and Juniper say that they are already in the network virtualization game, but say there is still plenty of space for their custom systems. “We have been in the forefront of driving network virtualization and programmability,” Ram Velaga, a Cisco vice president, wrote in an e-mail. “We continue to evolve those technologies.” Juniper is also pushing more software-intensive systems but, like Cisco, it uses custom chips.


    The incumbents may have a while left to contend with the upstarts, because of some deeply held loyalties. Despite its long interest in Nicira, Mr. Casado says his old friends in the intelligence community are not yet customers. “They are the most conservative and slow-moving people you can find, as far as technology cycles go,” he said with a shrug.

    “Companies like NTT and Rackspace are in a rush.”

    http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/06/start-up-nicira-plans-to-disrupt-networking-giants/?scp=1&sq=a startup has plans&st=Search

  • #2
    Re: Server Virtualization

    Interesting article and a very interesting topic. Thanks for sharing.

    I still can't help but wonder how bad and far-reaching the train wreck will be when the cloud, pregnant with irreplaceable data, is compromised and/or succumbs to a massive crash event/attack.

    Here's another article for thought from CFO magazine on the "cloud" issue:


    January 24, 2012 | CFO.com | US
    When Disaster Thunders Through the Cloud
    CFO Magazine

    Cloud computing and disaster recovery can make for a stormy marriage. The best intentions — and a robust business continuity plan — may not be enough to save you from an expensive divorce.


    The Obvious Disaster

    The most obvious disaster that could befall a business in the cloud is that its provider ceases to exist, whether due to a catastrophic business failure, seizure by regulatory authorities, or some apocalyptic event. The recent and sudden takedown of the global file-sharing provider megaupload.com last week by the FBI locked out hundreds of thousands, possibly millions, of users, whether law abiding or not. Academics, musicians, and others are now unable to access their data. If your cloud provider is a privately owned company in a foreign country, the risks associated with business longevity are even more difficult to figure. On top of that, the cloud marketplace is nowhere near stable, with new entrants competing and vying for business on a daily basis. It’s a safe bet that not all of them will survive.

    If you are using a cloud application for your critical, core transactional applications, such as order processing, billing, or logistics, there are major technological hurdles to shifting your systems to another provider in the event of a failure of your current one. Here are some things you need to consider: While in most cases you will be able to retrieve your data, your business logic and software systems will be left behind. You’ll need specific software — and the knowledge to use it — to bring your data back to life so that you can continue to run your business. Another consideration is that if you have a large volume of data, it could take days to extract it and transfer it to a new provider’s system. It may, in fact, be quicker to airfreight the data on a hard disk, if that’s technically possible.

    Due-Diligence Paradox
    The public cloud presents a due-diligence paradox. While it may simplify IT from your perspective by abstracting away all the nasty complexity of enterprise IT, it increases the difficulty of performing a comprehensive and deep due diligence. Many public cloud providers will not allow a stream of potential or existing clients into the most intimate parts of their organization to kick the tires. In most instances, you’ll have to rely on the provider’s assurances that it will meet your minimum standards of system security, confidentiality, availability, and integrity, and that the certificates they boast of (SAS 70, for example) have been earned.

    The Case for a Private Cloud
    With a private cloud, you are 100% in control, so you can dial your investment up or down to meet your own risk appetite. You get the full benefits of scalability, agility, lower unit operating cost, system resilience, and so on; however, the key financial determinants to building a private cloud are access to capital funding and the total cost of ownership over the expected lifespan of the system. You should always test the assumption that the public cloud is the lowest-cost option. Do the math: you may be surprised when you accurately factor in the cost of risk in the public cloud.

    After all, it’s your business, not your cloud vendor’s.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Server Virtualization

      My cloud data goes on dropbox which stores a copy on their cloud and also on every local computer I access it from.

      Comment

      Working...
      X