Re: Any comments on SOPA and Wikipedia's blackout?
Perhaps it is both. Well, at least there's a distinction there, isn't there? For P2P sharing, torrents, and the like, it's probably really mostly people 30 and younger just sharing and consuming media (much as we do here).
Kim Dotcom is perhaps another beast entirely, hosting copyrighted content and streaming it, and, while the same population consumes the media, he was able to amass wealth in the process.
I'm certain that there is copyrighted material that has been uploaded to iTulip - at least in the form of pictures and text. It's worth keeping in mind when considering SOPA/PIPA/ whatever new acronym on the matter is concocted.
Still, a large part of me can't help but feeling that we're not far from a point where we could have the something close to the whole of documented human knowledge freely available to anyone. There is something wonderful about this idea - something reminiscent of the arguments for public libraries two centuries ago.
Yet we will not do this because of the way income on media is made. I sincerely hope that someone smarter than myself comes up with a better way to monetize content than to erect paywalls through myriad distribution channels that are so numerous as to prevent all but the wealthiest of citizens from ever subscribing to all of them (this is particularly true for academia and scientific journals).
Originally posted by flintlock
View Post
Kim Dotcom is perhaps another beast entirely, hosting copyrighted content and streaming it, and, while the same population consumes the media, he was able to amass wealth in the process.
I'm certain that there is copyrighted material that has been uploaded to iTulip - at least in the form of pictures and text. It's worth keeping in mind when considering SOPA/PIPA/ whatever new acronym on the matter is concocted.
Still, a large part of me can't help but feeling that we're not far from a point where we could have the something close to the whole of documented human knowledge freely available to anyone. There is something wonderful about this idea - something reminiscent of the arguments for public libraries two centuries ago.
Yet we will not do this because of the way income on media is made. I sincerely hope that someone smarter than myself comes up with a better way to monetize content than to erect paywalls through myriad distribution channels that are so numerous as to prevent all but the wealthiest of citizens from ever subscribing to all of them (this is particularly true for academia and scientific journals).
Comment