Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Poor Jamie

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Poor Jamie

    I am fascinated by how out of touch these people are. Talking about percent of income in taxes suggests that they don't recognize that there is a non-discretionary level of income required to simply house, feed and clothe oneself. Money is not simply a unit of account but a means to survival. It's depressing that someone vaulted to this position and apparently worthy of Gillian Tett's time is so utterly vapid and tone-deaf.

    NEW YORK — Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JPMorgan Chase & Co., is railing against bashing the rich.

    Dimon was responding Wednesday to a question at an investor conference about the hostile political environment towards banks.

    "Acting like everyone who's been successful is bad and that everyone who is rich is bad – I just don't get it," said Dimon at the conference, which was organized by Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

    Dimon said he's worked on Wall Street for much of his life and contributed his fair share.

    "Most of us wage earners are paying 39.6 percent in taxes and add in another 12 percent in New York state and city taxes and we're paying 50 percent of our income in taxes," Dimon said in defense of his fellow Wall Street bankers.

    In his presentation to investors, Dimon warned that investment banking revenue at JPMorgan Chase in the fourth quarter would be flat and that the bank's private equity unit would post a loss. That's because clients and companies have been less active in markets in the fourth quarter, a particularly volatile period because of uncertainty surrounding the European debt crisis.

    Dimon said the bank hopes to pay slightly higher dividends and buy back stock next year if regulators allow it. Following the financial crisis, the Federal Reserve, which regulates banks, has to approve the largest banks' plans of raising capital, buying back shares or paying out dividends.

  • #2
    Re: Poor Jamie

    Originally posted by oddlots View Post
    I am fascinated by how out of touch these people are. Talking about percent of income in taxes suggests that they don't recognize that there is a non-discretionary level of income required to simply house, feed and clothe oneself. Money is not simply a unit of account but a means to survival. It's depressing that someone vaulted to this position and apparently worthy of Gillian Tett's time is so utterly vapid and tone-deaf.
    Indeed it is fascinating.

    Dimon (and many like him) appear to live inside a self-referential, self justifying local reality bubble.

    The Boxer

    I am just a poor boy
    Though my story's seldom told
    I have squandered my resistance
    For a pocket full of mumbles such are promises
    All lies and jests
    Still a man hears what he wants to hear
    And disregards the rest



    The word delusional springs to mind.

    Also reminds me of Jesse's recent articles about psychopaths - one of the chief characteristics being that they have zero capacity for empathy.

    http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot...ychopaths.html
    Last edited by bagginz; December 08, 2011, 03:13 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Poor Jamie

      maybe he's the next in line for a package return addressed from the ECB?

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Poor Jamie

        These articles make my blood boil.

        Jamie Dimon is the head of a criminal empire.

        If you listen to the full answer he says if people committed fraud they should be punished.

        We are still waiting.

        SEC fines do not qualify as punishment.

        http://www.propublica.org/blog/item/...jpmorgan-chase

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Poor Jamie

          double post

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Poor Jamie

            I am not rich, but I think there is a moral limit on what we should take from anyone, IFFFFF they are engaged in a truly
            above the board enterprise of providing helpful goods or services. Maybe that take should be 50%??? And that is not a marginal rate, but an effective rate. and that means of all forms of income.

            Does Lord Jamie have to buy his own car, his own house, his own medicine, his own food, etc etc out of his
            highly taxed income like I do, or are all these given to him as perks. How much of his total compensation is from
            stock options, or restricted stock units that will be later taxed at a long term rate of 15% instead of 39%?

            How much of his wealth is in some hidey hole not being taxed like J6P.

            Fines are ok, IFFF You steal one dollar, You have to pay back 10. If you can't afford to pay, you will be picking up cans on the side of the road in an orange jump suit making mininimal wage until you can pay back the your debt.
            Currenly the fines are, steal 1 dollar pay back .10, IFFF you get caught.

            And of course how much of JPMs success is by having access to gvt insiders, and bending the rules in their favor? In this case fairness rules don't apply. Where is Teddy the Trust Buster?

            Comment

            Working...
            X