Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

On Capital Flight and Forced Repatriation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • On Capital Flight and Forced Repatriation

    I sometimes feel like I am just mechanically re-posting articles from zerohedge or financialsense that everybody has already read, but I think that Bruce Krasting is an astute original thinker that deserves some attention. Look guys, This is a huge event that as far as I know has not been reported elsewhere. This can cause a bank wipe out that might happen in a matter of days. I just went to the bank here in Nice, France and asked to take out 5000 euros. This is not a big sum of money. They are insisting that I fill out forms and wait several weeks. I bank with the biggest bank in France. The problem is not theoretical. It is here now and it will spread like wildfire.


    By Bruce Krasting
    Created 11/19/2011 - 09:41
    Bruce Krasting's picture [1]



    There are some folks in America who will wake up this morning and read that Jefferies has been sued for its role in a bond deal with MF Global and they will vote with their feet (Zero hedge Link [11]). They will close their accounts with JEF and move to a safer address. That’s an example of capital flight.

    There are people all over the globe who have looked at the rapid un-gluing of the financial system and have bought gold as a safe haven. That’s another example of capital flight.

    Every time that something stupid crosses the tape from one of the EU deep thinkers the US bond market catches a bid. Yet another example of capital flight.

    I could go on for a bit with this. There are dozens of examples. All around the globe one can find evidence that money is moving around with the sole purpose of finding someplace “safe”.

    Capital flight is a perfectly logical consequence in today’s world. Barely a day passes where we are not reminded that nothing is safe any more. Not our currencies, not our equities, not our bonds and certainly not our banks/brokers.

    In Greece there are many example where capital flight is undermining stability. The most obvious is the capital flight from the Greek banks that has taken place over the past few years. This flow of money is also perfectly logical. There are many risks of leaving money in a Greek bank:

    -The Bank could default. The principal in the account is at risk.The guarantee (up to E100k) is from the government. What's that worth?

    -The government could default. The chaos that would follow would result in a freeze of all bank balances.

    -The government could announce one morning that it was re-establishing the Drachma. This would mean that any Euros in a Greek bank would be automatically converted into Drachmas at the old official rate. The value of those Drachma would be worth half (or less) as a result of the immediate devaluation that would occur.

    Put yourself in the mind of a Greek who had some savings in a local bank. What would you do? You would do whatever you could to get your money to high ground. It would be perfectly reasonable for you to do that. And that is exactly what the Greeks have done. They’ve moved billions of Euros to Swiss banks in an effort to preserve their wealth. In the process they have crippled the Greek banks and have added to the downward spiral in Greece and the rest of the EU.

    There was (IMHO) a very significant development on this front last week. A move is being made in Brussels to “force” the Swiss government/banks to transfer all of the assets of Greek citizens back to the Greek banks. For a Greek this means that your money is hostage. It has been functionally expropriated. It will be transferred into a banking system that is fraught with risk. Some portion of the money that goes back to Greece will certainly be lost.

    I have talked with some who I know in Athens. They are out of their minds with this development.

    Some thoughts/quotes:

    - BRUSSELS—The European Commission is helping Greece negotiate an agreement with Switzerland to repatriate as much as $81 billion believed to be hidden in Swiss bank accounts, a high level European Union executive body official said Nov. 17.

    $81 billion?? That’s massive. This is not the shopkeeper or pensioner. This is big bucks and that means the Greek shippers. It is a fact that the Greek government doesn’t tax the foreign earnings of the shippers. Call that a mistake, but that is the law. As a result, the shippers have held huge bucks in Switzerland. It’s not dirty money. Right or wrong, there was no legal tax on this.

    The European Commission is working with Switzerland and Greece stop what it believes is an ongoing exodus of money from Greek bank accounts into Swiss and other offshore banking centers, the EU official said.

    The only way to stop capital flight is to address the underlying causes of the flight. That can’t happen in Greece for years. The alternative is to trap the money, force it to go where it is at most risk. The owner of the money will have no choice. Any rights they might have to preserve their assets will be abrogated.

    I’m amazed at this development. The Swiss government/banks are obligated to cooperate with EU tax authorities when there is evidence of tax fraud. But that is not what this is about. The people in Brussels and Bern know that. The fact is that the Greek tax system is so screwed up that there simply are no taxes levied on certain types of income/capital (the shippers). No doubt, some of the Greek cash that is in Switzerland is there because of tax avoidance. But the vast majority is simply safe haven money.

    The word “Repatriation” sounds nice enough but really it means “Theft and expropriation”. There will be nothing voluntary about this. There will be little (if any) due process.

    If this happens (the folks in Brussels are pushing hard) a very dangerous precedent will have been set. Flight capital will have been made illegal. Where might this go?



    -It will go to Spain very quickly. After that it will go to Italy where there are truly huge fortunes outside the country. I see a development like that as being a lights out event.




    -It will come to the USA. EU residents have tons of assets here.



    -Money that is subject to forced repatriation back to countries with weak banks and bankrupt governments will seek the last remaining safe haven, gold. If governments go so far as to repatriate money, they would also not hesitate to make gold ownership illegal. That too would be a lights out event.



    We have a situation developing where the technocrats in Brussels are trying to institute capital controls. They have put a gun to the Swiss government to achieve their objectives. They will likely succeed. The fear of broader capital controls and more repatriation will spread like wildfire. The fact is, capital flight is a very reasonable response in our current environment. Capital controls that either stop or reverse it will undermine confidence and create a panic.

    Those officials in Brussels have no idea what they are unleashing.

    .







    Source URL: http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed...d-repatriation

  • #2
    Re: On Capital Flight and Forced Repatriation

    I'd say that this story would be a lot more believable if we hadn't seen the exact same thing in 2008.

    The entire PIIGS drama and its effects on banks is no different than the collapse of Lehman, Bear Stearns, or Northern Rock on various interbank schema.

    Ultimately the problem can be papered over by CBs - and we've just gone through an example where they did exactly that.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: On Capital Flight and Forced Repatriation

      Originally posted by c1ue View Post
      ...

      Ultimately the problem can be papered over by CBs - and we've just gone through an example where they did exactly that.
      The problem is, that the ECB has, for some inexplicable reason, been playing coy. As you point out, this will end soon, but not before they go full scorched earth on "tax cheats". Otherwise they lose the mandate.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: On Capital Flight and Forced Repatriation

        gec, i'm curious to know if you got your 5k euros. and if you wrote a check for 5k euros to deposit in some other institution, would it not be honored? would it be "held" for weeks?

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: On Capital Flight and Forced Repatriation

          Originally posted by jk View Post
          gec, i'm curious to know if you got your 5k euros. and if you wrote a check for 5k euros to deposit in some other institution, would it not be honored? would it be "held" for weeks?
          No I have not received my money yet. So far there has been no problem with checks, just cash. Checks I write inside of France typically clear in about a week. Checks from the US typically take three weeks to clear. This is a developing story. Things might change quickly.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: On Capital Flight and Forced Repatriation

            Originally posted by globaleconomicollaps View Post
            No I have not received my money yet. So far there has been no problem with checks, just cash. Checks I write inside of France typically clear in about a week. Checks from the US typically take three weeks to clear. This is a developing story. Things might change quickly.
            what if you wrote a check to a non-french, let's say non-eurozone, entity? e.g. a bank in singapore? any idea how that would fly? i'm just wondering about whether this is the typical anti-money-laundering, anti-drug, anti-terrorist, can't trust people with their own money, blather. or is it perhaps the leading edge of capital controls?

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: On Capital Flight and Forced Repatriation

              We're closing on a condo. More capital fight. Cash sale - screw the banks. My return equals 10% annually compared to renting (compared to ZIRP- tell me about it). We done our due diligence and built in an additional 10- 15% drop in equity (purchase price was 15% below current comps - baked in the cake) over the next 2 years. After that, who in hell knows.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: On Capital Flight and Forced Repatriation

                Originally posted by globaleconomicollaps View Post
                I sometimes feel like I am just mechanically re-posting articles from zerohedge or financialsense that everybody has already read...
                PLEASE dont think that gec, as not everybody reads the same stuff - we are all naturally drawn to subject matter of interest to ones own view of the world - where we benefit is in reading whats of interest to the other guy that we might not ever even run across in our normal reading habits - so thanks to ALL for everything that gets put up here.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: On Capital Flight and Forced Repatriation

                  sounds like a good bet to me don - am looking to do same in a closer-to-the-rockies location

                  and i'll take solid IRR (internal rate of return) over 'income' any day...

                  and while theres still the risk of being caught short in the event of a Ka-Poom*, it seems like a better bet these daze to spend money in ways that generate IRR than to suffocate/evaporate in ZIRPland

                  am just hoping we're going to see the predicted downdraft in AU/AG here perty quick, as either way i'm getting nervous about my cash position...


                  * assuming i'm using this term correctly?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: On Capital Flight and Forced Repatriation

                    Originally posted by don View Post
                    We're closing on a condo. More capital fight. Cash sale - screw the banks. My return equals 10% annually compared to renting (compared to ZIRP- tell me about it). We done our due diligence and built in an additional 10- 15% drop in equity (purchase price was 15% below current comps - baked in the cake) over the next 2 years. After that, who in hell knows.
                    sounds like your greatest risk is whether other condo owners continue to pay their fees, i.e. the stability of the community.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: On Capital Flight and Forced Repatriation

                      Originally posted by don View Post
                      We're closing on a condo. More capital fight. Cash sale - screw the banks. My return equals 10% annually compared to renting (compared to ZIRP- tell me about it). We done our due diligence and built in an additional 10- 15% drop in equity (purchase price was 15% below current comps - baked in the cake) over the next 2 years. After that, who in hell knows.
                      American banks don't need our money - they have the Fed, and Bernanke will print and deposit whatever they need or want.

                      This is a criminal system. It's run by and for the benefit of the banks (and their pimp, the U.S. Federal Government).

                      Screw you and me.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: On Capital Flight and Forced Repatriation

                        OK, so I'm a British citizen by birth, but I live on the Isle of Man (not UK). Right now, I'm sitting in France, and will be for a couple of months more.

                        I was concerned about the possibility of Sterling collapse leading to capital controls, so I put about a third of my savings outside the UK: a bank in Singapore (multi-currency), a bank in Switzerland (Swiss Franc), and Bullionvault, Swiss vault.

                        The score so far:

                        Singapore bank. First they sent a letter, surface mail, to the Isle of Man informing me that they would terminate my internet access if I didn't contact them promptly, because it had not been used for several months. By the time that was forwarded to me it was too late. I contacted them, got forms, sent them scans of my passport and other ID, etc, to get it re-activated. It never was. Then they informed me similarly that they were closing all currency facilities except Sterling as I didn't seem to be using them, but I could prevent this by transferring some money into the other currencies I wished to keep. Internet access was the only form of access I ever had for this account, so now they are sitting on my cash, stuck in Sterling, and I can't access it.

                        Swiss bank. I read that in future all Swiss accounts belonging to UK citizens will be subject to a confiscation of capital (ISTR 15-30 percent, not sure), to be paid to the UK, if the account has not been notified to UK tax authorities. There is no reason I should have done this, because I'm not UK resident, and anyway there is no income (zero interest), only capital. I will talk to the bank at some point, but I doubt they will feel it's up to them to determine my liability to UK tax, they will just do what they're told. The UK have also demanded to know, where, if UK citizens transfer their cash out before the deadline, it goes next.

                        I'm up to my neck in work just now and have no time to deal with either of the above issues until next year.

                        Bullionvault. So far, so good. But...

                        What I read from the confiscation of assets in Swiss accounts is that the UK consider that any asset belonging to a UK citizen in fact belongs to them, and the Swiss have acceded to this. When the UK says "we've just made it illegal to hold gold, please hand over all gold in Swiss custody belonging to UK citizens", what then? It also says that the UK now feel that they have a right to know about any assets held worldwide by any UK citizen. I gather that in many countries this is already true, but AFAIK is new in the UK. They previously only knew about any income of any UK resident, which is different.

                        One final thing on a related note. I had some savings in a UK retirement account (SIPP) from years ago. Last year I wanted to put it into a gold ETF. When I tried to trade, I was informed that I couldn't as I was not UK resident, so that too is stuck in Sterling and not accessible to me. I see that in the UK there are suggestions that pension funds should be "encouraged" to invest in Britain's future by providing the capital to help young people get mortgages.

                        And, in case UK HMRC are reading this. All my savings are legitimate, taxed, and the result of decades of self-employed hard work much of which brought income into the UK which otherwise it would not have had.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: On Capital Flight and Forced Repatriation

                          Originally posted by jk View Post
                          what if you wrote a check to a non-french, let's say non-eurozone, entity? e.g. a bank in singapore? any idea how that would fly? i'm just wondering about whether this is the typical anti-money-laundering, anti-drug, anti-terrorist, can't trust people with their own money, blather. or is it perhaps the leading edge of capital controls?
                          No idea. Have not tried it.

                          The bulk of money transfers are done here with a "Virement" or wire transfer.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: On Capital Flight and Forced Repatriation

                            Originally posted by jk View Post
                            sounds like your greatest risk is whether other condo owners continue to pay their fees, i.e. the stability of the community.
                            Which was a priority of our due diligence. of course there's no long term guarantees.
                            American banks don't need our money - they have the Fed, and Bernanke will print and deposit whatever they need or want.

                            This is a criminal system. It's run by and for the benefit of the banks (and their pimp, the U.S. Federal Government).

                            Screw you and me.
                            Yes Raz, I agree. This was one chance for me personally to keep the SOB's from taking even more of my production economy earnings.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: On Capital Flight and Forced Repatriation

                              and now you have the case for -- physical assets. Only those can be confiscated as well.

                              where do you go for safety? Gold.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X