Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

$4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • $4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe

    My non-financial friend fwd the URL to me. I'm not an options trader, but I understand some basics, but not enough to validate this. The writer on the blog sounds like a nut, but can someone verify if the option activity is true, is the volume abnormal as claimed, and what is the potential signficance (with more analytical rigger than claiming a catastrophe).

    http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.com/20...n-4-weeks.html
    $4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe within four weeks
    Anybody have a clue as to what these 'investors' are expecting?
    The two sales are being referred to by market traders as "bin Laden trades" because only an event on the scale of 9-11 could make these short-sell options valuable.
    There are 65,000 contracts @ $750.00 for the SPX 700 calls for open interest. That controls 6.5 million shares at $750 = $4.5 Billion. Not a single trade. But quite a bit of $$ on a contract that is 700 points away from current value. No one would buy that deep "in the money" calls. No reason to. So if they were sold looks like someone betting on massive dislocation. Lots of very strange option activity that I haven't seen before.
    The entity or individual offering these sales can only make money if the market drops 30%-50% within the next four weeks. If the market does not drop, the entity or individual involved stands to lose over $1 billion just for engaging in these contracts!
    Clearly, someone knows something big is going to happen BEFORE the options expire on Sept. 21.
    THEORIES:
    The following theories are being discussed widely within the stock and options markets today regarding the enormous and very unusual activity reported above and two stories below. Those theories are:
    1) A massive terrorist attack is going to take place before Sept. 21 to tank the markets, OR;
    2) China, reeling over losing $10 Billion in bad loans to the sub-prime mortgage collapse presently taking place, is going to dump US currency and tank all of Capitalism with a Communist financial revolution. Either scenario is bad and the clock is ticking. The drop-dead date of these contracts is September 21. Whatever is going to happen MUST take place between now and then or the folks involved in these contracts will lose over $1 billion for having engaged in this activity.
    "$1.78 Billion Bet that Stock Markets will crash by third week in September Anonymous Stock Trader Sells 10K Contracts on EVERY S&P/Y "Strike" Shorts Stocks "in the money" effectively selling all his SPY holdings for cash up front without pressuring the market downward.
    This is an enormous and dangerous stock option activity. If it goes right, the guy makes about $2 Billion. If he's wrong, his out of pocket costs for buying these options will exceed $700 Million!!! The entity who sold these contracts can only make money if the stock market totally crashes by the third week in September.
    Bear in mind that the last time anyone conducted such large and unusual stock option trades (like this one) was in the weeks before the attacks of September 11.
    Back then, they bought huge numbers of PUTS on airline stocks in the same airlines whose planes were involved in the September 11 attacks.
    Despite knowing who made these trades, the Securities and Exchange Commission NEVER revealed who made the unusual trades and no one was ever publicly identified as being responsible for the trades which made upwards of $50 million when the attacks happened.
    The fact that this latest activity by a single entity gambles on a complete collapse of the entire market by the third week in September, seems to indicate someone knows something really huge is in the works and they intend to profit almost $2 Billion within the next four weeks from whatever happens! This is really worrisome."

    Source: Ticker Forum

  • #2
    Re: $4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe

    They bet not only on the SPX, but also on the Eurostoxx50

    See Mystery trader bets market will crash by a third

    Based on the 2,800 strike price, the position covers a notional €6.9bn, and potentially even more using a market price of about 4,100 when the trades were done on Tuesday and Wednesday.
    .
    .
    The identity of the investor is unknown but market sources speculated it was either a large hedge fund hedging itself against deepening losses, or a long-only fund manager pressing the panic button to protect its gains.

    The investor has bought a total of 245,000 put options on the index. The September put option with a 2,800 strike was the most popular DJ Eurostoxx 50 contract yesterday, according to data from Bloomberg.
    .
    .

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: $4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe

      Originally posted by dbarberic View Post
      My non-financial friend fwd the URL to me. I'm not an options trader, but I understand some basics, but not enough to validate this. The writer on the blog sounds like a nut, but can someone verify if the option activity is true, is the volume abnormal as claimed, and what is the potential signficance (with more analytical rigger than claiming a catastrophe).

      http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.com/20...n-4-weeks.html
      A couple comments on that blog suggest that this is not as big of a deal as it has been made out to be:

      Anonymous said...
      Ok, so your theory is that some "investor" sold these calls?
      Are these listed options on the future? If so the CME does not even have this strike listed on their website so this leads me to believe they were traded OTC with a bank and/or banks. Since if it were exchange traded it would be listed on their website. If I am wrong and you have a link to the this contract please post it.

      If I am correct and it was traded OTC I believe there is no multiplier, (that's how we used to do it), so the notional would be 65,000 x 750 = around 50mm USD. Not a large sum.

      If I am wrong about the multiplier there is not a single bank who would take that kind of risk on. No one is giving this "investor" $4.5 billion dollars which he would recieve from writing this option. It's just too big of a trade with not enough of an upside. Why wouldn't the buyer just buy 1440 or 1450 calls where they wouldn't have to pay out that huge premium? There breakeven is 1450. No options trader would do this. Just silly.
      Anonymous said...
      The SPX cash options are traded on the Chicago Board Options Exchange. The open interest for the 700 CALL is 61,730.

      The first clue this is not a smart way play a crash is to see that you could buy the 900 PUTS for .05, the cheapest increment. So why synthetically buy the 700 puts, over 20% lower?

      The second clue is to look at the 1700 PUTS. The open interest is 61,740.

      Also look at the open interest in the 700 puts and 1700 calls.

      It is common practice to trade deep (wide strike) "boxes" in the SPX...buying call, selling put, and selling call, buying put...for interest rate reasons.

      There is no early exercise in the CBOE SPX and no market risk by doing this. All brokers/clearing firms have an interest spread that applies to their customers. If a firm has sold a lot of option premium in its overall portfolio it is receiving interest at the lower rate on it's positive assessed balance...say about 4.6% now. If a firm has bought a lot of option premium then they will have a negative assessed balance and the clearing firm w/ charge them a higher rate for the money to carry that position...say about 5.6% right now. This is NOT a market risk calculation, that is separate, but a money & banking issue.

      So these two firm meet in the middle and price a BOX in the SPX so that the implied interest rate is say... 5.1% and they both come out ahead.

      Sorry if this explanation/theory is somewhat less exciting than the one postulated above.

      Finally, trading deep in the money options are a proxy for stock. You do not need a crash to make money if you are short a deep option. It moves up and down with the market, no matter the size of the move.

      The following statement is simply incorrect: "The entity who sold these contracts can only make money if the stock market totally crashes by the third week in September."

      Now if the blogger is attempting to say the initiating BUYER of these calls was trying to hide his/her real intentions and the sold enough S&P futures to make the calls into synthetic 700 puts, then that would be true. But here again, those puts are offered at .05, so if the trades were efficiently put on, .05 x 100 multiplyer x trade quantity would be the $$$ at risk, or about $300k. Again, he could buy the 900 puts for the same price...over 20% higher...would be a dumb play, and not the correct read on the trade as explained above.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: $4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe

        Originally posted by zoog View Post
        A couple comments on that blog suggest that this is not as big of a deal as it has been made out to be:


        This is an insurance bet, because the trader is actually Long the market with all his other bets and this Crash cover is in case he bet incorrectly. I'll bet these Puts were very, very cheap.
        "Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one."
        - Charles Mackay

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: $4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe

          I think that's a reasonable trade if you believe Ben is going to use a play from Volcker, not Greenspan.

          Break the back of the "bubble" system.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: $4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe

            Volker, wasn't he the Fed guy under "Ronny"? (I miss the 80's!)
            Mike

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: $4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe

              Originally posted by Mega View Post
              Volker, wasn't he the Fed guy under "Ronny"? (I miss the 80's!)
              Mike
              In the early years.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: $4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe

                Originally posted by dbarberic View Post
                Bear in mind that the last time anyone conducted such large and unusual stock option trades (like this one) was in the weeks before the attacks of September 11.
                Back then, they bought huge numbers of PUTS on airline stocks in the same airlines whose planes were involved in the September 11 attacks.
                Despite knowing who made these trades, the Securities and Exchange Commission NEVER revealed who made the unusual trades and no one was ever publicly identified as being responsible for the trades which made upwards of $50 million when the attacks happened.
                I thought this was just a rumor that was discredited?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: $4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe

                  The BBC (that bunch of perennial doomers) are now calling for market meltdown in September

                  http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6970287.stm

                  Maybe they're the guys behind these bets ;)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: $4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe

                    Originally posted by friendly_jacek View Post
                    I thought this was just a rumor that was discredited?
                    Everything that I have read indicates that the option activity on the airlines did occur, but somewhere in the investigative process the ball was dropped and never further pursued.
                    Considering that most of the hijackers were Saudi nationals, maybe the complex web of money traced back to organizations that were supposed to be US allies and the investigation was dropped to prevent embarrassment. But that is just a wild guess and pure speculation.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: $4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe

                      Originally posted by dbarberic View Post
                      Everything that I have read indicates that the option activity on the airlines did occur, but somewhere in the investigative process the ball was dropped and never further pursued.
                      There has been the talk of Carlyle Canada Hedge Fund managers having made those bets. See Hawk's Cafe and "McConnell, Hawkins Describe 9/11 Murder of Burlingame, DeConto"

                      Red team and blue team had different perceptions of their roles in the upcoming war game, thanks to fraudulent side bets on the results of Global Guardian by red team commanders and hedge fund managers of the Carlyle Canada* private equity group.
                      Excuse the tinfoil hat aspects of this -- but the whole 9/11 thing is totally mind boggling no matter which way you look at it!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: $4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe

                        Originally posted by Rajiv View Post
                        There has been the talk of Carlyle Canada Hedge Fund managers having made those bets. See Hawk's Cafe and "McConnell, Hawkins Describe 9/11 Murder of Burlingame, DeConto"



                        Excuse the tinfoil hat aspects of this -- but the whole 9/11 thing is totally mind boggling no matter which way you look at it!
                        There is precedent for pre-attack trades. Here is some decent research on 9/11 trades by a credible site.

                        Here is TheStreet.com's coverage of the bin Laden Trades.
                        Last edited by FRED; August 30, 2007, 11:21 AM.
                        Ed.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: $4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe

                          Originally posted by dbarberic View Post
                          Everything that I have read indicates that the option activity on the airlines did occur, but somewhere in the investigative process the ball was dropped and never further pursued.:p:p
                          :p:p
                          Considering that most of the hijackers were Saudi nationals, maybe the complex web of money traced back to organizations that were supposed to be US allies and the investigation was dropped to prevent embarrassment. But that is just a wild guess and pure speculation.
                          This is the official version I heard:
                          http://www.snopes.com/rumors/putcall.asp
                          I guess it could be a cover-up for sensitive info related to Saudis.
                          Alternatively, FBI, CIA or even Mossad insiders knew of high probability of attacks and likely tipped Bush, who refused to listen.
                          Last edited by friendly_jacek; August 30, 2007, 04:55 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: $4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe

                            From
                            Originally posted by friendly_jacek View Post
                            This is the official version I heard:
                            http://www.snopes.com/rumors/putcall.asp
                            A single U.S. based institutional investor with no conceivable ties to al Qaeda purchased 95 percent of the UAL puts on September 6 as part of a trading strategy that also included buying 115,000 shares of American on September 10.
                            This assumes that Al Qaeda was behind the attack

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: $4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe

                              Folks,

                              Occam's razor wins again: the 'Bin Laden' trade was just some fund/institution taking out a 5%/month quick loan.

                              No planes, no bombs.

                              I discredited the notion from the start - first of all I don't see any counterparty taking on the flip side to this bet without REALLY knowing who the original agent was and why this agent was doing it.

                              From the Option Investor newsletter:

                              Dispelling the Bin Laden Trade
                              8/30/2007 2:22 PM EDT
                              Much has been made of the large and unusual, open interest that has appeared the S&P 500 index options as discussed in this morning's article and a range of online articles such as this that have the conspiracy theorists out in full force. Since it fell into the option domain I would have been remiss in not reporting about it.

                              But I'm glad to now be able to confirm that this was not a cloak and dagger situation and it was least glamorous of the scenarios, that box spread trade, that explains and is the catalysts for the activity.
                              Dan Perder, a Partner at Peak 6 one of the largest option maker makers and proprietary trading firms, told me this morning that his firm was the counterparty to a good portion of the volume and position in question. "This was done as a package in which the box spread was used means of alternative financing at more attractive interest rates" explained Perder.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X