Re: Geothermal pluses and minuses
Yes, but just how much "geothermal fluid and gas" is involved?
Note Hawaii is just a series of volcanoes - I'd just about guarantee it isn't necessary to drill down 2 miles to access high geothermal heat.
This isn't true for most of the rest of the world, including the entire lower 48 of the US.
30 megawatts also is completely puny. Hawaii only has 1 million or so people, so perhaps 30 MW is a significant chunk, but California alone used 258 Terawatt-hours in the year 2000.
Even assuming 100% load factor, this equates to 29.4 Gigawatts of capacity - or over 1000 of the example plants.
Throw in transmission losses, load factors in the 60% to 80% range (fossil fuels) and we're talking serious volumes.
Originally posted by lektrode
Note Hawaii is just a series of volcanoes - I'd just about guarantee it isn't necessary to drill down 2 miles to access high geothermal heat.
This isn't true for most of the rest of the world, including the entire lower 48 of the US.
30 megawatts also is completely puny. Hawaii only has 1 million or so people, so perhaps 30 MW is a significant chunk, but California alone used 258 Terawatt-hours in the year 2000.
Even assuming 100% load factor, this equates to 29.4 Gigawatts of capacity - or over 1000 of the example plants.
Throw in transmission losses, load factors in the 60% to 80% range (fossil fuels) and we're talking serious volumes.
Comment