Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A Brief History of the United States (Fred Reed)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A Brief History of the United States (Fred Reed)

    From Beginning to End
    March 21, 2011


    In 1492 Columbus rediscovered America, and the settlers, destructively exploiting its vast resources, achieved a success which they attributed to their own near-miraculous virtues, some of which they actually had: courage, rude vigor, industry, and an independent spirit. Shortly after, they emerged from WWII unscathed due to the military genius embodied in two oceans while competitors—Europe, Russia, China, and Japan—lay prostrate. America’s intact military and an economy up and running allowed the establishment of a fairly benign empire and an astonishing commercial dominance, both being attributed to near-miraculous virtues and regarded as permanent.

    They didn’t see it coming.

    Japan revived and began producing something it called a Toyota while Detroit, sure of its market, manufactured lousy cars that arrived falling apart, final assembly by owner. Germany revived. Communism still protected America from China, and no one foresaw that this would change. Airbus Industries appeared, but no one believed that it could compete with American know-how and engineering. It did. One by one American manufacturers of airliners took shelter in the military market until only Boeing was left, more or less equal to Airbus. But Americans knew that Europe was socialist and had no work ethic.

    Before long Japan had completely devoured the market for consumer electronics, cameras, and suchlike. Ship-building went, except for builders catering to the captive military market. The steel industry left for foreign shores. Few noticed. Americans knew that their prosperity sprang from their near-miraculous virtues, which foreigners could never achieve.

    Eventually China gave up on communism and became 1.3 billion smart, hard-working people who saw nothing wrong with the idea of becoming the world’s dominant power. Brazil began making airliners and American airlines began buying them. Even India showed signs of life. Americans didn’t worry because they knew that these funny countries couldn’t compete with America’s democratic values.

    Manufacturing jobs began flowing to Asia, first a trickle and then a torrent. Americans didn’t pay attention, not knowing exactly where Asia was. Anyway, those foreigners were comic little people with squinty eyes and ate with sticks. Who could take them seriously? Then design work and programming began emigrating eastward. American had invented the internet and now would pay the price. Intellectual capital had broken free from physical capital. Oops.

    American industry largely ceased to exist, or at least ceased to be American. The big companies became free-floating international entities, adventitiously putting down roots wherever taxes were low and labor cheap, which wasn’t America. An HP laptop now consisted of a CPU from Intel but made perhaps in Ireland, the motherboard, hard drive, power supply and case made in Taiwan, RAM and screen from Samsung, assembled in Taiwan or China, but the label said HP, so it was American.

    The trade balance went sour, and then very sour. The country had long since become captive to consumerism both national and individual, “He who dies with the most toys wins” being a bumper-sticker anthem. At every level America began living on credit, but America’s credit was good, which American’s attributed to near-miraculous virtues which they no longer had, if they had ever had them.

    As the economy invisibly declined, the military’s budget grew and grew. The country could no longer afford it, but the Pentagon was so deeply embedded in the economy and Congress that the country couldn’t stop affording it. The five-sided money hole spent on, an aging kept woman with no obvious purpose since, with the fall of the Soviet Union, America had no military enemies.


    Rest here.

    http://fredoneverything.net/AmericanHistory.shtml

    Not bad: the entirety of US history in 14 short paragraphs.
    Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. -Groucho

  • #2
    Re: A Brief History of the United States (Fred Reed)

    Originally posted by Master Shake View Post
    America had no military enemies.
    When you don't have enemies you create them. (North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, Libya, etc.) All countries that have no chance of ever posing a serious threat to the US yet are considered great "enemies".

    When someone with a sense of reality makes a statement such as James Clapper last week.

    http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...,1768260.story

    The neocons and libs come out gunning, including obama administration distancing themselves from clapper.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...mortal-threat/

    http://content.usatoday.com/communit...re-hot-water/1

    http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpu...-prevail-.html

    Europe also has not had any legitimate military threats, yet they are told to spend more money on NATO and other military crap, all the while the real threat is the mass immigration which is welcomed under the guise of 'diversity' and 'mulitculturalism'

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: A Brief History of the United States (Fred Reed)

      I used to read Reed's stuff but the never-ending negativity gets old. He personally abandoned ship to go live in Mexico with a Mexican woman. Now he sits down there and snipes at the rest of us, telling us how stupid and doomed we are. He never makes real suggestions about how to make things better. His idea of a solution seems to be something like "find a Mexican woman and drink beer and watch the whole ****-house go up in flames." It seems funny and clever for a few pieces and then it just gets tired.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: A Brief History of the United States (Fred Reed)

        Originally posted by Mn_Mark View Post
        I used to read Reed's stuff but the never-ending negativity gets old. He personally abandoned ship to go live in Mexico with a Mexican woman. Now he sits down there and snipes at the rest of us, telling us how stupid and doomed we are. He never makes real suggestions about how to make things better. His idea of a solution seems to be something like "find a Mexican woman and drink beer and watch the whole ****-house go up in flames." It seems funny and clever for a few pieces and then it just gets tired.
        How we gonna make things better, Mark?
        Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. -Groucho

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: A Brief History of the United States (Fred Reed)

          Originally posted by Master Shake View Post
          How we gonna make things better, Mark?
          You need a WE first. Not much anyone can do when the mentality is YOU or I do whatever you or I want without taking into account the consequences of those actions to society and others.

          Comment


          • #6
            Get a Leader with a Vision

            Originally posted by Master Shake View Post
            How we gonna make things better, Mark?
            May I interject?

            As a solution, how about a Vision, plus a Leader who supports & promotes the Vision. Soon, the Leader gets a follower, and we are off to the brave new future.

            One of the best Visions I ever heard was, "We will send a man to the moon and return him to earth safely before the end of the decade". Everybody knew what to do, from the janitor on up. Now that's a Vision!

            Here's a great 3 minute video that demonstrates my point.

            http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/814

            Watch as a crazy dancer (ie. the lone nut who becomes a Leader) soon rallies about 300 people to come join him in 3 minutes or less.

            After that, it's a 9 step process for the leader to make it into maximum effectiveness.
            Last edited by Glenn Black; March 22, 2011, 06:15 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Get a Leader with a Vision

              Originally posted by Glenn Black View Post
              May I interject?

              As a solution, how about a Vision, plus a Leader who supports & promotes the Vision. Soon, the Leader gets a follower, and we are off to the brave new future.

              One of the best Visions I ever heard was, "We will send a man to the moon and return him to earth safely before the end of the decade". Everybody knew what to do, from the janitor on up. Now that's a Vision!

              Here's a great 3 minute video that demonstrates my point. http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/814 This crazy dancer (ie. the lone nut who becomes a Leader), rallies about 300 people to come join him in 3 minutes or less.

              After that, it's a 9 step process for the leader to make it into maximum effectiveness.
              Good old human nature, use a humans own psyche against him. No different than methods by which the FIRE economy is promoted, political ideologies, consumerism, globalism, etc.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Get a Leader with a Vision

                Originally posted by chr5648 View Post
                Good old human nature, use a humans own psyche against him. No different than methods by which the FIRE economy is promoted, political ideologies, consumerism, globalism, etc.
                Interesting response. I would suggest that a Leader & a Vision in isolation, is neither positive nor negative. A lousy Vision can be negative. Manipulation of people is a negative. All tools can be used in a negative or positive manner. For example, a hammer is also a tool, and it can be used for good or evil (eg. can be used to build housing for the homeless, or smash in somebody's head).

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Get a Leader with a Vision

                  The video is funny and can make the points made by the speaker less appreciated. I too had a visceral reaction to it. Instead the question it brings up, is how can I prepare myself to know who and how to follow. Or else I'll just be a schmuck dancing on a hill.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: A Brief History of the United States (Fred Reed)

                    Originally posted by chr5648 View Post
                    When you don't have enemies you create them. (North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, Libya, etc.) All countries that have no chance of ever posing a serious threat to the US yet are considered great "enemies".

                    When someone with a sense of reality makes a statement such as James Clapper last week.

                    http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...,1768260.story

                    The neocons and libs come out gunning, including obama administration distancing themselves from clapper.

                    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...mortal-threat/

                    http://content.usatoday.com/communit...re-hot-water/1

                    http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpu...-prevail-.html

                    Europe also has not had any legitimate military threats, yet they are told to spend more money on NATO and other military crap, all the while the real threat is the mass immigration which is welcomed under the guise of 'diversity' and 'mulitculturalism'
                    It is always curious how those infected with the delusion of egalitarianism come to the most preposterous conclusions.

                    Neocons are obsessed with American Exceptionalism and consider our hordes virtuous. This cat simply seems to think they are just crazy, not corrupted by a sick ideology intent on their extermination.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: A Brief History of the United States (Fred Reed)

                      Originally posted by Master Shake View Post
                      How we gonna make things better, Mark?
                      It depends on the problem you're trying to solve, and of course there are various approaches you could take. Some will work better than others. So there is no single straightforward answer to "how we gonna make thing better?"

                      But I'll tell you what won't do it: sitting around cynically riffing on how everything is sh*t and there's no point to trying anymore because there's no hope. I'll grant that it can be amusing to read that kind of stuff if the writer has a way with words, and yes, everyone feels discouraged sometimes. But in the columns of his that I read over the span of couple years, Reed was just a one-note charlie about how the United States is a dying, hopeless society and the only thing to do is drink and write it off. Ultimately that is an adolescent and useless response to our problems.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Get a Leader with a Vision

                        Originally posted by Glenn Black View Post
                        Interesting response. I would suggest that a Leader & a Vision in isolation, is neither positive nor negative. A lousy Vision can be negative. Manipulation of people is a negative. All tools can be used in a negative or positive manner. For example, a hammer is also a tool, and it can be used for good or evil (eg. can be used to build housing for the homeless, or smash in somebody's head).
                        This is why nobility is such a necessity.

                        The natural intelligence distribution of civilized people is such that there were always be a large number of followers. Leading them to meaningful life and a sense of belonging is the only path towards stability and prosperity.

                        The present crisis, which stems from fundamental liberal principles, assumes that all people are of equal ability and potential and that materialism is the only legitimate universal criterion for success.

                        A major cause of this crisis is the sheer despair of the lower orders of humans who despite unprecedented material prosperity and so-called freedom are more alienated than ever.

                        The point I am trying to make is that it is an essential attribute of lesser men to follow. They cannot achieve happiness without doing so. The problem we have today is democratic capitalism misleads them to desire destructive lives in which they are consumed by their passions.

                        As I have said elsewhere on this forum, the first steps towards reforming society will be the destruction of the centralized system of propaganda that infects the minds of the people, starting with Hollywood and the educational system. Only when that system is crushed do we have a chance. Until then, things will only get worse until social stability is no longer sustainable.

                        At that point, the disheartened masses will easily be swayed to destroy the civilization that has betrayed their naivete with lies. The lowest orders eat and fornicate like animals, while the former working classes of the past now retreat to a world of porn and video games. Tomorrow, the adventure will be real.

                        People with nothing to live for have everything to die for, and the hedonistic-utilitarian creed of liberalism leaves nothing but empty hearts and minds, and a profound sense of disconnection from their extended family to which they instinctively desire to belong.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: A Brief History of the United States (Fred Reed)

                          Originally posted by Mn_Mark View Post
                          It depends on the problem you're trying to solve, and of course there are various approaches you could take. Some will work better than others. So there is no single straightforward answer to "how we gonna make thing better?"

                          But I'll tell you what won't do it: sitting around cynically riffing on how everything is sh*t and there's no point to trying anymore because there's no hope. I'll grant that it can be amusing to read that kind of stuff if the writer has a way with words, and yes, everyone feels discouraged sometimes. But in the columns of his that I read over the span of couple years, Reed was just a one-note charlie about how the United States is a dying, hopeless society and the only thing to do is drink and write it off. Ultimately that is an adolescent and useless response to our problems.
                          The more important question is what does "better" mean? It sounds like this fellow has a chosen a path familiar to every civilized man since antiquity. He has chosen to remain in the land of the lotus eaters.

                          This is a spiritual crisis. The error is the new religion of liberalism that has through unprecedented propaganda crushed the heart and soul of humanity by denying their intrinsic desires and nature. More and more people every day are pulling away and recognizing the grand promise of satisfying every desire is a dead end even if it succeeds. Most would go mad living in that land of the lotus eaters. Nothing can compare to the thrill of victory. And so we wait and see.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: A Brief History of the United States (Fred Reed)

                            Gets some stuff wrong and some stuff right, on the whole I think its pretty good. This right here though:

                            Originally posted by Master Shake View Post
                            adventitiously putting down roots wherever taxes were low and labor cheap, which wasn’t America.
                            for instance is nonsense. Anyone talking about corporate taxes who doesn't mention the EFFECTIVE tax rate (which is among the lowest in the world) and just quotes the highest amount is way off base. Lowering it further would effectively amount to paying corporations to make money, and that is before you consider all the subsidies they get.

                            A quick n' dirty google on the subject will get you this for instance:

                            Ostensibly, the U.S. federal tax code requires corporations to pay 35 percent of their profits in income taxes.
                            But of the 275 Fortune 500 companies that made a profit each year from 2001 to 2003 and for which adequate information to draw conclusions is publicly available, only a small proportion paid federal income taxes anywhere near that statutory 35 percent tax rate. The vast majority paid considerably less.
                            In fact, in 2002 and 2003, the average effective tax rate for all of these 275 companies was less than half the statutory 35 percent rate. Over the 2001-2003 period, effective tax rates ranged from a low of -59.6 percent for Pepco Holdings to a high of 34.5 percent for CVS.
                            Over the three-year period, the average effective rate for all 275 companies dropped by a fifth, from 21.4 percent in 2001 to 17.2 percent in 2002-2003.

                            ...
                            There are a few industry funded research papers that conflict with this but in general you'll find that most everyone agrees that US corporations are only paying around half of what they should be.



                            Bear in mind also its profits and not principal that is taxed, so even if effective tax rates went up to the statutory 40% or so then that would mean that corporations would still make a 60% after tax profit. Also its generally the mega corps that are the ones who really aren't paying their fair share and should be made to pay up, the "little guy" has nothing to worry about.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: A Brief History of the United States (Fred Reed)

                              Originally posted by chr5648 View Post
                              You need a WE first. Not much anyone can do when the mentality is YOU or I do whatever you or I want without taking into account the consequences of those actions to society and others.
                              Our (America's) socio economic base/culture is based on ethical egoism as prescribed by Adam Smith. Which is basically a You or I mentality. So I am not sure what can be done if you are saying we are doomed with that sort of mentality. Some one would have to go about trying to do away with that sorta thinking to get the masses to change. Then from there going about fixing things. Unfortunately I don't see that happening.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X