Gold+Oil_20110223.png
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui
The above chart shows how a new equilibrium level has established itself over the last 3 years between prices for gold bullion and crude oil (WTI: West Texas Intermediate).
The US$ may go up or down as people play on the fringes and speculate. As we can see here, the ratio is getting more and more stable since the major disturbance occurred in March 2008. Also note that there has been a significant shift in the normal ratio, before Mar/08 it was just under 10:1
Now, it is 15.5:1
I wonder why?
There are just a few possibilities. Let's examine them and see if we can discover what's going on.
Gold has certainly moved up in price. Or has it? Could it be that the US$ is what has dropped in value, for gold is sold in US$/troy ounce.
Oil has certainly jumped around in the last 4 years, from $80/bbl, to $147, then quickly back to less than $80 when the Greater Depression hit.
We also have to consider the effect of Peak Cheap Oil. Some people think we hit maximum production in 2008, so it may be more expensive due to supply & demand.
But wait, there's more. Gold has increased greatly since 2001, but they aren't building too many new gold mines. Many of the older ones have re-opened now that the higher price makes it worth while to re-mine the tailings, etc. SO as the market demands more bullion, supply and demand should drive up the price here as well.
Head spinning yet?data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90ada/90ada5f7b366c3bfc6d7cc9a3c6e137a2c7906ef" alt="Confused"
What we know for sure is that it takes 50% more gold ounces to buy a barrel of oil today, as compared to Mar/08.
Speculators make maximum returns when they drive prices up or down. Here, we find the opposite; the price ratio is stabilizing and variability is decreasing. This tends to indicate that speculator, evil banksters, dark pools, etc. are not the major driving force here.
I also think that it's safe to conclude that while gold's price is high, it is well justified and a "fair" price when compared to oil. Therefore there is strong support for the current price of gold. If we assume that gold needs to recover its previous price ratio, do we believe it is more probable that the price of oil drops 50%, or that the price of gold goes up by 50%?
Which scenario do you tend to believe?data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/038c9/038c9c4fff95c620966050f0d3dcd2c10fa1105c" alt="Yes"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3402/b34026bdf44a686bc7d00ec8fcc59afda3b7b45d" alt="No"
In 2005, I was working in Saudi Arabia. I saw and heard how the major Saudi fields are pumping more and more sea water and less and less oil as their oil reservoirs run empty.
Around the world, oil processing plants are getting older each year, and need replacing, yet for the most part, it doesn't occur. Check out Exxon's capital depreciation vs. capital spending, as well as their insured replacement values. These should be very indicative. Why are they (and everybody else in the oil industry) holding so much liquid and short term cash and equivalents? Why aren't the oil companies spending billions to build new plants, new capacity, and keep their existing plants in top notch reliability, efficiency, and capacity? I think the answers all point to the same conclusion. The cost to produce the oil isn't going to go down.
Therefore, we can only assume that the price of gold will be going up in price by as much as 50% from Feb. 2011 prices of $1,411
This gives us a target price for gold of $2,116 per troy ounce.
Fasten your seat belts folks. We're in for a ride as the financial titans and other forces convene to make (or prevent) this from occurring. We get to watch the action from front row seats.
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui
The above chart shows how a new equilibrium level has established itself over the last 3 years between prices for gold bullion and crude oil (WTI: West Texas Intermediate).
The US$ may go up or down as people play on the fringes and speculate. As we can see here, the ratio is getting more and more stable since the major disturbance occurred in March 2008. Also note that there has been a significant shift in the normal ratio, before Mar/08 it was just under 10:1
Now, it is 15.5:1
I wonder why?
There are just a few possibilities. Let's examine them and see if we can discover what's going on.
Gold has certainly moved up in price. Or has it? Could it be that the US$ is what has dropped in value, for gold is sold in US$/troy ounce.
Oil has certainly jumped around in the last 4 years, from $80/bbl, to $147, then quickly back to less than $80 when the Greater Depression hit.
We also have to consider the effect of Peak Cheap Oil. Some people think we hit maximum production in 2008, so it may be more expensive due to supply & demand.
But wait, there's more. Gold has increased greatly since 2001, but they aren't building too many new gold mines. Many of the older ones have re-opened now that the higher price makes it worth while to re-mine the tailings, etc. SO as the market demands more bullion, supply and demand should drive up the price here as well.
Head spinning yet?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90ada/90ada5f7b366c3bfc6d7cc9a3c6e137a2c7906ef" alt="Confused"
What we know for sure is that it takes 50% more gold ounces to buy a barrel of oil today, as compared to Mar/08.
Speculators make maximum returns when they drive prices up or down. Here, we find the opposite; the price ratio is stabilizing and variability is decreasing. This tends to indicate that speculator, evil banksters, dark pools, etc. are not the major driving force here.
I also think that it's safe to conclude that while gold's price is high, it is well justified and a "fair" price when compared to oil. Therefore there is strong support for the current price of gold. If we assume that gold needs to recover its previous price ratio, do we believe it is more probable that the price of oil drops 50%, or that the price of gold goes up by 50%?
Which scenario do you tend to believe?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/038c9/038c9c4fff95c620966050f0d3dcd2c10fa1105c" alt="Yes"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3402/b34026bdf44a686bc7d00ec8fcc59afda3b7b45d" alt="No"
In 2005, I was working in Saudi Arabia. I saw and heard how the major Saudi fields are pumping more and more sea water and less and less oil as their oil reservoirs run empty.
Around the world, oil processing plants are getting older each year, and need replacing, yet for the most part, it doesn't occur. Check out Exxon's capital depreciation vs. capital spending, as well as their insured replacement values. These should be very indicative. Why are they (and everybody else in the oil industry) holding so much liquid and short term cash and equivalents? Why aren't the oil companies spending billions to build new plants, new capacity, and keep their existing plants in top notch reliability, efficiency, and capacity? I think the answers all point to the same conclusion. The cost to produce the oil isn't going to go down.
Therefore, we can only assume that the price of gold will be going up in price by as much as 50% from Feb. 2011 prices of $1,411
This gives us a target price for gold of $2,116 per troy ounce.
Fasten your seat belts folks. We're in for a ride as the financial titans and other forces convene to make (or prevent) this from occurring. We get to watch the action from front row seats.
Comment