Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Gaming the Cold War

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Gaming the Cold War

    “Russians don’t take a dump, son, without a plan.” – Admiral Painter, The Hunt For Red October


    A funny thing happened in the world of board gaming on Dec. 9, 2010; the top-ranked game for the better part of 7 years running on BoardGameGeek was usurped by a very unlikely candidate – Twilight Struggle, a massively strategic, chit-laden, brain-grinding, two-player game about the Cold War, released in 2005. Huh. And this is why I love the board gaming community. This is also why, four hours after learning the news, I walked out of my favorite local game store with Twilight Struggle under my arms and my wife and I proceeded to get about 4 hours sleep over the next five days.

    Upon opening the heavily-compacted box, we discovered that there were about 1,687,241 little cardboard chits, divided amongst two cardboard sheets. While the wife practiced her chit-punching skills, I dove into the rulebook. The instructions read like the missile codes for silo 237 near Tribune, Kansas, or the operations manual for a 1968 Dodge Dart. There were numbers everywhere, and every single line in the rulebook is coded so that rules earlier or later in the rulebook can use this code for cross-referencing. It’s all a bit reminiscent of a large-print Bible or the 8 volume statute laws for housing in Brooklyn, and can be a bit intimidating. Luckily, this was not my first “war” game, and so the concepts were far from alien.

    After about an hour of surveying the territory and going over the rules for the third time, the wife took on the side of the free world, while I readied the Red Tide. After that first game, I was tempted to call the game Twilight Imperium Struggle because of its length. That first game took us almost 3 hours, and we only made it to round 5. Things seemingly got better when our second game ended at round 6 and it only took us 1.5 hours. Of course, that’s when we realized that we had missed rule 23.1.10.z.5x.B that made the game much, much more complex.

    Despite the thickish, cross-indexed rulebook, the underlying gameplay and concepts of Twilight Struggle are fairly simple. The period of play begins at the end of World War II, as Germany is split between Soviet and US occupation; the two players of the game assume the roles of these burgeoning superpowers. The game is broken into ten rounds, each representing a particular span of time in the Cold War, ending in 1989. The goal of the game is to spread enough influence throughout the world to become the reigning superpower by the end of round 10.

    OPERATIONS

    Each player spreads influence and affects their standings in the world through play of cards that are received each round. Every card contains a starred number, the color of which indicates which side benefits from the event listed on the card, should that event be activated. The number represents how many Operations (Ops) Points that card provides the player when the card is put into play. These Operation Points can be used in various ways to try and control a country and therefore score more points in that region when the region is scored.


    Operation Points may be used in the following ways:
    • INFLUENCE. Ops Points are used to Influence a country for control. If a country contains no influence of another superpower, then the player may place one Influence Point per Ops Point spent. When that player has an equal or greater amount of Influence than the country’s Stability score, then that player controls the country. When a country is controlled by another superpower, cost of another player placing influence there is doubled.
    • REALIGNMENT ROLLS. These high risk, high yield rolls are used to reduce the amount of Influence an opponent has in a country while raising the player’s own. The risk is that, with a bad die roll, the opponent may gain more Influence there than was present previously.
    • COUPS. In a coup, a player uses Ops Points to boost a die roll in an effort to use military force to take control of a country. The outcome of a coup is more easily controlled than a realignment roll, but attempting coups on “battleground” countries will cause the Defcon level to drop. When the world hits Defcon 1, nuclear war breaks out and everybody loses. This is, of course, a very bad thing.

    EVENTS

    Each card, with the exception of Scoring cards, is also playable as an Event. If the color of the numbered star matches the player’s superpower – blue for the US and red for the USSR – then that player may opt to activate the event associated with the card, instead of using the number inside the star as Ops Points. When played, the effect on the game is thematically tied to the event, creating not only a reason for the event, but also a close tie to the overall theme. For instance, the Fidel card allows the Soviet player to take control of Cuba. This card is an Early War card, which means that it comes into play within the first three rounds of the game.
    If a card displays a numbered star with a color opposite of the player’s superpower, then that Event is activated if the player uses the card for Ops Points. The good news is that the player receives some Ops Points – the bad news is that your opponent is going to get a nifty little bonus with which you’ll have to contend.


    SCORING


    Mixed in amongst the Event cards are certain Scoring cards which, when played, force players to tally up controlled countries in a certain region and determine scores. Typically, players will have one or two cards left over each round that they can hold in their hands to the next round, hoping to make a big play or minimize the effects of a particularly nasty Event that will benefit their opponents. Scoring cards cannot be held from round to round; all Scoring cards must be played before the end of the round, even if that means holding onto cards that may help a player to gain more Influence.

    STRATEGY

    Twilight Struggle is all about balance – how best to keep your Influence spreading in the world while containing your opponent’s Influence, matching lost Scoring opportunities, minimizing the effects of detrimental Events, and figuring out the right mix of long-term strategy with immediate tactical play. Here are a few key points that are essential for solid play in Twilight Struggle:
    • EVENT MANAGEMENT. Each player will typically find a healthy mix of both red and blue cards in their hand each round, so it is essential to calculate when to play a card that will trigger an Event that is detrimental to your superpower and then diffusing the effects of that card through clever use of Ops Points.
    • THE SPACE RACE. Each superpower can discard card(s) of a certain Ops Point value to try to advance in the Space Race each round. By advancing, the player can gain both victory points and/or special abilities, as well as get rid of a card that would trigger a particularly nasty opponent’s Event.
    • PATIENCE AND DILIGENCE. This game is mostly a struggle for the US player. US players must not get discouraged. Just like in the real Cold War, the Americans are up against a Red Tide and they have to stick it out for the long war. My wife and I have played Twilight Struggle over eight times now, and each time the US has lost to the Soviets; however, each time the strategy of the US become clearer and clearer. It is very important for the US player to make wise tactical decisions in the early game to contain the Soviets, then focus on their long-term plans for scoring around mid-game as the mix of helpful US Events will begin to outweigh the strong Soviet Events from the Early War. The last game my wife and I played I managed to take the US all the way until the final round and then eventually lost in final scoring because of a tactical error in Europe in round 8. Had I stayed completely focused on controlling Europe, I likely would have celebrated as the Berlin Wall fell.


    Overall, Twilight Struggle can be a grueling, grinding experience, but the end rewards are rich. Rarely have I played a game more balanced in strategy and tactics, where every decision is crucial. The mechanics of the game are incredibly tight, which, when combined with abilities and historical flavor of the cards, can create a truly immersive experience.

    One of the game’s amazing qualities is how well the cards and the situations around the board can recreate history; at one point, my wife and I spent almost an entire round fighting a long, prolonged struggle for influence over Cuba while the Cuban Missile Crisis loomed. In a later game, we fought vehemently for control of East Germany at about the time that Reagan asked for Gorbachev to tear the wall down. It is this attention to detail and the resulting gameplay which makes you feel as though you are not only living history, but influencing it, that makes Twilight Struggle transcend the ordinary and chronicle this extraordinary period of the 20th century all in the placement of a single chit and the smooth roll of a die.
    Gameplay/ReplayComponents & ThemeFun
    There's barely another adjective that can express Twilight Struggle's gameplay other than intense. For the 3+ hours of a typical game, your mind is on full throttle the entire time. The game is fully card-driven, which makes for a very immersive, unique and variable experience. This variability also lends the game a very high replay value. Rarely has any round of the game that we've played been the same, and that bodes well for those who relish the challenge this game offers.The board is massive, and the wave of chits that cover its breadth impressive. The colors are limited, but magnificent, nonetheless. It's very easy to see the scope of the situation at any given moment given the components. The theme is inherent in almost every conflict, card and decision; the game plays out the events and hard tactics of the actual Cold War so perfectly, it would have saved everyone a lot of trouble had it been invented in 1945.Judging this category is difficult for Twilight Struggle. Is the game fun? In the traditional sense - where you all sit around and laugh at the misfortune of Johnny Adderall or the silly answer that your Aunt Sally gave in Trivial Pursuit - Twilight Struggle can't even register on the same scale. The game is an entirely different animal; the fun in reenacting the Cold War lies in the experience and the thrill of matching wits with a wily and often devastatingly offensive opponent. Much of the fun comes in the long, detailed analysis in which you and your opponent will engage after the battle is long over. Despite the long conflict and sometimes-fatigue-inducing gameplay, even the most devastating defeat will leave you clamoring for more. That's not addiction, or hubris - that, my friends, is pure, unbridled love for a game and of The Game. Nothing can be more fun than that.



  • #2
    Re: Gaming the Cold War

    The Hunt for Red October was a very entertaining movie, but was 100% incorrect in its characterization of Russia and its people.

    Then again, Tom Clancy was writing to his audience, so it shouldn't be too surprising.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Gaming the Cold War

      Originally posted by c1ue View Post
      The Hunt for Red October was a very entertaining movie, but was 100% incorrect in its characterization of Russia and its people.

      Then again, Tom Clancy was writing to his audience, so it shouldn't be too surprising.
      Wonder what Tom's sales in Russia were?

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Gaming the Cold War

        If those I know are any indication, I wouldn't be travelling to Russia any time soon were I Tom Clancy.

        The book and movie, I consider entertainment. The Russians I know all consider the behavior encapsulated therein treason of the highest order.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Gaming the Cold War

          The Hunt for Red October was a very entertaining movie, but was 100% incorrect in its characterization of Russia and its people.
          Both sides played this game. Russians/Soviets had their version of the West and the West of them.

          So Clancy "mission" was to make them look evil with one smart guy who knew what was the Best.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Gaming the Cold War

            Originally posted by c1ue View Post
            If those I know are any indication, I wouldn't be travelling to Russia any time soon were I Tom Clancy.

            The book and movie, I consider entertainment. The Russians I know all consider the behavior encapsulated therein treason of the highest order.
            Tom Clancy is Russian!?

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Gaming the Cold War

              Originally posted by flintlock View Post
              Tom Clancy is Russian!?
              Card #36 in the game

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Gaming the Cold War

                Originally posted by flintlock
                Tom Clancy is Russian!?
                That may be, but that won't save him.

                The hatchet job he did in 'Red October' as well as his other books really makes Russians angry - only were he a defector would it be any worse.

                Many people just don't get how patriotic Russians are.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Gaming the Cold War

                  Originally posted by c1ue View Post
                  That may be, but that won't save him.

                  The hatchet job he did in 'Red October' as well as his other books really makes Russians angry - only were he a defector would it be any worse.

                  Many people just don't get how patriotic Russians are.
                  First clue: their performance in WW2.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Gaming the Cold War

                    Originally posted by don View Post
                    First clue: their performance in WW2.
                    Well that and the NKVD officer at their back with one of these.



                    Russian soldiers were terrified of the NKVD. At Stalingrad alone, supposedly thousands of Russians were shot as "deserters". The Germans were able to form large numbers on the South front with Russian/Ukrainian deserters and other rabble who defected rather than face the NKVD for failing to hold their positions. Most fought to the death as they knew there would be no surrender for them. Some of these "Ost" units faced US GIs when they hit the beaches at Normandy as well.

                    I'd be more inclined to attribute revenge to the fury of the Russian soldier than patriotism. Germany really did a number on them and the Russians let them know they didn't appreciate it. Until the time of Stalingrad, patriotism was mostly linked to loyalty to the party, not mother Russia. Only out of desperation did Stalin start allowing patriotic references to famous leaders of the old Empire, like Kutuzov.
                    Last edited by flintlock; February 24, 2011, 10:56 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Gaming the Cold War

                      You married well Don. Very well.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Gaming the Cold War

                        I read the book a long time ago but don't remember much about the portrayal of the Russians. How were they portrayed?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Gaming the Cold War

                          Originally posted by flintlock
                          Russian soldiers were terrified of the NKVD. At Stalingrad alone, supposedly thousands of Russians were shot as "deserters". The Germans were able to form large numbers on the South front with Russian/Ukrainian deserters and other rabble who defected rather than face the NKVD for failing to hold their positions. Most fought to the death as they knew there would be no surrender for them. Some of these "Ost" units faced US GIs when they hit the beaches at Normandy as well.

                          I'd be more inclined to attribute revenge to the fury of the Russian soldier than patriotism. Germany really did a number on them and the Russians let them know they didn't appreciate it. Until the time of Stalingrad, patriotism was mostly linked to loyalty to the party, not mother Russia. Only out of desperation did Stalin start allowing patriotic references to famous leaders of the old Empire, like Kutuzov.
                          You're almost right, but not right.

                          Yes, the Germans had a large number of nominally Russian troops. But these were rarely ethnic Russians, they were generally Baltics (Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia), Ukrainians, and various other Eastern European groups. See the Estonian SS memorial.

                          All of the above groups consider themselves not Russian, though the Russians all consider them to be part of Russia!

                          And yes, there were NKVD troops in Stalingrad.

                          But this nice story doesn't hold up well: in Stalingrad, the fighting was so chaotic, so disorganized, and so brutal that it is debatable just how well NKVD military police units could contain hundreds of thousands of literally starving and armed people. These people could just as easily have surrendered, rather than dig in and literally fight tooth and nail.

                          Equally so, the Germans suffered through massive partisan warfare in their supply lines despite extremely brutal reprisal tactics.

                          And don't forget - no matter what the cause - it is extremely unusual to see any nation suck up 20-25+ million dead out of a total population of 110M to 125M, and not surrender.

                          Civil War losses in comparison, so devastating to the US, were 400K out of a population of 31.5M

                          As for the party - certainly the official line was loyalty to the Communist Party.

                          Much as the official line during the Tsars was loyalty to the Tsars.

                          For Russians, the concept of Rodina - the motherland - extends above and beyond any purely temporal secular government or even religious belief.

                          By the way, did you know that the book was originally published by the US Naval Institute?

                          Why is a US military institution in the business of publishing fiction?
                          Last edited by c1ue; February 25, 2011, 10:19 AM.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X