Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Finding the ON Switch

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Finding the ON Switch

    I'm going long on the NSA on this one . . .



    Decentralizing the Internet So Big Brother Can’t Find You

    By JIM DWYER

    On Tuesday afternoon, as Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton spoke in Washington about the Internet and human liberty, a Columbia law professor in Manhattan, Eben Moglen, was putting together a shopping list to rebuild the Internet — this time, without governments and big companies able to watch every twitch of our fingers.

    The list begins with “cheap, small, low-power plug servers,” Mr. Moglen said. “A small device the size of a cellphone charger, running on a low-power chip. You plug it into the wall and forget about it.”

    Almost anyone could have one of these tiny servers, which are now produced for limited purposes but could be adapted to a full range of Internet applications, he said.

    “They will get very cheap, very quick,” Mr. Moglen said. “They’re $99; they will go to $69. Once everyone is getting them, they will cost $29.”

    The missing ingredients are software packages, which are available at no cost but have to be made easy to use. “You would have a whole system with privacy and security built in for the civil world we are living in,” he said. “It stores everything you care about.”

    Put free software into the little plug server in the wall, and you would have a Freedom Box that would decentralize information and power, Mr. Moglen said. This month, he created the Freedom Box Foundation to organize the software.

    “We have to aim our engineering more directly at politics now,” he said. “What has happened in Egypt is enormously inspiring, but the Egyptian state was late to the attempt to control the Net and not ready to be as remorseless as it could have been.”

    Not many law professors have Mr. Moglen’s credentials as lawyer and geek, or, for that matter, his record as an early advocate for what looked like very long shots.

    Growing up on the West Side of Manhattan, he began fooling around with computers as a boy. In 1973, at age 14, he was employed writing programs for the Scientific Time Sharing Corporation. At 26, he was a young lawyer, clerking for Justice Thurgood Marshall. Later, he got a Ph.D. in history from Yale. He was also the lawyer for the Free Software Foundation, headed by Richard M. Stallman, which aggressively — and successfully — protected the ability of computer scientists, hackers and hobbyists to build software that was not tied up by copyright, licensing and patents.

    In the first days of the personal computer era, many scoffed at the idea that free software could have an important place in the modern world. Today, it is the digital genome for millions of phones, printers, cameras, MP3 players, televisions, the Pentagon, the New York Stock Exchange and the computers that underpin Google’s empire.

    This month, Mr. Moglen, who now runs the Software Freedom Law Center, spoke to a convention of 2,000 free-software programmers in Brussels, urging them to get to work on the Freedom Box.

    Social networking has changed the balance of political power, he said, “but everything we know about technology tells us that the current forms of social network communication, despite their enormous current value for politics, are also intensely dangerous to use. They are too centralized; they are too vulnerable to state retaliation and control.”

    In January, investors were said to have put a value of about $50 billion on Facebook, the social network founded by Mark Zuckerberg. If revolutions for freedom rest on the shoulders of Facebook, Mr. Moglen said, the revolutionaries will have to count on individuals who have huge stakes in keeping the powerful happy.
    “It is not hard, when everybody is just in one big database controlled by Mr. Zuckerberg, to decapitate a revolution by sending an order to Mr. Zuckerberg that he cannot afford to refuse,” Mr. Moglen said.

    By contrast, with tens of thousands of individual encrypted servers, there would be no one place where a repressive government could find out who was publishing or reading “subversive” material.

    In response to Mr. Moglen’s call for help, a group of developers working in a free operating system called Debian have started to organize Freedom Box software. Four students from New York University who heard a talk by Mr. Moglen last year have been building a decentralized social network called Diaspora.

    Mr. Moglen said that if he could raise “slightly north of $500,000,” Freedom Box 1.0 would be ready in one year.

    “We should make this far better for the people trying to make change than for the people trying to make oppression,” Mr. Moglen said. “Being connected works.”

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/16/ny...l?ref=nyregion

  • #2
    Re: Finding the ON Switch

    Funny this is mentioned. I'm close to launching a website (non-profit) which deals with running the latest Debian release on computers with a focus on low-power devices using the Marvel Kirkwood architecture, which is also used in the sheevaplug device as appears in the picture.

    My main focus won't be about de-centralizing internet though. I'm focussed about running software packages that will decrease your dependency on cloud computing (i.e. run your own email server, VPN server, a recursive caching DNS resolver, web server, etc). It's an idea of me to share my knowledge to decrease dependency on third parties for private data.
    Last edited by FrankL; February 17, 2011, 12:58 PM.
    engineer with little (or even no) economic insight

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Finding the ON Switch

      Originally posted by FrankL View Post
      Funny this is mentioned. I'm close to launching a website (non-profit) which deals with running the latest Debian release on computers with a focus on low-power devices using the Marvel Kirkwood architecture, which is also used in the sheevaplug device as appears in the picture.

      My main focus won't be about de-centralizing internet though. I'm focussed about running software packages that will decrease your dependency on cloud computing (i.e. run your own email server, VPN server, a recursive caching DNS resolver, web server, etc). It's an idea of me to share my knowledge to decrease dependency on third parties for private data.
      Frank- Could you share your thoughts on the cloud computing movement?

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Finding the ON Switch

        Originally posted by don View Post
        Frank- Could you share your thoughts on the cloud computing movement?
        Cloud Computing is a vague term used for various meanings.

        Google pushes for it in the sense that they want people to use web-based software and storage for their everyday use. Think google gmail for email, google docs for office needs, etc. With a standards compliant web browser it is OS agnostic and available from any device with internet access. It's part of their monetization of user's private data by being able to launch more individually tailored advertisements (the main revenue motor of Google). I personally think it is a very dangerous development to give access to loads of private data to any big corporation, as you never know what they do with this access in future or behind closed doors.

        Companies like Amazon push for the term cloud computing as in using datacenters for out-sourcing computational and bandwidth capacity (check out Amazon EC2). Once datacenters pass a energy efficiency per computational unit that is a certain factor beyond what user computers provide, it will be very interesting to offload computationally intensive tasks to the cloud (datacenter). Think rendering 3d animations, encoding video, etc. You may also add online gaming to this cloud paradigm with the OnLive service, although I have my doubts about the added network latency for this to be very successful. Right now this form of cloud computing is mostly used for webhosting and by big corporations that outsource computational power for very specific tasks. Mainstream success in this area depends on when big players like Microsoft and Apple provide for an API in their OS that allows applications to access the computational power in the cloud. Once successful, it might allow for a shift to much lower power consumer computer devices. Microsoft announcing that Windows 8 will be available for ARM architecture (currently the low power cpu architecture that dominates cellphones and tablets) might be a hint that they're going onto this road, so keep an eye on them. Apple already having a OS and devices for this architecture (iphone OS) means they are serious about this direction too (although they currently seem focused on monetizing access to content such as applications, ebooks/magazines, video and music). I personally find this form of cloud computing far more attractive, as power hungry applications don't necessarily handle sensitive personal data as Google does.
        Last edited by FrankL; February 17, 2011, 02:37 PM.
        engineer with little (or even no) economic insight

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Finding the ON Switch

          Thanks, Frank. That coincides with my less-tech take on a FIRE-friendly all fee/little product campaign. I've been using the Adobe suite for years. The thought of being a "cable subscriber" as the only way to stay abreast with the programs turns my stomach, as well as your point. . .

          as you never know what they do with this access in future or behind closed doors..
          (The choice of the label Cloud Computing sure is a flashback to the daze when there was some marketing artistry in the biz. For us non-techs, the intrigue when we first heard the term, Windows . . . )

          Comment

          Working...
          X