Re: Get a safe, hold cash, and wait for the buying opportunity.
Spartacus,
Thanks for your reply.
Unfortunately, very true.
I've been aware at this downside of Treasuries, but chose to look at them from the perspective of "Where can I invest to lose the least during the next 5 years?"
I hadn't thought of tax-free municipals, which would get around the problem of taxing inflated gains.
But there are a couple of things that come up for me about this . . . .
I don't know much about municipal bonds, but I suspect that their returns aren't indexed to inflation.
So, if the Fed decides to inflate away the current economic problems, one is stuck with a low interest rate for several years.
The benefit of Treasuries is that they can be short-term, so as inflation rises, one can continually reinvest at ever-increasing interest rates. (I'm assuming Treasury yields would rise along with inflation, but maybe that's not the case.)
I suppose if you could find very short-term municipals, you could accomplish the same thing, but I don't know if these exist. Do you know of some?
Regards safety . . . .
According to one source, there are 3 types of municipal bonds, two of which concern the small investor:
If there is a recession in which many businesses fail, people lose jobs and housing is devalued, there would be a dramatic reduction in municipal tax revenues. I don't know if municipalities invest in securities, but if they do, they may also experience a loss of assets and income from this.
What would municipalities do in the case where they couldn't pay off their bonds due to decreased revenues?
At first, I expect they would just delay payments, extending the payoffs to a later time in the hope that things would get better.
They also could sharply cut services to raise money, but then the public would be up in arms. Perhaps there would be a lot of pressure to shift the losses to the bond holders.
If there were a protracted recession/depression, they might just default and say, "Sorry, we haven't got it." My Ukrainian wife tells me that's what happened in her country after the Soviet breakup in 1991.
As discussed above, if the Fed decides to inflate out of the economic mess, then the value of longer term municipal bonds would plummet.
So, all things (that I can think of) considered, I don't see how municipals are better than Treasuries.
Finally, you suggested:
After seeing the unison drops in the world markets in the past weeks, I'm thinking no one country is safer than another. It seems that everyone is invested in the dollar, and if we go down, they go down. That makes me hesitate to invest in another country's government bonds.
I'd appreciate your thoughts on all this . . . .
Spartacus,
Thanks for your reply.
In a high-inflation environment, with US treasuries you could be paying taxes on inflation "gains".
I've been aware at this downside of Treasuries, but chose to look at them from the perspective of "Where can I invest to lose the least during the next 5 years?"
I hadn't thought of tax-free municipals, which would get around the problem of taxing inflated gains.
But there are a couple of things that come up for me about this . . . .
Just out of curiosity, what do you think would happen to the bonds of the safest, best-run municipalities in the US?
So, if the Fed decides to inflate away the current economic problems, one is stuck with a low interest rate for several years.
The benefit of Treasuries is that they can be short-term, so as inflation rises, one can continually reinvest at ever-increasing interest rates. (I'm assuming Treasury yields would rise along with inflation, but maybe that's not the case.)
I suppose if you could find very short-term municipals, you could accomplish the same thing, but I don't know if these exist. Do you know of some?
Regards safety . . . .
According to one source, there are 3 types of municipal bonds, two of which concern the small investor:
1. General obligation bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the issuing agency. For municipal bonds, full faith and credit also means the taxing power of the issuing municipality.
2. Revenue bonds are backed by the funds from a designated tax or the revenues from a specific project, authority, or agency. These bonds are not backed by the full faith and credit (or the taxing power) of the issuing agency. In other words, revenue bonds are only as good (and as creditworthy) as the ventures they support.
#1 is obviously the safer of the two . . . .2. Revenue bonds are backed by the funds from a designated tax or the revenues from a specific project, authority, or agency. These bonds are not backed by the full faith and credit (or the taxing power) of the issuing agency. In other words, revenue bonds are only as good (and as creditworthy) as the ventures they support.
If there is a recession in which many businesses fail, people lose jobs and housing is devalued, there would be a dramatic reduction in municipal tax revenues. I don't know if municipalities invest in securities, but if they do, they may also experience a loss of assets and income from this.
What would municipalities do in the case where they couldn't pay off their bonds due to decreased revenues?
At first, I expect they would just delay payments, extending the payoffs to a later time in the hope that things would get better.
They also could sharply cut services to raise money, but then the public would be up in arms. Perhaps there would be a lot of pressure to shift the losses to the bond holders.
If there were a protracted recession/depression, they might just default and say, "Sorry, we haven't got it." My Ukrainian wife tells me that's what happened in her country after the Soviet breakup in 1991.
As discussed above, if the Fed decides to inflate out of the economic mess, then the value of longer term municipal bonds would plummet.
So, all things (that I can think of) considered, I don't see how municipals are better than Treasuries.
Finally, you suggested:
Still, if you're going the government backed bond route, a little diversification would not hurt, as long it doesn't cost too much extra.
I'd appreciate your thoughts on all this . . . .
Comment