Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pretense be Damned: Supreme Court Justice's Wife Now a Lobbyist

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pretense be Damned: Supreme Court Justice's Wife Now a Lobbyist

    Justice Thomas’s Wife Sets Up a Conservative Lobbying Shop

    By ERIC LICHTBLAU

    WASHINGTON — The wife of Justice Clarence Thomas, who has raised her political profile in the last year through her outspoken conservative activism, is rebranding herself as a lobbyist and self-appointed “ambassador to the Tea Party movement.”

    Virginia Thomas, the justice’s wife, said on libertyinc.co, a Web site for her new political consulting business, that she saw herself as an advocate for “liberty-loving citizens” who favored limited government, free enterprise and other core conservative issues. She promised to use her “experience and connections” to help clients raise money and increase their political impact.

    Ms. Thomas’s effort to take a more operational role on conservative issues could intensify questions about her husband’s ability to remain independent on issues like campaign finance and health care, legal ethicists said.

    Justice Thomas “should not be sitting on a case or reviewing a statute that his wife has lobbied for,” said Monroe H. Freedman, a Hofstra Law School professor specializing in legal ethics. “If the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, that creates a perception problem.”

    Ms. Thomas’s founding of her own political consulting shop, Liberty Consulting, was first reported Thursday by Politico, which said she had begun reaching out to freshmen Republicans in Congress.

    The move comes a few months after she gave up the top spot at Liberty Central, a conservative Web site that she founded in 2009 and that has strong links to the Tea Party movement.

    An anonymous $500,000 donation to start up Liberty Central came from Harlan Crow, a Dallas real estate investor and Republican financier, Politico reported.
    Mr. Crow, reached by phone Friday, would not say whether he was the source of the money. “I disclose what I’m required by law to disclose,” he said, “and I don’t disclose what I’m not required to disclose.”

    Ms. Thomas did not respond to telephone and e-mail requests for an interview on Friday. The Daily Caller reported in December that she had said in an interview that she was looking forward to a new role involving “lobbying on Capitol Hill” and a variety of other hands-on operational duties.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/05/us...thomas.html?hp

  • #2
    Re: Pretense be Damned: Supreme Court Justice's Wife Now a Lobbyist

    Time for Virginia to place another friendly call to Ms. Hill

    "According to records filed with the IRS, Virginia “Ginny” Thomas was paid $686,589 by the Heritage Foundation, a think tank, for her work there from 2003-07. Published reports indicate that Ms. Thomas also drew a salary from Liberty Central, a political education and action group she co-founded in 2009.

    None of his wife’s earnings are disclosed on Justice Thomas’ annual financial disclosure forms, however. The Ethics in Government Act of 1978 requires federal officials, including Supreme Court justices, to disclose their spouse’s income. On the appropriate section of his 2003 to 2009 disclosure forms, Justice Thomas checked the box for “none.”

    Common Cause

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Pretense be Damned: Supreme Court Justice's Wife Now a Lobbyist

      The Thomas are a high profile example of the complete corruption of Washington.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Pretense be Damned: Supreme Court Justice's Wife Now a Lobbyist

        Waiter, there's a hair in my tea.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Pretense be Damned: Supreme Court Justice's Wife Now a Lobbyist

          Originally posted by housingcrashsurvivor View Post
          Waiter, there's a hair in my tea.
          Maybe some of you are too young to remember the "high tech lynching" Justice Thomas got from the racially-sensitive but hyper-hypocritical Left during his confirmation hearing. I don't. Ted Kennedy is doing time on a meat rack in Hell for some of the things he said.

          And because of that, I say, if you don't like what his wife is up to, "Tough."

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Pretense be Damned: Supreme Court Justice's Wife Now a Lobbyist

            Originally posted by cpnscarlet View Post
            ... And because of that, I say, if you don't like what his wife is up to, "Tough."
            Are you saying that previous offenses to the Justice and his wife give her some sort of immunity so that she can be corrupt and we must accept it?

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Pretense be Damned: Supreme Court Justice's Wife Now a Lobbyist

              Originally posted by thriftyandboringinohio View Post
              Are you saying that previous offenses to the Justice and his wife give her some sort of immunity so that she can be corrupt and we must accept it?
              No...even more basic than that. I won't even devote the nuerons to consider that what she's doing is "corrupt" especially when the Judiciary and Legislature are independent branches of government, and therefore any lobbying of congress cannot affect a Supreme Court decision. Unless, of course, congress wants to impeach a Justice or overturn a Supreme Court decision....which last happened.....????

              Remember when Hillary (an unelected presidential family member in the 1990s) was directing domestic policy like she was actually elected as "co-president". I don't remember too many complaints - typical pinko double standard I hear in this thread.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Pretense be Damned: Supreme Court Justice's Wife Now a Lobbyist

                Originally posted by cpnscarlet View Post
                I don't remember too many complaints - typical pinko double standard I hear in this thread.
                Whoa there, Sen. McCarthy. The 50s are that-a-way <--

                You know, 60 years ago, over near the Fonz.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Pretense be Damned: Supreme Court Justice's Wife Now a Lobbyist

                  Originally posted by dcarrigg View Post
                  Whoa there, Sen. McCarthy. The 50s are that-a-way <--

                  You know, 60 years ago, over near the Fonz.
                  whoooo.... ok, i guess i'll stay out of this one, looks like its about to go HOT
                  c1ue's onto to something over at:
                  http://www.itulip.com/forums/showthr...n-then-and-now

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Pretense be Damned: Supreme Court Justice's Wife Now a Lobbyist

                    Originally posted by dcarrigg View Post
                    Whoa there, Sen. McCarthy. The 50s are that-a-way <--

                    You know, 60 years ago, over near the Fonz.
                    Actually, thanks to the fall of the Soviet Union, and the declassification of many soviet files, it is now a matter of historical record that McCarthy was pretty much right, and the liberal douchebag media was, in fact, wrong.

                    http://www.spongobongo.com/em/em9820.htm

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Pretense be Damned: Supreme Court Justice's Wife Now a Lobbyist

                      Originally posted by cpnscarlet View Post
                      ... I won't even .. consider that what she's doing is "corrupt" ...(
                      That approach should work well to prevent drawing the conclusion.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Pretense be Damned: Supreme Court Justice's Wife Now a Lobbyist

                        Originally posted by cpnscarlet View Post
                        No...even more basic than that. I won't even devote the nuerons to consider that what she's doing is "corrupt" especially when the Judiciary and Legislature are independent branches of government, and therefore any lobbying of congress cannot affect a Supreme Court decision. Unless, of course, congress wants to impeach a Justice or overturn a Supreme Court decision....which last happened.....????

                        Remember when Hillary (an unelected presidential family member in the 1990s) was directing domestic policy like she was actually elected as "co-president". I don't remember too many complaints - typical pinko double standard I hear in this thread.
                        Reminder of iTulip Forum rule #1: Treat your fellow members with respect. Carry on.
                        Ed.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Pretense be Damned: Supreme Court Justice's Wife Now a Lobbyist

                          thai politics, US supreme court, 2008 meltdown, egypt...

                          yeah for al jazeera

                          http://english.aljazeera.net/watch_now/

                          http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/02/01-1

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Pretense be Damned: Supreme Court Justice's Wife Now a Lobbyist

                            Originally posted by BuckarooBanzai View Post
                            Actually, thanks to the fall of the Soviet Union, and the declassification of many soviet files, it is now a matter of historical record that McCarthy was pretty much right, and the liberal douchebag media was, in fact, wrong.

                            http://www.spongobongo.com/em/em9820.htm
                            Do you have a more authoritative source than persian rug notes by Barry O'Connell at spongobongo.com?

                            Regardless, the thread is off track.

                            There is general public interest involved in partisan and/or corporate lobbying performed by the spouses of Supreme Court justices. A decision can make or break entire industries, political policies, and/or fortunes. A vested family interest put forth to the public in this manner is not a good thing. Pretense matters! Certainly it is ethically questionable, regardless of party affiliation.

                            Of course, it's also ethically questionable to accept an $800 NASCAR leather coat, or take $10k in free country club memberships, but 5 of them did it according to this article from 2006:
                            http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Inve...ory?id=1534260.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Pretense be Damned: Supreme Court Justice's Wife Now a Lobbyist

                              Originally posted by FRED View Post
                              Reminder of iTulip Forum rule #1: Treat your fellow members with respect. Carry on.
                              Thanks Fred.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X