Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New York Times: Meet the POMO desk

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New York Times: Meet the POMO desk

    Yes I first saw this on Zero Hedge, but the graphic included with the article is a classic.



    The Federal Reserve creates money! Thank you! Finally, an honest admission.


    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/11/bu...?_r=1&emc=eta1
    When devising the program, Mr. Frost and his team decided to focus most on buying Treasury notes with an average maturity of five to six years. That is because the yields on these notes have the biggest impact on interest rates for mortgage holders, consumers and companies issuing debt, and on banks’ decisions to lend to businesses. Over the weeks and months of the program, his purchases should drive up the prices of these securities — because they will be in greater demand — and consequently push down their yields.

    The trouble is, though yields fell sharply between August and November as the markets anticipated the new program, they have risen since it was formally announced in November, leaving many in the markets puzzled about the value of the Fed’s bond-buying program.

    Mr. Frost, and his boss, Brian P. Sack, insist the program has succeeded. Mr. Sack, 40, joined the Fed 18 months ago to run the entire markets group. He has a Ph.D. from M.I.T. and worked most recently for a Washington consulting firm. In 2004, he wrote a paper with Ben S. Bernanke, the future chairman of the Federal Reserve, and another economist about unconventional measures for stimulating the economy in extraordinary times — just like large-scale purchases of Treasuries.

    “We didn’t know then that the Fed would be putting it to the test,” he said.

    He said the Obama administration’s $858 billion tax compromise with Congressional Republicans in December complicated the macroeconomic picture.

    But the biggest reason for the rise in interest rates was probably that the economy was, at last, growing faster. And that’s good news.

    “Rates have risen for the reasons we were hoping for: investors are more optimistic about the recovery,” said Mr. Sack. “It is a good sign.”

  • #2
    Re: New York Times: Meet the POMO desk

    I'd like to see an outright discussion of how much money that the FED has basically given the oligarchy as it repurchases treasuries.

    Why can't the fed just buy them straight from the Government? Why must it pay money to GS, JP, etc just to maintain some F&&&ING charade?

    So disgusting..

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: New York Times: Meet the POMO desk

      Originally posted by blazespinnaker View Post
      I'd like to see an outright discussion of how much money that the FED has basically given the oligarchy as it repurchases treasuries.

      Why can't the fed just buy them straight from the Government? Why must it pay money to GS, JP, etc just to maintain some F&&&ING charade?

      So disgusting..
      The idea is to push down the yield on the treasuries and hence increase the premium paid to the banks on the treasuries the banks hold. When the Fed buys the treasuries the banks make a profit on the sale. It's a stealth way of increasing bank capital. Just handing them the money would be rather vulgar. This way the banks are good capitalists making a profit due to their superior abilities and not welfare recipients.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: New York Times: Meet the POMO desk

        Did you guys happen to see that this entire POMO team is ~ 3 folks.... Brian sack, a 36 year old supervisor and an NYU intern... The committee to flood the world with dollars

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: New York Times: Meet the POMO desk

          Originally posted by karim0028 View Post
          Did you guys happen to see that this entire POMO team is ~ 3 folks.... Brian sack, a 36 year old supervisor and an NYU intern... The committee to flood the world with dollars
          I think that's two too many. It only takes one person to give away money. Can you think of an easier job? It's not like you have to beg people to take it.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: New York Times: Meet the POMO desk

            Originally posted by BigBagel View Post
            I think that's two too many. It only takes one person to give away money. Can you think of an easier job? It's not like you have to beg people to take it.
            Yeah, its not a difficult job for sure, but the fact that these guys have no f'ing experience with markets scares me... It shows they really have no clue... They are following algorithms; its like the economy is now on autopilot Markets simply dont work that way...

            If/when interest rates start careening out of control do you really want an intern in there shitting her pants ;) They need some traders who understand market dynamics and can understand what a chart is telling them...

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: New York Times: Meet the POMO desk

              Could the U.S. central bank go broke?

              By Pedro da Costa and Ann Saphir
              WASHINGTON/CHICAGO | Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:30am EST

              WASHINGTON/CHICAGO (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Reserve's journey to the outer limits of monetary policy is raising concerns about how hard it will be to withdraw trillions of dollars in stimulus from the banking system when the time is right.
              While that day seems distant now, some economists and market analysts have even begun pondering the unthinkable: could the vaunted Fed, the world's most powerful central bank, become insolvent?
              Almost by definition, the answer is no.
              As the monetary authority, the central bank is the master of the printing press. It can literally conjure up money at will, and arguably did exactly that when it bought about $2 trillion of mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasuries to push down borrowing costs and boost the economy.
              The Fed's unorthodox steps helped it generate record profits in 2010, allowing it to send $78.4 billion to the U.S. Treasury Department. But its swollen balance sheet leaves the central bank unusually exposed to possible credit losses that could create a major headache at a time of increasing political encroachment on the Fed's independence.
              ...

              http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE7096FE20110111

              what a question

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: New York Times: Meet the POMO desk

                ...The U.S. Federal Reserve's journey to the outer limits of monetary policy ...
                LOL! There was an old TV series called The Outer Limits - tales of of the weird, much like The Twilight Zone.
                The reference above is tres apropos in light of the little opening monolgue for every episode of The Outer Limits:


                "There is nothing wrong with your television set. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling transmission. If we wish to make it louder, we will bring up the volume. If we wish to make it softer, we will tune it to a whisper. We will control the horizontal. We will control the vertical. We can roll the image, make it flutter. We can change the focus to a soft blur or sharpen it to crystal clarity. For the next hour, sit quietly and we will control all that you see and hear. We repeat: there is nothing wrong with your television set. You are about to participate in a great adventure. You are about to experience the awe and mystery which reaches from the inner mind to... The Outer Limits. "
                — Opening narration – The Control Voice – 1960s


                and the original B&W clip:

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: New York Times: Meet the POMO desk

                  I only knew and watched the one from the 90's

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: New York Times: Meet the POMO desk

                    Originally posted by blazespinnaker View Post
                    Why can't the fed just buy them straight from the Government? Why must it pay money to GS, JP, etc just to maintain some F&&&ING charade?
                    The theory behind buying from primary dealers is that the Fed should pay a "market price." If they bought directly from Treasury, how would prices be set?

                    Unfortunately, the theory doesn't account for the fact of front-running by the dealers. The whole process is utterly corrupt.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: New York Times: Meet the POMO desk

                      "Not all information is beneficial." Ben Bernanke
                      http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/a...o-laugh-or-cry

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: New York Times: Meet the POMO desk

                        Originally posted by karim0028
                        Yeah, its not a difficult job for sure, but the fact that these guys have no f'ing experience with markets scares me... It shows they really have no clue... They are following algorithms; its like the economy is now on autopilot Markets simply dont work that way...
                        Algorithms? Or...



                        Muah ha ha ha ha ha ha!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: New York Times: Meet the POMO desk

                          Originally posted by D-Mack View Post
                          what a question
                          Of course they can go broke, it's called hyperinflation..

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: New York Times: Meet the POMO desk

                            Originally posted by blazespinnaker View Post
                            Of course they can go broke, it's called hyperinflation..
                            Another frequently misunderstood point is that the Fed can only create debt-based money (credit). They cannot create capital -- either for themselves or for the banking system. Only the Treasury can do that (ala TARP).

                            Imagine the following scenario: as the Fed begins to reverse the transactions that brought the bank's bad debt onto their balance sheets (which do, after all, have nominal time limits associated with them), it suffers huge losses. To prevent the Fed from collapsing, the only cure would be a multi-trillion dollar capital infusion from the Treasury. To do that will require an act of Congress, along with an associated increase in the debt ceiling. Given the mood in Congress today regarding things like the debt ceiling and the unaccountability of the Fed, what's the likelihood of such a bill being passed?

                            Also, let's not forget that the Fed is not the first US central bank.... Why would anyone think it's the last?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: New York Times: Meet the POMO desk

                              Originally Posted by karim0028 Yeah, its not a difficult job for sure, but the fact that these guys have no f'ing experience with markets scares me... It shows they really have no clue... They are following algorithms; its like the economy is now on autopilot Markets simply dont work that way...



                              Originally posted by c1ue View Post
                              Algorithms? Or...



                              Muah ha ha ha ha ha ha!
                              OR MAYBE it's "mini me" ?

                              but the high-freq trading and the 'quants' wouldnt have _anything_ to do with it

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X