Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

FIRE term appearing in mainstream economist blog

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FIRE term appearing in mainstream economist blog

    http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/movable_type/

    Brad DeLong does a fine analysis of the FIRE economy (he actually uses this word), much in line with iTulip's point of view.

    The graph that he inserts at the beginning of his post is a real eye-opener.

    I extract his conclusions:

    "....
    Do not get us wrong: we do not hate service industries. But most service industries produce something of value in return for their profits. Health care administration simply produces denials of coverage. Finance as currently construed simply produces portfolios for individuals that involve them bearing extraordinarily large and idiosyncratic risks that they had no idea they were bearing. There are two ways to make money in health care: (i) by providing people with valuable treatments that they are willing to pay for, and (ii) by collecting insurance premiums and finding some excuse not to pay them out when people get sick. There are two ways to make money in finance: (i) to find people who are willing to bear risks that they understand, selling them risks that offer attractive risk-return tradeoffs, and collecting a commission; and (ii) by selling people risks that they don't understand. It looks to us very much as though our modern health-care administration and financial sectors are good at the second but not the first.
    ..."

  • #2
    Re: FIRE term appearing in mainstream economist blog

    Originally posted by Alvaro Spain View Post
    http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/movable_type/

    Brad DeLong does a fine analysis of the FIRE economy (he actually uses this word), much in line with iTulip's point of view.

    The graph that he inserts at the beginning of his post is a real eye-opener.

    I extract his conclusions:

    "....
    Do not get us wrong: we do not hate service industries. But most service industries produce something of value in return for their profits. Health care administration simply produces denials of coverage. Finance as currently construed simply produces portfolios for individuals that involve them bearing extraordinarily large and idiosyncratic risks that they had no idea they were bearing. There are two ways to make money in health care: (i) by providing people with valuable treatments that they are willing to pay for, and (ii) by collecting insurance premiums and finding some excuse not to pay them out when people get sick. There are two ways to make money in finance: (i) to find people who are willing to bear risks that they understand, selling them risks that offer attractive risk-return tradeoffs, and collecting a commission; and (ii) by selling people risks that they don't understand. It looks to us very much as though our modern health-care administration and financial sectors are good at the second but not the first.
    ..."
    w/o attribution... at least ej attributes fire to hudson.

    Comment

    Working...
    X