Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fed Officials Debate Easing Tools as Dudley Says Further Steps Warranted

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fed Officials Debate Easing Tools as Dudley Says Further Steps Warranted

    Fed Officials Debate Easing Tools as Dudley Says Further Steps Warranted

    Federal Reserve policy makers are now debating how to deploy tools for more unconventional easing as two top officials indicated action may be needed to lower unemployment persisting near 10 percent.

    Further action is likely to be warranted unless the economic outlook evolves in a way that makes me more confident that we will see better outcomes for both employment and inflation before too long,” New York Fed president William Dudley said yesterday.

    His comments, following Chairman Ben S. Bernanke’s statement on Sept. 30 that the Fed has a duty to aid the economy, indicate that the outlook has weakened enough for action, said former Fed Governor Laurence Meyer. Dudley, vice chairman of the Fed’s policy-setting Open Market Committee, said additional securities purchases can have a “significant” effect on the economy.

    “The threshold is met,” said Meyer, vice chairman of Macroeconomic Advisers LLC in Washington. The details of how the Fed eases further are “the most important question that’s on my mind,” he said. “It’s going to be an amount that is high enough to say, they really mean it now.”

    The FOMC meets on Nov. 2-3, giving members time to digest reports on September employment, retail sales and inflation.

    They have decided to do another round of quantitative easing,” said Dino Kos, managing director at Portales Partners LLC in New York and former executive vice president in charge of markets at the New York Fed. “The only thing left to fight over is how they do it.”

    Dollar Weakens

    The dollar fell to the lowest level since March versus the euro and dropped against the yen after Dudley’s comments. The Treasury two-year yield was 0.41 percent after falling to a record-low of 0.4066 percent.

    Government reports yesterday showed U.S. manufacturing expanded at a slower pace, while consumer spending increased, underlining the Fed’s forecast for a “modest” pace of economic growth.

    Dudley said that $500 billion of purchases, for example, would add as much stimulus as reducing the Fed’s benchmark rate 0.5 percentage point to 0.75 percentage point, depending on how long investors expect the Fed to hold the assets. Officials can’t lower the rate further because it’s already close to zero.

    The speech is “a strong indication that the next statement is going to announce purchases,” said Jan Hatzius, who succeeded Dudley as chief U.S. economist at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. In a research note, Goldman Sachs said the amount of announced purchases is likely to be $500 billion.

    26-Year High

    Dudley’s comments indicate Fed officials aren’t willing to tolerate a pace of recovery that’s showing few signs of lowering the unemployment rate from close to a 26-year high or lifting the inflation rate.

    The economy expanded at a 1.7 percent annual pace in the second quarter, down from 3.7 percent in the previous three months. The Fed’s preferred inflation benchmark rose 1.4 percent for the 12 months ending August, below the FOMC’s preferred range of 1.7 percent to 2 percent.

    “Both the current levels of unemployment and inflation and the timeframe over which they are likely to return to levels consistent with our mandate are unacceptable,” Dudley said yesterday.

    Those remarks echoed Bernanke’s comments to economists at Princeton University Sept. 24. “A concerted policy effort has so far not produced an economic recovery of sufficient vigor to significantly reduce the high level of unemployment,” he said.

    The comments mark a shift from Bernanke’s Aug. 27 statement that more action would be called for if “the outlook were to deteriorate significantly.”

    Bullard’s Influence

    Meyer said St. Louis Fed President James Bullard may be influencing colleagues with his call for a quantitative rule to determine the suitable amount of asset purchases and to adjust the balance sheet based on the FOMC’s judgments about progress on growth and inflation. Bullard said in August he would favor gradual adjustments to the purchase program rather than a “shock and awe” policy.

    Another option is for the Fed to announce an explicit inflation goal and then, if price increases are too slow, potentially aim to overshoot the goal in future years, Dudley said. One risk is that investors may “mistakenly” conclude that the Fed was “tinkering with its long-run inflation objective,” undermining the change in policy.

    Less than seven months ago, Bernanke was testifying before the House Financial Services Committee on the central bank’s exit strategy. Since then, financial turmoil in Europe and a weak hand-off from inventory re-stocking to consumer spending in the U.S. have produced two quarters of growth that have kept the unemployment rate at 9.5 percent or higher.

    Aircraft Maker

    Textron Inc., based in Providence, Rhode Island, last month said it plans to cut 700 jobs at its Cessna plane division, as the aircraft maker reduces production further because demand hasn’t picked up after the recession. The cuts represent about 8.3 percent of the unit’s workforce.

    U.S. central bankers began to focus on their mandate to achieve stable prices and full employment in their September statement as it became apparent that the risk of another year of moderate growth combined with waning fiscal policy could result in more under-shooting on jobs and prices.

    Sluggish growth leaves the economy more vulnerable to a recession and in the event of a shock, deflation risks could increase. Further declines in inflation would constitute an increase in interest rates in the absence of further Fed action.

    Some policy makers this week expressed skepticism about the need for further easing.

    Business ‘Angst’

    Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher said in a speech yesterday that the benefits of action may not outweigh the costs unless “fiscal and regulatory authorities are able to dispel the angst that businesses are reporting.”

    Philadelphia Fed President Charles Plosser said Sept. 29 that he doesn’t see how additional asset purchases will help employment in the near term, and Narayana Kocherlakota of the Minneapolis Fed said it would probably have a “more muted effect” than purchases that ended in March.

    Other officials who indicated this week that they favor further easing include Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren, who said Sept. 29 the Fed should respond “vigorously, creatively, thoughtfully and persistently” to a slow recovery, and Chicago Fed President Charles Evans, who said yesterday more action may be “desirable.”

    New Members

    The FOMC will have two additional voters at the November meeting who are likely to buttress any decision to ease policy, Vincent Reinhart, former Fed monetary-affairs director, said this week. The Senate on Sept. 29 confirmed San Francisco Fed President Janet Yellen for vice chairman and Sarah Bloom Raskin for a governor position.

    Since Bernanke’s Aug. 27 speech at Jackson Hole, Wyoming, yields on the 10-year Treasury note have fallen 13 basis points to 2.51 percent, and the Standard & Poor’s 500 stock index is up 7.7 percent.

    “Investors are buying into the strategy,” said Kos, who noted that prospects for further quantitative easing have depreciated the dollar without a rise in Treasury yields that foreign investors typically demand to compensate for currency risk. “You worry that at some point they don’t. A loss of credibility in central banking is really difficult to recover from.”

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-1...warranted.html

    jk- emphases added
    Last edited by jk; October 02, 2010, 09:15 PM.

  • #2
    Re: Fed Officials Debate Easing Tools as Dudley Says Further Steps Warranted

    This is one thing Robert Shiller wrote Saturday in NY Times: Sometimes the private sector needs help from the government, and this is one of those times. We need to break the cycle of protracted unemployment and sagging morale through big government programs to create millions of jobs. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/03/bu...my/03view.html

    I'm of the impression that QE is not going to create jobs, if that is correct and if Shiller is correct, further "unconventional easing" will amount to peeing into a stiff breeze.

    I read somewhere else this evening, can't remember where, that to increase employment GDP needs to get up to 3%.

    Robert Reich argues http://robertreich.org/post/1224694203 Why It’s Foolish to Weaken the Dollar to Create Jobs.
    Jim 69 y/o

    "...Texans...the lowest form of white man there is." Robert Duvall, as Al Sieber, in "Geronimo." (see "Location" for examples.)

    Dedicated to the idea that all people deserve a chance for a healthy productive life. B&M Gates Fdn.

    Good judgement comes from experience; experience comes from bad judgement. Unknown.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Fed Officials Debate Easing Tools as Dudley Says Further Steps Warranted

      Originally posted by Jim Nickerson View Post
      This is one thing Robert Shiller wrote Saturday in NY Times: Sometimes the private sector needs help from the government, and this is one of those times. We need to break the cycle of protracted unemployment and sagging morale through big government programs to create millions of jobs. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/03/bu...my/03view.html

      I'm of the impression that QE is not going to create jobs, if that is correct and if Shiller is correct, further "unconventional easing" will amount to peeing into a stiff breeze.

      I read somewhere else this evening, can't remember where, that to increase employment GDP needs to get up to 3%.

      Robert Reich argues http://robertreich.org/post/1224694203 Why It’s Foolish to Weaken the Dollar to Create Jobs.
      it may be foolish, and it may not be capable of working, but that doesn't mean it won't happen.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Fed Officials Debate Easing Tools as Dudley Says Further Steps Warranted

        Once again, the word in Yiddish for those on the FOMC who are following the failed policies of Bernanke: "tookis-lackers". It is very important to understand what the word means because a "tookis-lacker" stays loyal to a failed-policy leader for reason of office politics and career advancement. A "tookis-lacker" never questions leadership, so a "tookis-lacker" is the ultimate "team-player" or "ditto-head".

        What is interesting to note here are the number of tookis-lackers surrounding Bernanke on the FOMC, also in the economics departments of major universities to-day. They stick with Bernanke, and they will write the history of this Great Recession to fit the dogma of Keynesian Economics...... This is why it is so important for kids to-day observing what is happening now, to accurately record for posterity what is happening now, and to challenge the economics orthodoxy for this manifest failure in policy.

        "Friday, Oct 1, 2010: Gold hits $1320 as the dollar erodes further. Oil probes the top of its trading-range. Commodities look to break-out to higher ground on their charts. The housing market is deader than ever, and the despair of failed-policy is everywhere throughout America. Meanwhile, FOMC member Dudley, another Bernanke supporter, says that further easing steps are warranted, no-mind that interest rates are at zero." (Write it all down, just like this, day-by-day, because the economics orthodoxy will deny this ever happened.)
        Last edited by Starving Steve; October 03, 2010, 03:57 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Fed Officials Debate Easing Tools as Dudley Says Further Steps Warranted

          Couple of comments:
          1) QE is not Keynesian economics. Keynesian would be to spend same amounts building infrastructure, giving money to workers so as to speed up spending in goods and services, that is, measures to boost employment directly. QE serves to inflate bubbles everywhere. And save banks balance sheets. But money does not go where it is needed. It ends in rich guys pockets.
          2) An example of bubbles: a friend of mine bought two or three months ago an apartment over Byscayne ave. Miami, for $1500 per sp. metre. Same kind of apartment in Punta del Este, Uruguay, costs $3000 dollars for sq./mt. But, minimum salary in Uruguay is less than half that in the USA. And cost of living in Uruguay is not much low (if any at all) than in the USA.
          Thatīs the kind of bubbles USA QE is inflating all over the world.
          3) The message is loud and clear: run away from US dollars. Anything is better. Mainly PMīs, oil related papers, commodities.
          Any comments?

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Fed Officials Debate Easing Tools as Dudley Says Further Steps Warranted

            Originally posted by Southernguy View Post
            Couple of comments:
            1) QE is not Keynesian economics. Keynesian would be to spend same amounts building infrastructure, giving money to workers so as to speed up spending in goods and services, that is, measures to boost employment directly. QE serves to inflate bubbles everywhere. And save banks balance sheets. But money does not go where it is needed. It ends in rich guys pockets.
            2) An example of bubbles: a friend of mine bought two or three months ago an apartment over Byscayne ave. Miami, for $1500 per sp. metre. Same kind of apartment in Punta del Este, Uruguay, costs $3000 dollars for sq./mt. But, minimum salary in Uruguay is less than half that in the USA. And cost of living in Uruguay is not much low (if any at all) than in the USA.
            Thatīs the kind of bubbles USA QE is inflating all over the world.
            3) The message is loud and clear: run away from US dollars. Anything is better. Mainly PMīs, oil related papers, commodities.
            Any comments?
            keynesian policy calls for fiscal stimulus, but political gridlock precludes that, so we fall back to qe. and i agree that fiscal stimulus could at least in theory be better targeted to help j6p, but since that's impossible, we'll just have to give more money to bankers. i'm down to less than 20% cash, but i feel more and more that cash is trash, and i'm itchy to do something with it.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Fed Officials Debate Easing Tools as Dudley Says Further Steps Warranted

              Originally posted by jk View Post
              keynesian policy calls for fiscal stimulus, but political gridlock precludes that, so we fall back to qe. and i agree that fiscal stimulus could at least in theory be better targeted to help j6p, but since that's impossible, we'll just have to give more money to bankers. i'm down to less than 20% cash, but i feel more and more that cash is trash, and i'm itchy to do something with it.
              Well I think we can all be quite confident that the bankers won't lend much of it into the productive economy, and most of it will flow into speculation. I gather that lending to hedge funds has made a remarkable recovery. And it seems to me that in this age of razor-thin returns the hedgies cannot meet investor expectations without levering back up. I also note that CNBC Europe and Bloomberg over here are both running adverts for a company that will lend 5:1 in a retail currency trading account [the example is depositing Euro 200k and having Euro1 million to play with].

              The risk-on trade would seem to be ever more secure for at least a few more quarters. Happy days are here again...
              Last edited by GRG55; October 04, 2010, 03:57 AM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Fed Officials Debate Easing Tools as Dudley Says Further Steps Warranted

                in the early '70s, equities were believed to be good inflation hedges. and the early flow of qe2 cash will likely boost equities [that also fits with finster's scenario which is more based on political stasis]. only after inflation is well-established and obvious to the public, down the road, will equities be seen to lag as commodities outrace them. this timing also fits with current high levels of profit from cost cutting. as materials prices continue to rise and demand is constrained, profits will be squeezed out. this is all speculation, obviously, but remains plausible in my mind provided we avoid the dreaded double dip.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Fed Officials Debate Easing Tools as Dudley Says Further Steps Warranted

                  Originally posted by Southernguy View Post
                  Couple of comments:
                  1) QE is not Keynesian economics. Keynesian would be to spend same amounts building infrastructure, giving money to workers so as to speed up spending in goods and services, that is, measures to boost employment directly. QE serves to inflate bubbles everywhere. And save banks balance sheets. But money does not go where it is needed. It ends in rich guys pockets.
                  2) An example of bubbles: a friend of mine bought two or three months ago an apartment over Byscayne ave. Miami, for $1500 per sp. metre. Same kind of apartment in Punta del Este, Uruguay, costs $3000 dollars for sq./mt. But, minimum salary in Uruguay is less than half that in the USA. And cost of living in Uruguay is not much low (if any at all) than in the USA.
                  Thatīs the kind of bubbles USA QE is inflating all over the world.
                  3) The message is loud and clear: run away from US dollars. Anything is better. Mainly PMīs, oil related papers, commodities.
                  Any comments?
                  I am observing what looks like a sharp break in prices in the foreclosure market for McMansions on the Central Coast of California. If this trend continues, I will supply the details of the drop, i.e, the addresses and MLS numbers and re-possession prices. But the drop appears to be around 75% of the (Greenspan) dot.com bubble top in real estate. In other words, the new price is 25% of the old price.

                  This drop nicely explains why Silicon Valley is dark and dead at night, no-one on the freeways, no-one in downtown San Jose, very few people at San Jose Airport, almost no-one at the Almaden Fashion Plaza, and no-one at Taco Bell. Times are changing. In other words, very few people appear to have cash to buy anything with, especially not a McMansion.

                  If real estate is this depressed now in California, imagine how depressed real estate could be if the bond market tanks, as it did in Greece. Imagine what a round of 10% interest rates for mortgages could do to real estate prices! No wonder why people are afraid.
                  Last edited by Starving Steve; October 04, 2010, 12:30 PM.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X