Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

German Govt Peak Cheap Oil Report leaked on Der-Spiegel

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • German Govt Peak Cheap Oil Report leaked on Der-Spiegel

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/...715138,00.html


    A study by a German military think tank has analyzed how "peak oil" might change the global economy. The internal draft document -- leaked on the Internet -- shows for the first time how carefully the German government has considered a potential energy crisis.

    The term "peak oil" is used by energy experts to refer to a point in time when global oil reserves pass their zenith and production gradually begins to decline. This would result in a permanent supply crisis -- and fear of it can trigger turbulence in commodity markets and on stock exchanges.

    The issue is so politically explosive that it's remarkable when an institution like the Bundeswehr, the German military, uses the term "peak oil" at all. But a military study currently circulating on the German blogosphere goes even further.
    The study is a product of the Future Analysis department of the Bundeswehr Transformation Center, a think tank tasked with fixing a direction for the German military. The team of authors, led by Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Will, uses sometimes-dramatic language to depict the consequences of an irreversible depletion of raw materials. It warns of shifts in the global balance of power, of the formation of new relationships based on interdependency, of a decline in importance of the western industrial nations, of the "total collapse of the markets" and of serious political and economic crises.

    The study, whose authenticity was confirmed to SPIEGEL ONLINE by sources in government circles, was not meant for publication. The document is said to be in draft stage and to consist solely of scientific opinion, which has not yet been edited by the Defense Ministry and other government bodies.

    The lead author, Will, has declined to comment on the study. It remains doubtful that either the Bundeswehr or the German government would have consented to publish the document in its current form. But the study does show how intensively the German government has engaged with the question of peak oil.

    According to the German report, there is "some probability that peak oil will occur around the year 2010 and that the impact on security is expected to be felt 15 to 30 years later." The Bundeswehr prediction is consistent with those of well-known scientists who assume global oil production has either already passed its peak or will do so this year.

    Market Failures and International Chain Reactions

    The political and economic impacts of peak oil on Germany have now been studied for the first time in depth. The crude oil expert Steffen Bukold has evaluated and summarized the findings of the Bundeswehr study. Here is an overview of the central points:

    Oil will determine power: The Bundeswehr Transformation Center writes that oil will become one decisive factor in determining the new landscape of international relations: "The relative importance of the oil-producing nations in the international system is growing. These nations are using the advantages resulting from this to expand the scope of their domestic and foreign policies and establish themselves as a new or resurgent regional, or in some cases even global leading powers."

    Increasing importance of oil exporters: For importers of oil more competition for resources will mean an increase in the number of nations competing for favor with oil-producing nations. For the latter this opens up a window of opportunity which can be used to implement political, economic or ideological aims. As this window of time will only be open for a limited period, "this could result in a more aggressive assertion of national interests on the part of the oil-producing nations."

    Politics in place of the market: The Bundeswehr Transformation Center expects that a supply crisis would roll back the liberalization of the energy market. "The proportion of oil traded on the global, freely accessible oil market will diminish as more oil is traded through bi-national contracts," the study states. In the long run, the study goes on, the global oil market, will only be able to follow the laws of the free market in a restricted way. "Bilateral, conditioned supply agreements and privileged partnerships, such as those seen prior to the oil crises of the 1970s, will once again come to the fore."

    Market failures: The authors paint a bleak picture of the consequences resulting from a shortage of petroleum. As the transportation of goods depends on crude oil, international trade could be subject to colossal tax hikes. "Shortages in the supply of vital goods could arise" as a result, for example in food supplies. Oil is used directly or indirectly in the production of 95 percent of all industrial goods. Price shocks could therefore be seen in almost any industry and throughout all stages of the industrial supply chain. "In the medium term the global economic system and every market-oriented national economy would collapse."

    Relapse into planned economy: Since virtually all economic sectors rely heavily on oil, peak oil could lead to a "partial or complete failure of markets," says the study. "A conceivable alternative would be government rationing and the allocation of important goods or the setting of production schedules and other short-term coercive measures to replace market-based mechanisms in times of crisis."

    Global chain reaction: "A restructuring of oil supplies will not be equally possible in all regions before the onset of peak oil," says the study. "It is likely that a large number of states will not be in a position to make the necessary investments in time," or with "sufficient magnitude." If there were economic crashes in some regions of the world, Germany could be affected. Germany would not escape the crises of other countries, because it's so tightly integrated into the global economy.

    Crisis of political legitimacy: The Bundeswehr study also raises fears for the survival of democracy itself. Parts of the population could perceive the upheaval triggered by peak oil "as a general systemic crisis." This would create "room for ideological and extremist alternatives to existing forms of government." Fragmentation of the affected population is likely and could "in extreme cases lead to open conflict."

    The scenarios outlined by the Bundeswehr Transformation Center are drastic. Even more explosive politically are recommendations to the government that the energy experts have put forward based on these scenarios. They argue that "states dependent on oil imports" will be forced to "show more pragmatism toward oil-producing states in their foreign policy." Political priorities will have to be somewhat subordinated, they claim, to the overriding concern of securing energy supplies.

    For example: Germany would have to be more flexible in relation toward Russia's foreign policy objectives. It would also have to show more restraint in its foreign policy toward Israel, to avoid alienating Arab oil-producing nations. Unconditional support for Israel and its right to exist is currently a cornerstone of German foreign policy.

    The relationship with Russia, in particular, is of fundamental importance for German access to oil and gas, the study says. "For Germany, this involves a balancing act between stable and privileged relations with Russia and the sensitivities of (Germany's) eastern neighbors." In other words, Germany, if it wants to guarantee its own energy security, should be accommodating in relation to Moscow's foreign policy objectives, even if it means risking damage to its relations with Poland and other Eastern European states.

    Peak oil would also have profound consequences for Berlin's posture toward the Middle East, according to the study. "A readjustment of Germany's Middle East policy in favor of more intensive relations with producer countries such as Iran and Saudi Arabia, which have the largest conventional oil reserves in the region, might put a strain on German-Israeli relations, depending on the intensity of the policy change," the authors write.

    When contacted by SPIEGEL ONLINE, the Defense Ministry declined to comment on the study.
    Last edited by karim0028; September 17, 2010, 09:08 AM.

  • #2
    Re: German Govt Peak Cheap Oil Report leaked on Der-Spiegel

    This study was re-posted, with the repost apparently being moved to iTulip Select.

    http://www.energybulletin.net/sites/...Study%20EN.pdf

    The interesting part about this report is that it isn't actually research itself, it is a report on other reports.

    Several items stand out:

    In the short term, the global economy would respond proportionally to the decline in oil supply. 154

    {with credits being}

    153 Cf. Robert L. Hirsch, Roger Bezdek and Robert Wendling, Peaking of World Oil Propduction: Impacts, Mitigation, & Risk Management (February 2005), 57 ff., http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications...aking_netl.pdf (accessed on 11 October 2010). This study assumes that thte economy would take approximately 20 years to adapt to the conditions of a post-peak-oil world. Sufficient investments 20 years before that peak occurs could prevent negative consequences. If the first investments coincide with the peak, the ensuring transition phase would also take 20 years. It is thus implicitly assumed in this context that the respective investment environment for switching to green tech is generally comparable in both cases. In the light of the system considerations described here, this assumption should be regarded as a highly disputable simplification. At any rate, however, it shows that the transformation period would be very long, which mean that the uncertainty presumed here seems plausible.
    154 Cf. Ibid, 24 ff.
    followed by

    In the medium term, the global economic system and all market-oriented economies would collapse.

    1. Economic entities would realize the prolonged contraction and would have to act on the assumption that the global economy would continue to shrink for a long time. 156

    2. Tipping point: In an economy shrinking over an indefinite period, savings would not be invested because companies would not be making any profit.156 For an indefinite period, companies would no longer be in a position to pay borrowing costs or to distribute profits to investors. The banking system, stock exchanges, and financial markets could collapse altogether. 158

    3. Financial markets are the backbone of global economy and an integral component of modern societies. All other subsystems have developed hand in hand with the economic system. A disintegration can therefore not be analyzed based on today's system. A completely new system state would materialize. {no credit here!}

    {credits listed}

    156 Although society has great confidence in the market economy system and has little understanding for complex relations, and although the assumption of rational economic systems is debatable, we can presume that as of a certain point during this global recession, all insecurity will give way to the realization that a critical point has been crossed.

    It is not possible to predict exactly how this realization process will occur. A potential scenario is that initially, massive fluctuations of cash flow will clearly expose the "real economy" consequences of a financial crash, causing panic to break out amongst investors. Resorting to raw materials will neither be possible nor sensible for everyone. Huge quantities of assets will be destroyed. The lack of logical alternative ways out of this situation may then result in the consequences described above.

    157 In theory, there are industries that could profit from the situation. The oil industry or companies in the green-tech sector would certainly have an increasing demand for capital. Given the companies' environment, in particular the dependence of these industries on (international) value chains and infrastructures, as well as the dramatically changing conditions on the demand side, ti would be implausible to expect "islands of stability" which continue to exist on a "micro level".

    158 the term "financial markets" encompasses all markets on which capital is traded. In addition to the capital and credit market, this includes the exchange market and the money market.
    This bit is a fine piece of pseudo-scholarship. Where most of the other assertions in this report are based on other bits of research (I'll get to that later), here a very strong conclusion (society will collapse! The End Of The World Is Nigh!) is based purely on the author's conjecture.

    While this is theoretically plausible, you'd think there'd be a bit more analysis around this conclusion than a chain of unsupported statements.

    The end of the report then speaks on various questions, and concludes with

    Further reading on Peak Oil Task Force reports

    Portland, Oregon: Descending the Oil Peak: Navigating the Transition from Oil and
    Natural Gas, March 2007, http://www.portlandonline.com/OSD/in...145732&c=42894 (accessed on 14 October 2010).

    San Buenaventura, California: Transforming Urban Environments for a Post-Peak
    Oil Future. A Vision Plan for the City of San Buenaventura, 2007, http://www.cityofventura.net/files/p...t]peakoil.pdf (accessed on 14 October 2010).

    Oakland, California: Oil Independent Oakland Action Plan, February 2008,
    http://www.oaklandnet.com/oil/pdfs/O...lan020608.pdf (accessed on 14 October 2010).

    San Francisco, California: San Francisco Peak Oil Preparedness Task Force Report,
    March 2009, http://www.sfenvironment.org/downloa...nal_report.pdf (accessed on 14 October 2010).

    Berkeley, California: Berkeley Energy Descent 2009-2020: Transitioning to the Post
    Carbon Era, April 2009, http://postcarboncities.net/files/Be...escentPlan.pdf (accessed on 14 October 2010)
    Interesting that all of this further reading is based on US local city reports. The San Francisco one, for example, has these authors:

    Jeanne-Marie Rosenmeier, Chair
    Jeanne-Marie Rosenmeier is a self-employed CPA, who has lived and worked in the Bay Area since 1982. She is active in San Francisco Oil Awareness and San Francisco Post Carbon, and was a founding member of Diablo Post Carbon. In 2002, Ms. Rosenmeier was the Green Party candidate for California State Treasurer. Her interests focus on the economic and social consequences of the inability of oil supply to expand to meet demand, as well as the interaction between the limits to oil production and climate change. Her undergraduate degree is in mathematics, and she received an MBA from the University of Chicago in 1975.

    Bernard Meyerson, Vice Chair
    Bernie Meyerson is Vice President and co-owner of East Bay Resources, Inc., a 20-year old recyclable paper brokerage. Since 1971 he has been a waste and recyclables management consultant to local, state, national, and international clients. Mr. Meyerson has lectured and given classes at UC Berkeley Extension and San Francisco State. Prior to 1971 he had a 14-year career in International Higher Education in New York City and the University of Illinois. He holds a BA and MA in Political Science and International Relations.

    Patricia Gerber
    Pat Gerber is a San Francisco author and cartoonist. A life-long environmentalist, she has been active in the antiwar movement since 2002 and remains a member of numerous local and national peace groups. She studied architecture with Paolo Soleri and received a Master of Liberal Arts from Johns Hopkins University in 1979.

    Woody Hastings
    Woody Hastings is an environmental professional with over twenty years of experience in community organizing, strategic planning, policy analysis, government relations, media outreach, and project management. Energy-related projects he has worked on include solar photovoltaic installations, a landfill gas-to-energy project, alternative fuel vehicle policy, a solar/hydrogen technology demonstration project, and leading a campaign to defeat an oil pipeline. Mr. Hastings first became concerned about global oil supply limitations on
    his arrival to California in 1979 to find cars lined up waiting for gas. He holds a degree in Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice from San Francisco State University.

    Benjamin Lowe
    Benjamin Lowe is a researcher and advocate focusing on issues of regional transportation. He has worked on a range of transit projects, working with the Transportation and Land Use Coalition (now TransForm) on a report about the benefits of encouraging school children to walk and bicycle to school, and also served as Treasurer and Marin County Grassroots Organizer for the North Bay Transportation Alliance, a campaign to secure funding for the Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART) commuter rail program. Mr. Lowe has also worked on a number of Federal, state, and local emergency management and homeland security projects. For instance, he helped to draft the Los Angeles Neighborhood Council Emergency Preparedness Plan, and served on the support staff for the Department of Homeland Security team tasked with the National Infrastructure Protection Plan, which outlines Federal policies for protecting U.S. infrastructure from natural disasters, catastrophic failure, and terrorist attack.

    Jason Mark
    Jason Mark is an author, activist, and urban farmer committed to creating a more ecologically sustainable San Francisco. He co-manages Alemany Farm, the City's largest food production site. Alemany Farm uses organic food production to grow green job for low-income communities and promote neighborhood food security. Mr. Mark is also the co-author, (with Kevin Danaher and Shannon Biggs) of the book Building the Green Economy: Success Stories from the Grassroots (PoliPointPress). He edits the environmental quarterly magazine Earth Island Journal. His writings on the environment have appeared in The Nation, Orion, E, Yes! The San Francisco Chronicle, Alternet.org, Grist.org, and TomPaine.org.

    Cal Simone
    Cal Simone is a writer, speaker, coach, and teacher influenced by Carl Jung. He began his involvement with Bay area peak oil groups in 2005 as the East Bay post carbon group's first speaker, talking on "Consumerism at the End of the Oil Age" and the societal and psychological implications of a post-peak collapse, and has been writing and speaking about it ever since. His writings on peak oil and a variety of other topics have appeared in Culture Change Letter, the ManKind Project Journal, and Open Exchange magazine. Mr. Simone is also active in the
    Tribe of Men, a men's leadership group that develops and practices cutting-edge methods of governance and collaborative decision-making in groups. Earlier in his life, he was a music producer and founded an award winning Macintosh software company.
    Notice how nearly every single author has a strong environmental focus or a business based on environmental views with the exception of Mr. Lowe. While this doesn't impact the information per se, it certainly does speak to a specific viewpoint.

    A perusal of the access dates within the report show a very tight range: The first access listed was October 11, 2010 with the last on October 28, 2010.

    The vast majority were from October 11 to October 14, 2010.

    Given that there are 218 references in the document, some 200 of which are unique, it beggars the imagination to think that all of these were read in any detail or consideration.

    All in all, as a work of scholarship, this report has very little going for it.

    It appears to be a hurried summary of a 3 day web trawl on "Peak Oil".

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: German Govt Peak Cheap Oil Report leaked on Der-Spiegel

      Originally posted by c1ue View Post
      Notice how nearly every single author has a strong environmental focus or a business based on environmental views with the exception of Mr. Lowe. While this doesn't impact the information per se, it certainly does speak to a specific viewpoint.

      A perusal of the access dates within the report show a very tight range: The first access listed was October 11, 2010 with the last on October 28, 2010.

      The vast majority were from October 11 to October 14, 2010.

      Given that there are 218 references in the document, some 200 of which are unique, it beggars the imagination to think that all of these were read in any detail or consideration.
      I interpret the range of access dates as the period of time, prior to publication, that these web links were last checked to make sure they were valid. If you look at the German-language document, you will see that these links were checked on 6. Juli 2010. Throughout the document, many of the links are dated in April or May. I do not think this gives us a definitive picture of the research time involved with those links.

      No argument about the viewpoints of the people involved in these sources. Even though I may largely agree with them, these local committee reports did not seem to involve a wide array of backgrounds and likely opposing personal interpretations to arrive at some balanced consensus.

      One thing I noticed, the English version has more credits/notes than the German version. For example, what is #153 in the English version ("Cf. Robert L. Hirsch, Roger Bezdek and Robert Wendling, Peaking of World Oil Production: Impacts, Mitigation, & Risk Management...") is #85 in the German version.

      Comment

      Working...
      X