Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ISRAEL is SCREWED!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ISRAEL is SCREWED!!

    So much for the Judeo-Christian ethic. . .

    http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?...nd_of_the_road

    The House at the End of the Road

    In the culture of Israeli settlements, stealing land has become invisible, unnoticed.


    Gershom Gorenberg | July 23, 2010 | web only

    Dror Etkes picked me up in front of the bank, next to the convenience store, on a normal Jerusalem street where nothing slows the morning commuters except normal traffic jams. I wanted to visit the Palestinian village of Silwad. To that, Etkes added a couple of other stops on our tangled route through the West Bank.

    The day's task was to examine how to take someone's land for settlement -- via stealth, strong-arm tactics, or legal maneuvers. Only at the day's end would I understand what my real goal had been: to remind myself that the main street, the bank, the apartment buildings, the buses taking kids to summer day camps -- the whole normal city day flowing according to sensible rules -- is an enclave of illusory sanity.

    Once upon a time you could get from Jerusalem to Silwad easily. You drove north on the main mountain-ridge highway. After Ramallah you turned right. On the other side of the country road from Silwad stood the wooden sign marking the entrance to the Israeli settlement of Ofrah. In the Oslo years of the 1990s, when Ramallah became the de facto capital of the Palestinian Authority, the drive got even easier. A new road -- built so settlers wouldn't need to commute through Palestinian towns -- bypassed the Arab city.

    Then came the second Intifada. To stop Palestinian drive-by shootings on West Bank roads and to keep suicide bombers from shredding themselves and other human beings in Israeli cafes and buses, the Israeli army installed a vast array of checkpoints and roadblocks. For Palestinians in occupied land, getting from one town to the next was somewhere between nerve-wracking and impossible.

    Now, with the Intifada's brutality becoming a memory, and with Israel under American pressure to loosen restrictions, traveling between Palestinian towns and villages has slowly become easier. To reach Silwad, we still had to take the long back road that loops over the dry eastern slopes. Etkes, an Israeli activist who has tenaciously charted settlement growth and challenged it in court, stopped along the way at Adam. According to an official report, the bedroom community is built on real estate that Israel considers state property under its interpretation of a 19th-century Ottoman law. But in 2003, Israeli settlers built a new fence around the settlement, outside the town limits, cutting through nearby Palestinian fields.

    In addition, there are islands of privately owned Palestinian land inside Adam, surrounded by the suburban homes. Officially, the enclaves aren't part of Adam's municipal jurisdiction, but the Palestinians who once farmed them can't reach them. We found one such enclave covered in rock and concrete debris from building sites, no longer fit to cultivate. Two synagogues and a kindergarten, all prefab, have been illegally erected on the scarred land. Their presence not only violates the law; it shames the religion in whose name many of the settlers purport to speak. I'm sure that the people who set up the kindergarten wouldn't want the kids to steal each others' crayons. Those who pray in the synagogues know the basic, obvious rule of Judaism that an obligation cannot be fulfilled through committing a sin. They wouldn't steal prayer books from another house of worship. In the culture of the settlements, it seems, stealing land has become invisible, unnoticed.
    ***

    At the southern tip of Silwad, we met Mohammed Sullaiman, 79. Sullaiman's living room was the front porch before he closed it in with glass and aluminum and lined it with couches. The walls on two sides of the room are cut stone; Sullaiman showed me where he had carefully spread cement to fill in the pits in the stone chiselled by bullets during the war in June 1967, when Israel conquered the West Bank.

    Across the road is a chain-link fence topped with barbed wire. It was built in 2001, says Etkes. At Ofrah, as at Adam, the troubles served as a pretext for erecting a wide security perimeter around the settlement. The land past the fence, Sullaiman says, belongs to Silwad and the neighboring village of Ein Yabrud. Silwad's farmers used to grow figs there and wheat where the land was flat. Ein Yabrud's people raised olives.

    The difference between Adam and Ofrah is that the open theft of land is the rule at Ofrah, not the exception. The first settlers arrived in 1975, moving into a small, abandoned Jordanian army base, with then-defense minister Shimon Peres providing support in a bureaucratic rogue operation. A 1980 aerial photo of Ofrah shows the renovated barracks and beginnings of a neighborhood -- all surrounded by the cultivated land of the Palestinian villages. In another aerial picture taken 10 years later, the housing developments have spread. In a 2008 picture, one can also see the settlement outpost of Amonah on a mountaintop above Ofrah. According to the Spiegel Report, a secret army database (Hebrew excerpts are here ) leaked to Ha'aretz in 2009, most of Ofrah stands on fully surveyed land, clearly listed in the land registry under the names of Palestinian owners.

    Amonah, likewise, is stolen land. Another government report says that its water supply is apparently "pulled" from Ofrah, meaning that the hook-up lacks legal approval. Ofrah itself has verdant, irrigated landscaping, including a park in front of the village center where rushes grow around a tiny wooden bridge, simulating the lushness of some distant country. Silwad, says Sullaiman, suffers water shortages; sometimes the municipality stops the supply for two or three days a week. People store water in cisterns to get by. In occupied land, the division of water is the division of political power, made tangible.
    ***

    We drove on. Travel between the Palestinian communities is no longer near impossible. With some roadblocks removed but others in place and with access to major highways still cut off, getting from place to place is now merely aggravating, insultingly inconvenient, bizarrely roundabout. Just past Sullaiman's house, for instance, is the turnoff that should link the country lane to the bypass road built in the 1990s. But the turnoff is still blocked by a line of concrete cubes, so that Palestinian drivers can't share the main highway in the area with Israelis. On the other hand, it's now possible to continue along the lane to neighboring Ein Yabrud. A phantom checkpoint -- a turnstile for pedestrian passage, a concrete cube, a piece of portable concrete fencing -- marks where the road was closed to vehicles for several years. Etkes says the army removed the checkpoint as part of the "Obama effect" of easing travel under pressure from Washington. So far, the Obama effect is limited. This road was once the direct way to Ramallah. But past one more village, Beitin, it's blocked by a chained gate and a mound of earth and stone. To get to the region's central city, one must instead take a much longer route -- which was also closed until recently. If you are confused, you understand: Getting from point A to point B is always confusing.
    ***

    We looped through the hills to the Bir Nabalah enclave northwest of Jerusalem. When we pulled over to ask a young Palestinian man for directions, he told us in Arabic to avoid a certain road lest we run into the yahud -- the "Jews" -- which turned out to be a new slang term for Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Salam Fayyad's strengthened police force. Read that, if you want, as a statement about where some Palestinians believe that Fayyad's loyalties lie, or simply as an attitude toward police mixed with an attitude about Jews, or submit your own interpretation. Dror and I laughed but avoided the road.

    The Bir Nabalah enclave is a set of Palestinian villages surrounded entirely by Israel's security fence and accessed by a single road. To be exact, there are two enclaves. Between them are Israeli settlements connected by modern highways to Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. An underground road connects the eastern and western enclave. It's partly in a trench, partly in a tunnel. Etkes' pickup seemed to be rushing through a concrete chute.

    At the other end is the small village of Beit Ijza, which borders the settlement of Givon Hahadashah. From the edge of the village, you can look through a wire fence at the two-story houses of the Israeli suburb with their red tile roofs, lined up as if they'd just been stamped out of a factory for use on a Monopoly board. In a trench slashed through the hillside runs the much more serious divider, the Israeli security barrier, with its patrol roads, cameras, and concertina coils.

    And above that runs the entrance to Sabri Gharib's house. It's a long driveway, eight paces wide, with walls on either side. At the end is the one-story square stone house with the grape arbor, surrounded also by fencing and then by the homes of Givon Hahadashah. Over the entrance to the driveway is a camera, apparently linked to a command room somewhere, where someone in a uniform can watch who crosses the barrier line to get to the Gharib house.

    Gharib is too old and sick to interview, Etkes told me. According to Palestinian human-rights lawyers Raja Shehadeh and Jonathan Kuttab, Gharib originally owned and farmed the land around the house. Using its expansive interpretation of the old Ottoman law, Israel declared the land to be state-owned. Gharib's long legal battle ended with him owning little more than the house, and with the settlement spreading around him on the ground that was once his fields.

    When the security barrier was built between Beit Ijza and Givon Hahadashah, the Gharib home was on the wrong side of the line. The "solution" was the gate, the walled driveway, the fenced house.

    This is the reality, a short drive from Jerusalem, from the other side of the fence, a world away from the morning commuters but created in their name. This is the end of the road: the land sliced and resliced, down to an enclave of a single house. Surely we need to turn around and find a path to a different future.


    Gershom Gorenberg is a senior correspondent for The Prospect. He is the author of The Accidental Empire: Israel and the Birth of the Settlements, 1967-1977 and The End of Days: Fundamentalism and the Struggle for the Temple Mount. He blogs at South Jerusalem.

  • #2
    Re: ISRAEL is SCREWED!!

    Thanks for having the guts to post this. It takes Chutzpah to call this land dispute masquerading as a religious conflict, a spade. (yes, even today).

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: ISRAEL is SCREWED!!

      The irony in this situation is that if the Palestinians were to suddenly disappear from Israel and its immediate environs, like as not Israel would soon dissolve.

      The Ashkenazim, the Hasids, the Sephardim, etc etc get along as well as a herd of cats.

      Only with the Palestinian threat hanging above their collective heads can they keep it together.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: ISRAEL is SCREWED!!

        Perhaps if the Palestinians would repudiate Hamas and end homicide-bombing, stop their Intifada, stop bashing Isreal, stop re-inventing history about World War II, and instead honour a peace agreement with Isreal, they might have their own state--- and a state with roads that connect Gaza to the West Bank. Palestinians really need to change their entire approach; they need to become good neighbours to Israel, just the way Jordan and Egypt have become.

        Someday, perhaps in twenty-five or fifty years, I envision a Middle East unified by a free trade agreement. Perhaps Jordan, Israel, Palestine, and Egypt might be connected by interstate freeways, a common water system, a common electric grid, and a common currency.... Am I too optimistic?
        Last edited by Starving Steve; July 26, 2010, 11:50 AM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: ISRAEL is SCREWED!!

          "Someday, perhaps in twenty-five or fifty years, I envision a Middle East unified by a free trade agreement. Perhaps Jordan, Israel, Palestine, and Egypt might be connected by interstate freeways, a common water system, a common electric grid, and a common currency.... Am I too optimistic"

          No, you are not too optimistic, maybe not optimistic enough though? (Let's hope that it takes far FAR LESS than 25 years, say 25-50 WEEKS Instead of 25-50 years).

          But you did forget a rail line, an air corridor like we had in Berlin, and an internationally administered Jerusalem as the capital of both countries, but other than that, I think you got it basically correct.

          I think Zbigniew Brzezinski proposed a very similar construct in FP, not too long ago.

          http://www.foreignpolicy.com/article...have_we_failed

          FEATURE PRINT | TEXT SIZE | EMAIL | SINGLE PAGE
          Middle East Peace: So Why Have We Failed?

          FP speaks with leading Americans, Israelis, and Palestinians who've tried to bring this decades-long conflict to an end.

          MAY/JUNE 2010


          "More than 60 years after Israel's stunning victory in the 1948 war that birthed the Jewish state, an end to the world's most exasperating conflict seems more distant than ever. U.S. President Barack Obama is trying to drag both sides kicking and screaming to the negotiating table after nearly a decade of no progress. But is there still any reason for hope?
          We asked leading Americans, Israelis, and Palestinians who've tried and failed to make peace to answer three crucial questions: What have you learned, who's primarily to blame, and what's your out-of-the-box idea to solve the conflict? Here are excerpts from what they told us.

          Zbigniew Brzezinski
          National security advisor to U.S. President Jimmy Carter from 1977 to 1981
          Who's to blame: The United States. On more than one occasion it pledged to become seriously engaged in promoting peace, but in fact its engagement has been more rhetorical than real, lacking in will to use the obvious dependence of both the Israelis and the Palestinians on American support.
          Out-of-the-box idea: To announce to the world America's commitment to a framework for peace based on four key points, namely (1) no right of return for Palestinian refugees to Israel proper; (2) West Jerusalem as the seat for Israel's capital and East Jerusalem as the seat of the Palestinian capital with some internationally based sharing of the Old City; (3) the drawing of borders between the two states along the 1967 lines, adjusted on the basis of one-for-one swaps as the frontiers; and (4) an essentially demilitarized Palestinian state with U.S. or NATO forces on the west bank of the Jordan River.

          Saeb Erekat
          Head of the Palestine Liberation Organization's Steering and Monitoring Committee and the organization's chief negotiator

          What I learned: At the beginning of the peace process I honestly thought I knew Israel better. I used to believe that Israel's fears and concerns were about security and recognition. But when Arab and Islamic countries offered recognition to Israel in exchange for Israeli withdrawal to the 1967 borders in the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative and Israel chose to continue its colonization, I started rethinking Israel's goals.


          The False Religion of Mideast Peace
          And why I'm no longer a believer.
          By Aaron David Miller


          Who's to blame: If you ask me as a Palestinian, I would tell you the Israeli occupation. But it is also important to say that Israel has not been seriously challenged to stop its illegal policies against the peoples of the region. Therefore I also blame the third parties for turning a blind eye to Israeli actions and consolidating a culture of impunity, which allows Israel to continue creating facts on the ground. Without this blind support, Israel would have never been able to settle over half a million settlers within the occupied Palestinian territory.
          Daniel Kurtzer
          U.S. ambassador to Israel under President George W. Bush and ambassador to Egypt under President Bill Clinton; professor of Middle East studies at Princeton University

          What I learned: Almost everything the United States tries to achieve in the Middle East is informed by what we do or fail to do in the peace process. When we are active diplomatically, Arab states are more willing to cooperate with us on other problems; when we are not active, our diplomatic options shrink. The Arab-Israeli conflict is not just another squabble among "tribes" over land; it has become a signature issue in international relations that encompasses dimensions of territory, security, historical rights, and religion. Achieving peace between Arabs and Israelis is a significant U.S. national interest.
          Out-of-the-box idea: Nearly 43 years since the 1967 war, it is astounding that the United States has not articulated its view on what a final settlement should look like on borders and territory, settlements, Jerusalem, refugees, security, and the like. Today, we have worn-out guidance on some of these issues -- mostly focused on what we oppose -- but we lack a clear vision of what we support. In other words, it is time for us to act like a great power in resolving one of the world's festering and dangerous conflicts."



          I personally think that for the sake of national pride, the Palestinians would never accept a Fully De-Militarized State, no nation can call itself a nation if it lacks the means of self-defense. So a military posture similar to what the Japanese had after WWII seems to be in order. A Controlled, strictly defensive national military, that would have to be mutually agreed to by BOTH the Palestinians and the Israelis. Controls on the types and numbers of military equipment would seem to be called for, just like what the Japanese agreed to.

          I know the circumstances are vastly different, Japan was a defeated axis power, an aggressor in WWII, but the construct is VERY USEFUL as a trust building measure for BOTH SIDES in this conflict. The key is that Palestinians can gain symbols of national pride (an Air Force, for example) and the Israelis can eliminate the threats that are most critical to their security concerns, namely mortar, artillery, and rocket delivery systems.
          Last edited by jtabeb; July 26, 2010, 01:44 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: ISRAEL is SCREWED!!

            Steve, you are becoming a caricature of yourself. . .Perhaps you could go back in time and tell the Stern Gang what the Rabbi said when asked what he thought of Palestine as a home for the Zionist Jews: "The bride is beautiful, but she is already married."

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: ISRAEL is SCREWED!!

              Originally posted by KGW View Post
              Steve, you are becoming a caricature of yourself. . .Perhaps you could go back in time and tell the Stern Gang what the Rabbi said when asked what he thought of Palestine as a home for the Zionist Jews: "The bride is beautiful, but she is already married."
              Yeah -he is the prototypical zionist prattling irrelevancies, illogic and in short determined to be a cacophonous moron so that he may in some absurd verbal diarrheal method avoid the many documented transgressions of the Israeli government and at the very least prevent a rational and informed discussion. Sheesh =give it a rest and find some courage to look at the other side of the issue with out indulging in spewing of propaganda. Lord knows too many people on this board are giving him too much courtesy.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: ISRAEL is SCREWED!!

                Originally posted by iyamwutiam View Post
                Yeah -he is the prototypical zionist prattling irrelevancies, illogic and in short determined to be a cacophonous moron so that he may in some absurd verbal diarrheal method avoid the many documented transgressions of the Israeli government and at the very least prevent a rational and informed discussion. Sheesh =give it a rest and find some courage to look at the other side of the issue with out indulging in spewing of propaganda. Lord knows too many people on this board are giving him too much courtesy.

                Some folks really need to go pick up a history book I laugh out loud when i hear revisionist history as portrayed by Steve.... Reminds me of Bush Juniors; "they hate us because of our freedoms"..... Propaganda BS... No one fights and dies just for the hell of it... The Israel/Palestine thing is a land dispute wrapped in a blanket of religion... There is no arch rivalry between Judiasim/Islam, its two neighbors fighting; or in this case one neighbor came in with tanks and commandeered your house and said it was his....

                Can't we all just get along

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: ISRAEL is SCREWED!!

                  Originally posted by karim0028 View Post

                  Can't we all just get along
                  Bingo! (Hey, Someone had to second it)

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X