Someone proposed, (I think it was Alfredo) that the fed might raise rates but continue to pump up the m3.
Anyone starting to wonder if the hiding of M3 is part of an attempt by the Fed to let the air out of the housing bubble without risking a period of illiquidity? That is, while posturing as hawkish with regard to interest rates and having the real effect of putting the brakes on the real estate market, simultaneously opening the floodgates on M3
I thought that idea was very intriguing, but I have admit, I'm not sure how that would work exactly by imultaneously opening the floodgates on M3
If the fed did it via repos, wouldn't that impact the fed fund rate?
Anyone starting to wonder if the hiding of M3 is part of an attempt by the Fed to let the air out of the housing bubble without risking a period of illiquidity? That is, while posturing as hawkish with regard to interest rates and having the real effect of putting the brakes on the real estate market, simultaneously opening the floodgates on M3
I thought that idea was very intriguing, but I have admit, I'm not sure how that would work exactly by imultaneously opening the floodgates on M3
If the fed did it via repos, wouldn't that impact the fed fund rate?
Personally, I believe that the only link is what the Fed wants.
[image]http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/data/RPNS_Max.png[/image]
[image]http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/data/DFF_Max.png[/image]
Comment