The Post-War Recession

[don]

9 out of 10 economists were predicting a return of the Great Depression at war's end. To many it must have seemed like they were right. (I suggest you skip the Cato talk- who cares....)

Clearing Up Some Facts About the Depression of 1946

Written by David Rosnick

Wednesday, 02 June 2010 09:27

The Cato Institute wishes to erase away an entire recession, but the facts are simply not on their side. "You never heard of it because it never happened. However, the 'Depression of 1946' may be one of the most widely predicted events that never happened in American history." If true, this would have been a truly heroic feat on the part of the private sector, given that government spending fell by $56 billion dollars from 1944 to 1947. GDP was just over $200 billion in 1944. Today such a cut would be equivalent to $3.4 trillion, or 132 percent of government expenditures. While the private sector did pick up much of the slack, the downturn from 1945 to 1946 alone was far more severe than the current recession. In the current recession, real GDP fell 3.8 percent peak to trough. By comparison, real GDP fell 10.9 percent from 1945 to 1946, did not begin to rise until the fourth quarter of 1947, and still did not reach 1945 levels until the third quarter of 1950. Employment figures show a similar story. From 1945 to 1946, combined employment in nonfarm payrolls (the standard measure of employment at the Bureau of Labor Statistics) and the armed forces fell by 6.7 million, or 13.0 percent. By comparison, from the peak in December of 2008 to the trough in December of 2009, nonfarm payrolls fell 6.1 percent while the number of active-duty military personnel increased slightly. Cato is entitled to argue that the private sector did a fair job of picking up where the government left off. However, it is wholly illegitimate for the Institute to pretend that the largest economic downturn since the Great Depression "never happened." http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/...ssion-of-1946/