Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Irwin Stelzer nails it

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Irwin Stelzer nails it

    From The Sunday Times March 7, 2010

    America puts off the pain to have some jam todayIrwin Stelzer: American Account
    9 Comments
    Recommend?
    President Barack Obama, or his successor, will have a lot to answer for when the bills come due for his spending spree. But for now, he is due some credit for helping the American economy get back on track, while the eurozone lags, and for the strong performance of the dollar, while the euro weeps at the unfolding Greek tragedy.

    The Federal Reserve’s recent survey of business conditions concludes that “economic conditions continued to expand since the last [monthly] report”; Fed chairman Ben Bernanke guesses the economy will grow at an annual rate of about 3% in the near term; and the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) has raised its 2010 growth forecast from 2.5% to 2.8% despite expectations of a “gradual withdrawal” of monetary stimulus, including a rise in the fed funds rate.

    Throw in a musing by Larry Summers, a White House economics adviser, that this might be a recovery in which employment grows faster than GDP — the opposite of past experience — and the president just might have a good story to tell come the November congressional elections. Indeed, he better have, because if he pushes through his much-disliked healthcare plan by Easter, as now seems likely, his party’s candidates will have to explain why they rushed to do so before hearing their constituents’ views during the Easter recess.

    These rather cheery forecasts come from the balancing of decidedly mixed signals. The manufacturing sector continues to expand, but not at the increasing rate of recent months. “We are at that point where we are starting to level out,” says Norbert Ore, chairman of the committee that surveys manufacturers. Consumer spending has started the year by posting what Goldman Sachs’ economists characterise as “firm gains”, despite terrible weather last month, but the increase in spending exceeds the growth in incomes, and so might not be sustainable. World trade is recovering, but the huge imbalances between net importer America and exporters such as China and Germany remain.

    Private-sector balance sheets are in better shape as consumers have scaled back debt, but public-sector balance sheets are a shambles. As the EIU puts it: “Major economies such as the US have merely shifted liabilities from one part of the economy to the other and merely postponed, rather than avoided, a needed adjustment.”

    I recite these difficult-to-read runes not to seek sympathy for those of us who are charged with deciphering them, although such sympathy would be much appreciated. Rather, I mention them for two reasons. First, it is important to take any economic forecast with a mine of salt: the more confident the forecaster sounds, the warier the reader or auditor should be. Crystal balls are inevitably fogged in an economy as huge and fast-changing as ours.

    Second, even if it is reasonable to interpret these data as indicating that 2010 will see a decent recovery, especially if we factor in the fiscal stimulus that is about to hit the streets, that tells us little about the longer-term outlook.

    Consumer confidence is low and, Summers’ musings notwithstanding, the unemployment rate is more rather than less likely to remain high in 2011 and on into 2012. No recovery will be robust or sustainable unless consumer demand, which accounts for about 70% of economic activity, returns to something like normal levels. Most observers do not see that happening. John Makin, an economist at the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington think tank, writes in his latest economic outlook: “The sustainability of US demand growth, the key to a solid recovery, remains in question as the improvement in employment data has stalled while consumer confidence has remained weak.” Add the fact that American households are still deeply in debt, and there is reason for pessimism about the ability of the consumer to power a significant long-term recovery.

    And any hope of an export-led recovery was dashed last week when it became apparent that economic growth in Europe has stalled. With so many European countries scrambling to deleverage their national accounts, Europe’s ability to absorb imports from America is heading down, not up.

    Of course, a significant increase in job creation would change the outlook. Data released at the end of last week provide at least a slim hope that the employment picture might be about to brighten. The unemployment rate stabilised at 9.7%, and job losses were limited, at least by the standards of last year. But one month does not make a trend, and we have to assume that it will take a sizable increase in economic activity before the recent increase in the hiring of temporary workers converts into offers of permanent, full-time employment.

    The outlook is worsened by the sorry state of the public finances, both at the state and federal levels. California and New York are only the most publicised examples of the many states that are in no better shape than Greece, and are being forced to cut back on jobs and capital projects. And the condition of the federal books would be even worse were it not for the fact that in the end the federal government can print its way out of the problem. Deficits are high and rising, the Congress is readying still more spending bills, and the president is insisting that Congress enact his $1 trillion healthcare bill.

    Being unwilling to rein in spending, Obama will soon be proposing further tax increases of a size that will dwarf the few tax breaks he is offering to small businesses that take on new workers. Nobody doubts that the commission the president is appointing to find a way out of the fiscal mess will recommend tax increases now, and spending cuts, if any, much later. Or that Congress might well decide to do neither, and Micawber-like, simply hope that something turns up.

    That means we have an odd situation. We are to have jam today, this year, and perhaps even next, with the bill to come due shortly thereafter. If Obama has his way, that won’t happen until after his re-election in 2012.

    Irwin Stelzer is a business adviser and director of economic policy studies at the Hudson Institute

    stelzer@aol.com

  • #2
    Re: Irwin Stelzer nails it

    ...but Michael Moore is the more entertaining read...

    From HuffPost...

    President Obama, Replace Rahm With Me: An Open Letter From Michael Moore

    Dear President Obama,

    I understand you may be looking to replace Rahm Emanuel as your chief of staff.

    I would like to humbly offer myself, yours truly, as his replacement.

    I will come to D.C. and clean up the mess that's been created around you.

    I will work for $1 a year. I will help the Dems on Capitol Hill find their spines and I will teach them how to nonviolently beat the Republicans to a pulp.

    And I will help you get done what the American people sent you there to do. I don't need much, just a cot in the White House basement will do.

    Now, don't get too giddy with excitement over my offer, because you and I are going to be up at 5 in the morning, seven days a week and I am going to get you pumped up for battle every single day (see photo). Each morning you and I will do 100 jumping jacks and you will repeat after me:
    "THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ELECTED ME, NOT THE REPUBLICANS, TO RUN THE COUNTRY! I AM IN CHARGE! I WILL ORDER ALL OBSTRUCTIONISTS OUTTA MY WAY! IF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DON'T LIKE WHAT I'M DOING THEY CAN THROW MY ASS OUT IN 2012. IN THE MEANTIME, I CALL THE SHOTS ON THEIR BEHALF! NOW, CONGRESS, DROP AND GIVE ME 50!!"

    Then we will put on our jogging sweats and run up to Capitol Hill. We will take names, kick butts, and then take some more names. If we have to give a few noogies or half-nelson's, then so be it. In our pockets we will have a piece of paper to show the pansy Dems just how much they won by in 2008 -- and the poll results that show the majority of Americans oppose the Afghanistan and Iraq wars and want the bankers punished.

    Like drill sergeants, we will get right up in their faces and ask them, "WHAT PART OF THE PUBLIC MANDATE DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND, SOLDIER?!! DROP AND GIVE ME 50!"

    I know this is the job Rahm Emanuel was supposed to be doing.

    Now, don't get me wrong. I have always admired Rahm Emanuel (if you don't count his getting NAFTA pushed through Congress in the '90s which destroyed towns like Flint, Michigan. I know, picky-picky.). He is what we needed for a long time -- a no-apologies, take-no-prisoners fighting machine. Someone who is not afraid to get his hands dirty and pound the right wing into submission. Far from being the foul-mouthed bully he has been portrayed as, Rahm is the one who BEAT UP the bullies to protect us from them.

    That's certainly what he did in 2006. After six long, miserable years of the middle-class getting slaughtered and the poor being flushed down the toilet, Rahm Emanuel took on the job of returning Congress to the Democrats. No one believed it could be done.

    But he did it. Big time. He put the fear of God into the party of Rush and Newt. They had never been so scared. More importantly, though, he instilled a sense of hope in the Democrats that they could actually score the mother of all hat tricks in 2008 -- and with you, an African American no less, in the pole position!

    It worked. The Darkness ended. The vast majority of the nation wept with joy on the night of the election (those who weren't weeping went out and bought a record number of guns and ammo). Unlike the last president, you didn't "win" by 537 votes in Florida (although Gore won the popular vote by a half-million), you beat McCain nationally by 9,522,083 votes! The House Democrats got a walloping 79-vote margin. The Senate Dems would caucus with a supermajority of 60 votes unheard of in over 30 years. The wars would now end. America would have universal health care. Wall Street and the banks would, at the very least, be reined in. Hardworking citizens would not be thrown out of their homes. It was supposed to be the dawning of a new age.

    But the Republicans were not going to go quietly into the night. You see, instead of having just one Rahm Emanuel, they are ALL Rahm Emanuels.

    That's why they usually win. Unlike most Democrats, they are relentless and unstoppable. When they believe in something (which is usually themselves and the K Street job they hope to be rewarded with someday), they'll fight for it till the death. They are loyal to a fault to each other (they were never able to denounce Bush, even though they knew he was destroying the party). They dig their heels in deep no matter what. If you exiled them to a lone chunk of melting polar ice cap, they would keep insisting that it was just a normal "January thaw," even as the frigid Arctic waters rose above their God-fearing necks ("See what I mean -- this water is COLD! What 'global warming'?! Adam and Eve rode dinos...aagghh!!... gulp gulp gulp").

    We thought we were all done with this craziness, but we were mistaken.

    Like a beast that you just can't cage, the Republicans convinced not only the media, but YOU and your fellow Dems, that 59 votes was a minority! Precious time was lost trying to reach a "consensus" and trying to be "bipartisan."

    Well, you and the Democrats have been in charge now for over a year and not one banking regulation has been reinstated. We don't have universal health care. The war in Afghanistan has escalated. And tens of thousands of Americans continue to lose their jobs and be thrown out of their homes.

    For most of us, it's just simply no longer good enough that Bush is gone. Woo hoo. Bush is gone. Yippee. That hasn't created one new friggin' job.

    You're such a good guy, Mr. President. You came to Washington with your hand extended to the Republicans and they just chopped it off. You wanted to be respectful and they decided that they were going to say "no" to everything you suggested. Yet, you kept on saying you still believed in bipartisanship.

    Well, if you really want bipartisanship, just go ahead and let the Republicans win in November. Then you'll get all the bipartisanship you want.

    Let me be clear about one thing: The Democrats on Election Day 2010 are going to get an ass-whoopin' of biblical proportions if things don't change right now. And after the new Republican majority takes over, they, along with a few conservative Democrats in Congress, will get to bipartisanly impeach you for being a socialist and a citizen of Kenya. How nice to see both sides of the aisle working together again!

    And the brief window we had to fix this country will be gone.

    Gone.

    Gone, baby, gone.

    I don't know what your team has been up to, but they haven't served you well. And Rahm, poor Rahm, has turned into a fighter -- not of Republicans, but of the left. He called those of us who want universal health care "f***ing retarded." Look, I don't know if Rahm is the problem or if it's Gibbs or Axelrod or any of the other great people we owe a debt of thanks to for getting you elected. All I know is that whatever is fueling your White House it's now running on fumes. Time to shake things up! Time to bring me in to get you pumped up every morning! Go Barack! Yay Obama! Fight, Team, Fight!

    I'm packed and ready to come to D.C. tomorrow. If it helps, you won't really be losing Rahm entirely because I'll be bringing his brother with me -- my agent, Ari Emanuel. Man, you should see HIM negotiate a deal! Have you ever wanted to see Mitch McConnell walking around Capitol Hill carrying his own head in his hands after it's just been handed to him by the infamous Ari? Oh, baby, it won't be pretty -- but boy will it be sweet!

    What say you, Barack? Me and you against the world! Yes we can! It'll be fun -- and we may just get something done. Whaddaya got to lose? Hope?

    Retardedly yours,
    Michael Moore
    MMFlint@aol.com
    MichaelMoore.com

    P.S. Just to give you an idea of the new style I'll be bringing with me, when a cornhole like Sen. Ben Nelson tries to hold you up next time, this is what I will tell him in order to get his vote: "You've got exactly 30 seconds to rescind your demand or I will personally make sure that Nebraska doesn't get one more federal dollar for the rest of Obama's term. And then I will let everyone in your state know that you wear Sooner panties, backwards. NOW DROP AND GIVE ME 50!"

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Irwin Stelzer nails it

      Michael Moore is an optimist and even worse still in denial. The Left vs Right bullshit doesnt fly anymore.

      The only value of the brand Democrat or Republican is that no one else can join the game. Vote out one set of crooks, elect the other set of crooks right back in. They answer to the same people. They are just salesmen for the Oligarchs. Even if the Republican/Democrat salespitch doesnt work on the American people, they still shove it down our throats. Iraq war, Wallstreet bailout, full body scanners at the airports, and soon to be healthcare.

      Michael Moore is either dupped or in denial.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Irwin Stelzer nails it

        Originally posted by GRG55 View Post
        ...but Michael Moore is the more entertaining read...
        hi, GRG55,

        your posts are always wider than all the others on my screen. yours get cut off on the right side of my screen, requiring me to scroll laterally to see everything you've posted.

        i didn't understand why this was, but think i figured it out.

        iTulip gives you a "location" field in your control panel. your location is relatively long:

        "Location: Bunker Ag Centre: dairy below; poultry above..."

        instead of your location text scrolling down the header of each of your posts, your posts become wider, to accommodate your location text.

        also, i notice that you occasionally reply to a post with an article that doesn't really follow ("non sequitur") the original post. like here, with your Michael Moore Huffington post.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Irwin Stelzer nails it

          Originally posted by Morelia View Post
          hi, GRG55,

          your posts are always wider than all the others on my screen. yours get cut off on the right side of my screen, requiring me to scroll laterally to see everything you've posted.

          i didn't understand why this was, but think i figured it out.

          iTulip gives you a "location" field in your control panel. your location is relatively long:

          "Location: Bunker Ag Centre: dairy below; poultry above..."

          instead of your location text scrolling down the header of each of your posts, your posts become wider, to accommodate your location text...
          I wasn't aware there was a problem as none of the displays on the computers I use seem to have that problem, including the mini-screen on my ultra light weight Viao notebook. Thanks for pointing it out...hopefully it's fixed now.

          Originally posted by Morelia View Post
          also, i notice that you occasionally reply to a post with an article that doesn't really follow ("non sequitur") the original post. like here, with your Michael Moore Huffington post.
          There's rarely "no association" between what I post and something else on the thread. I have a strong belief that fewer threads containing even loosely associated information is more useful than the shotgun pellet spray that iTulip, especially the "News" section has turned into. You've probably noticed that I don't create a lot of new threads, and prefer whenever possible to put new information on a related existing thread, even one that may have been dormant for quite some time. You will also find that occasionally when someone posts something that is supposed to be "new", I will drag out something that demonstrates it's not...we had an example this weekend regarding a currency announcement from China.

          We all make different associations...our brains aren't all wired the same. So what to you may seen unrelated, to others, including me, might be the opposite...and vice versa. In the case of this thread, what I read into the first post was a wide ranging lament about "what's wrong with the way policy makers are managing this country [the USA]". What I read into the Michael Moore item was a lament about "what's wrong with the way you [the government] are not managing this country". Neither of the first two posts contained any new information for anyone following iTulip...the only difference is that Moore's was more entertaining...;)
          Last edited by GRG55; March 07, 2010, 10:52 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Irwin Stelzer nails it

            Originally posted by GRG55 View Post
            I wasn't aware there was a problem as none of the displays on the computers I use seem to have that problem, including the mini-screen on my ultra light weight Viao notebook. Thanks for pointing it out...hopefully it's fixed now.
            thanks very much. it is fixed now. i watch iTulip on a 61" TV, so maybe that has something to do with it. but most everything else scales just fine, so i figured it was the location text. in any case, it's all good now. you could still put in your location, just something shorter than what you had (but i don't know the absolute length that would fit). i think location is useful; it adds depth to the posts.

            Originally posted by GRG55 View Post
            There's rarely "no association" between what I post and something else on the thread. I have a strong belief that fewer threads containing even loosely associated information is more useful than the shotgun pellet spray that iTulip, especially the "News" section has turned into. You've probably noticed that I don't create a lot of new threads, and prefer whenever possible to put new information on a related existing thread, even one that may have been dormant for quite some time. You will also find that occasionally when someone posts something that is supposed to be "new", I will drag out something that demonstrates it's not...we had an example this weekend regarding a currency announcement from China.

            We all make different associations...our brains aren't all wired the same. So what to you may seen unrelated, to others, including me, might be the opposite...and vice versa. In the case of this thread, what I read into the first post was a wide ranging lament about "what's wrong with the way policy makers are managing this country [the USA]". What I read into the Michael Moore item was a lament about "what's wrong with the way you [the government] are not managing this country". Neither of the first two posts contained any new information for anyone following iTulip...the only difference is that Moore's was more entertaining...;)
            gotcha. no worries. thanks for the reply and taking the time to tweak things for me, at least.

            Comment

            Working...
            X