Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Questions For Harry Markopolos

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Questions For Harry Markopolos

    The Madoff whistle-blower talks about what the S.E.C. doesn't understand about money

    What was it like to spend nine years trying to persuade the Securities and Exchange Commission that Bernard Madoff was a fraud, only to learn that the agency thought he was perfectly reputable?

    For nine years I was the S.E.C.’s doormat.

    Now you’re triumphant, a hero in investment circles who exposes the S.E.C. as the most futile of agencies in your new book, “No One Would Listen.”

    It was a trip through the twilight zone.

    Why do you think the S.E.C. failed to wake up to Madoff’s $65 billion Ponzi scheme until he turned himself in?

    They weren’t even asleep at the switch; they were comatose. They didn’t respond to heat and light, much less evidence of wrongdoing. They were not engaged in the fight.

    This was when William Donaldson was head of the S.E.C.?

    Donaldson was too tough on Wall Street, so he got the ax. Then you had Christopher Cox, because he wasn’t going to do his job. That’s why he got the job.

    You met last year with Mary Schapiro, the current head of the S.E.C. How did that go?

    I would say she was coldly polite. Her general counsel, David Becker, did most of the talking. He and I did not get along at all. He was getting ready to come across the coffee table and strangle me.

    In the year since you testified before Congress about the S.E.C.’s failures, many of the agency’s employees have been replaced.

    They’ve redisorganized. They redisorganized the enforcement unit. I actually approve of that. I think Robert Khuzami, the new head of the enforcement division, has got fire in his belly.

    Are you saying the S.E.C. under Schapiro is about to catch fraud on Wall Street?

    She has the wrong staff. They’re a bunch of idiots there.

    What do you mean?

    The five commissioners of the S.E.C. are securities lawyers. Securities lawyers never understand finance. They don’t have the math background. If you can’t do math and if you can’t take apart the investment products of the 21st century backward and forward and put them together in your sleep, you’ll never find the frauds on Wall Street.

    So why doesn’t the S.E.C. hire finance people? Why don’t they hire you?

    They’re overlawyered. They’re poisoned by lawyers.



    You actually began your career as a money manager in Boston who first noticed Madoff’s monkey business when your boss told you to try and duplicate his investment returns. You realized they were mathematically impossible.

    Madoff was a competitor of mine, and I couldn’t compete against him because he was making up his investment returns, and I had to manage according to the market. It wasn’t a level playing field.


    Where did you learn about finance?

    You don’t learn much in grad school. Half the formulas they teach you are false. It’s a lot of self-study. I read a lot of finance books, and I usually read them with a calculator because I go through the math to make sure I master the formulas.

    Were you always a math whiz?

    I needed a tutor in 7th and 8th grade. Whatever it was, I was having big problems with algebra.

    In a recent interview with a government investigator conducted in prison, Madoff called you “a joke in the industry.” Have you ever met him?

    No. I was asked if I wanted to. I don’t want to sit there and hear his lies.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/28/ma...l?ref=magazine

  • #2
    Re: Questions For Harry Markopolos

    your new book, “No One Would Listen.”
    Ah, so that truly explains why Mr. Markopolos dropped off the face of the Earth over the last couple of months.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Questions For Harry Markopolos






      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Questions For Harry Markopolos

        Originally posted by don View Post
        ...You actually began your career as a money manager in Boston who first noticed Madoff’s monkey business when your boss told you to try and duplicate his investment returns. You realized they were mathematically impossible.

        Madoff was a competitor of mine, and I couldn’t compete against him because he was making up his investment returns, and I had to manage according to the market. It wasn’t a level playing field...
        This is exactly what happened in other sectors of the economy in other bubble fraud stages. For example in the telecom bubble AT&T couldn't figure out how its competitor Worldcom could generate the financial [and stock market] results that it was. Under immense pressure from its stockholders and Wall Street analysts, AT&T made some incredibly stupid [in retrospect] moves in a desperate effort to emulate parts of Worldcom's so-called business results...which turned out in the end to be completely fraudulent accounting.

        A similar situation occurred with the merchant energy model that Enron managed to convert from a fundamentally sound business strategy, into an entire company that could allegedly grow to infinity...and every company that tried to copy it - and there were plenty of them - was badly damaged or destroyed when Enron collapsed.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Questions For Harry Markopolos

          I'd argue this goes to the heart of the 'musical chairs' comment in the other thread too GRG. The reason that no one can stop before the music is that you have idiot shareholders and an even dumber financial press pounding on the people who might be trying to do it right.

          The idea that markets are rational when the ultimate owners of the organizations in that market are removed from day to day operation is ludicrous.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Questions For Harry Markopolos

            In Harry's musical chairs, the players are the type you may not want to beat to a seat ;)

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Questions For Harry Markopolos

              Originally posted by WDCRob View Post
              I'd argue this goes to the heart of the 'musical chairs' comment in the other thread too GRG. The reason that no one can stop before the music is that you have idiot shareholders and an even dumber financial press pounding on the people who might be trying to do it right.

              The idea that markets are rational when the ultimate owners of the organizations in that market are removed from day to day operation is ludicrous.
              The worst players are the so-called "analysts" on Wall Street. They are the worst offenders to jump on whatever story is doing the rounds and then build a +/- bar chart to show which companies in the sector "get it" and which don't.

              I used to work for a Big Oil company that was one of the most disciplined at capital allocation [upstream petroleum is an unbelievably capital intensive business]...sort of a Berkshire Hathaway of the oil industry. Our executives and Board were so good that we were almost alone in our global upstream peer group to be profitable in 1986, the year that oil prices crashed when Saudi Oil Minister Ahmed Zaki Yamani decided to "teach OPEC a lesson" and opened the taps. We also had a then much deserved triple-A corporate bond rating.

              So what did that get us? Lot's and lots of criticism from Wall Street analysts who insisted that we would be underperformers because we were underlevered and "weren't using our balance sheet effectively"...and a stock price that chronically lagged our more levered up peers, some of whom didn't make it to the end of the 1990s.

              Unfortunately neither did my former employer...it got taken out by another firm that bought the assets unbelievably cheap in the late 1990s. Seeing the writing on the wall I had left the firm a year earlier...but kept all my stock and sold into the takeover announcement pop [top quality assets eventually get recognized].

              There are few oil analysts that I have any respect for...and having seen how the game is played from the inside of Big Oil, an intermediate upstream company, and now also the junior sector that opinion is unlikely to change any time soon.

              Comment

              Working...
              X