Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Vancouver Olympic Blues?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Vancouver Olympic Blues?

    did Chicago dodge a bullet....

    The Vancouver Olympic Blues


    by Dave Zirin

    When I arrived in Vancouver, the first thing I noticed was the frowns.

    The International Olympic Committee has leased every sign and billboard in town to broadcast Olympic joy, but they can't purchase people's faces. It's clear that the 2010 Winter Games has made the mood in the bucolic coastal city decidedly overcast. Even the customs police officer checking my passport started grumbling about "$5,000 hockey tickets." Polls released on my first day in Vancouver back up this initial impression. Only 50 percent of residents in British Columbia think the Olympics will be positive and 69 percent said too much money is being spent on the Games.

    "The most striking thing in the poll is that as the Olympics get closer, British Columbians are less likely to see the Games as having a positive impact," said Hamish Marshall, research director for the pollster, Angus Reid.

    "Conventional wisdom was that as we got closer to the Olympics, people here would get more excited and more supportive." If the global recession hadn't smacked into the planning last year, with corporate sponsors fleeing for the hills, maybe the Vancouver Olympic Committee would be on more solid ground with residents. But public bailouts of Olympic projects have decisively altered the local mood.

    I spoke to Charles, a bus driver, whose good cheer diminished when I asked him about the games. "I just can't believe I wanted this a year ago," he said. "I voted for it in the plebiscite. But now, yes. I'm disillusioned." This disillusion is developing as the financial burden of the Games becomes public. The original cost estimate was $660 million in public money. It's now at an admitted $6 billion and steadily climbing. An early economic impact statement was that the games could bring in $10 billion. Price Waterhouse Coopers just released their own study showing that the total economic impact will be more like $1 billion. In addition, the Olympic Village came in $100 million over budget and had to be bailed out by the city.

    Security was estimated at $175 million and the final cost will exceed $1 billion. These budget overruns are coinciding with drastic cuts to city services. On my first day in town, the cover of the local paper blared cheery news about the Games on the top flap, while a headline announcing the imminent layoff off 800 teachers was much further down the page.

    As a staunch Olympic supporter, a sports reporter from the Globe and Mail said to me, "The optics of cuts in city services alongside Olympic cost overruns are to put it mildly, not good."

    But these aren't just p.r. gaffs to Vancouver residents, particularly on the eastside of the city where homelessness has spiked. Carol Martin who works in the downtown eastside of Vancouver, the most economically impoverished area in all of Canada, made this clear: "The Bid Committee promised that not a single person would be displaced due to the Games, but there are now 3,000 homeless people sleeping on Vancouver's streets and these people are facing increased police harassment as they try to clean the streets in the lead up to the Games."

    I strolled the backstreets of the downtown eastside and police congregate on every corner, trying to hem in a palpable frustration and anger. Anti-Olympic posters wallpaper the neighborhood, creating an alternative universe to the cheery 2010 Games displays by the airport. The Vancouver Olympic Committee has tried to quell the crackling vibe by dispersing tickets to second-tier Olympic events like the luge. It hasn't worked.

    The people of the downtown eastside and beyond are developing a different outlet for their Olympic angst. For the first time in the history of the games, a full-scale protest is being planned to welcome the athletes, tourists, and foreign dignitaries.

    Bringing together a myriad of issues, Vancouver residents have put out an open call for a week of anti-game actions. Different demonstrations on issues ranging from homelessness to indigenous rights have been called.

    Protesters from London and Russia, site of the next two Olympics will be there. Expect a tent city, expect picket signs, expect aggressive direct actions. Tellingly, according to the latest polls, 40 percent of British Columbia residents support the aims of the protesters, compared to just 13 percent across the rest of Canada. Harsha Walia of the Olympic Resistance Network said, "We are seeing increasing resistance across the country as it becomes more visible how these Games are a big fraud."

    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/dave_zirin/01/25/vancouver/index.html

  • #2
    Re: Vancouver Olympic Blues?

    Every time Toronto has tried to get the Olympics there's been a local grassroots movement to block them.

    The last time the organization called themselves "bread not circuses"

    I don't know if that's what prevented the Olympics coming here, but it must have added negative votes.

    Not to say that Toronto doesn't have unpeakably smelly, cr*ppy, wasteful politicians who'll try again, and who have already done the expensive mega-stadium "socialize the debt, privatize the profits" bullsh*t.

    And it's too bad that Montreal did what they did ... they just paid off the debt from 1970 a couple of years ago. Supposedly according to a lot of the participants the 1970 games were "the best ever" for the athletes, but for the regular people of the city ...

    Hopefully we can put the next bid in the crapper too.

    Originally posted by don View Post
    did Chicago dodge a bullet....

    The Vancouver Olympic Blues


    by Dave Zirin

    When I arrived in Vancouver, the first thing I noticed was the frowns.

    The International Olympic Committee has leased every sign and billboard in town to broadcast Olympic joy, but they can't purchase people's faces. It's clear that the 2010
    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/dave_zirin/01/25/vancouver/index.html

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Vancouver Olympic Blues?

      The original cost estimate was $660 million in public money. It's now at an admitted $6 billion and steadily climbing. An early economic impact statement was that the games could bring in $10 billion. Price Waterhouse Coopers just released their own study showing that the total economic impact will be more like $1 billion. In addition, the Olympic Village came in $100 million over budget and had to be bailed out by the city.


      Who believed these estimates in the first place? Although the amount of miscalculation is amazing. Reminds me of the Bush Administrations estimate of the Medicare prescription drug plan. Wrong early and often.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Vancouver Olympic Blues?

        Originally posted by cjppjc View Post
        The original cost estimate was $660 million in public money. It's now at an admitted $6 billion and steadily climbing. An early economic impact statement was that the games could bring in $10 billion. Price Waterhouse Coopers just released their own study showing that the total economic impact will be more like $1 billion. In addition, the Olympic Village came in $100 million over budget and had to be bailed out by the city.


        Who believed these estimates in the first place? Although the amount of miscalculation is amazing. Reminds me of the Bush Administrations estimate of the Medicare prescription drug plan. Wrong early and often.
        It is all Gollum's fault: all that positive energy :rolleyes:

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Vancouver Olympic Blues?

          Originally posted by Spartacus View Post

          And it's too bad that Montreal did what they did ... they just paid off the debt from 1970 a couple of years ago. Supposedly according to a lot of the participants the 1970 games were "the best ever" for the athletes, but for the regular people of the city ...
          I would say more like for the "People of the Belle Province" as a special tobacco tax was enacted to pay for the white elephant.

          Comment


          • #6
            $600 billion overbudget is typical

            Unfortunately, the average for project management using Gantt, PERT, Earned Value Analysis, and other PMBOK-approved methods (Project Management Body of Knowledge, issued by PMI, Project Management Institute) is:
            • 90% completion takes the scheduled duration. The last 10% of completion take another 78% duration, for a total completion of 178% duration.
            • Project cost is usually double of what was budgeted.

            CCPM (Critical Chain Project Management), invented by Dr. Eli Goldratt in 1997, has been found to get projects done 10% to 50% faster than traditional project management methods.

            Unfortunately, less than 0.1% of PMP's (Project Management Professionals) even know that CCPM exists. Maybe soon.

            Comment

            Working...
            X