Re: Nearly 25% of San Jose Residents Now Live in Poverty
Unfortunately that is too much the case in our western societies today.
But there was a time when it was the family unit that was expected to take care of their own, not the state. Instead, over time, we have removed the stigma of divorce, among other "anti-family" legislation, and created an entire class of single parent households, without any extended family support, living in poverty.
Apparently the only solution is more state intervention, in the form of family services departments, "child welfare" organizations, calls for state organized day-care [which, unfortunately, seems what many of our schools are turning into], and a host of other programs designed to address the problems the state helped amplify in the first place.
Originally posted by Rajiv
View Post
Unfortunately that is too much the case in our western societies today.
But there was a time when it was the family unit that was expected to take care of their own, not the state. Instead, over time, we have removed the stigma of divorce, among other "anti-family" legislation, and created an entire class of single parent households, without any extended family support, living in poverty.
...In 2008, 28.7 percent of households headed by single women were poor, while 13.8 percent of households headed by single men and 5.5 percent of married-couple households lived in poverty...
[from the National Poverty Center at the University of Michigan, Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy]
[from the National Poverty Center at the University of Michigan, Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy]
Comment