Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is anyone really reading this?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is anyone really reading this?

    From the Washington Post

    Where's the Primer...how does the average Joe get anything out of this?

    "Fed officials do not make policy with an eye toward maximizing profits. They are charged by law with managing the nation's money supply to keep employment high and prices stable, and earnings fluctuate depending on a wide range of factors as they pursue that goal. In the crisis, the central bank's policy has been to create money and use it to buy a wide variety of assets, which in turn pay interest.

    "In effect, the unprecedented range of actions taken to address the crisis has made the Fed's balance sheet more like that of a private bank. A firm such as Bank of America takes money from depositors, whom it pays little or nothing in interest, and lends it out at significantly higher rates. The Fed, similarly, takes money that banks keep on deposit, at a rate of 0.25 percent, and lends it to the U.S. government by buying Treasury securities and, lately, to home buyers and other private borrowers though more exotic investments.

    "While that resulted in higher earnings in 2009, it exposes the Fed to more risks down the road. "They've moved up the risk-return curve, as they have more long-term assets and more things that involve credit risk," said Diane Swonk, chief economist at Mesirow Financial.

    "If the price of Treasury bonds or mortgage-related securities issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were to fall in the years ahead, and Fed leaders decided they need to drain money from the financial system by selling off some of their portfolio, the central bank would lose money. "If they do enough asset sales and rates go high enough, that could eat into future profits pretty substantially," said Michael Feroli, an economist at J.P. Morgan Chase.

    "Even as the Fed comes to resemble private banks in terms of its balance sheet and its earnings power, there remains one big difference. The CEO of the Federal Reserve, Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, received a modest cost-of-living raise for 2010, despite the record earnings: He now makes $199,700, with no bonus at all."

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...l?hpid=topnews

  • #2
    Re: Is anyone really reading this?

    Diana Swork....is one of "THEM".........Be VERY carful around her.

    Mike

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Is anyone really reading this?

      Beginning to resemble a private bank???!!! It is a private bank!
      "...the western financial system has already failed. The failure has just not yet been realized, while the system remains confident that it is still alive." Jesse

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Is anyone really reading this?

        Originally posted by Thailandnotes View Post

        Where's the Primer...how does the average Joe get anything out of this?
        This was picked up and broadcast in rotation on National Public Radio this morning. Announcer voice emphasis and editing influenced the take-away for average Joe, it was:

        - Fed made a ton of money for the people that will go back to treasury, 3 cheers for the Fed

        - Bernanke made us the 46 billion with his big bank and only took $200K salary with no bonus, shame on Wall Street titans.

        (NPR Morning Edition, Jan 12, examine at NPR.org )
        Last edited by thriftyandboringinohio; January 12, 2010, 03:42 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Is anyone really reading this?

          Originally posted by thriftyandboringinohio View Post
          This was picked up and broadcast in rotation on National Public Radio this morning. Announcer voice emphasis and editing influenced the take-away for average Joe, it was:

          - Fed made a ton of money for the people that will go back to treasury, 3 cheers for the Fed

          - Bernanke made us the 48 billion with his big bank and only took $200K salary with no bonus, shame on Wall Street titans.

          (NPR Morning Edition, Jan 12, examine at NPR.org )
          I read a text version elsewhere... I thought there were some misleading statements about the mechanics of the whole thing. I think the worst offender is the idea that interest collected from the Treasury, and then paid back to the Treasury, somehow constitutes earning money for the Treasury.

          Here is the Fed's actual press release:
          The Federal Reserve Board on Tuesday announced preliminary unaudited results indicating that the Reserve Banks provided for payments of approximately $46.1 billion of their estimated 2009 net income of $52.1 billion to the U.S. Treasury. This represents a $14.4 billion increase over the 2008 results ($31.7 billion of $35.5 billion of net income). The increase was primarily due to increased earnings on securities holdings during 2009.

          Under the Board's policy, the Reserve Banks are required to transfer their net income to the U.S. Treasury after providing for the payment of statutory dividends to member banks and equating surplus to paid-in capital. In 2009, statutory dividends totaled $1.4 billion and approximately $4.6 billion of earnings were used to equate surplus to paid-in capital.

          The Federal Reserve Banks' 2009 net earnings were derived primarily from $46.1 billion in earnings on securities acquired through open market operations (U.S. Treasury securities, government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) debt securities, and federal agency and GSE mortgage-backed securities), $5.5 billion in net earnings from consolidated limited liability companies (LLCs), which were created in response to the financial crisis, and $2.9 billion in earnings on loans extended to depository institutions, primary dealers, and others. (Meaning that the Fed printed money to buy Treasuries, MBS, and other interest-bearing securities, collected interest payments on those securities from the Treasury and the GSEs, and then paid that interest back to the government, minus the Fed's operating expenses.) The significant increase in earnings on securities was primarily due to increased securities holdings as a result of the Federal Reserve's response to the severe economic downturn. Net earnings from currency swap arrangements, which have been established with 14 central banks, and investments denominated in foreign currencies totaled $2.6 billion. Additional net earnings of $1.5 billion were derived primarily from fees of $0.7 billion for the provision of priced services to depository institutions.

          Operating expenses of the twelve Reserve Banks, net of amounts reimbursed by the U.S. Treasury and other entities for services the Reserve Banks provided as fiscal agents, totaled $3.4 billion in 2009. In addition, the interest paid to depository institutions on reserve balances totaled $2.2 billion. The Reserve Banks were assessed for Board expenditures, including the cost of new currency, totaling $0.9 billion.

          The preliminary results include valuation adjustments through September 30 for loans and consolidated LLCs. The final results, which will be presented in the Reserve Banks' annual financial reports and the Board of Governors' Annual Report, will reflect valuation adjustments through December 31.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Is anyone really reading this?

            Fed posts record profits for last year

            Fed makes record windfall off economic revival program, sends $46.1B to Treasury

            WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Federal Reserve generated record profits last year, reflecting money made off its extraordinary efforts to rescue the country from the worst economic and financial crisis since the 1930s.
            The central bank announced Tuesday it logged a record windfall of $52.1 billion. Of that total, a record of $46.1 billion gets turned over to the Treasury Department.

            It marks both the biggest profit and payment to Treasury on records dating back to 1914, when the Fed began operating. The previous record payment turned over to the Treasury -- of $34.6 billion -- was registered in 2007. In 2008, the Fed reported a payment of $31.7 billion.

            The Fed's efforts to end the crisis are separate from the $700 billion taxpayer-funded financial bailout program authorized by Congress in 2008 and overseen by the Treasury Department.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Is anyone really reading this?

              Free enterprise is SO WONDERFUL.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Is anyone really reading this?

                Originally posted by grapejelly View Post
                Free enterprise is SO WONDERFUL.
                I, too, could turn a 'profit' creating reserves to buy interest-bearing securities, and then collecting the interest. Will somebody give me a job in central banking? Bernanke is getting paid more than I am, and I hear he's underpaid!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Is anyone really reading this?

                  I assume the FED is mark to model or whatever I dam like !

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Is anyone really reading this?

                    Originally posted by ASH View Post
                    I read a text version elsewhere... I thought there were some misleading statements
                    NPR broadcast a highly condensed summary to the masses that had all the difficult things removed, leaving only a small juicy morsel of misleading information. ;)

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Is anyone really reading this?

                      This is my belief too. There is only a profit if the MBS is valued at PAR, or whatever value the fed paid for it. I'm sure that once the FED tries to unwind this position it will not get what it paid for it.

                      Unless, fred and fan buy it back with their new unlimited balance sheet courtesy of the treasury.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Is anyone really reading this?

                        Why does the FED ever need to unwind the position?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Is anyone really reading this?

                          Originally posted by aaron View Post
                          Why does the FED ever need to unwind the position?
                          I am of the opinion that it doesn't need to. In principle, if the assets on its balance sheet drop in market value, then the Fed no longer has the capacity to withdraw a quantity of reserves from the banking system equal to the quantity it created by buying the assets in the first place. However, there's nothing that says the Fed needs to use these particular assets for open market operations. In extremity, if the Fed was out of Treasuries to sell and still needed to reduce liquidity, an increase in the reserve fraction requirement would accomplish the same thing.

                          I personally don't think it is meaningful to talk about a central bank making a profit or taking a loss on assets purchased by creating reserves ex nihilo. Neither do I think there's much of a parallel between bad assets on the balance sheet of a central bank, versus on the balance sheet of a commercial bank.

                          Not that I'm a banking expert.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Is anyone really reading this?

                            if things work as theory says, that 1T dollars paid for the MBS is now in the economy. If the banks ever start lending again, That 1T of base money can be levered up, and cause massive inflation. Technically at some point the fed must pull the money back in. Under normal operations the fed would sell the MBS and "destoy" the $$$.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Is anyone really reading this?

                              This is working perfectly. You see it really is A Wonderfull Life.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X