Tweet
Today marks the seventh day since the campaign activated the zip code search tool. In the 168 hours that have transpired, Americans have searched for banking alternatives in 16,631 zip codes. That's sixteen percent of the country actively asking the question "what can we do to effect change?" During this time we've been flooded with questions, which taught us a lot of things. Just so you know, we literally cobbled it together in about four hours and spent another four hours cleaning up the look. Then America got to field test it. During the first 48 hours we spent most of our time bomb-proofing it. You'd be amazed what people will type into a box that says "enter a five digit zip code here." Mischief managed, we were able to shift the system over to its full traffic configuration. Congratulations, America! In those 48 hours, over 115,000 of you stress-tested that tool and in the days since you've been continuing to use the tool around 45,000 times a day.
So the burning question, of course, is "will moving your money have an effect?" And by effect, I don't mean making a momentary political statement. I mean making a structural difference to the country's financial system. The answer is yes, and here's how.
Inside banking there's something called a "core deposit" that every American should know about. These are the most important deposits to a bank. It's the money relied on the most as the foundation for the business. The most important core deposits include the checking and savings accounts of consumers and businesses. Your accounts! All other forms of deposits and advances, and there are a number of them, are less attractive sources of funds to support a bank's lending engine.
For each lending dollar of a bank, increasing the fraction of support for that lending dollar by core deposits (versus other forms of money) means greater confidence and stability for that bank. The effect is less pronounced in institutions that have large fractions of their business model involved in investments that yield income from non-lending uses of funds. This means it's the community institutions focused on purer "classic" banking operating models that get the most bang from your buck ... literally. So if the public shifts a small fraction of the nation's core deposit base into these institutions it magnifies the stabilizing effect on this portion of the financial system. That's provided the receiving bank is already in good shape, of course, and isn't saddled with other problems. That's why the listing tool we created for the MoveYourMoney campaign only shows the best of breed, to our best ability to identify who they might be. In future blog posts I'll discuss other types of banks and the issues facing banks not in the greatest of shape.
Full post here.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dennis..._b_412681.html
So the burning question, of course, is "will moving your money have an effect?" And by effect, I don't mean making a momentary political statement. I mean making a structural difference to the country's financial system. The answer is yes, and here's how.
Inside banking there's something called a "core deposit" that every American should know about. These are the most important deposits to a bank. It's the money relied on the most as the foundation for the business. The most important core deposits include the checking and savings accounts of consumers and businesses. Your accounts! All other forms of deposits and advances, and there are a number of them, are less attractive sources of funds to support a bank's lending engine.
For each lending dollar of a bank, increasing the fraction of support for that lending dollar by core deposits (versus other forms of money) means greater confidence and stability for that bank. The effect is less pronounced in institutions that have large fractions of their business model involved in investments that yield income from non-lending uses of funds. This means it's the community institutions focused on purer "classic" banking operating models that get the most bang from your buck ... literally. So if the public shifts a small fraction of the nation's core deposit base into these institutions it magnifies the stabilizing effect on this portion of the financial system. That's provided the receiving bank is already in good shape, of course, and isn't saddled with other problems. That's why the listing tool we created for the MoveYourMoney campaign only shows the best of breed, to our best ability to identify who they might be. In future blog posts I'll discuss other types of banks and the issues facing banks not in the greatest of shape.
Full post here.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dennis..._b_412681.html
Comment