Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pat Buchanan: A Decade of Self Delusion (We Did It To Ourselves)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pat Buchanan: A Decade of Self Delusion (We Did It To Ourselves)

    Ole Pat still makes sense. Too bad he got stuck with the whacko religion tag.

    http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=35018

    About the first decade of what was to be the Second American Century, the pessimists have been proven right.

    According to the International Monetary Fund, the United States began the century producing 32 percent of the world's gross domestic product. We ended the decade producing 24 percent. No nation in modern history, save for the late Soviet Union, has seen so precipitous a decline in relative power in a single decade.

    The United States began the century with a budget surplus. We ended with a deficit of 10 percent of gross domestic product, which will be repeated in 2010. Where the economy was at full employment in 2000, 10 percent of the labor force is out of work today and another 7 percent is underemployed or has given up looking for a job.

    Between one-fourth and one-third of all U.S. manufacturing jobs have disappeared in 10 years, the fruits of a free-trade ideology that has proven anything but free for this country. Our future is being outsourced -- to China.

    While the median income of American families was stagnant, the national debt doubled.

    The dollar lost half its value against the euro. Once the most self-sufficient republic in history, which produced 96 percent of all it consumed, the U.S.A. is almost as dependent on foreign nations today for manufactured goods, and the loans to pay for them, as we were in the early years of the republic.

    What the British were to us then, China is today.

    Beijing holds the mortgage and grows impatient as we endlessly borrow on equity and refuse to begin paying it down. The possibility exists of an eventual run on the dollar or even a U.S. debt default.

    Who did this to us? We did it to ourselves.

    We sold ourselves a lot of snake oil about the Global Economy, interdependence, free trade and "it doesn't make any difference where goods are produced." The George W. Bush Republicans ran up the deficit with tax cuts, two wars and a splurge in social spending to rival the guns-and-butter of the Great Society.

    Abandoning its role as the fellow who comes and takes away the punch bowl when the party's getting good, the Fed kept the money flowing fast and free, creating the tech bubble that burst in Y2K and the stock and housing bubble that burst at decade's end.

    To pull us back from the cliff's edge, over which we were headed a year ago, the Fed doubled the money supply, while the administration ran up deficit spending to the highest level since World War II.

    Unlike World War II, however, there is no end in sight to these deficits.

    The stock market, which flat-lined over the decade, had to surge 50 percent in 2009 to retrieve the worst losses since the Depression.

    Everyone, it seems, except for Washington bureaucrats and Wall Street, for whom the bonuses never seem to stop, has been hammered by the sinking home values and shrinking portfolios.

    After Sept. 11, the nation was united behind a president as it had not been since Pearl Harbor. But instead of focusing on the enemies who did this to us, we took Osama bin Laden's bait and plunged into a war in Iraq that bled and divided us, alienated Europe and the Arab world, and destroyed the Republican Party's reputation as the reliable custodian of national security and foreign policy.

    The party paid -- with the loss of both houses in 2006 and the presidency in 2008 -- but the nation has not stopped paying.

    With nearly 200,000 troops in Iraq and Afghanistan and another 30,000 more on the way, al-Qaida is now in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and North Africa, while the huge U.S. military presence in Afghanistan and Iraq serves as its recruiting poster.

    Again, it is not a malevolent fate that has done this to us. We did it to ourselves. We believed all that hubristic blather about our being the "greatest empire since Rome," the "indispensable nation" and "unipolar power" advancing to "benevolent global hegemony" in a series of "cakewalk" wars to "end tyranny in our world."

    After a decade of self-delusion and self-indulgence, we must stop deceiving ourselves. As Hurricane Katrina demonstrated, the "can-do" nation that won World War II in Europe and the Pacific in less than four years, that put a man on the moon in the same decade JFK said we would, is history.

    We have a government that cannot balance its books, defend its borders or win its wars. And what is it now doing? Drafting another entitlement program as we are informed that the Social Security and Medicare trust funds have unfunded liabilities in the trillions.

    At the end of the first decade of the 21st century, the question is not whether we will preside over the creation of a New World Order, but whether America's decline is irreversible.

  • #2
    Re: Pat Buchanan: A Decade of Self Delusion (We Did It To Ourselves)

    Originally posted by c1ue View Post
    Ole Pat still makes sense. Too bad he got stuck with the whacko religion tag.

    http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=35018
    Thanks for posting this, clue1.

    Ole Pat has always made sense, and he's far from a "whacko" in his faith - except to those who worship at the altar of Secular Humanism and despise Orthodox and Catholic Christianity. (I've met Pat and spoken with him; even his political opponents seem to like him.)

    But to be fair Pat has said some foolish things in his lifetime; the good part is that he does learn and he has become more pluralstic, while standing fast for basic Paleoconservative principles.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Pat Buchanan: A Decade of Self Delusion (We Did It To Ourselves)

      Originally posted by Raz
      Ole Pat has always made sense, and he's far from a "whacko" in his faith - except to those who worship at the altar of Secular Humanism and despise Orthodox and Catholic Christianity. (I've met Pat and spoken with him; even his political opponents seem to like him.)

      But to be fair Pat has said some foolish things in his lifetime; the good part is that he does learn and he has become more pluralstic, while standing fast for basic Paleoconservative principles.
      I don't disagree with your statement - hence my reference to the 'tag'.

      Sometimes 'tag's are accurate - i.e. flip-flopper ;) and sometimes they are not.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Pat Buchanan: A Decade of Self Delusion (We Did It To Ourselves)

        Buchanan/Paul 2012?
        "...the western financial system has already failed. The failure has just not yet been realized, while the system remains confident that it is still alive." Jesse

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Pat Buchanan: A Decade of Self Delusion (We Did It To Ourselves)

          Originally posted by Raz View Post
          Ole Pat has always made sense, and he's far from a "whacko" in his faith - except to those who worship at the altar of Secular Humanism and despise Orthodox and Catholic Christianity.
          You might want to edit that "and" to an "or" there Raz. Plenty of Secular Humanists have no problem with the religious choices others make.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Pat Buchanan: A Decade of Self Delusion (We Did It To Ourselves)

            Originally posted by WDCRob View Post
            You might want to edit that "and" to an "or" there Raz. Plenty of Secular Humanists have no problem with the religious choices others make.
            wouldn't changing it to 'or' change the meaning to exactly what you are proposing isn't true in your eyes?
            engineer with little (or even no) economic insight

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Pat Buchanan: A Decade of Self Delusion (We Did It To Ourselves)

              One of Pat's best ever. Thanks for posting.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Pat Buchanan: A Decade of Self Delusion (We Did It To Ourselves)

                Originally posted by Raz View Post
                Thanks for posting this, clue1.

                Ole Pat has always made sense, and he's far from a "whacko" in his faith - except to those who worship at the altar of Secular Humanism and despise Orthodox and Catholic Christianity. (I've met Pat and spoken with him; even his political opponents seem to like him.)

                But to be fair Pat has said some foolish things in his lifetime; the good part is that he does learn and he has become more pluralstic, while standing fast for basic Paleoconservative principles.
                A number of things bankrupted America: 1.) the unwillingness of Americans to pay more taxes to pay-down the deficits for govn't spending; 2.) the unwillingness of Americans to sacrafice and save for the future; 3.) the policies of Alan Greenspan and Bernanke that kept interest rates near or at zero in order to enable federal-spending and bail-out bubbles and lenders; 4.) unnecessary military spending and waste; 5.) nation-building adventures; 6.) the unwillingness of America to develop atomic energy, not to mention even oil and gas reserves, even hydro-electric power sites; 7.) nationalism, xenophobia, English-only, and the unwillingness of Americans to embrace the world with open-borders, free trade, common markets, common currency, and common citizenships; 8.) the unwillingness of America to change its political system and to adapt to the world and the 21st Century's realities; 9.) the unwillingness of America to change anything, which has led to the festering of all kinds of critical problems in American society; 10.) corruption on a scale never before envisioned, and corruption re-enforced by the political system of grid-lock, drift, "check and balance", and the peoples' fear of change. :rolleyes:

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Pat Buchanan: A Decade of Self Delusion (We Did It To Ourselves)

                  Originally posted by Starving Steve View Post
                  7.) nationalism, xenophobia, English-only, and the unwillingness of Americans to embrace the world with open-borders, free trade, common markets, common currency, and common citizenships
                  Ah yes, this is why I put this guy on my ignore list.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Pat Buchanan: A Decade of Self Delusion (We Did It To Ourselves)

                    Originally posted by c1ue View Post
                    Ole Pat still makes sense. Too bad he got stuck with the whacko religion tag.

                    http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=35018
                    America's decline is not irreversible. The same conservative folk who look back on the 40's 50's and 60's with fondness would choke with rage if the tax rates were the same.

                    Let's go back to the tax rates, inflation adjusted, of yesteryear, and I am sure the government could go to the moon in a decade and fight bigger wars without such big deficits...Arthur Laffer's threories be damned.

                    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_..._United_States

                    All that I am saying is that either you want less money in the public sector, or you want a more effective government. You can rarely have both - fighting the Japanese and pulling off the Apollo Program were not free activities.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Pat Buchanan: A Decade of Self Delusion (We Did It To Ourselves)

                      Originally posted by dcarrigg
                      Let's go back to the tax rates, inflation adjusted, of yesteryear, and I am sure the government could go to the moon in a decade and fight bigger wars without such big deficits...Arthur Laffer's threories be damned.

                      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_..._United_States

                      All that I am saying is that either you want less money in the public sector, or you want a more effective government. You can rarely have both - fighting the Japanese and pulling off the Apollo Program were not free activities.
                      I fear focus on tax rates is counterproductive.

                      An examination of federal spending as a percentage of GDP show that tax rates are irrelevant:

                      http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/...olor=c&local=s

                      US federal spending as percent gdp.bmp

                      Though nominal tax rates may have appeared higher in the 60s, the reality is that federal spending has been increasing at a very substantial rate.

                      This spending increase is accompanied not only via increased income from income taxes, but via income from entitlement taxes - and the entitlement tax withholdings have been going up mercilessly in the past decade.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Pat Buchanan: A Decade of Self Delusion (We Did It To Ourselves)

                        As a new member here at iTulip, please be patient if I appear to overlook the obvious; I'm trying hard to get my arms wrapped around this macroeconomics.

                        Although I agree with much of what Pat Buchanan wrote in that article, his claim that free trade has damaged the country (a charge that Peter Schiff also makes) just doesn't make sense to me. Doesn't the fact that a product is produced cheaper elsewhere result in a savings to the American consumer and, in the big picuture, thereby raise everyone's standard of living? As long as we are trading value for value, why does anyone get harmed?

                        Thanks,

                        Steph

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Pat Buchanan: A Decade of Self Delusion (We Did It To Ourselves)

                          Your answer is common-sense: free trade works best for everyone because the cost-of-living is reduced and everyone has more money to spend. So, even if you have lost your job to a lower-cost producer, you benefit by having your dollars buy more goods.

                          And the converse is true: when govn't interferes to protect jobs, it drives-up the cost of production and raises the cost-of-living for everyone. So even if you do have a job, your benefit by working is minimal. Your dollars buy less.

                          Simple! And we learned this hard lesson in economics by going through a difficult period of inflation and stagnation from 1963-1980. So why do we have to re-learn this economic lesson again now?:rolleyes:

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Pat Buchanan: A Decade of Self Delusion (We Did It To Ourselves)

                            Originally posted by steph_m_chick View Post
                            As a new member here at iTulip, please be patient if I appear to overlook the obvious; I'm trying hard to get my arms wrapped around this macroeconomics.

                            Although I agree with much of what Pat Buchanan wrote in that article, his claim that free trade has damaged the country (a charge that Peter Schiff also makes) just doesn't make sense to me. Doesn't the fact that a product is produced cheaper elsewhere result in a savings to the American consumer and, in the big picuture, thereby raise everyone's standard of living? As long as we are trading value for value, why does anyone get harmed?

                            Thanks,

                            Steph
                            There are a lot of “free” things that in reality are just like “free lunch”. You can get it if you pay double price for dinner. E.g. our “free financial markets” are based on the fiat currency freely distributed by the Gosbank (FED) in support of the insane fractional reserve banking and financial manipulations. The same applies to the international finance/trade, where political considerations and cronyism direct the “free hand” of the CBs.

                            The notion of the free markets emerged when everything was much smaller, trade happened between similarly developed Western countries and gov’t was not involved in manipulating the financial system. Nowadays it will take quite an effort to restore even semblance of the free market. Obviously, nobody is interested in making this effort.
                            медведь

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Pat Buchanan: A Decade of Self Delusion (We Did It To Ourselves)

                              Originally posted by Steph_m_chick
                              Although I agree with much of what Pat Buchanan wrote in that article, his claim that free trade has damaged the country (a charge that Peter Schiff also makes) just doesn't make sense to me. Doesn't the fact that a product is produced cheaper elsewhere result in a savings to the American consumer and, in the big picuture, thereby raise everyone's standard of living? As long as we are trading value for value, why does anyone get harmed?
                              There are several reasons why 'free trade' is a misnomer:

                              1) China's trade with the US is far from free. China has (and continues) to subsidize its exports in many ways including:

                              a) import barriers for US and other outside companies to sell inside China
                              b) a national currency (RMB) which is significantly lower in value than it 'ought' to be
                              c) considerably different regulatory and environmental considerations
                              d) outright subsidies on land, on energy costs, etc etc

                              2) The cost of a product is not the only factor. The economic benefit from the product's life cycle also matters: the income earned in the circle from commodities to parts to product to wholesale to retail.

                              While in the short term having a cheaper widget is great, is it a net benefit when in the long term overall incomes fall? We can't all make a living waiting tables, cutting hair, and walking dogs.

                              3) The actuality of the 'free trade' experience has not demonstrated any of the benefits of theoretical free trade. Has the US - which has given up a significant part its domestic manufacturing - shown a significant increase in standard of living? The average - as weighed up by the outsize profits by the top 0.5% - is higher, but the middle and working classes have clearly gone nowhere in 10 years as Buchanan has noted.

                              In fact outside of the few resource rich nations - outsourcing of too much manufacturing has not worked well anywhere.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X