Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

U.S. plane attacker "sneaked" into Nigeria: government

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • U.S. plane attacker "sneaked" into Nigeria: government

    This article probably belongs in Rand and Rave, but I did not know how to post it there. Anyhow, I thought this article was a perfect example of the times we live in when we spend trillions on banks, foreign wars, and social obligations that are bankrupting our country, we can't seem to stop a lone attacker who was on a terrorist watch list and whose OWN FATHER had notified U.S. authorities concerning his son's actions.

    From Reuters:
    Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, 23, was charged on Saturday in the United States with trying to blow up Northwest Airlines flight 253 as it approached Detroit from Amsterdam on Christmas Day with almost 300 people on board.
    The London-educated Nigerian, son of a respected former banker, started his journey to Detroit in Nigeria's commercial hub of Lagos, where he boarded a KLM flight to Amsterdam before going through transit at Schiphol airport.
    "The man in question has been living outside the country for a while. He sneaked into Nigeria on the 24th of December and left the same day," Nigerian Information Minister Dora Akunyili told reporters in the commercial capital Lagos.
    "The father, Alhaji Umar Mutallab who is a responsible and respected Nigerian, with a true Nigerian spirit had earlier reported his concern about his son's activities to relevant American authorities," Akunyili said.
    The U.S. government created a record of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab last month in the intelligence community's central repository of information on known and suspected international terrorists, but there was not enough negative data to put him on a "no-fly" list, a U.S. official has said.
    Akunyili said Alhaji Umar Mutallab, who met with Nigerian intelligence officials on Saturday, had expressed "deep shock and regret" over his son's actions. He also met with U.S. security officials in Abuja on their invitation on Sunday, a family friend told Reuters.
    The United States asked airports and airlines around the world to tighten security after the foiled attack, which raised questions about how Abdulmutallab had been able to get explosive materials onto the plane despite higher security worldwide since the September 11, 2001 hijacked airline attacks.
    Abdulmutallab went through normal security checks when he began his journey in Lagos and had a multiple-entry U.S. visa issued in London, a senior Nigerian aviation official said.
    "The passenger did not check in any baggage but was spotted with a shoulder bag. He went through a normal screening and check-in process," the head of Nigeria's Civil Aviation Authority, Harold Demuren, told reporters on Saturday.
    U.S. VISA ISSUED IN LONDON
    Demuren said Abdulmutallab's U.S. visa had been issued in London on June 16, 2008 and was due to expire in June 2010. He said it was scanned without the Advance Passenger Information System (APIS) returning any objection.
    "Thereafter, he passed through aviation security comprising a walk-through metal detector and baggage X-ray screening machine. He proceeded to the boarding gate where he went through secondary screening as confirmed by KLM officials," he said.
    He was refused a visa to enter Britain in May 2009 when he tried to apply for a course at a bogus college, Britain's Sunday Times newspaper said. University College London earlier said it had a record of a student of that name attending from 2005-2008.
    The incident has raised questions about security at Nigerian airports but Akunyili said Nigeria recently passed an audit by International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and another America Transportation Security Audit (ATSA) just last month.
    "We want to assure everybody that our airports are very safe ... However, in the light of the new developments, we have reinforced our security systems in all our airports," she said.
    Abdulmutallab was charged with trying to blow up the plane by setting alight an explosive device attached to his body.
    An initial FBI analysis found the device contained PETN, also known as pentaerythritol, one of the explosives carried by "shoe bomber" Richard Reid in his failed attempt to blow up a U.S. passenger jet just before Christmas in 2001, months after the September 11 attacks.
    The device consisted of a six-inch (15-cm) packet of powder and a syringe containing a liquid, which were sewn into the suspect's underwear, according to media reports.
    Demuren said Abdulmutallab had purchased his $2,831 Lagos-Amsterdam Detroit return ticket at the KLM office in Accra, Ghana, on December 16 with a January 8, 2010 return date.

    I think that the story is relevant for a number of reasons, mostly because of the public's reaction. Now while the average reader might ask what this has to do with itulip or the economy, I say it has plenty. For many years I did survey research. One of the interesting things I noticed in the many studies that I managed was when we would interview a customer who was particularly upset about a particular experience or issue. They tended to rate everything negatively, even those factors not directly linked to the particular negative experience. For instance, if you eat at a restaurant with bad food, you are much less likely to rave about the service you received no matter how good it is. It's the same way with this story. With the steady drip, drip, drip of bad news whether it be the health care debate, Climategate, Wall Street bailouts, oversized executive bonuses, endless foreign wars, or an inability to secure our own borders, people no longer distinguish between the failings of Wall Street, Homeland Security, American foreign policy, or whatever. All they see is a system that no longer works for them. All stories like this do is to add to the growing polarization in American politics between the have's and the have not's (i.e. those with political access and those without it).

    The lone comment at the bottom of the page pretty much sums it up:
    You’ve got to be kidding me. We have how many tens of thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands of Average every day Americans who haven’t done anything whatsoever on this list, or at least, flagged a various color to indicate ‘risk’ of terrorism. Yet, we have this guy who has been on a watch list, followed by the FBI or whatever, and who even has his dad (prominent Nigerian banker) calling Americans to warn us of him? What is even the point of the no-fly list when we let these people fly? If anything, this attack is a reason we should fire all TSA workers, and remove all the draconian measures we took. Why? Because the wrong people are on the list, and the right people are OFF it. All the people go through screenings, pat downs, strip searches whether physical or by the new ultrasound or whatever machine. All of it, doesn’t do crap for us. We still get a guy on a plane trying to blow it up.
    But hey, that’s what we get for valuing security over freedom. Neither.

    But then again we are making that same bet with Climategate, Deathcare, and the Ponzi Scheme known as Derivatives.

    One pissed off Democrat who voted for change. Still hasn’t got it. (and won’t vote republican because they’re even MORE clueless)
    I think this is just one more nail in the coffin of the existing political and economic order. It also ;ooks like some of the shine of our fearless leader, OMGObama, has worn off.:rolleyes:

    Original story here:

    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BQ0WB20091227

  • #2
    Re: U.S. plane attacker "sneaked" into Nigeria: government

    I want to be friends with the person that left that comment.

    If anything, this attack is a reason we should fire all TSA workers, and remove all the draconian measures we took.
    Unfortunately this event has given the government types a reason to trot out the the biggest 9/11 lie ever told all so they can reinforce their security structure, not break it down.

    "we never could have imagined it"

    I am not slow, nor did I imagine reading about Project Bojinka and the arrests made in the Philippines in wire stories that were re-printed by several prominent American daily newspapers at the time.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: U.S. plane attacker "sneaked" into Nigeria: government

      Only one carry on? No electronics for the first hour of flight? I wish that, just once, some terrorist would try something that you can only foil by upgrading the passengers to first class and giving them free drinks.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: U.S. plane attacker "sneaked" into Nigeria: government

        +1.

        Your comments in the first post are on the mark, re: the failure of the system. A couple of years ago, I drove my then 80 year old mother-in-law to JFK (I live in MD), for her return flight to Argentina. Because of security restrictions, I could not go with her to the boarding area. However, I did watch her get pulled out after going through the detectors and have to remove her shoes and get hand searched. An 80 year old lady from Argentina! And what makes it even better is that there was a Muslim family, in full regalia (women in head scarfs, long dresses, etc), that went right through without a problem.
        Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. -Groucho

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: U.S. plane attacker "sneaked" into Nigeria: government

          Originally posted by Master Shake View Post
          +1.

          Your comments in the first post are on the mark, re: the failure of the system. A couple of years ago, I drove my then 80 year old mother-in-law to JFK (I live in MD), for her return flight to Argentina. Because of security restrictions, I could not go with her to the boarding area. However, I did watch her get pulled out after going through the detectors and have to remove her shoes and get hand searched. An 80 year old lady from Argentina! And what makes it even better is that there was a Muslim family, in full regalia (women in head scarfs, long dresses, etc), that went right through without a problem.
          This happens because what is the ultimate failure of the "system" is ideological bias that contradicts reality.

          "Racial profiling" would have found this bomber in minutes, but the powers that be are beholden to an egalitarian ideology that forces them to hassle old ladies so that they appear "fair".

          While ideology is useful to motivate and unify the masses, it cannot be used to make such ridiculous strategic decisions. We are either at war with Muslims, whereby all of them are a potential threat and should be treated as such, or we are a nation of peace that does not have a military presence outside of its own borders. You cannot have it both ways.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: U.S. plane attacker "sneaked" into Nigeria: government

            Instant Karma:New US War Target Gets Its Own Terror Icon

            http://chris-floyd.com/component/con...rror-icon.html

            Written by Chris Floyd
            Sunday, 27 December 2009 01:29

            Wow, that didn't take long at all. Scant days after the American war machine took the cloaking device off its direct military involvement in Yemen, we have an alleged attempted terrorist attack by an alleged attempted terrorist who, just scant hours after his capture, has allegedly confessed to getting his alleged attempted terrorist material from ... wait for it ... Yemen!

            Yemen-trained terrorists on the loose in American airplanes! At Christmas! Great googily moogily! It's a good thing our boys are on the case over there right now, pounding the holy hell outta some of them Al Qaeder ragheads! And to think, a few pipsqueaky fifth columnists had been starting to wonder why we were killing dozens of innocent civilians on behalf of an authoritarian regime embroiled in a three-way civil war on the other side of the world.

            Well, now they have their answer, by God! Alleged attempted terrorists allegedly trained in Yemen! What else do you need -- a freaking warrant or something? We would obviously be justified in nuking that desert hell-hole and everybody in it! Just think of it -- some guy with some kind of something on an airplane, right there in the Heartland! You gonna stand for that? Exterminate the brutes!

            And yet, because we are good, because we are godly, because our heart is always in the right place, even when -- as President Obama himself admitted in his noble Nobel Speech -- we sometimes make mistakes, we have not brought down the full force of the iron rod that God himself has placed into our hands for the chastisement and right order of the world. No, there will be no nukes falling on the children of Yemen tonight. But boy howdy, they'd better get ready for some sure-enough heavy ordnance -- fired from distant ships, from far-flung bases and from computer consoles in leafy Stateside suburbs, where you can bravely kill some alleged attempted somebody-or-other (and everyone in their immediate vicinity), and still make it home in time to to eat supper with the kids.

            So here we are. Just one day after the alleged attempted terrorist incident in Detroit, we already have headlines blaring in the New York Times, the "paper of record," tying the alleged attempt to Yemen. How quick and convenient is that? Already the echo chamber is roaring with the all-justifying cacophony: "Terror, Yemen, al Qaeda, Homeland, Bomb, Terror, Yemen, Yemen, al Qaeda."

            And it must be true, right? I mean, just look at how well-sourced the NYT story is. "A law enforcement official" -- Police captain? State trooper? G-Man? Traffic cop? -- said that the alleged attempted terrorist said he'd got his "explosive chemicals" from Yemen. (Elsewhere in the paper, other unnamed officials told NYT reporters that the alleged material strapped to the alleged attempted terrorist was "incendiary," not explosive. But who cares? "Bomb, Terror, Yemen!")

            Of course, the NYT noted that "authorities have not independently corroborated the Yemen connection claimed by the suspect" (nor, they could have added, have they independently corroborated that the claim was actually made), but still, the completely anonymous "law enforcement official" said that the suspect's claim "was plausible," and even added: "I see no reason to discount it."

            Well, it doesn't get more solid than that, does it? They nailed that story down so tight you couldn't pry it open with God's own crowbar. An anonymous source confirmed the plausibility of his own claim. Man, that's ironclad. It's certainly good enough to light up the media firmament with headlines linking "terror in the Heartland" with the empire's newest killing field in a volatile foreign land.

            And it turns out that the suspected attempted terrorist, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, was already on the radar of our all-encompassing security services -- just like the last Muslim terrorist in the heartland, Major Nidal Hasan. (And, for that matter, just like many of those accused of carrying out the 9/11 attack.) As in almost all of these cases, the question arises: Who is running whom? (For more, see "Darkness Renewed: Terror as a Tool of Empire.")

            But this query is precisely the kind of pantywaist handwringing that rightly goes down in the flood of the he-man Homeland Security strutting that always follows these incidents. As we noted here the other day, there's no time for depth, context, history -- or even facts -- when the "frame" is screaming "Terror!"

            In any case, whatever facts about the case -- or rather, shards and splinters of filtered information -- that are allowed to emerge from the depths of the security apparat, you can be absolutely sure that, as always, the "facts will be fixed around the policy."

            And what is that policy? Why, endless war, of course! The American war machine (which now dominates most of "civilian" society as well) is like a shark: it must keep moving, and feeding, or die. "Terror, Bomb, Yemen!"

            ..............................

            Jason Raimundo's piece is interesting, as well:

            http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2...omber-mystery/

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: U.S. plane attacker "sneaked" into Nigeria: government

              Originally posted by Master Shake View Post
              +1.

              Your comments in the first post are on the mark, re: the failure of the system. A couple of years ago, I drove my then 80 year old mother-in-law to JFK (I live in MD), for her return flight to Argentina. Because of security restrictions, I could not go with her to the boarding area. However, I did watch her get pulled out after going through the detectors and have to remove her shoes and get hand searched. An 80 year old lady from Argentina! And what makes it even better is that there was a Muslim family, in full regalia (women in head scarfs, long dresses, etc), that went right through without a problem.
              Maybe said Muslims were carrying American passports...;)

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: U.S. plane attacker "sneaked" into Nigeria: government

                Originally posted by KGW View Post
                Instant Karma:New US War Target Gets Its Own Terror Icon

                http://chris-floyd.com/component/con...rror-icon.html

                Written by Chris Floyd
                Sunday, 27 December 2009 01:29

                Wow, that didn't take long at all. Scant days after the American war machine took the cloaking device off its direct military involvement in Yemen, we have an alleged attempted terrorist attack by an alleged attempted terrorist who, just scant hours after his capture, has allegedly confessed to getting his alleged attempted terrorist material from ... wait for it ... Yemen!

                Yemen-trained terrorists on the loose in American airplanes! At Christmas! Great googily moogily! It's a good thing our boys are on the case over there right now, pounding the holy hell outta some of them Al Qaeder ragheads! And to think, a few pipsqueaky fifth columnists had been starting to wonder why we were killing dozens of innocent civilians on behalf of an authoritarian regime embroiled in a three-way civil war on the other side of the world.

                Well, now they have their answer, by God! Alleged attempted terrorists allegedly trained in Yemen! What else do you need -- a freaking warrant or something? We would obviously be justified in nuking that desert hell-hole and everybody in it! Just think of it -- some guy with some kind of something on an airplane, right there in the Heartland! You gonna stand for that? Exterminate the brutes!

                And yet, because we are good, because we are godly, because our heart is always in the right place, even when -- as President Obama himself admitted in his noble Nobel Speech -- we sometimes make mistakes, we have not brought down the full force of the iron rod that God himself has placed into our hands for the chastisement and right order of the world. No, there will be no nukes falling on the children of Yemen tonight. But boy howdy, they'd better get ready for some sure-enough heavy ordnance -- fired from distant ships, from far-flung bases and from computer consoles in leafy Stateside suburbs, where you can bravely kill some alleged attempted somebody-or-other (and everyone in their immediate vicinity), and still make it home in time to to eat supper with the kids.

                So here we are. Just one day after the alleged attempted terrorist incident in Detroit, we already have headlines blaring in the New York Times, the "paper of record," tying the alleged attempt to Yemen. How quick and convenient is that? Already the echo chamber is roaring with the all-justifying cacophony: "Terror, Yemen, al Qaeda, Homeland, Bomb, Terror, Yemen, Yemen, al Qaeda."

                And it must be true, right? I mean, just look at how well-sourced the NYT story is. "A law enforcement official" -- Police captain? State trooper? G-Man? Traffic cop? -- said that the alleged attempted terrorist said he'd got his "explosive chemicals" from Yemen. (Elsewhere in the paper, other unnamed officials told NYT reporters that the alleged material strapped to the alleged attempted terrorist was "incendiary," not explosive. But who cares? "Bomb, Terror, Yemen!")

                Of course, the NYT noted that "authorities have not independently corroborated the Yemen connection claimed by the suspect" (nor, they could have added, have they independently corroborated that the claim was actually made), but still, the completely anonymous "law enforcement official" said that the suspect's claim "was plausible," and even added: "I see no reason to discount it."

                Well, it doesn't get more solid than that, does it? They nailed that story down so tight you couldn't pry it open with God's own crowbar. An anonymous source confirmed the plausibility of his own claim. Man, that's ironclad. It's certainly good enough to light up the media firmament with headlines linking "terror in the Heartland" with the empire's newest killing field in a volatile foreign land.

                And it turns out that the suspected attempted terrorist, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, was already on the radar of our all-encompassing security services -- just like the last Muslim terrorist in the heartland, Major Nidal Hasan. (And, for that matter, just like many of those accused of carrying out the 9/11 attack.) As in almost all of these cases, the question arises: Who is running whom? (For more, see "Darkness Renewed: Terror as a Tool of Empire.")

                But this query is precisely the kind of pantywaist handwringing that rightly goes down in the flood of the he-man Homeland Security strutting that always follows these incidents. As we noted here the other day, there's no time for depth, context, history -- or even facts -- when the "frame" is screaming "Terror!"

                In any case, whatever facts about the case -- or rather, shards and splinters of filtered information -- that are allowed to emerge from the depths of the security apparat, you can be absolutely sure that, as always, the "facts will be fixed around the policy."

                And what is that policy? Why, endless war, of course! The American war machine (which now dominates most of "civilian" society as well) is like a shark: it must keep moving, and feeding, or die. "Terror, Bomb, Yemen!"

                ..............................

                Jason Raimundo's piece is interesting, as well:

                http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2...omber-mystery/
                If one were a cynic -it wouldn't be to hard to surmise that this is a false flag operation which intentionally duped this fool in to thinking whatever they wanted. The point that it was an incendiary device and didn't work and was basically a copy of the shoe bombers mo- should give one some pause.

                A little too convenient -and I ask you after 8 years -our Security system must be incredible -considering these same mountain dwelling cavemen -hijacked 3 planes simultaneously -ran them into two national monuments and miraculously despite all the explosions -their passport descended from the skies untouched.

                Anyway -on with the war. An aside -the perturbation byCNN and others concerning the so-called "hidden messages' in Avataar being 'Anit-War'. My, my can't have that can we.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: U.S. plane attacker "sneaked" into Nigeria: government

                  That is funny! Hidden messages? Ha. They are right out in the open! Kudos to James Cameron. . .


                  Originally posted by iyamwutiam View Post

                  Anyway -on with the war. An aside -the perturbation byCNN and others concerning the so-called "hidden messages' in Avataar being 'Anit-War'. My, my can't have that can we.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: U.S. plane attacker "sneaked" into Nigeria: government

                    My question is why have these 'explosive' devices failed? Were they meant to fail? Seems strange that simple and sophisticated IEDs could function properly overseas in combat zones while these devices couldn't. Pleading ignorance of bomb making is a dubious argument.

                    Something like this certainly keeps the media preoccupied with these events as pundits, 'experts', etc. eat up media time and perpetuate public anxiety and fear rather than delving into the depth of some of the issues presented on this board and exposing them for what they are.

                    The financial explosive devices set off, being manufactured, and ignored and/or protected by corrupt legislation has done more damage that 9/11 and these recent attempts at criminal activity. The 'reform' legislation that still has not addressed universal coverage has yet to give us an estimate of how many lives will not be saved from this purposeful oversight...if sanctity of life is the main priority of media and legislative attention that rises to prominence from these events.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X