Re: Barry Ritholtz says Gold to Drop 20%-30% next year
Ritholtz is smart but he seems to be thinking that $US value (and thus gold) is determined by the free market rather than what we as iTulipers think (at least those of us who read EJ's analysis)- that the $ is being stealthily managed downward (hopefully in a controlled manner) by our central economic planners and will continue to be so for some time yet. (Spikes and dips along the way, of course)
This is an instance where I think one should read everything EJ has written on the dollar/gold/Fed and then review everything Ritholtz has written on the same subject and decide who you think knows more about the subject. Because not a day goes by where some smart sounding guy with plausible arguments isn't gold bashing. But there's a difference between being smart and understanding based on study and research what Central Economic Planning is doing.
It seems that if one can be easily spooked by Ritholtz on this subject, that one hasn't read what EJ has written on this subject. And if one isn't reading EJ, what is the point of paying a membership fee? That's what we're paying for here- EJ's analysis.
Ritholtz is smart but he seems to be thinking that $US value (and thus gold) is determined by the free market rather than what we as iTulipers think (at least those of us who read EJ's analysis)- that the $ is being stealthily managed downward (hopefully in a controlled manner) by our central economic planners and will continue to be so for some time yet. (Spikes and dips along the way, of course)
This is an instance where I think one should read everything EJ has written on the dollar/gold/Fed and then review everything Ritholtz has written on the same subject and decide who you think knows more about the subject. Because not a day goes by where some smart sounding guy with plausible arguments isn't gold bashing. But there's a difference between being smart and understanding based on study and research what Central Economic Planning is doing.
It seems that if one can be easily spooked by Ritholtz on this subject, that one hasn't read what EJ has written on this subject. And if one isn't reading EJ, what is the point of paying a membership fee? That's what we're paying for here- EJ's analysis.
Comment