This is the second time in as many days that I've run across the simultaneity argument for deflation and inflation. As I believe EJ has pointed out before, deflationary and inflationary forces are not monolithic. Every large economy has pockets of deflation and inflation at any given time.
This argument however seems to suggest in the current climate that deflation is the apriori and predominant force against which the powers-that-be attempt to mitigate it by fashioning inflationary responses.
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/defau...ns_Dilemma.pdf
"As long as deflationary forces prevail, world governments will remain addicted to currency debasement. If currencies are successfully debased through inflation, gold will retain its value. The middle ground between deflation and inflation exists only in the imagination of policy makers and analysts who still believe governments can create wealth."
If I can paraphrase, as long as we have deflation, governments will attempt to countervail it by creating monetary inflation (as a means to getting out from under an increasingly punishing debt burden.) In this context, deflation is like an elemental 'natural' force. Whereas inflation is a policy response. It's almost as if two black holes are arrayed against one another. Can enough money be 'printed' to offset the massive amounts of debt/money destruction that deleveraging wreaks upon the economy?
I have been struggling for some time with the notion of deflation being a somehow more profound force than inflation. Deflation comes from the gods. Man attempts to fight it through the hubris of inflation.
This argument however seems to suggest in the current climate that deflation is the apriori and predominant force against which the powers-that-be attempt to mitigate it by fashioning inflationary responses.
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/defau...ns_Dilemma.pdf
"As long as deflationary forces prevail, world governments will remain addicted to currency debasement. If currencies are successfully debased through inflation, gold will retain its value. The middle ground between deflation and inflation exists only in the imagination of policy makers and analysts who still believe governments can create wealth."
If I can paraphrase, as long as we have deflation, governments will attempt to countervail it by creating monetary inflation (as a means to getting out from under an increasingly punishing debt burden.) In this context, deflation is like an elemental 'natural' force. Whereas inflation is a policy response. It's almost as if two black holes are arrayed against one another. Can enough money be 'printed' to offset the massive amounts of debt/money destruction that deleveraging wreaks upon the economy?
I have been struggling for some time with the notion of deflation being a somehow more profound force than inflation. Deflation comes from the gods. Man attempts to fight it through the hubris of inflation.
Comment