Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sarah's Coming to Town

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sarah's Coming to Town


    Acme Bookstore's proprietress considers a Sarah Palin moment :eek:






    Glasses removed...hair down...shop closed




    Mission accomplished


    for those iTulip rogues who still believe....

    December 7, 2009, 9:30 pm

    Sarah Palin Is Coming to Town


    When I walked into the Strand Bookstore in Manhattan last week, I headed straight for the bright young thing who wore an “Ask Me” button, and asked her to point me to the section of the store where I might find Sarah Palin’s memoir, “Going Rogue: An American Life.” She looked at me as if I had requested a copy of “Mein Kampf” signed in blood by the author, and directed me to the nearest Barnes and Noble, where, presumably, readers of dubious taste and sensibility could find what they wanted.

    A few days later, I attended a seminar on political and legal theory where a distinguished scholar observed that every group has its official list of angels and devils. As an example, he offered the fact (of which he was supremely confident) that few, if any, in the room were likely to be Sarah Palin fans. By that time I had begun reading Palin’s book, and while I wouldn’t count myself a fan in the sense of being a supporter, I found it compelling and very well done.

    My assessment of the book has nothing to do with the accuracy of its accounts. Some news agencies have fact-checkers poring over every sentence, which would be to the point if the book were a biography, a genre that is judged by the degree to which the factual claims being made can be verified down to the last assertion. “Going Rogue,” however, is an autobiography, and while autobiographers certainly insist that they are telling the truth, the truth the genre promises is the truth about themselves — the kind of persons they are — and even when they are being mendacious or self-serving (and I don’t mean to imply that Palin is either), they are, necessarily, fleshing out that truth. As I remarked in a previous column, autobiographers cannot lie because anything they say will truthfully serve their project, which, again, is not to portray the facts, but to portray themselves.

    The questions to ask then are (1) Does Palin succeed in conveying to her readers the kind of person she is? and (2) Does she do it in a satisfying and artful way? In short, is the book a good autobiographical read? I would answer “yes” to both.

    First, the art. The book has an architectonic structure that is built around a single moment, the moment when Palin receives a call from John McCain inviting her to be the vice-presidential candidate of the Republican party.
    When we first hear about the call it is as much a surprise to us as it was (at least as reported) to her, because for six pages she has been recounting a wonderful family outing at the Alaska State Fair. When her phone rings, she hopes it might be a call from her son Track, a soldier soon to deploy to Iraq, but “it was Senator John McCain asking if I wanted to help him change history.”

    And that’s the last we hear of it for 200 pages. In between we hear a lot about Wasilla, high school, basketball, college, marriage, children, Down syndrome, Alaska politics, the environment, a daughter’s pregnancy. The re-entry of John McCain into the narrative on page 208 introduces Palin’s account of the presidential campaign and its aftermath, especially her decision to resign the governorship before the end of her term. In the epilogue, another 200 pages on, the famous call serves as a bookend: “It is one year ago this week that I got the call from John McCain.”

    Paradoxically, the effect of the neatly spaced references to the call is to de-emphasize it as a dramatic moment. It is presented not as a climax, but as an interruption of matters more central to Palin’s abiding concerns — her family, Alaska’s prosperity, energy policy. (She loves to rehearse the kind of wonkish details we associate with Hillary Clinton, whom she admires.)

    Indeed, it is a feature of this narrative that events we might have expected to be foregrounded are elided or passed over. Palin introduced herself to the nation with a powerful, electrifying speech accepting McCain’s invitation to join the ticket. It gets half a sentence (“I gave my speech”). Chapter Two ends with Palin, no longer a mayor, wondering what she is going to do next. Four paragraphs into Chapter Three we learn, almost parenthetically, that she had decided to run for governor. (When and how did that happen?) The only event that receives an extended discussion is her resignation. It is important to her because as an act it reflects on her integrity, and she has to be sure (as she eventually was) that she was doing it for the right reasons.

    Resigning was a moral act for which she was responsible. The vice-presidential candidacy just happened to her; her account of it reads like an extended “what-I-did-on-my summer-and fall-vacation” essay. For many politicians, family life is sandwiched in between long hours in public service. Palin wants us to know that for her it is the reverse. Political success is an accident that says nothing about you. Success as a wife, mother and citizen says everything.

    Do I believe any of this? It doesn’t matter. What matters is that she does, and that her readers feel they are hearing an authentic voice. I find the voice undeniably authentic (yes, I know the book was written “with the help” of Lynn Vincent, but many books, including my most recent one, are put together by an editor). It is the voice of small-town America, with its folk wisdom, regional pride, common sense, distrust of rhetoric (itself a rhetorical trope), love of country and instinctive (not doctrinal) piety. It says, here are some of the great things that have happened to me, but they are not what makes my life great and American. (“An American life is an extraordinary life.”) It says, don’t you agree with me that family, freedom and the beauties of nature are what sustain us? And it also says, vote for me next time. For it is the voice of a politician, of the little girl who thought she could fly, tried it, scraped her knees, dusted herself off and “kept walking.”

    In the end, perseverance, the ability to absorb defeat without falling into defeatism, is the key to Palin’s character. It’s what makes her run in both senses of the word and it is no accident that the physical act of running is throughout the book the metaphor for joy and real life. Her handlers in the McCain campaign wouldn’t let her run (a mistake, I think, even at the level of photo-op), no doubt because they feared another opportunity to go “off script,” to “go rogue.”

    But run she does (and falls, but so what?), and when it is all over and she has lost the vice presidency and resigned the governorship, she goes on a long run and rehearses in her mind the eventful year she has chronicled. And as she runs, she achieves equilibrium and hope: “We’ve been through amazing days, and really, there wasn’t one thing to complain about. I feel such freedom, such hope, such thankfulness for our country, a place where nothing is hopeless.”

    The message is clear. America can’t be stopped. I can’t be stopped. I’ve stumbled and fallen, but I always get up and run again. Her political opponents, especially those who dismissed Ronald Reagan before he was elected, should take note. Wherever you are, you better watch out. Sarah Palin is coming to town.

    http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...oming-to-town/




  • #2
    Re: Sarah's Coming to Town

    Personally, I believe she is far better than most of her detractors, many of whom are foaming with hate yet all the while proclaim themselves to be the most caring and compassionate of Americans. (If you happen to be at the age of 8 months or less gestation that's a sick joke.)

    That said, I do NOT believe she is even remotely qualified to be POTUS,
    and I will not vote for her or anyone else with even a whif of NeoCon flavor.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Sarah's Coming to Town

      Raz: That may have been the gist of that review of both her book and her political future. And I've always respected Dorothy Malone since watching her scene with Bogey

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Sarah's Coming to Town

        Could there be a worse possible candidate for any office with influence over foreign policy?

        Must like John McCain the Completely Insane, she wants nothing less than to allow the Generals to set our nation's foreign policy. Basically a military dictatorship.

        I remind everyone once again that McCain called for a ground invasion of Serbia literally right up until the end and he never backed away from it. It's all in the Congressional Record.

        So what about Palin?

        http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/12...y5863327.shtml

        "At long last, President Obama decided to give his military commanders much of what they need to accomplish their mission in Afghanistan," Palin wrote on her Facebook page last night.
        These people are not rogues. They are not independents. They are the WAR Party. Americans love to be duped by a good fairy tale (see Barrack O., election of).

        Comments like this left to the NYT article are downright scary:

        Mr. Fish, thank you for an excellent column on the Sarah Palin autobiography; the phrase 'fair and balanced' comes to mind. I am a political independent but at this moment in time I am actually considering supporting Mrs. Palin if she decides to run for the presidency. That would not have happened just a few years ago but I have grown tired of both sides of the political spectrum back home in America and would welcome a fresh version of 'Mr. Smith', in the form of a simple mother from the hinterlands of Alaska, to go to Washington.

        The real job of president is to lead the American people on a true and straight course via heartfelt inspiration and to use the power of the veto to deter outlandish bills from Congress. I feel she is quite capable of doing both well and that she certainly could do better than most recent presidents in regards to these two basic job requirements.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Sarah's Coming to Town

          Originally posted by Raz View Post

          That said, I do NOT believe she is even remotely qualified to be POTUS,
          and I will not vote for her or anyone else with even a whif of NeoCon flavor.
          Thank you.

          If I remember correctly, Finster posted something a few months back in support of Palin. (Forgive me if this is incorrect, Finster.) Given his obvious intellect, I was surprised to see him support someone with such limited qualifications. I get the feeling Palin is a sort of Chance the Gardener for many conservatives, an empty vessel they can pour their hopes into.

          Palin may be, as you say, better than her detractors, or at least better than they say she is. But surely there are other conservatives out there who are eminently qualified to be POTUS, far more than Palin. It baffles me that more conservatives don't see that. Perhaps I'm blinded by my own ideology, but I don't think so.

          And thanks, Don, for posting the review.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Sarah's Coming to Town

            i shorted sarah palin on intrade. i find her likeable, but not in any remote sense competent enough to be running this country. i consider shorting her free money on there. i'll be stupified if proven wrong.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Sarah's Coming to Town

              another review

              Ain't afraid of no Vietcong king, November 17, 2009
              By Gen. JC Christian, patriot (Tremonton, UT United States) - See all my reviews

              There are many kinds of truth. There are truths based on facts, truths based on faith, and truths based on something that sounds as if it should be true (truthiness). Then there's the kind of truth we find in Sarah's book: stories and concepts that become truths simply because she states them. She's a lot like our Lord and Savior, Glen Beck, in that respect.

              Sometimes, she states truths that would be considered ludicrous if uttered by someone else. Her claim that the McCain campaign forced her to spend $150,000 in RNC funds to dress her family in designer clothes is one example of that. Although it might be easier to believe that she acted like a trailer park Zsa Zsa who'd found a credit card left behind at a possum feed, she blames McCain staffers. That's good enough for us, because we have faith; we want to believe her truths.

              But the book isn't perfect. As much as I enjoyed the few short paragraphs in which Mrs Palin laid out her policy objectives, she could have condensed it all into one sentence: "I'm going to grab an Oxo Good Grips Stainless Serving Spatula and go all mavericky on your non-white, non-Christian and non-heterosexual butts."

              The book also fails to expose Mrs. Palin's intellectual brilliance and keen grasp of foreign policy issues. Why wasn't the text of her recent speech in Hong Kong included? Although it remains secret, it's rumored that she viciously rebuked the Vietcong king for his assault on the Empire State Building. That's a speech we've been waiting for nearly 75 years to hear. It's big news and should have been included.

              As you read other reviews of this book, please remember that Mrs. Palin has many enemies who are eager to pan her work. The Palin family's most potent nemesis, Levi's johnston, is no dpubt fully erect and ready to spew globs of misfortune upon them for a third time. And reason-adoring intellectuals are certain to point out that an interview on Good Morning Topeka doesn't qualify as a policy summit in the Far East.

              But a few bad reviews won't stop her. She's seen much worse from her kitchen window. It can't be pleasant to gaze upon Antichristograd every morning as you brew your coffee.

              My review isn't complete, but I think I'll quit anyway, because writing reviews, like governing, is just too darned hard to finish.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Sarah's Coming to Town

                She certainly is a lightning rod. Often people underestimate others and their potential. A sure way is to call them stupid.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Sarah's Coming to Town

                  for those iTulip rogues who still believe....

                  The Presidents. more or less since Kennedy's brains were blown out, have been glorified Santas in Macy's window. Sure, we've had a spook or two (George Sr.) but most are political elites who can carry off the part. When Ronnie baby, bless his heart- who could
                  not like the guy- was asked how in hell could a B actor be governor of California, he laughingly answered he'd learn the part, just like he always did. Of course he was right. What the hell should we expect in a global hegemon? You can't rule the world from a republic- no way, senor. Best to fess up and pony on. We're citizens of Rome if we acknowledge the fact or not. Palin? Enjoy the show, enjoy the librarian come on. That may be the highlight of the next "election". Don't have a camel

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Sarah's Coming to Town

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Sarah's Coming to Town

                      Originally posted by Andreuccio View Post
                      Thank you.

                      If I remember correctly, Finster posted something a few months back in support of Palin. (Forgive me if this is incorrect, Finster.) Given his obvious intellect, I was surprised to see him support someone with such limited qualifications. I get the feeling Palin is a sort of Chance the Gardener for many conservatives, an empty vessel they can pour their hopes into.

                      Palin may be, as you say, better than her detractors, or at least better than they say she is. But surely there are other conservatives out there who are eminently qualified to be POTUS, far more than Palin. It baffles me that more conservatives don't see that. Perhaps I'm blinded by my own ideology, but I don't think so.

                      And thanks, Don, for posting the review.
                      I don't recall the earlier posting, A, but it doesn't sound implausible. Qualifications schmalifications. We keep electing people with impressive resumes and the country keeps getting worse off. At least if we define "qualifications" as political experience, I'll pass, thank you. A lifelong background in politics seems if anything to be more a liability than an asset.

                      But thats doesn't mean qualifications don't count. Quite the opposite; qualifications count much. It's just that our idea of qualifications doesn't fit the mold the urban elite has fashioned for us.
                      Finster
                      ...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Sarah's Coming to Town

                        It was an act an desperation, trying to mobilize all the religious retards in America and hookwick a few normal women into voting McMain.

                        Perhaps it would be like the Democrats selecting Pamela Anderson to be a VP candidate in hope of getting a few redneck republicans to vote for them.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Sarah's Coming to Town

                          Originally posted by fliped42
                          I still have not heard any solid reason why she is not qualified to be POTUS is it because she is a woman? (Hillary) because she is a mother? (Hillary) because she is religious? (Bush, Carter) because she has a family scandal? (Kennedy,Bush) Because she comes from a small state? (Clinton) Because she supports the military? (Eisenhower,Reagan, Bush) Because she wrote a book? (Obama) Because she fumbles interviews? (Nixon, Ford, Carter) Because she talks folksy? (Carter, Clinton) Because she had a troopergate? (Clinton) Because she didn't go to an ivy league school (Reagan, Carter) or is it just a mindless smear by the opposition?
                          I think she's unqualified because she lacks experience and has insufficient intelligence.
                          raja
                          Boycott Big Banks • Vote Out Incumbents

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Sarah's Coming to Town

                            Originally posted by fliped42
                            Give me examples read her Bio how does it compare to Obama, Clinton, Carter, Bush II, Regan and Kennedy. How do you grade her intelligence? Do you have her IQ results? SAT scores? She did get elected to be Governor of Alaska in a largely male dominated state, She has excelled at everything she has done. She was tapped to run as VP. She is as popular as a sitting president. She has a best selling book. Anyone with a low intelligence level and a pretty face could do that right? :rolleyes: Raja you are obviously intelligent from your postings I could understand you saying you couldn't support her because of her positions but she surely has the experience as compared to other presidents and the intelligence to be where she is.
                            All right, try this:

                            For me it's not so much the lack of a resume. It's that, from what I saw of her during the presidential campaign, she appeared inarticulate and seemed to have no command whatsoever of many important issues. Not even a clue. Perhaps she was thrust into the national spotlight before she was prepared. I confess to not having paid much attention to her since then, so maybe she's proven herself more recently. But the impression that was formed, for me and, apparently many others, was one of someone way out of their depth.

                            While I can't be sure, I don't believe my opinion is strongly colored by ideology, either. Take Mike Huckabee, for instance. I assume he and Palin have similar positions on many issues. He was governor of a small state, religious, etc. When I hear him speak, I disagree with much of what he says. But I can understand why people who share his opinions would support him. The guy's obviously bright. It's interesting hearing him speak and engage in debate. I learn something from him. He knows what he's talking about.

                            I just don't get that from Palin. I remain puzzled as to her appeal, at least to an office as important as President, or VP.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Sarah's Coming to Town

                              Originally posted by fliped42
                              Give me examples read her Bio how does it compare to Obama, Clinton, Carter, Bush II, Regan and Kennedy. How do you grade her intelligence? Do you have her IQ results? SAT scores? She did get elected to be Governor of Alaska in a largely male dominated state, She has excelled at everything she has done. She was tapped to run as VP. She is as popular as a sitting president. She has a best selling book. Anyone with a low intelligence level and a pretty face could do that right? :rolleyes: Raja you are obviously intelligent from your postings I could understand you saying you couldn't support her because of her positions but she surely has the experience as compared to other presidents and the intelligence to be where she is.
                              Okay, I'm going to throw my two cents in on this one. Palin may be a bright woman, but that does not make her qualified to be one heart beat away from the Presidency. Understand that Alaska has a population just shy of 700K people. The mayors of Seattle, WA, Columbus, OH, or Atlanta, GA are responsible for more people. While her down home folksiness may have helped her connect with certain people, she was out of her depth when it came time to discuss national issues like foreign policy ("The Bush Doctine? What's that?"), energy policy ("Drill baby drill"), or even just trying to stay on message with the rest of the McCain campaign. To top it off, the woman couldn't even finish her term as Governor. Please explain to me why I would want to elect someone who picks up and leaves office after going through the trouble to get elected? Why would I want someone like that to be Vice President?

                              While I'm sure that her new book will resonate with certain audiences, I don't think it will with me. My conservative party of small government, less regulation, and lower taxes morphed into something unrecognizable about 10 years ago. It became dominated by the likes of talk radio icons and convicted felons Rush Limbaugh (drug addict), Ollie North (lying to Congress), and Tom Delay (soon to be convict). Mike Huckabee, another conservative hopeful, commuted the sentence of a crazed criminal apparently on the basis that the man swore that he had "found Jesus." This same man would later move to Seattle and murder four police officers in cold blood. Unfortunately, many of the people who feel that the likes of Rush, Ollie, Tom, and Mike reflect their "conservative values" are the very same ones who were energized over Ms. Palin's Vice Presidential bid. You'll forgive me if I tell you that I think that many of these folks have an extremely poor track record in judging character or competence for public office.

                              Okay, I'll stop now. I think you get the point.;)

                              BTW, you misspelled "Reagan"

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X