I'd be interested to get some input on this article - isn't it all dependent on when you cash out?
Why gold can make you poor
Ian McGugan, Financial Post Published: Friday, November 20, 2009
More On This Story
Related Topics
Story Tools
Share This Story
Story tools presented by
Getty Images If you had bought gold for, say, US$350 an ounce in the early 1980s, you would have made no money on it for close to 20 years. Factor in inflation during that time and you would have lost close to ...
Rolfe Winkler of Reuters has an interesting piece about gold in which he thoughtfully explores the case for a boom in the metal's price and comes to the conclusion that gold won't make you rich, but it may protect you from becoming poor.
Here's why I think he's wrong.
Let's imagine that you had bought gold at its peak in 1980, when it was trading near US$850 an ounce. You would have lost most of your money as gold prices slid back to around US$350 and stayed at depressed levels for the next two decades. Twenty years after the 1980 peak your investment would be worth less than half of what you paid.
So, with all due respect to Winkler, gold can make you poor.
While this may be an extreme case, the point holds up even if you take a less dramatic starting point. If you had bought gold for, say, US$350 an ounce in the early 1980s, you would have made no money on it for close to 20 years. Factor in inflation during that time and you would have lost close to half your purchasing power.
Again: gold can make you poor.
This is the point where gold bugs usually start muttering about gold's 5,000-year history as a store of value. "Gold may be volatile," Winkler writes, "but at least it maintains its real value."
Problem is, Winkler also reproduces a chart that shows seven-and-a-half centuries of real gold prices. At least to my eyeballs, it appears that if you had bought gold between 1415 and 1765 or so, you would have to wait until around the mid-1960s to be back to even in terms of purchasing power.
Call me crazy, but I like my investments to pay off in a century or less.
Freelance business journalist Ian McGugan blogs for the Financial Post.
Ian McGugan, Financial Post Published: Friday, November 20, 2009
Related Topics

Story Tools
- - + Change font size
- Print this story
- E-Mail this story
Share This Story
Story tools presented by
Rolfe Winkler of Reuters has an interesting piece about gold in which he thoughtfully explores the case for a boom in the metal's price and comes to the conclusion that gold won't make you rich, but it may protect you from becoming poor.
Here's why I think he's wrong.
Let's imagine that you had bought gold at its peak in 1980, when it was trading near US$850 an ounce. You would have lost most of your money as gold prices slid back to around US$350 and stayed at depressed levels for the next two decades. Twenty years after the 1980 peak your investment would be worth less than half of what you paid.
So, with all due respect to Winkler, gold can make you poor.
While this may be an extreme case, the point holds up even if you take a less dramatic starting point. If you had bought gold for, say, US$350 an ounce in the early 1980s, you would have made no money on it for close to 20 years. Factor in inflation during that time and you would have lost close to half your purchasing power.
Again: gold can make you poor.
This is the point where gold bugs usually start muttering about gold's 5,000-year history as a store of value. "Gold may be volatile," Winkler writes, "but at least it maintains its real value."
Problem is, Winkler also reproduces a chart that shows seven-and-a-half centuries of real gold prices. At least to my eyeballs, it appears that if you had bought gold between 1415 and 1765 or so, you would have to wait until around the mid-1960s to be back to even in terms of purchasing power.
Call me crazy, but I like my investments to pay off in a century or less.
Freelance business journalist Ian McGugan blogs for the Financial Post.
Comment