Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The 0.53% Solution

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The 0.53% Solution

    file under fiscal catastrophes....

    November 13, 2009

    Housing Agency’s Cash Reserves Down Sharply

    By DAVID STREITFELD

    The Federal Housing Administration, the government agency whose loan-insurance programs have become a crucial source of support for the housing market, said on Thursday that its cash reserves had dwindled significantly in the last year as more borrowers defaulted on their mortgages.

    The agency released an audit that spelled out the rapid deterioration of its finances. It is tightening loan standards in hopes it will not become another drain on the United States Treasury, but is reluctant to clamp down so much that it snuffs out the tentative recovery in housing.

    How successfully the agency walks this tightrope could well determine whether the recovery gathers force, or whether home prices slide again — perhaps creating a fresh economic downturn.

    As recently as a few weeks ago, the F.H.A. had said that even under the bleakest economic forecast, its cash cushion would quickly recover. On Thursday, it abandoned that position.

    “There is a real risk. Nobody has a crystal ball,” Shaun Donovan, secretary of housing and urban development, said in an interview. “We recognize there is a possibility that the reserves go below zero and stay there.”
    Still, Mr. Donovan stressed that the agency, which had a role in one out of five home purchases in the last year, would not need a direct taxpayer bailout.

    and why is that?

    “There is no extraordinary action that Congress or anyone else needs to take,” he said during a news conference in Washington.
    Instead, the agency would borrow from the Treasury, under authority previously granted by Congress.
    The F.H.A.’s annual audit was scheduled for release last week, but was mysteriously delayed at the last minute. On Thursday, as it released the document, the agency explained that it wanted its auditors to include more negative forecasts as a way of understanding the worst-case risk.

    The audit showed reserves to be 0.53 percent of the total portfolio, far below the 2 percent minimum mandated by Congress and far less than the audit last year had forecast. In 2007, just before housing prices began their worst slump in decades, the reserves were above 6 percent.

    Ann Schnare, a consultant who has analyzed the F.H.A. balance sheet, put the situation this way: “They’re running on empty.”
    Nearly one in five loans it insured in 2007 falls into the category of “seriously delinquent,” it said Thursday. These loanholders are at least three months behind in their payments. For 2008 loans, 12 percent of them were seriously delinquent.

    The F.H.A. says it is insuring loans to more financially secure buyers with higher credit scores. The average credit score of new borrowers, it said, is 693, compared with 633 two years ago.

    In a sense, the agency is bulking up and giving as many loans as it can to qualified buyers as a way to diminish the relative size of the pool of problem loans. It guaranteed more than $360 billion in mortgages in the last year, four times the amount of 2007.

    Critics say this is only increasing the size of the ultimate peril.

    “They keep saying they’re going to outrun their problems, but some way, somehow, the taxpayer is going to end up on the hook,” said Edward Pinto, a former executive with Fannie Mae.
    Brian Montgomery, who ran the F.H.A. for the Bush administration, said in a recent interview that the agency felt it had no choice but to open the doors to a broader group of applicants. Citing pressure from Congress and the White House, Mr. Montgomery said: “We had to let these loans through.”
    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/13/bu...ef=todayspaper

  • #2
    Re: The 0.53% Solution

    when subprime lenders went under, the FHA took over their role and is making the same loans. They are going bad so fast and no surprise.

    It's a result of politicizing housing.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: The 0.53% Solution

      Another idiotic post trying to place blame on one side.

      Obama the Savior is the one offering the First Time Home Buyer tax credit.

      Obama is the one who is using Fannie/Freddie to subsidize the housing market.

      To say the GOP is responsible alone is ridiculous.
      Last edited by BDAdmin; November 15, 2009, 10:27 AM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: The 0.53% Solution

        Originally posted by c1ue View Post
        Another idiotic post trying to place blame on one side.

        Obama the Savior is the one offering the First Time Home Buyer tax credit.

        Obama is the one who is using Fannie/Freddie to subsidize the housing market.

        To say the GOP is responsible alone is ridiculous.
        I guess all those videos of the Congressional hearings with Maxine Waters, Barney Frank, and friends defending Franklin Raines and his Fannnie/Freddie hench men and women from their own inspectors went down the memory hole.

        Community Reinvestment Act? What's that?
        Last edited by Master Shake; November 13, 2009, 05:12 PM. Reason: spelling
        Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. -Groucho

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: The 0.53% Solution

          You seem to remember quite a few things that never happened.
          I suggest you see a doctor for a fecal flush - because you are TOTALLY full of it.

          The Demonrats enacted the Community Reinvestment Act, not the Repukelicans. And it was Barney Frank (D. MA) who pushed regulators to lighten up on qualifications in order to make loans to people who (a) had insufficient income to repay, and/or (b) had never repaid anyone in their entire life. Thus the origin of "liars loans" and "NINA Loans".
          The Bush administration actually tried to rein it in, but were repulsed by the Democrats.

          Angelo Mozillo's only qualification was that you have a body temperature of 98.6 Farenheit.
          Barny's only qualification was that you were a Democratic voter.

          There are plenty of things to blame the Republicans for without fabricating events.
          The biggest thing to blame them for is *becoming like the self-serving Democrats of the Jim Wright variety*.
          Last edited by BDAdmin; November 15, 2009, 10:27 AM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: The 0.53% Solution

            Originally posted by grapejelly View Post
            when subprime lenders went under, the FHA took over their role and is making the same loans. They are going bad so fast and no surprise.

            It's a result of politicizing housing.
            Here at iTulip we forecast this eventuality in 2005 as a nationalized housing market.

            Don't worry about the FHA or FDIC. There's more bailout money where the last came from. See? :eek:


            Ed.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: The 0.53% Solution

              The ongoing revision of housing bubble history is still very entertaining.

              Democrats and liberals alike love to blame the Republicans and the investment banks for everything.

              Republicans and conservative alike love to blame the Democrats, ACORN and the Community Reinvestment Act.

              The truth lies somewhere in between.

              How many times have we seen/heard the following claim made in the last two years, roughly 50 million?

              Originally posted by Raz View Post
              The Bush administration actually tried to rein it in
              Meanwhile, back in June of 2002:

              http://www.hud.gov/news/speeches/presremarks.cfm

              REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT ON HOMEOWNERSHIP
              at the Department of Housing and Urban Development
              Washington, D.C.

              The goal is, everybody who wants to own a home has got a shot at doing so. The problem is we have what we call a homeownership gap in America. Three-quarters of Anglos own their homes, and yet less than 50 percent of African Americans and Hispanics own homes. That ownership gap signals that something might be wrong in the land of plenty. And we need to do something about it.

              We are here in Washington, D.C. to address problems. So I've set this goal for the country. We want 5.5 million more homeowners by 2010 -- million more minority homeowners by 2010. (Applause.) Five-and-a-half million families by 2010 will own a home. That is our goal. It is a realistic goal. But it's going to mean we're going to have to work hard to achieve the goal, all of us. And by all of us, I mean not only the federal government, but the private sector, as well.

              [..]

              And so what are the barriers that we can deal with here in Washington? Well, probably the single barrier to first-time homeownership is high down payments. People take a look at the down payment, they say that's too high, I'm not buying. They may have the desire to buy, but they don't have the wherewithal to handle the down payment. We can deal with that. And so I've asked Congress to fully fund an American Dream down payment fund which will help a low-income family to qualify to buy, to buy. (Applause.)

              [..]

              The second barrier to ownership is the lack of affordable housing. There are neighborhoods in America where you just can't find a house that's affordable to purchase, and we need to deal with that problem. The best way to do so, I think, is to set up a single family affordable housing tax credit to the tune of $2.4 billion over the next five years to encourage affordable single family housing in inner-city America. (Applause.)

              [..]

              And so, therefore, I've called -- yesterday, I called upon the private sector to help us and help the home buyers. We need more capital in the private markets for first-time, low-income buyers. And I'm proud to report that Fannie Mae has heard the call and, as I understand, it's about $440 billion over a period of time. They've used their influence to create that much capital available for the type of home buyer we're talking about here. It's in their charter; it now needs to be implemented. Freddie Mac is interested in helping. I appreciate both of those agencies providing the underpinnings of good capital.


              also see this thread: National Homeownership Strategy
              Last edited by BDAdmin; November 15, 2009, 10:31 AM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: The 0.53% Solution

                there's plenty of blame to go around.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: The 0.53% Solution

                  Originally posted by Raz View Post
                  You seem to remember quite a few things that never happened.
                  I suggest you see a doctor for a fecal flush - because you are TOTALLY full of it.

                  The Demonrats enacted the Community Reinvestment Act, not the Repukelicans. And it was Barney Frank (D. MA) who pushed regulators to lighten up on qualifications in order to make loans to people who (a) had insufficient income to repay, and/or (b) had never repaid anyone in their entire life. Thus the origin of "liars loans" and "NINA Loans".
                  The Bush administration actually tried to rein it in, but were repulsed by the Democrats.

                  Angelo Mozillo's only qualification was that you have a body temperature of 98.6 Farenheit.
                  Barny's only qualification was that you were a Democratic voter.

                  There are plenty of things to blame the Republicans for without fabricating events.
                  The biggest thing to blame them for is *becoming like the self-serving Democrats of the Jim Wright variety*.
                  Lets not forget Larry Summers and Glass Stegal. "Its a big club, and guess what your not in it"
                  "that each simple substance has relations which express all the others"

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: The 0.53% Solution

                    Originally posted by FRED View Post
                    Here at iTulip we forecast this eventuality in 2005 as a nationalized housing market.

                    Don't worry about the FHA or FDIC. There's more bailout money where the last came from. See? :eek:


                    Can you direct me to the paragraph or sentence where this was predicted?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: The 0.53% Solution

                      Originally posted by babbittd View Post
                      the ongoing revision of housing bubble history is still very entertaining.

                      Democrats and liberals alike love to blame the Republicans and the investment banks for everything.

                      Republicans and conservative alike love to blame the Democrats, ACORN and the Community Reinvestment Act.

                      The truth lies somewhere in between.

                      How many times have we seen/heard the following claim made in the last two years, roughly 50 million?



                      Meanwhile, back in June of 2002:

                      http://www.hud.gov/news/speeches/presremarks.cfm

                      REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT ON HOMEOWNERSHIP
                      at the Department of Housing and Urban Development
                      Washington, D.C.





                      also see this thread: National Homeownership Strategy
                      I stand corrected. Like everything else that's wrong with America - it's Bush's fault.
                      Not one single person from the Bush administration ever went down to Capitol Hill in 2004-05 and asked for tighter regulation of the GSEs.

                      And my apologies to that great American public servant, that shining example of altruism, that selfless, honest, always objective and fair plebian hero, the Honorable Barney Frank. :rolleyes:
                      Last edited by BDAdmin; November 15, 2009, 10:29 AM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: The 0.53% Solution

                        Originally posted by jk View Post
                        there's plenty of blame to go around.
                        Very true, and that should include the electorate and 99% of practising economists.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: The 0.53% Solution

                          Originally posted by Master Shake View Post
                          I guess all those videos of the Congressional hearings with Maxine Waters, Barney Frank, and friends defending Franklin Raines and his Fannnie/Freddie hench men and women from their own inspectors went down the memory hole.

                          Community Reinvestment Act? What's that?
                          If I recall correctly Maxine Waters and Barney Frank are both Democrats. Which would seem to suggest that you agree with C1ue's closing sentence...

                          Originally posted by c1ue View Post
                          ...To say the GOP is responsible alone is ridiculous.
                          ...although one wouldn't infer that from the tone of your post?


                          As for the Community Reinvestment Act, where in the legislation does it state that any lender was obligated to lend on the basis of:
                          • zero down payment;
                          • negative amortization mortgages;
                          • self-declaration combined with no verification of income [or assets., or credit history either];
                          • loan to value of 120% [Fannie is now doing 125% fercrissake];
                          • appraisers gaming the valuations;
                          • the ratings agencies giving securitized toxic paper AAA ratings;
                          Given my head is still in the sand, thus making me somewhat hard of hearing, perhaps you might clarify how you came to your position?
                          Or is the CRA just another convenient scapegoat?
                          Last edited by GRG55; November 13, 2009, 10:59 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: The 0.53% Solution

                            When are you guys going to get it that your arguing is exactly what the powers that be want? Republicans and Democrats are a joke, they both fellate finance and finance is the only game that means squat in this epic devolution of our economy. Both sides serve the same master and both sides need to be expunged from office. Social issues are a side show, the blame for this mess is clear; it lies squarely on both parties. It was willingly enacted by both also. The "debate" on Red vs. Blue is the distraction, and always has been. As you debate, everyone except a few chosen elite are getting hammered.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: The 0.53% Solution

                              Originally posted by Jay View Post
                              When are you guys going to get it that your arguing is exactly what the powers that be want? Republicans and Democrats are a joke, they both fellate finance and finance is the only game that means squat in this epic devolution of our economy. Both sides serve the same master and both sides need to be expunged from office. Social issues are a side show, the blame for this mess is clear; it lies squarely on both parties. It was willingly enacted by both also. The "debate" on Red vs. Blue is the distraction, and always has been. As you debate, everyone except a few chosen elite are getting hammered.
                              Jay, I agree. When putting forth your viewpoint in a political discussion, I normally hear, "yes, but....." (fill in the blank with the appropriate parroted-party response).

                              Why are there seemingly few people who see the "debate" on Red vs. Blue as a distraction? The growing number of Independents should keep hammering out this point.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X