Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Off the Charts

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Off the Charts



    Some surprising trends: the New York Post has the same circulation it had two decades ago! Also, the once-captivating battle of the New York City tabloids has become completely moot.

    Some unsurprising trends: the Los Angeles Times is an absolute horrorshow. Not shown: the Boston Globe disappearing off the bottom of this chart, in a two decade decline from 521,000 in 1990 to 264,105 this year.


    http://www.theawl.com/2009/10/a-grap...st-two-decades


    Each day in the U.S., people spend 4 hours watching TV, 3 hours listening to the radio and 14 minutes reading magazines.

    (Source: Veronis, Suhler & Associates investment banker)

    Last edited by don; October 28, 2009, 12:21 PM.

  • #2
    Re: Off the Charts

    Originally posted by don View Post
    ...Each day in the U.S., people spend 4 hours watching TV, 3 hours listening to the radio and 14 minutes reading magazines.






    (Source: Veronis, Suhler & Associates investment banker)

    I was going to read this post, but it would have cut into my allocated TV time...

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Off the Charts

      Originally posted by GRG55 View Post
      I was going to read this post, but it would have cut into my allocated TV time...
      I understand....

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Off the Charts

        Originally posted by don View Post
        Each day in the U.S., people spend 4 hours watching TV, 3 hours listening to the radio and 14 minutes reading magazines.

        (Source: Veronis, Suhler & Associates investment banker)
        Would have been helpful to include a stat on how many hours a day people spend reading news on-line. I read a fair amount of news, but none of it in printed form.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Off the Charts

          Originally posted by ASH View Post
          Would have been helpful to include a stat on how many hours a day people spend reading news on-line. I read a fair amount of news, but none of it in printed form.


          I haven't seen numbers, but I bet it's a lot.. And why limit yourself to one paper ?

          Newspapers have seen their circulation decline sharply in recent years as readers increasingly have turned to online sources for news. Many of these websites are operated by the same newspapers that are losing traditional subscribers, but publishers are struggling to bring in enough online ad dollars to replace the loss of print advertising. And readers have been reluctant to pay for access to newspaper websites.
          http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...tory?track=rss

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Off the Charts

            Originally posted by ASH View Post
            Would have been helpful to include a stat on how many hours a day people spend reading news on-line. I read a fair amount of news, but none of it in printed form.
            The only reference to that is in the WSJ numbers, when they began including their online readers in their sub database. I agree that's an important missing number. Another unmentioned factor is the big falloff in newspaper ads. Of equal weight as readership numbers.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Off the Charts

              distribution of international newspapers has dropped as well. I wanted to take Le Monde, but the only US distributor has gone out of business. A few of these papers do not have web sites, or sites that don't contain all the news in the printed version.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Off the Charts

                Here is the company that filled a niche for out of market same day delivery of printed international newspapers anywhere in the world:

                NewspaperDirect, http://www.newspaperdirect.com

                The same company offers electronic newspaper distribution via paid subscription through a website called http://www.pressdisplay.com.

                Igor

                Comment

                Working...
                X