Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

U.S. Dollar Hegemony for Another Century; China No Serious Long-run Threat - Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • U.S. Dollar Hegemony for Another Century; China No Serious Long-run Threat - Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance...other-century/

    Ambrose Evans-Pritchard has covered world politics and economics for 25 years, based in Europe, the US, and Latin America. He joined the Telegraph in 1991, serving as Washington correspondent and later Europe correspondent in Brussels. He is now International Business Editor in London.



    Dollar hegemony for another century

    By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard (Last updated: October 21st, 2009)

    Let me stick my neck out.

    The dollar will still be the world’s dominant reserve currency in 2030, sharing a degree of leadership in uneasy condominium with the Chinese yuan. It will then regain much of its hegemonic status as the 21st century unfolds. It may indeed end the century even stronger than it was at the start.

    The aging crisis in Asia — and indeed the outright demographic implosion in Japan and China, not to mention China’s water crisis — will soon be obvious to everybody. Talk of Oriental supremacy will start to sound overblown at first, and then preposterous.

    Japan is about to go bankrupt. It is on the cusp of a fiscal crisis that will change perceptions of Asia dramatically. The IMF says gross public debt will reach 218pc of GDP this year. This is compounding very fast. It will be 246pc in 2014.

    The Hatoyama government is spending as if there is no tomorrow. It plans to issue ¥50 trillion or $550bn in fresh bonds. I have no idea when this will spiral out of control. It could take another two or three years. It could start next week. Yes, I know that Japan has been borrowing merrily at ever lower rates for 20 years without the sky falling. The 10-year yield is 1.3pc. What happens when it rises to global levels of 3pc to 4pc? People made the same sort of arguments about the global boom before it suddenly tipped over.

    This blog does not attempt market timing, nor does it offer investment advice. But I am absolutely certain that pundits consigning the dollar to its death have missed an even more dramatic currency and debt story in Japan. The yen will top ¥200 to the dollar before this is over. Jim O’Neill from Goldman Sachs has already begun to hint at this.

    Apologies to readers who feel confused about my view on the dollar. I have written a string of NEWS pieces over recent weeks quoting the currency experts and Asian officials slamming America, or exploring the dollar demise thesis.

    People assume that I share these views. I do not. Furthermore, I suspect that at least some of China’s grumbling about the dollar slide over recent months has been a ruse to lower the yuan (pegged to the dollar of course) against the euro, yen, and even sterling. The goal is to protect export margins. (Surely premier Wen Jiabao knows that China’s $1.6 trillion or so invested in US bonds is a sunk cost. Forget about it. The holdings are the consequence of their own currency manipulation in the first place.)

    The fact that Asian central banks are accumulating $600bn or more a year in reserves by running huge trade surpluses is proof enough that their (mostly rigged) currencies are undervalued by 30pc to 40pc against the West. To that extent, I agree entirely with HSBC currency guru David Bloom that this is untenable. If these countries continue to resist currency appreciation they will overheat and succumb to asset bubbles — if they haven’t already in China.

    Where I am less sure is that this will necessarily be resolved by a falling dollar. The evidence so far is that Asia will put off the day of adjustment as long as possible because they are addicted to mercantilist export strategies — and export oligarchs control the political systems (bar Japan). In which case they will lose competitive edge the old-fashioned way, by wage inflation for year after year until the world comes back into alignment. If so, the dollar will not fall at all. It may rise.

    Nor do I really agree that this is in essence a story of the two sick sisters: Britain and the US.

    They are certainly sick. But as readers know, I think much of Europe is equally sick — Spain, Italy, Greece, Ireland, the Baltics, are even sicker — even if the lag-times are longer. The IMF keeps telling us that Europe has failed to come clean on its bank losses. Germany’s BaFin regulator says the same thing. Are they wrong?

    It all has echoes of the early 1930s when the Anglo-Saxons were crushed in the first two to three years, and the French bloc was crushed over the subsequent three years. What goes around, comes around.

    Charles Dumas from Lombard Street Research says Washington must be chuckling as the weak dollar gives it time to rebuild America’s industrial core. The “inflationistas” — ie, those convinced that the dollar is being debauched despite the fact that core inflation in the US is falling and that the M3 money supply is contracting — are playing straight into the hands of the United States.

    Nobel Laureate Gary Becker told me a few weeks ago that America’ spectacular gains in productivity – growing at a trend rate of 2.25pc to 2.5pc — is laying the foundation for a much stronger US recovery in the long-term than most people seem to realize. Compare that with 0pc to 1pc for the eurozone. In Italy it is negative.

    The UN expects America to add roughly 100m people by 2050, keeping its age balance in relatively good shape through a mix of immigration and a healthy fertility rate — now 2.12 live births per woman, still above replacement level. This compares to: Taiwan (1.13), Korea (1.2), Japan (1.22), Ukraine (1.25), Poland (1.27), Spain (1.3), Italy (1.3), Russia (1.4), Germany (1.41), China (1.77), Britain (1.96), and France (1.98). Some of this data may be slightly out of date, but the picture remains valid.

    Professor Becker said a collapsing birth rate is extremely hard to reverse, and the cultural effects are insidious. Old societies are status quo. They are slow to embrace new technologies. Young minds are the source of hi-tech invention.

    The EU is fully aware of the danger. “What is at risk in the medium to long run is nothing less than the sustainability of the society Europe has built and the viability of its civilisation,” said an EU report (initially suppressed) by former Dutch premier Wim Kok as long ago as 2004. Nothing has been done since despite endless warnings from the Commission.

    China’s work force will peak in absolute terms in six years, and then go into sharp decline. I have no idea how people square this with claims that China will soon replace the US as world hegemon. The stark reality is that China will hit a Japanese-style demographic crunch before it becomes rich. Sheer size will give it weight. But mastery?

    Of course, if the US were stupid enough to enact the 10-year spending plans projected by the White House — with a deficit of $1.9 trillion in 2019 on Congressional Budget Office estimates — the country will be ruined. I do not think America has so far lost its senses that it will commit suicide in this fashion. In any case, the bond markets will react long before we get there. They will force a change in policy. That change will imply higher US savings, and less import growth. The export surplus powers that live off America’s market are going to take it on the chin.

    At the end of the day, America is a unified nation forged by wars, under the rule of law, with a (largely) unifying language and patriotic creed, and one of the oldest and most deeply-rooted democracies in the world. As the Supreme Court demonstrated during Watergate, it can break presidents who violate the law.

    It is often stated that a currency reflects the strength of an economy over time. Actually, it reflects the strength of a society. Who really thinks that Europe’s old-aged home is a better bet than America, even if they can hold the euro together as the gap widens further between Germania and Club Med? Or thinks that China’s half-reformed Communist regime is ready for global leadership. Remember the little girl in a red dress with pigtails who `lip-synched’ the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics? Believe what you will.

  • #2
    Re: U.S. Dollar Hegemony for Another Century; China No Serious Long-run Threat - Ambrose Evans-Pritc

    Well, before that happens, I see it more likely that the US breaks up into various countries with the states that got natural resources doing much better than the ones that are only playing with banana money.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: U.S. Dollar Hegemony for Another Century; China No Serious Long-run Threat - Ambrose Evans-Pritc

      Having worked with many Britons I can say there is a keen wish not to appear too far out of step with the establishment lest one become less than "respectable." There's a fair bit of that feeling in his latest post. He certainly has distanced himself from those dirty shirt gloom and doomers.

      BTW...

      This is a good book:


      The Secret Life of Bill Clinton
      by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
      http://www.amazon.com/Secret-Life-Bi.../dp/0895264080
      Last edited by Yaowarat; October 23, 2009, 06:55 AM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: U.S. Dollar Hegemony for Another Century; China No Serious Long-run Threat - Ambrose Evans-Pritc

        Ambrose is a muckraking populist.

        In his own column he contradicts himself:

        The HatoyamaObama government is spending as if there is no tomorrow. It plans to issue ¥50 trillion or $550bn$1.4 trillion in fresh bonds [just in FY 2009]. I have no idea when this will spiral out of control.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: U.S. Dollar Hegemony for Another Century; China No Serious Long-run Threat - Ambrose Evans-Pritc

          Originally posted by c1ue View Post
          Ambrose is a muckraking populist.

          In his own column he contradicts himself:
          I liked this part:

          Of course, if the US were stupid enough to enact the 10-year spending plans projected by the White House — with a deficit of $1.9 trillion in 2019 on Congressional Budget Office estimates — the country will be ruined. I do not think America has so far lost its senses that it will commit suicide in this fashion.

          [..]

          Charles Dumas from Lombard Street Research says Washington must be chuckling as the weak dollar gives it time to rebuild America’s industrial core.
          What is this, blind faith in the Republicans, or some unforeseen group of new political leaders that no one has ever heard of or from?

          Nobel Laureate Gary Becker told me a few weeks ago that America’ spectacular gains in productivity – growing at a trend rate of 2.25pc to 2.5pc —
          How much of that is due to offshoring to Asia?

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: U.S. Dollar Hegemony for Another Century; China No Serious Long-run Threat - Ambrose Evans-Pritc

            Originally posted by touchring View Post
            Well, before that happens, I see it more likely that the US breaks up into various countries with the states that got natural resources doing much better than the ones that are only playing with banana money.
            well put, gerald calente.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: U.S. Dollar Hegemony for Another Century; China No Serious Long-run Threat - Ambrose Evans-Pritc

              Bully for the Anglo banking hegemony! I like this piece. It's like, "why our school is going to be tops at football league this year."

              I don't think the dollar is dead. But I'll put my money on regionalism, multi-polar world, neo-neo-colonalism, energy net exporters vs. net importers, etc.



              Originally posted by Dr.No View Post
              http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance...other-century/

              Ambrose Evans-Pritchard has covered world politics and economics for 25 years, based in Europe, the US, and Latin America. He joined the Telegraph in 1991, serving as Washington correspondent and later Europe correspondent in Brussels. He is now International Business Editor in London.



              Dollar hegemony for another century

              By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard (Last updated: October 21st, 2009)

              Let me stick my neck out.

              The dollar will still be the world’s dominant reserve currency in 2030, sharing a degree of leadership in uneasy condominium with the Chinese yuan. It will then regain much of its hegemonic status as the 21st century unfolds. It may indeed end the century even stronger than it was at the start.

              The aging crisis in Asia — and indeed the outright demographic implosion in Japan and China, not to mention China’s water crisis — will soon be obvious to everybody. Talk of Oriental supremacy will start to sound overblown at first, and then preposterous.

              Japan is about to go bankrupt. It is on the cusp of a fiscal crisis that will change perceptions of Asia dramatically. The IMF says gross public debt will reach 218pc of GDP this year. This is compounding very fast. It will be 246pc in 2014.

              The Hatoyama government is spending as if there is no tomorrow. It plans to issue ¥50 trillion or $550bn in fresh bonds. I have no idea when this will spiral out of control. It could take another two or three years. It could start next week. Yes, I know that Japan has been borrowing merrily at ever lower rates for 20 years without the sky falling. The 10-year yield is 1.3pc. What happens when it rises to global levels of 3pc to 4pc? People made the same sort of arguments about the global boom before it suddenly tipped over.

              This blog does not attempt market timing, nor does it offer investment advice. But I am absolutely certain that pundits consigning the dollar to its death have missed an even more dramatic currency and debt story in Japan. The yen will top ¥200 to the dollar before this is over. Jim O’Neill from Goldman Sachs has already begun to hint at this.

              Apologies to readers who feel confused about my view on the dollar. I have written a string of NEWS pieces over recent weeks quoting the currency experts and Asian officials slamming America, or exploring the dollar demise thesis.

              People assume that I share these views. I do not. Furthermore, I suspect that at least some of China’s grumbling about the dollar slide over recent months has been a ruse to lower the yuan (pegged to the dollar of course) against the euro, yen, and even sterling. The goal is to protect export margins. (Surely premier Wen Jiabao knows that China’s $1.6 trillion or so invested in US bonds is a sunk cost. Forget about it. The holdings are the consequence of their own currency manipulation in the first place.)

              The fact that Asian central banks are accumulating $600bn or more a year in reserves by running huge trade surpluses is proof enough that their (mostly rigged) currencies are undervalued by 30pc to 40pc against the West. To that extent, I agree entirely with HSBC currency guru David Bloom that this is untenable. If these countries continue to resist currency appreciation they will overheat and succumb to asset bubbles — if they haven’t already in China.

              Where I am less sure is that this will necessarily be resolved by a falling dollar. The evidence so far is that Asia will put off the day of adjustment as long as possible because they are addicted to mercantilist export strategies — and export oligarchs control the political systems (bar Japan). In which case they will lose competitive edge the old-fashioned way, by wage inflation for year after year until the world comes back into alignment. If so, the dollar will not fall at all. It may rise.

              Nor do I really agree that this is in essence a story of the two sick sisters: Britain and the US.

              They are certainly sick. But as readers know, I think much of Europe is equally sick — Spain, Italy, Greece, Ireland, the Baltics, are even sicker — even if the lag-times are longer. The IMF keeps telling us that Europe has failed to come clean on its bank losses. Germany’s BaFin regulator says the same thing. Are they wrong?

              It all has echoes of the early 1930s when the Anglo-Saxons were crushed in the first two to three years, and the French bloc was crushed over the subsequent three years. What goes around, comes around.

              Charles Dumas from Lombard Street Research says Washington must be chuckling as the weak dollar gives it time to rebuild America’s industrial core. The “inflationistas” — ie, those convinced that the dollar is being debauched despite the fact that core inflation in the US is falling and that the M3 money supply is contracting — are playing straight into the hands of the United States.

              Nobel Laureate Gary Becker told me a few weeks ago that America’ spectacular gains in productivity – growing at a trend rate of 2.25pc to 2.5pc — is laying the foundation for a much stronger US recovery in the long-term than most people seem to realize. Compare that with 0pc to 1pc for the eurozone. In Italy it is negative.

              The UN expects America to add roughly 100m people by 2050, keeping its age balance in relatively good shape through a mix of immigration and a healthy fertility rate — now 2.12 live births per woman, still above replacement level. This compares to: Taiwan (1.13), Korea (1.2), Japan (1.22), Ukraine (1.25), Poland (1.27), Spain (1.3), Italy (1.3), Russia (1.4), Germany (1.41), China (1.77), Britain (1.96), and France (1.98). Some of this data may be slightly out of date, but the picture remains valid.

              Professor Becker said a collapsing birth rate is extremely hard to reverse, and the cultural effects are insidious. Old societies are status quo. They are slow to embrace new technologies. Young minds are the source of hi-tech invention.

              The EU is fully aware of the danger. “What is at risk in the medium to long run is nothing less than the sustainability of the society Europe has built and the viability of its civilisation,” said an EU report (initially suppressed) by former Dutch premier Wim Kok as long ago as 2004. Nothing has been done since despite endless warnings from the Commission.

              China’s work force will peak in absolute terms in six years, and then go into sharp decline. I have no idea how people square this with claims that China will soon replace the US as world hegemon. The stark reality is that China will hit a Japanese-style demographic crunch before it becomes rich. Sheer size will give it weight. But mastery?

              Of course, if the US were stupid enough to enact the 10-year spending plans projected by the White House — with a deficit of $1.9 trillion in 2019 on Congressional Budget Office estimates — the country will be ruined. I do not think America has so far lost its senses that it will commit suicide in this fashion. In any case, the bond markets will react long before we get there. They will force a change in policy. That change will imply higher US savings, and less import growth. The export surplus powers that live off America’s market are going to take it on the chin.

              At the end of the day, America is a unified nation forged by wars, under the rule of law, with a (largely) unifying language and patriotic creed, and one of the oldest and most deeply-rooted democracies in the world. As the Supreme Court demonstrated during Watergate, it can break presidents who violate the law.

              It is often stated that a currency reflects the strength of an economy over time. Actually, it reflects the strength of a society. Who really thinks that Europe’s old-aged home is a better bet than America, even if they can hold the euro together as the gap widens further between Germania and Club Med? Or thinks that China’s half-reformed Communist regime is ready for global leadership. Remember the little girl in a red dress with pigtails who `lip-synched’ the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics? Believe what you will.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: U.S. Dollar Hegemony for Another Century; China No Serious Long-run Threat - Ambrose Evans-Pritc

                here's another view:

                http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=ak4Q2kkq0v9o

                The central bank realizes it “can’t afford” to add more cash to the economy through dollar buying and will allow yuan appreciation within six months, said Adam McCabe, a portfolio manager in Singapore at Aberdeen Asset Management Plc, Scotland’s largest independent money manager.

                “It’s going to be a decision made in the best interests of the domestic economy and not because of pressures from foreign policy makers.”

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: U.S. Dollar Hegemony for Another Century; China No Serious Long-run Threat - Ambrose Evans-Pritc

                  I'm surprised it's in contrast to Ferguson

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: U.S. Dollar Hegemony for Another Century; China No Serious Long-run Threat - Ambrose Evans-Pritc

                    Originally posted by babbittd View Post
                    here's another view:

                    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=ak4Q2kkq0v9o

                    The central bank realizes it “can’t afford” to add more cash to the economy through dollar buying and will allow yuan appreciation within six months, said Adam McCabe, a portfolio manager in Singapore at Aberdeen Asset Management Plc, Scotland’s largest independent money manager.

                    “It’s going to be a decision made in the best interests of the domestic economy and not because of pressures from foreign policy makers.”
                    Well what is clearly not being discussed are the baby elephant in the room. That of the move of the BRIC nations to trade between themselves in commodities and REMOVE the necessity of holding dollar reserves (or atleast lower the percentage).

                    The recent Chinese accords with several south american nations (Venezuela/Brazil and Bolivia) as well as with Russia for the supply of natural gas and prbably a few central asian countries (Kazakstan/Turkmensistan) when all is said and done.

                    This is huge -the world is moving to natural gas and the dollar oil hegemony is on a precipice. Already many developing nations are running smaller cars/taxis/buses on natural gas cylinders and bio-fuels.

                    Take the decline in the need of oil over-all, the move for large commodities that supported the dollar hegemony (natural gas/iron ore/etc) also moving out to regional currencies and SDRs and what you will see is that a 10 percent reduction of Asian/Mercosur and GCC countries can unleash a tidal wave of dollars being repatriated back to the bosom of its printing press home.

                    Inflation hits 10-12%, unemployment will be considered low at a permanent 8% and the standard of living will be onerous for the less than welathy -especially the elderly.

                    In short- if the dollar has lost 96% of its value from 1903 -it will lose an additional 96% of the residual 4% in the next 30 years -count on it -as we have seen this acceleration since 1970! The dollar has been dying -they just keep denying it -thats all.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: U.S. Dollar Hegemony for Another Century; China No Serious Long-run Threat - Ambrose Evans-Pritc

                      Ambrose analysis is correct insofar one thinks inside the box, which is the current system where everything is denominated in dollars and the world is a sand farm full of ostriches.

                      And it may stay so. But future is all about probabilities, not possibilities. Possibilities are endless (as Ambrose article shows), but probabilities are not.

                      It is more probable that US will decline and other blocks will rise. It is also probable that this will cause instabilities, namely regional wars. It is less likely it will cause wider conflicts.

                      But I would say that unfortunately it is probable to cause some sort of internal dissent within the US. Obama putting down 13,000 billion in international banks and 30 billion to help states is a huge centrifugal force in the US that many people simply do not see but will soon feel as a big federal whip. How far it will go, I do not know. Hopefully, that new breed of wiser politicians will come along before any further acceleration of this proverbial weight being spun around Washington.

                      But I must say, nice speech on the Ambrose part. He should write some for Obama too.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: U.S. Dollar Hegemony for Another Century; China No Serious Long-run Threat - Ambrose Evans-Pritc

                        Originally posted by serge_oc View Post
                        Ambrose analysis is correct insofar one thinks inside the box, which is the current system where everything is denominated in dollars and the world is a sand farm full of ostriches.

                        And it may stay so. But future is all about probabilities, not possibilities. Possibilities are endless (as Ambrose article shows), but probabilities are not.

                        It is more probable that US will decline and other blocks will rise. It is also probable that this will cause instabilities, namely regional wars. It is less likely it will cause wider conflicts.

                        But I would say that unfortunately it is probable to cause some sort of internal dissent within the US. Obama putting down 13,000 billion in international banks and 30 billion to help states is a huge centrifugal force in the US that many people simply do not see but will soon feel as a big federal whip. How far it will go, I do not know. Hopefully, that new breed of wiser politicians will come along before any further acceleration of this proverbial weight being spun around Washington.

                        But I must say, nice speech on the Ambrose part. He should write some for Obama too.

                        This has always been the bludgeon of inequity-violence, needless death and destruction foisted upon other nations Panama/Grenada/Falkland Islands/East Timor/Columbiia/El Salvador etc -and so the world has seen enuf of Shah of Iran/ Honduran /Fiji coups etc.

                        The repudiation of capitalism has been waiting in the wings quietly biding its time till strident Neocons were exposed for the fools they were and will continue to be.

                        The movements in South America will become very significant when it reaches Mexico -which it did with the disputed results of Calderon vs Lobrador. The timing is inevitable due to China's rather large surplus for the beginning of the denourment of this play called dollar hegemony.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: U.S. Dollar Hegemony for Another Century; China No Serious Long-run Threat - Ambrose Evans-Pritc

                          Originally posted by touchring View Post
                          Well, before that happens, I see it more likely that the US breaks up into various countries with the states that got natural resources doing much better than the ones that are only playing with banana money.
                          Yet when you look at the world there are plenty of countries with abundant natural resources coupled with abundant misery. Look at the oil producing nations. A place like Norway is the exception not the rule.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: U.S. Dollar Hegemony for Another Century; China No Serious Long-run Threat - Ambrose Evans-Pritc

                            Originally posted by Dr.No View Post
                            http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance...other-century/

                            Ambrose Evans-Pritchard has covered world politics and economics for 25 years, based in Europe, the US, and Latin America. He joined the Telegraph in 1991, serving as Washington correspondent and later Europe correspondent in Brussels. He is now International Business Editor in London.



                            Dollar hegemony for another century

                            By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard (Last updated: October 21st, 2009)

                            Let me stick my neck out.

                            The dollar will still be the world’s dominant reserve currency in 2030, sharing a degree of leadership in uneasy condominium with the Chinese yuan. It will then regain much of its hegemonic status as the 21st century unfolds. It may indeed end the century even stronger than it was at the start.

                            The aging crisis in Asia — and indeed the outright demographic implosion in Japan and China, not to mention China’s water crisis — will soon be obvious to everybody. Talk of Oriental supremacy will start to sound overblown at first, and then preposterous.

                            Japan is about to go bankrupt. It is on the cusp of a fiscal crisis that will change perceptions of Asia dramatically. The IMF says gross public debt will reach 218pc of GDP this year. This is compounding very fast. It will be 246pc in 2014.

                            The Hatoyama government is spending as if there is no tomorrow. It plans to issue ¥50 trillion or $550bn in fresh bonds. I have no idea when this will spiral out of control. It could take another two or three years. It could start next week. Yes, I know that Japan has been borrowing merrily at ever lower rates for 20 years without the sky falling. The 10-year yield is 1.3pc. What happens when it rises to global levels of 3pc to 4pc? People made the same sort of arguments about the global boom before it suddenly tipped over.

                            This blog does not attempt market timing, nor does it offer investment advice. But I am absolutely certain that pundits consigning the dollar to its death have missed an even more dramatic currency and debt story in Japan. The yen will top ¥200 to the dollar before this is over. Jim O’Neill from Goldman Sachs has already begun to hint at this.

                            Apologies to readers who feel confused about my view on the dollar. I have written a string of NEWS pieces over recent weeks quoting the currency experts and Asian officials slamming America, or exploring the dollar demise thesis.

                            People assume that I share these views. I do not. Furthermore, I suspect that at least some of China’s grumbling about the dollar slide over recent months has been a ruse to lower the yuan (pegged to the dollar of course) against the euro, yen, and even sterling. The goal is to protect export margins. (Surely premier Wen Jiabao knows that China’s $1.6 trillion or so invested in US bonds is a sunk cost. Forget about it. The holdings are the consequence of their own currency manipulation in the first place.)

                            The fact that Asian central banks are accumulating $600bn or more a year in reserves by running huge trade surpluses is proof enough that their (mostly rigged) currencies are undervalued by 30pc to 40pc against the West. To that extent, I agree entirely with HSBC currency guru David Bloom that this is untenable. If these countries continue to resist currency appreciation they will overheat and succumb to asset bubbles — if they haven’t already in China.

                            Where I am less sure is that this will necessarily be resolved by a falling dollar. The evidence so far is that Asia will put off the day of adjustment as long as possible because they are addicted to mercantilist export strategies — and export oligarchs control the political systems (bar Japan). In which case they will lose competitive edge the old-fashioned way, by wage inflation for year after year until the world comes back into alignment. If so, the dollar will not fall at all. It may rise.

                            Nor do I really agree that this is in essence a story of the two sick sisters: Britain and the US.

                            They are certainly sick. But as readers know, I think much of Europe is equally sick — Spain, Italy, Greece, Ireland, the Baltics, are even sicker — even if the lag-times are longer. The IMF keeps telling us that Europe has failed to come clean on its bank losses. Germany’s BaFin regulator says the same thing. Are they wrong?

                            It all has echoes of the early 1930s when the Anglo-Saxons were crushed in the first two to three years, and the French bloc was crushed over the subsequent three years. What goes around, comes around.

                            Charles Dumas from Lombard Street Research says Washington must be chuckling as the weak dollar gives it time to rebuild America’s industrial core. The “inflationistas” — ie, those convinced that the dollar is being debauched despite the fact that core inflation in the US is falling and that the M3 money supply is contracting — are playing straight into the hands of the United States.

                            Nobel Laureate Gary Becker told me a few weeks ago that America’ spectacular gains in productivity – growing at a trend rate of 2.25pc to 2.5pc — is laying the foundation for a much stronger US recovery in the long-term than most people seem to realize. Compare that with 0pc to 1pc for the eurozone. In Italy it is negative.

                            The UN expects America to add roughly 100m people by 2050, keeping its age balance in relatively good shape through a mix of immigration and a healthy fertility rate — now 2.12 live births per woman, still above replacement level. This compares to: Taiwan (1.13), Korea (1.2), Japan (1.22), Ukraine (1.25), Poland (1.27), Spain (1.3), Italy (1.3), Russia (1.4), Germany (1.41), China (1.77), Britain (1.96), and France (1.98). Some of this data may be slightly out of date, but the picture remains valid.

                            Professor Becker said a collapsing birth rate is extremely hard to reverse, and the cultural effects are insidious. Old societies are status quo. They are slow to embrace new technologies. Young minds are the source of hi-tech invention.

                            The EU is fully aware of the danger. “What is at risk in the medium to long run is nothing less than the sustainability of the society Europe has built and the viability of its civilisation,” said an EU report (initially suppressed) by former Dutch premier Wim Kok as long ago as 2004. Nothing has been done since despite endless warnings from the Commission.

                            China’s work force will peak in absolute terms in six years, and then go into sharp decline. I have no idea how people square this with claims that China will soon replace the US as world hegemon. The stark reality is that China will hit a Japanese-style demographic crunch before it becomes rich. Sheer size will give it weight. But mastery?

                            Of course, if the US were stupid enough to enact the 10-year spending plans projected by the White House — with a deficit of $1.9 trillion in 2019 on Congressional Budget Office estimates — the country will be ruined. I do not think America has so far lost its senses that it will commit suicide in this fashion. In any case, the bond markets will react long before we get there. They will force a change in policy. That change will imply higher US savings, and less import growth. The export surplus powers that live off America’s market are going to take it on the chin.

                            At the end of the day, America is a unified nation forged by wars, under the rule of law, with a (largely) unifying language and patriotic creed, and one of the oldest and most deeply-rooted democracies in the world. As the Supreme Court demonstrated during Watergate, it can break presidents who violate the law.

                            It is often stated that a currency reflects the strength of an economy over time. Actually, it reflects the strength of a society. Who really thinks that Europe’s old-aged home is a better bet than America, even if they can hold the euro together as the gap widens further between Germania and Club Med? Or thinks that China’s half-reformed Communist regime is ready for global leadership. Remember the little girl in a red dress with pigtails who `lip-synched’ the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics? Believe what you will.
                            Cool! Chant with me now. U-S-A U-S-A U-S-A
                            Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. -Groucho

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: U.S. Dollar Hegemony for Another Century; China No Serious Long-run Threat - Ambrose Evans-Pritc

                              Originally posted by BigBagel View Post
                              Yet when you look at the world there are plenty of countries with abundant natural resources coupled with abundant misery. Look at the oil producing nations. A place like Norway is the exception not the rule.
                              canada
                              australia
                              usa... until we used them up...

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X