Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Oh Maya- the Law of Uneven Development

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Oh Maya- the Law of Uneven Development

    The Fall of the Maya: "They Did it to Themselves"

    October 6, 2009: For 1200 years, the Maya dominated Central America. At their peak around 900 A.D., Maya cities teemed with more than 2,000 people per square mile -- comparable to modern Los Angeles County. Even in rural areas the Maya numbered 200 to 400 people per square mile. But suddenly, all was quiet. And the profound silence testified to one of the greatest demographic disasters in human prehistory -- the demise of the once vibrant Maya society.



    Mayan ruins in Guatemala. Photo copyright Tom Sever.

    What happened? Some NASA-funded researchers think they have a pretty good idea.
    "They did it to themselves," says veteran archeologist Tom Sever.

    "The Maya are often depicted as people who lived in complete harmony with their environment,' says PhD student Robert Griffin. "But like many other cultures before and after them, they ended up deforesting and destroying their landscape in efforts to eke out a living in hard times."

    A major drought occurred about the time the Maya began to disappear. And at the time of their collapse, the Maya had cut down most of the trees across large swaths of the land to clear fields for growing corn to feed their burgeoning population. They also cut trees for firewood and for making building materials.

    "They had to burn 20 trees to heat the limestone for making just 1 square meter of the lime plaster they used to build their tremendous temples, reservoirs, and monuments," explains Sever.

    He and his team used computer simulations to reconstruct how the deforestation could have played a role in worsening the drought. They isolated the effects of deforestation using a pair of proven computer climate models: the PSU/NCAR mesoscale atmospheric circulation model, known as MM5, and the Community Climate System Model, or CCSM.

    "We modeled the worst and best case scenarios: 100 percent deforestation in the Maya area and no deforestation," says Sever. "The results were eye opening. Loss of all the trees caused a 3-5 degree rise in temperature and a 20-30 percent decrease in rainfall."

    The results are telling, but more research is needed to completely explain the mechanisms of Mayan decline. Archeological records reveal that while some Maya city-states did fall during drought periods, some survived and even thrived.

    "We believe that drought was realized differently in different areas," explains Griffin. "We propose that increases in temperature and decreases in rainfall brought on by localized deforestation caused serious enough problems to push some but not all city-states over the edge."

    The Maya deforested through the use of slash-and-burn agriculture – a method still used in their old stomping grounds today, so the researchers understand how it works.

    "We know that for every 1 to 3 years you farm a piece of land, you need to let it lay fallow for 15 years to recover. In that time, trees and vegetation can grow back there while you slash and burn another area to plant in."

    But what if you don't let the land lay fallow long enough to replenish itself? And what if you clear more and more fields to meet growing demands for food?

    "We believe that's what happened," says Griffin. "The Maya stripped large areas of their landscape bare by over-farming."



    A deadly cycle of drought, warming and deforestation may have doomed the Maya.


    Not only did drought make it difficult to grow enough food, it also would have been harder for the Maya to store enough water to survive the dry season.

    "The cities tried to keep an 18-month supply of water in their reservoirs," says Sever. "For example, in Tikal there was a system of reservoirs that held millions of gallons of water. Without sufficient rain, the reservoirs ran dry." Thirst and famine don't do much for keeping a populace happy. The rest, as the saying goes, is history.

    "In some of the Maya city-states, mass graves have been found containing groups of skeletons with jade inlays in their teeth – something they reserved for Maya elites – perhaps in this case murdered aristocracy," he speculates.

    No single factor brings a civilization to its knees, but the deforestation that helped bring on drought could easily have exacerbated other problems such as civil unrest, war, starvation and disease.

    Many of these insights are a result of space-based imaging, notes Sever.

    "By interpreting infrared satellite data, we've located hundreds of old and abandoned cities not previously known to exist. The Maya used lime plaster as foundations to build their great cities filled with ornate temples, observatories, and pyramids. Over hundreds of years, the lime seeped into the soil. As a result, the vegetation around the ruins looks distinctive in infrared to this day."

    "Space technology is revolutionizing archeology," he concludes. "We're using it to learn about the plight of ancients in order to avoid a similar fate today."


    http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/06oct_maya.htm?list10390


  • #2
    The great drought: Disaster looms in East Africa

    I was in Marsabit, Kenya in 2005 with a non-profit. After 3 days in Samburu-land, midway between Nairobi and Marsabit, we drove to Marsabit. Trip was 6 hours were on a dusty, unpaved, gravel road that I'll never forget. It was VERY dry.

    We spent 2 days meeting with the Redille people (Rendille tribe) just outside Marsabit. In 2005 we heard about all the same issue touched upon in the article. Increasing drought, cattle raids in which family members were killed, very serious inter-tribal conflict due to scarcity of water and an effort to replace dead animals. Area has beome increasingly violent also due to greter prevalence of guns leaking over the Somali border. The people herd animals because it is too dry to grow crops, would be kind of like trying to farm in Arizona.

    The government of Kenya at that time (and probably today also) was making an effort to tamp down on the violence and inter-tribal violence. But the problems were overwhelming in some ways. The BIG problem is that the Sahel (dry rim south of the Sahara) is moving south due to increasing drought. These people are totally dependent on their animals.

    We spent one day in Marsabit National Park. Amazing. It's so dry on the plains, then you start climing the mountain range, and it's like paradise.

    The mountain catches the mist from overhead clouds, and are green, lots of trees, shrubs, and wildlife. Marsabit National Park guest lodges are slightly uphill from a crater lake where wildlife come to drink. Lake was shaped like a bowl, so my guess was that the "mountain" was probably a dormant volcano.

    If that mountain is being denuded now, as article says, that is a serious poblem, it's the only green spot in the entire area.

    From article at link below:

    "Across the north of Kenya competition for water, grazing land and surviving cattle has sparked ethnic conflict. Cattle raids were always a feature of nomadic cultures but as the battle for survival intensifies the death toll climbs...

    In reality no one can deliver the rain that is really needed. Leina Mpoke has been working to unravel the cycles of drought, local deforestation and global influences for the Kenya Climate Working Group...

    Marsabit mountain rises up from the semi-desert of northern Kenya to touch the clouds at nearly 2,000 metres. Its highland slopes have always offered respite from the heat and dust of the savannah...
    and its elevated forest sheltered elephants, kudus, lions and high altitude lakes. It is now home to climate refugees who have swollen the population to more than 40,000. Ibrahim Adan grew up in Marsabit and is sad to see how it's changed: "It used to be all green, now it's horrible and dusty."..."


    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...a-1797003.html

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Oh Maya- the Law of Uneven Development

      I am becoming more and more sceptical of archeologists and paleo-climatologists, and the others trying to re-construct the distant past.

      Good science depends upon loads of unbiased evidence and very little in the way of theory. Junk science, on the other hand, is rich in theory, rich in hidden assumptions, rich in modelling, rich in political correctness, rich in terminology and jargon--- but rather poor in hard evidence.

      I think the research going on now in climatology and archeology is more revealing about the researchers and fad beliefs of the present-day than about any paleo-climate or past civilization.

      Just reading an article on Bloomberg in the past few days, it had to do with the bones of a paleo-human, one-million years older than Lucy. ( Lucy's bones, you may re-call, were dug-up in Odavai Gorge in east Africa, and from Lucy all of mankind was supposed to have decended. But these new bones were dug-up in Kenya, but not in Odavai Gorge. ) And according to the archeologists, they determined that the bones were evidence of a paleo-civilization of apes, dominated by women. Men were feminized. ( How hilarious! )

      But all they had dug-up were old fossils of apes, apparently washed together by rain, and little more than that. Who knows how the apes related or if they did relate to each other? Who knows what was a civilization and what was not a civilization? Who knows what gender roles apes had? ( Again, hilarious! )

      And in climatology, we know climates in the world change naturally due to changes in solar activity as well as changes in the Earth's orbit and changes in the Earth's axis of rotation. We know scientifically that these changes were (and are) huge..... But we do not know how much mankind's activities have modified the Earth's natural change in climate, and we should not pretend or assume that we know. ( Sadly, and again, hilarious! )

      Yes, desertification can be partly caused by over-grazing and tree-cutting. Slash-and-burn agriculture in the tropics may contribute to climate change. We have known that for decades...... So what else is new in honest climate science? --- And sadly, the answer is not very much.
      Last edited by Starving Steve; October 07, 2009, 05:57 PM.

      Comment

      Working...
      X