Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bailout Nation Reviewed

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bailout Nation Reviewed

    BOOK REVIEW

    Bailout Nation: How Greed and Easy Money Corrupted Wall Street and Shook the World Economy

    by Barry Ritholtz with Aaron Task

    For the past three decades, finance replaced doctor or lawyer as the smart career choice. The cleverest people gravitated to business schools and then to Wall Street, some detouring to Silicon Valley during the dot-com boom. So how did these masters of the universe create the worst global economic misery in 80 years?

    It was stupidity and arrogance, pure and simple, fund manager and TheStreet.com columnist Barry Ritholtz contends in Bailout Nation, the same traits that led a previous generation of America's best and brightest to the tragedy of Vietnam (and a group of more recent, less illustrious ideologues to the debacle in Iraq). At least Camelot's villains thought they were doing good for the world. The modern bankers and traders and quants and arbs who acted so irresponsibly, almost exclusively with other people's money, were simply trying to make themselves obscenely wealthy.

    These "idiots", as Ritholtz often calls them, richly deserve every ounce of approbation he musters. He repeatedly contends that rather than being bailed out, they deserve to have been bankrupted, exposed as charlatans, hooted out of their professions, tarred, feathered, and in some cases jailed.

    Helping hand

    In his very readable book that will delight general readers as well as finance buffs, Ritholtz traces the history of US bailouts. He acknowledges that American capitalism was never purely laissez faire. From manipulating tariffs, to war, to attacking Barbary pirates, to railroad land grants, Uncle Sam has assisted commerce.

    Moving to modern times, Ritholtz rightly rejects comparisons between the New Deal and later bailouts. Although the 1930s feature remarkably similar shrieks of socialist takeover and demagoguery over presidential loyalty and origins (Franklin Delano Rosenfeld, they said back then), the government response was quite different. The New Deal focused on sector reform and aid to victims while the present - and Ritholtz contends, less justifiable - effort provides direct aid to corporations often guilty of gross mismanagement.

    The US conversion to doing the wrong thing to support business began, according to Ritholtz, with the bailout of Lockheed Aviation in 1971. In that and subsequent industrial bailouts of Penn Central Railroad and Chrysler Motors, the government became convinced the country and taxpayers had less to lose from a bailout than letting the companies fail. Ritholtz explodes that myth by simply asking how the US auto industry could possibly be in worse shape now if Chrysler had gone belly up 30 years ago?

    Who stole my cape?

    The financial bailout era begins with the October 19, 1987, Black Monday crash, when the Dow Jones Industrial Average plummeted a harrowing 22.6%. That was a first intervention by the man Ritholtz assigns the greatest slice of blame for the current debacle, former US Federal Reserve chairman and financial superhero Alan Greenspan. (Oddly and disappointingly, the book barely mentions the government's US$180 billion Savings & Loan bailout of the early 1990s. which at least superficially resembles the present crash.)

    Greenspan's predilection to meddle in equity markets combined with his paradoxical disdain for regulation in the name of free markets created a climate for excessive risk-taking. When Greenspan cut interest rates to all-time lows after September 11, 2001, it forced bond investors to search for new products for returns in an atmosphere where those best and the brightest had carte blanche to practice financial alchemy with disastrous results.

    After Greenspan, Ritholtz assigns the greatest blame to the Fed, twice - for keeping interest rates too low and failing as a bank regulator; then to rating agencies Moody's, Standard & Poor's and Fitch for classifying risky bonds as Triple A; to the Securities and Exchange Commission, for loosening leverage restrictions on investment banks; to mortgage lenders for offering liar loans; to borrowers and home buyers for lying; to Congress for its complicity in all; to the big five Wall Street firms and their greed-addled chief executive officers for ignoring Ritholtz's "first rule of economics: 'There is no free lunch'."

    Too big to succeed

    Ritholtz placed high in the blame game a figure that epitomized the pollution of politics with money and the (literal) marriage of government and business to advantage the privileged while preaching the free-market gospel, former senator Phil Gramm. Gramm's wife, Wendy, began the job of dismantling regulation of futures markets and then joined the board of directors at beneficiary Enron. Gramm (along with Bill Clinton Treasury secretary Robert Rubin, number 14 on Ritholtz's blame list with protege Larry Summers) spearheaded repeal of the Glass-Stegall Act that kept banks separate from other financial institutions. That enabled banks like Citigroup to become, as Ritholtz puts it, "too big to succeed" and pose systemic risk when they went bad.

    After their government service, Gramm and Rubin took jobs at Swiss bank UBS and Citigroup respectively, leviathans they helped create and eventually beach, costing shareholders and the public billions. Gramm remains unrepentant, "Bailout Nation's most intellectually bankrupt citizen," Ritholtz writes. "Like Greenspan, Gramm had only one idea; unlike Greenspan, he had no comprehension it was wrong."

    Ritholtz also absolves two of the rightwing fringe's favorite targets, the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) of 1977 and government-sponsored mortgage packagers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The toothless CRA never compelled any bank to make any loan, let alone a bad loan. Moreover, most lenders making bad loans weren't covered by CRA. As for Fannie and Freddie, Ritholtz acknowledges their problems (from good, old-fashioned fraud) that had nothing to do with the crisis. Politicians and ideologues that seize on CRA, Fannie and Freddy as villains are showcasing their own ignorance and intellectual bankruptcy.

    Putting the A in AIG

    When things fell apart in September last year, Ritholtz says, the government should have nationalized AIG, separating the giant's solvent insurance business from its loopy financial funhouse. Instead, US taxpayers have doled out $173 billion and counting to repay not widows and orphans holding policies on dear departed dads, but a coterie of Wall Street tycoons and overseas banks escaping the consequences of their foolish risks. That's not capitalism but socialism for the wealthy at taxpayer expense.

    For the housing market at the root of the boom and bust, Ritholtz convincingly demonstrates its disproportionate impact in the post-September US economy. He proposes converting 30% of any delinquent mortgage into a 10-year balloon loan with no interest accruing, and lenders carrying the loan as an asset. Ritholtz estimates that would save about one in five of the homes now threatened with foreclosure. The rest would need to be foreclosed to let prices adjust to reality. That's how free markets are supposed to work, rather than the "we win-you lose" bets Wall Street is still cashing.

    Bailout Nation's straightforward, compelling account puts the crisis in context, explains why the US government responded so stupidly, offers solutions, and advises how to prevent a repeat. Ritholtz's indictment of the financial and political establishment isn't terribly unique, but it's devastatingly accurate.

    Bailout Nation: How Greed and Easy Money Corrupted Wall Street and Shook the World Economy by Barry Ritholtz with Aaron Task. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, John Wiley & Sons, May 2009. ISBN: 978-0-470-52038-3. US$24.95; 332 pages.

    http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/KJ03Dj01.html

  • #2
    Re: Bailout Nation Reviewed

    Bill Moore, the comedian, said that Bernanke should be cleaning-up the mess both he and Greenspan made of the economy. He said that Bernanke should NOT be making policy at the Fed. He said that re-appointing Bernanke to head the Fed was like letting "the fox guard the hen-house".

    Speaking about Obama, Bill Moore said that he was the right president for the times and that his heart was in the right place, morally. But he said that Obama's advisors have given him very poor advice on important issues such as the economy, Bernanke, energy, etc.
    Last edited by Starving Steve; October 02, 2009, 01:37 PM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Bailout Nation Reviewed

      Don - would this fine review perhaps better be posted on the "iTulip Select -> Book Reviews" forum, than here on the "News" forum?

      In any case, good review. Thanks. I might have to get the book.
      Most folks are good; a few aren't.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Bailout Nation Reviewed

        I notice that "Book Reviews" is in "Select" territory. I'm glad I was able, as a Participating iTuliper, to read it.

        I can understand how book reviews provide extra benefit, commensurate with membership in the Select tier of participation. And, I wonder if there might also be a benefit to having book reviews in the open space. For example, comments by Senior iTulipers accompanying the reviews could reference material that lives in the "Select" zone, thereby promoting Select membership.

        I'm quite a neophyte and don't know that I have the background to take proper advantage of the Select membership. So far, I certainly appreciate the education I'm acquiring via the open areas.

        Thanks iTulip, and you senior (not by age) folks who keep all this humming.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Bailout Nation Reviewed

          Originally posted by CoyoteLaughs View Post
          And, I wonder if there might also be a benefit to having book reviews in the open space.
          Could be. I tend to leave such decisions to the owners. I see you placed this review here for a reason. Ok.
          Most folks are good; a few aren't.

          Comment

          Working...
          X