Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Geithner Wants Global Bank Deal Before 2010

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Geithner Wants Global Bank Deal Before 2010

    http://www.blacklistednews.com/news-5473-0-9-9--.html

    Geithner Wants Global Bank Deal Before 2010
    Published on 09-05-2009 Email To Friend Print Version
    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

    Source: News Max

    WASHINGTON -- The United States on Thursday said it would seek stronger capital and liquidity standards for banks as part of a global agreement by the end of next year to help prevent another financial crisis.

    The proposal, expected to be pushed by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner at this weekend's G20 finance chiefs meeting, is aimed at tightening the global regulatory framework which failed to prevent the build-up of financial risk blamed for the latest financial crisis.

    "A comprehensive agreement on new international capital and liquidity standards should be reached by December 31, 2010, and should be implemented in national jurisdictions by December 31, 2012," the Treasury Department said in a statement on the eve of the two-day talks beginning Friday in London.

    The plan calls for "core principles" that should guide reform of the international regulatory capital and liquidity framework "to better protect the safety and soundness of individual banking firms and the stability of the global financial system and economy."

    Geither said Wednesday that the United States would outline a framework of principles to begin the discussion on a "new international capital accord."

    "That will put in place -- again, once the crisis is behind us -- a more conservative framework of constraints on leverage in the financial sector across the major, globally active financial institutions," he said.

    The banking sector was a major casualty of the financial crisis stemming from a US housing mortgage meltdown that shook the United States, Europe and other countries and slammed the brakes on global growth.

    In the United States, the crisis led to the collapse of the venerable investment bank Lehman Brothers and a massive government bailout of financial institutions.

    "The global regulatory framework failed to prevent the build-up of risk in the financial system in the years leading up to the recent crisis," the statement said.

    Major financial institutions around the world had reserves and capital buffers that were too low, used excessive amounts of leverage to finance their operations, and relied too much on unstable, short-term funding sources, it said.

    "Going forward, global banking firms must be made subject to stronger regulatory capital and liquidity standards that are as uniform as possible across countries," it said.

    The Group of 20 developed and developing nations is also expected to discuss European proposals to set rules on bankers' bonuses that they say should be based on long-term, not short-term, success to discourage unnecessary risk taking.

    With Japan, France and Germany officially out of recession, the meeting of G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, in preparation of a summit later this month, is also expected to consider the fate of the massive fiscal stimuli introduced at the height of the crisis.

    The G20 leaders are scheduled to hold a September 24-25 summit in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, hosted by President Barack Obama.

  • #2
    Re: Geithner Wants Global Bank Deal Before 2010

    I guess raising capital requirements for banks shouldn't be a problem as long as we've got mark-to-fantasy accounting.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Geithner Wants Global Bank Deal Before 2010

      Originally posted by we_are_toast View Post
      I guess raising capital requirements for banks shouldn't be a problem as long as we've got mark-to-fantasy accounting.
      Not quite, Capital requirements in this sense means raising Wealth or Claims on Wealth with a low potential of default that a bank can use to meet its obligations.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Geithner Wants Global Bank Deal Before 2010

        No No ... that is mark-to-my-bank-account accounting!

        I listened to Geithner last night. I had no money in the market and I have no money in a mortgage. I paid my bills. I paid my taxes. I pay my own health-care. I pay for my kids college with-out borrowing money (so far). I have no debt. I don't drive a "clunker" and I own my cars outright. I am not rich. I take risks when returns are worth it but I don't see it as a life-style. Owning my own business I have seen it shrink by 50% each year the last three years. I have been responsible and tough to survive. I feel I have been SCREWED by my country on this financial bail-out. Forget saving "the system" of bull-shitters, crooks, arrogant self-promoters. How about NOT PUNISHING the people who suck-it-up and make good decisions?

        Shouldn't that be the litmus test of any policy?

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Geithner Wants Global Bank Deal Before 2010

          Originally posted by sunskyfan View Post
          No No ... that is mark-to-my-bank-account accounting!

          I listened to Geithner last night. I had no money in the market and I have no money in a mortgage. I paid my bills. I paid my taxes. I pay my own health-care. I pay for my kids college with-out borrowing money (so far). I have no debt. I don't drive a "clunker" and I own my cars outright. I am not rich. I take risks when returns are worth it but I don't see it as a life-style. Owning my own business I have seen it shrink by 50% each year the last three years. I have been responsible and tough to survive. I feel I have been SCREWED by my country on this financial bail-out. Forget saving "the system" of bull-shitters, crooks, arrogant self-promoters. How about NOT PUNISHING the people who suck-it-up and make good decisions?

          Shouldn't that be the litmus test of any policy?
          That's why "moral hazard" is going to kill us.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Geithner Wants Global Bank Deal Before 2010

            Originally posted by sunskyfan View Post
            No No ... that is mark-to-my-bank-account accounting!

            I listened to Geithner last night. I had no money in the market and I have no money in a mortgage. I paid my bills. I paid my taxes. I pay my own health-care. I pay for my kids college with-out borrowing money (so far). I have no debt. I don't drive a "clunker" and I own my cars outright. I am not rich. I take risks when returns are worth it but I don't see it as a life-style. Owning my own business I have seen it shrink by 50% each year the last three years. I have been responsible and tough to survive. I feel I have been SCREWED by my country on this financial bail-out. Forget saving "the system" of bull-shitters, crooks, arrogant self-promoters. How about NOT PUNISHING the people who suck-it-up and make good decisions?

            Shouldn't that be the litmus test of any policy?
            along the lines of my own sentiments, bravo.

            what percent of the population feels this way? I suspect it is significant %, but still a minority; is it 10%?, 25%?, 40%? What do folks think?

            If a large enough bloc ov voters could unify and articulate this, we might be able to effect change, absent that, my hope in the U.S. is waning

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Geithner Wants Global Bank Deal Before 2010

              Originally posted by Sapiens View Post
              Not quite, Capital requirements in this sense means raising Wealth or Claims on Wealth with a low potential of default that a bank can use to meet its obligations.
              Yeah, I think mortgages were put in the "low potential for default" category at one point because it was "common knowledge" that people would make any sacrifice to stay in their own homes.

              Yeah, right.

              Morons.

              They still haven't got it figured out what caused the problems was too much liquidity in the system in the form of cheap credit for the speculators. Forget the consumers, though they borrowed enough in their own right. No, it was the cheap money to the hedgies and the investment banks (and even regular banks) so they could leverage their investments 20-30 times or more for bigger returns. Well, we know how this strategy works. You make a killing when the market goes up, but you take it in the shorts when things head south.

              Now Turbo Timmy and Zimbabwe Ben want to keep the game alive by being the lender of last resort to these clowns through TARP, cash for trash, and the discount window. All we need to do is to create even more credit, right? Well, Timmy, you've run out of balloons to inflate and Mommy isn't going to give you anymore. The only thing you and your friends have left to play with is the Fed's balance sheet. When that pops, you can say good-bye to your country. The people will be beyond livid. We're talking civil unrest range here. Think LA riots in every single major population center in the country. And who's going to keep the peace when that happens? The military chased it's tail for nearly five years trying to keep the lid on a country with only 18 million people in Iraq. Best of luck using that option on a country with 15 times the population. All I can say is, I hope they have a plane ticket out of the country handy for a quick exit when things go sky high.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Geithner Wants Global Bank Deal Before 2010

                Originally posted by vinoveri View Post
                along the lines of my own sentiments, bravo.

                what percent of the population feels this way? I suspect it is significant %, but still a minority; is it 10%?, 25%?, 40%? What do folks think?

                If a large enough bloc ov voters could unify and articulate this, we might be able to effect change, absent that, my hope in the U.S. is waning

                I think the percent that THINKS like this is high. Do they in fact fit the profile outlined by sunskyfan? After all alot of people are benifiting from all sorts of government intervention and direct payments.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Geithner Wants Global Bank Deal Before 2010

                  sunskyfan

                  Aman....brother. I agree 100%.
                  RanMan :cool:

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Geithner Wants Global Bank Deal Before 2010

                    I THINK there are more people than you THINK. Even if it is 20% shouldn't they be given authority to take care of this mess by letting them buy the houses for 25 cents on the dollar and taking care of them and by letting them buy the penny stocks that have a change to grow into something useful. This isn't rocket science people and it IS NOT an act of god like a hurricane. It is the monetization equivalence of the rhetoric of failure.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Geithner Wants Global Bank Deal Before 2010

                      Originally posted by sunskyfan View Post
                      I THINK there are more people than you THINK. Even if it is 20% shouldn't they be given authority to take care of this mess by letting them buy the houses for 25 cents on the dollar and taking care of them and by letting them buy the penny stocks that have a change to grow into something useful. This isn't rocket science people and it IS NOT an act of god like a hurricane. It is the monetization equivalence of the rhetoric of failure.
                      I think there are many people on this site and around the country who agree in principal with your original thought.

                      I was pointing out how many people who though they may agree with your post, are the benificiary of many types of government largess, and tax code favoritism. As to your other thoughts after the first sentence I'm not sure I understand what you mean to say.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Geithner Wants Global Bank Deal Before 2010

                        They know very well what they are doing, this is a major consolidation of assets into one major control entity. Tin foil hat or not, their actions are very clear if you know how Usury works.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Geithner Wants Global Bank Deal Before 2010

                          Sorry, did not mean to take you the wrong way.

                          My point is that if we would have let the collapse happen people who had made the correct decisions would be able to pick up the pieces and build a better world. I do agree that there are people who benefit from government largess and then complain about it. Government should have preserved its credibility by dealing with the consequence of the collapse instead of trying to prevent it from happening.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Geithner Wants Global Bank Deal Before 2010

                            Originally posted by sunskyfan View Post
                            Sorry, did not mean to take you the wrong way.

                            My point is that if we would have let the collapse happen people who had made the correct decisions would be able to pick up the pieces and build a better world. I do agree that there are people who benefit from government largess and then complain about it. Government should have preserved its credibility by dealing with the consequence of the collapse instead of trying to prevent it from happening.

                            Absolutely could not agree more.

                            You place your bets, you takes your chances. And those who choose not to place any bets should not have to pick up the pieces. Although in anothr thread, Rajiv once explained a situation that arouse in his company involving fraud and liquidity issues that gave me pause.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X