Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bernanke's Next Parlor Trick

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bernanke's Next Parlor Trick

    The Old Switcheroo

    Bernanke's Next Parlor Trick

    By MIKE WHITNEY
    Federal Reserve boss Ben Bernanke is getting ready to pull another rabbit out of his hat and he's hoping no one figures out what he's up to. Here's the scoop; the Fed chief needs to "borrow up to $3.25 trillion in the fiscal year ending Sept. 30" (Bloomberg) without triggering a run on the dollar.

    But, how? If the stock market keeps surging, investors will turn their backs on low-yielding US Treasuries and move into riskier securities hoping for better returns. The only way to attract more buyers to US debt is by raising interest rates which will kill the "green shoots" of recovery and make it harder for people to buy homes and cars. It's a conundrum.

    In the next year, China will buy roughly $200 billion T-Bills while the oil-producing states and the rest of the world will add about $300 billion to their cache. That leaves more than $2 trillion for the domestic market where cash-strapped investors are likely to avoid government debt like the plague. So, who's going buy that mountain of low-yield government paper?

    The banks.

    The Fed has been helping the banks raise reserves for the last year. In fact, excess bank reserves have skyrocketed from $96.5 billion in August 2008 to $949.6 billion by April 2009. Nearly a trillion bucks in less than a year. But, why? Are the banks expecting to expand lending at the fastest rate in history in the middle of a depression?

    Of course not. Master illusionist Bernanke is just arranging the props for his next big trick. The fact is, Bernanke anticipated the current wave of deflation and set up a straw man (the banks) to deal with it so it wouldn't look like he was simply printing more paper to finance the deficits. As soon as rates on 10 year notes hit 4 per cent, the banks (that are borrowing money at 0 per cent) will probably start to purchase Treasuries and keep the housing and retail markets from crashing even faster. It's called "the old switcheroo" and no one does it better than the Fed.

    Bernanke pulled a similar stunt after Lehman Bros flopped and he and Paulson decided that it was time to dump $700 billion worth of garbage assets on the public. The Fed chief and Treasury figured out the only way they could hoodwink congress was to foment a crisis in the credit markets and then moan that if they didn't get $700 billion to buy up toxic assets in the next 48 hours "there wouldn't be an economy by Monday".

    Congress swallowed it hook, line and sinker, and weeks later funds were allocated for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) Of course, no one in the financial media noticed that the storm in the credit markets was NOT caused by "troubled assets" at all (for which TARP funds have NEVER been used) but by skyrocketing LIBOR and TED spreads and other indicators of market stress. Market Ticker's Karl Denninger was the only blogger on the Internet who figured out that Bernanke had deliberately caused the crisis by draining over $100 billion from the banking system just 10 days after Lehman defaulted.

    As soon as Paulson and Bernanke had pulled off their multi-billion dollar heist, the Fed chief created lending facilities (completely unrelated to the TARP) which provided government guarantees on money markets and commercial paper. This lowered LIBOR and TED spreads immediately and relieved the stress in the credit markets. The crisis had nothing to do with toxic assets. To this day, none of the junk securities have been purchased from the banks under the TARP program. $700 billion has vanished in a puff of smoke. Poof!

    Mike Whitney lives in Washington dtate. He can be reached at fergiewhitney@msn.net


    http://counterpunch.org/whitney06122009.html

  • #2
    Re: Bernanke's Next Parlor Trick

    Originally posted by Chomsky View Post
    Federal Reserve boss Ben Bernanke is getting ready to pull another rabbit out of his hat
    I like the way this guy thinks. So the ten year note stays in the general neighborhood of 4%, the dollar doesn't get hammered by having to be having to printed so much to buy treasuries no one wants, and those who were short the dollar (expecting it to die soon) and long the contrary investments (gold?, commodities) get hammered.

    Life is good in Fed land.
    Most folks are good; a few aren't.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Bernanke's Next Parlor Trick

      wait a sec.

      the fed lends to banks at 0-0.25% AND
      the fed pays interest on bank reserves (I don't really understand this)
      AND now
      the banks will use the "free money" created out of thin air by the fed to buy T-bonds from the Treasury yielding 4%, thus pocketing the 3.75% delta

      not only is this some silly circular accounting trick which only adds another layer of smoke from the situation where the Fed buy treasuries directly - and so I don't see how this transparent attempt supports the dollar, BUT

      american taxpayer will be paying that ~4% free money to the banks for the indefinite future - For the love of God, may the wisdom of Jefferson, Jackson, Hudson et al help us to throw off this yolk of bankers.

      so instead of me obtaining a mortgage from a bank and paying it off over 30 yrs myself, NOW, I obtain my mortgage from Uncle Sam, who borrows the money from the banks to lend/guarantee my loan, and then the public pays the interest on those bonds to the banks - what a wonderful world, we all pay for each other's mortgage why the banks clean up....

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Bernanke's Next Parlor Trick

        Originally posted by vinoveri View Post
        wait a sec.

        the fed lends to banks at 0-0.25% AND
        the fed pays interest on bank reserves (I don't really understand this)
        AND now
        the banks will use the "free money" created out of thin air by the fed to buy T-bonds from the Treasury yielding 4%, thus pocketing the 3.75% delta

        not only is this some silly circular accounting trick which only adds another layer of smoke from the situation where the Fed buy treasuries directly - and so I don't see how this transparent attempt supports the dollar, BUT

        american taxpayer will be paying that ~4% free money to the banks for the indefinite future - For the love of God, may the wisdom of Jefferson, Jackson, Hudson et al help us to throw off this yolk of bankers.

        so instead of me obtaining a mortgage from a bank and paying it off over 30 yrs myself, NOW, I obtain my mortgage from Uncle Sam, who borrows the money from the banks to lend/guarantee my loan, and then the public pays the interest on those bonds to the banks - what a wonderful world, we all pay for each other's mortgage why the banks clean up....

        yes, i've been talking about this arb for a while now. the last time i think was when they, imo, have modified it to include state government debt. they borrow from the taxpayer at 0% and lend it to the taxpayer at 3+% and lock in the spread. banks lock in profits, and they "lend" to entities that will eventually pay that cash out to people.

        very simple, not rocket science.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Bernanke's Next Parlor Trick

          Originally posted by WildspitzE View Post
          yes, i've been talking about this arb for a while now. the last time i think was when they, imo, have modified it to include state government debt. they borrow from the taxpayer at 0% and lend it to the taxpayer at 3+% and lock in the spread. banks lock in profits, and they "lend" to entities that will eventually pay that cash out to people.

          very simple, not rocket science.
          Banks get seniorage, not the Gov, need more proof that we duh peapull have lost all control over our goverment, I mean "master".

          That's what a slave calls his owner "master", right?

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Bernanke's Next Parlor Trick

            Originally posted by jtabeb View Post
            Banks get seniorage, not the Gov, need more proof that we duh peapull have lost all control over our goverment, I mean "master".

            That's what a slave calls his owner "master", right?
            Not sure I followed the point of your post.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Bernanke's Next Parlor Trick

              Originally posted by jtabeb View Post
              Banks get seniorage, not the Gov,
              This is a question I have been posing to myself for some time and certainly makes sense if base money supply lags the broad money creation if this expansion is driven by fractional reserve or leveraging in the private banking sector as suggested by Mish I think? as opposed to the general theory as taught in economics where broad money expansion is driven by the base money supply, any thoughts or corrections would be welcome, I have no expertise in finance and would appreciate any help in nuancing my understanding or rectifying my lack of.

              Last edited by Diarmuid; June 12, 2009, 05:01 PM.
              "that each simple substance has relations which express all the others"

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Bernanke's Next Parlor Trick

                Originally posted by Diarmuid View Post
                This is a question I have been posing to myself for some time and certainly makes sense if base money supply lags the broad money creation if this expansion is driven by fractional reserve or leveraging in the private banking sector as suggested by Mish I think? as opposed to the general theory as thaught in economics where broad money expansion is driven by the base money supply, any thoughts or corrections would be welcome, I have no expertise in finance and would appreciate any help in nuancing my understanding or rectifying my lack of.

                mish has no clue how money is created. read steve keen's blog or interviews here...

                in sum... the usa operates as a hybrid gov't fiat money/endogenous (private) credit money system.

                money is lent into existence when loan demand meets credit supply.

                a. if consumers/businesses demand fewer loans, less money is created.

                b. if the banks cannot/will not supply the money (lack of reserves, tighter standards, both) less money is created.

                c. if both a. and b. of the above, debt deflation.

                if c. then gov't steps in for b. and uses media to bullshit a. into borrowing to buy crap they don't need/can't afford, such as the latest from...

                Last edited by metalman; June 12, 2009, 05:04 PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Bernanke's Next Parlor Trick

                  this is the reason banks and government have always colluded since around 1865 -- so the banks would buy government debt. In turn they get to count it as reserves and the government gets a ready market for its debt.

                  Duh.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Bernanke's Next Parlor Trick

                    Originally posted by metalman View Post
                    mish has no clue how money is created. read steve keen's blog or interviews here...

                    in sum... the usa operates as a hybrid gov't fiat money/endogenous (private) credit money system.

                    money is lent into existence when loan demand meets credit supply.

                    a. if consumers/businesses demand fewer loans, less money is created.

                    b. if the banks cannot/will not supply the money (lack of reserves, tighter standards, both) less money is created.

                    c. if both a. and b. of the above, debt deflation.

                    if c. then gov't steps in for b and starts jacking a. around... tries to bullshit them into borrowing with their media.
                    You left out the important non-step of the banks not creating the interest. This guarantees that the public/government/whoever will have to continually borrow more and more money because the interest to service the debt is never created. The amount of money owed (including interest) will *always* be greater than the amount of money that exists in the entire monetary system. Thus it's a mathematical impossibility that you can pay back the loan without it having to be borrowed again at a future date.

                    Life really *is* great in Fed land...
                    Every interest bearing loan is mathematically impossible to pay back.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Bernanke's Next Parlor Trick

                      According to the article's numbers, that still leaves 1 trillion left to be further monetized by the Fed or foreign CBs?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Bernanke's Next Parlor Trick

                        i've noticed whitey never uses charts/graphs or data to back up his case. why is that? readers turned off by charts?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Bernanke's Next Parlor Trick

                          Originally posted by metalman View Post
                          mish has no clue how money is created. read steve keen's blog or interviews here...
                          Thanks MM - very informative interview
                          "that each simple substance has relations which express all the others"

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Bernanke's Next Parlor Trick

                            Originally posted by ricket View Post
                            You left out the important non-step of the banks not creating the interest. This guarantees that the public/government/whoever will have to continually borrow more and more money because the interest to service the debt is never created.
                            This is a myth, and is not correct. Interest received by banks can be spent back into the economy. New money does not have to be created to pay off interest-bearing loans.

                            Example: A bank lends me $1000 at 10% interest. Interest gets paid before principle, so I pay the bank $100 in interest, leaving me $900. Then I do some work for the bank, and they pay me $100. Now I pay the $1000 in principle off. No new money had to be created. The loan was paid in full, including interest.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Bernanke's Next Parlor Trick

                              Originally posted by ricket View Post
                              You left out the important non-step of the banks not creating the interest. This guarantees that the public/government/whoever will have to continually borrow more and more money because the interest to service the debt is never created. The amount of money owed (including interest) will *always* be greater than the amount of money that exists in the entire monetary system. Thus it's a mathematical impossibility that you can pay back the loan without it having to be borrowed again at a future date.

                              Life really *is* great in Fed land...
                              Ricket:
                              This has to be the 468th time I've read you say this. It's starting to get clearer. I've reread what Ash and Sharkey have written as well. I feel I'm almost there. Thanks.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X