Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

For Lukester

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • For Lukester

    Markets go down, then dollar goes down, Markets go up, dollar stays down. Pretty simple!

    http://www.kitco.com/ind/Lee/jun042009.html

    "Debt-based monetary systems are inherently unstable. Money is created out of thin air by the banks and lent to government, consumers and businesses. In order to service and replay those debts, the borrowers take on more debts. Asset prices are inflated, and the vicious cycle continues until the debtors are unable to borrow or the banks are unwilling to lend. At that point the system snaps, everything is sold off, and we have a financial crisis at hand. In this paper we examine what happens to equity and currency markets in the aftermath of financial crisis."

    "Gold is the ultimate antithesis to the dollar. Gold is liquid, universally recognized, limited in quantity. Just like Russians and Argentines trying to anchor their currencies to the dollar, the US government devised various ways to slow down the rise of gold prices to maintain dollar’s soundness. However the massive money printing by the Fed and fast-eroding confidence in the dollar by international investors might just be the key to drive gold past the all illusive $1,000/oz level and not look back.
    As we saw in the past crisis in Russia, Argentina, Thailand, and Brazil; equity markets eventually do return while the devalued currency never regained strength. The US case is no different. Further rebound by the equity market in nominal terms can be seen albeit with extreme volatility, and we will likely witness a 4-digit gold price in 2009 that will never look back. As the Chinese saying, crisis is spelled danger + opportunity. There is still time to diversify out of dollars before the world recognizes the dollar’s permanent debasement and demotion of status. Visit goldmau.com and sign up for our free market and stock updates.
    John Lee,"

  • #2
    Re: For Lukester

    Good post Jtabeb.

    I got plenty of gold and silver. Own some dollars too, which I'm watching with interest. When I say "with interest" that means I'm willing to entertain multiple scenarios as to how it proceeds to "wind down" as global currency. To suggest it can only wind down in one way stretches my credulity.

    That's all.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: For Lukester

      Originally posted by Lukester View Post
      Good post Jtabeb.

      I got plenty of gold and silver. Own some dollars too, which I'm watching with interest. When I say "with interest" that means I'm willing to entertain multiple scenarios as to how it proceeds to "wind down" as global currency. To suggest it can only wind down in one way stretches my credulity.

      That's all.
      Not saying "This way", just "Food for thought".

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: For Lukester

        Yeah well, I'm not a gold buyer this month, nor next I suspect.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: For Lukester

          Originally posted by Lukester View Post
          Yeah well, I'm not a gold buyer this month, nor next I suspect.
          I agree Luke, if one has been buying all along. For anyone just looking now without any holdings, this is as good a time as any to get started and average in until gold breaks through resistance. Opps, I said a bad word...;)...I'll stop before I get carried away and post a chart.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: For Lukester

            Originally posted by Lukester View Post
            Yeah well, I'm not a gold buyer this month, nor next I suspect.

            That wan't the point of the article, the POINT IS, that you should get your predicted large rally in stocks, is just that dollar devaluation would be the necessary cost of doing so. That's all.

            (This wasn't to chastize you or talk down to you, I read it and immediatly though of your calls for a higher broad stock market move, so I thought it related)-> as in Lukester's call for stock rally could have some real legs if the anticipated devalueation of the dollar materializes.

            This was the take-away for me [coinsident fall in the dollar and stocks, followed by a rebound in stocks, but the dollar stays in it's devalued state].

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: For Lukester

              What if we get an uptrending stock market and the dollar doesn't fall much more at all for a while?? :eek: Man, that would be a real kick in the head. Upside down world where nothing rational is panning out.

              I didn't take it the wrong way Jtabeb. No worries. Just sign over your Saudi $250K a year flight instructor's cushy sinecure job to me and we're golden. I'll give you all my stash of gold into the bargain as long as you assure they hire me. Don't tell them I never flew a plane in my life. I'll fake it good when I get out there. They won't even notice when I taxi a Saudi Airforce F15 into the gulf straight off the runway (after clipping a couple more F15's parked alongside). Just a few bubbles and it's out of sight ...
              Last edited by Contemptuous; June 04, 2009, 07:06 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: For Lukester

                Don't bring your "technical analysis" here to iTulip Santafe2. "Technical resistance lines" mumbo jumbo not allowed. Das ist Verboten hier, verstehst du? You are gonna pollute our empirically driven macroeconomic methodology. Bad Santafe2. Go stand in the corner Santafe2 and repeat 50 times "I will not ever cite technical analysis again", "I will not ever cite technical ..." etc ...

                Originally posted by santafe2 View Post
                I agree Luke, if one has been buying all along. For anyone just looking now without any holdings, this is as good a time as any to get started and average in until gold breaks through resistance. Opps, I said a bad word...;)...I'll stop before I get carried away and post a chart.
                Last edited by Contemptuous; June 04, 2009, 07:03 PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: For Lukester

                  Originally posted by Lukester View Post
                  Don't bring your "technical analysis" here to iTulip Santafe2. "Technical resistance lines" mumbo jumbo not allowed. Das ist Verboten hier, verstehst du? You are gonna pollute our empirically driven macroeconomic methodology. Bad Santafe2. Go stand in the corner Santafe2 and repeat 50 times "I will not ever cite technical analysis again", "I will not ever cite technical ..." etc ...
                  Yup, just gave myself a timeout and went back to work.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: For Lukester

                    Looks like a thread much better suited for PM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X